Veterans to see Nuked Blood evidence at last, but it will take 4 years to read
'Lab rat' veterans used in government radiation experiments have been told they can finally see hidden documents about the programme - but it will take more than four YEARS to read them all.
A top secret database about troops used in nuclear weapons tests is set to be declassified, but it is so vast that campaigners fear almost every veteran will be dead by the time it has been read.
Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: "The average age of our veterans is now 86 and we hear of another one dying without justice almost every week. To tell those men they can only get the answers they've waited seven decades for it they manage to hang on a bit longer is morally abhorrent.
"The government knows what's in those files: the Prime Minister should simply admit it to Parliament."
The database, codenamed Merlin, was created in 2007 to hold records for a legal claim brought by veterans and widows. After the case failed, it was classified on the grounds it held information that it could proliferate nuclear weapons and aid terrorists.
In 2023 the Mirror exposed that in fact that it included documents about a long-denied mass blood testing programme on troops. Such biological monitoring could provide the first irrefutable evidence of what amounts to human experiments - showing whether radiation entered the men's bodies, while scientists took note of the effects.
Many veterans have subsequently found the results of the tests are missing from their medical records, and the misuse of security classifications is now the subject of a criminal allegations to police about misconduct in public office by staff of the MoD and AWE.
* You can donate to the veteran's search for justice HERE
A handful of the Merlin files were released last year and featured in a BBC documentary about the Nuked Blood scandal. Ministry of Defence officials have now confirmed to campaigners the entire database will be published, for free, and made available online.
But the 28,000 files are estimated to include more than 700,000 pages. If veterans were able to review 500 pages a day, it would still take 1,465 days, or more than 4 years, to get through them all.
Oli Troen of law firm McCue Jury which is helping veterans to sue the MoD said: "It is no surprise that, when the MoD finally releases the evidence it has kept under lock and key until now, it tells them to figure it out for themselves.
"The MoD knows damn well what's in those files, and how important they are to the veterans and their families. The Prime Minister and Defence Secretary must treat these heroes with more respect and engage with them properly, not least to avoid what will otherwise be a costly and protracted legal battle that will shame this government."
The lawsuit, which is expected to be issued soon, seeks to force the MoD to produce the results of the monitoring programme. The Merlin records are expected to be made available via the National Archives at Kew, but there is no timeframe for them to go online.
A spokesman for the archive confirmed the records would be free to access and available for digital download, but they had not yet been provided by the MoD.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
MIKEY SMITH: 11 unhinged Donald Trump moments as Epstein survivors accuse him of 'cover up'
The survivors of America's most notorious dead paedophile are up in arms - accusing Trump of a "cover up" and giving paedophiles "preferential treatment" Donald Trump and the people around him seem to be signalling the direction the Epstein scandal is going to go - and it's towards a very dark place. The survivors of America's most notorious dead paedophile are up in arms - accusing Trump of a "cover up" and giving paedophiles "preferential treatment". It comes after the Mirror revealed Ghislaine Maxwell was being transferred to a much cushier prison. Meanwhile Trump didn't like the new, disappointing employment statistics, so he fired the person in charge of collecting them, mulled the idea of giving Diddy a pardon, was super creepy about a senior member of his team and paved over a historic part of the White House lawn - infuriating an important figure from his past. It's been quite a night, but here's everything you need to know. Buckle up. 1. Trump gets bad jobs figures, fires woman in charge of counting them You'll remember from yesterday's roundup that Trump was delivered some pretty rough jobs numbers for July - with May and June getting a hefty downgrade. Well, Trump last night did exactly what you'd expect him to do. He claimed they were "phony" and fired the person in charge of counting them. Claiming the figures had been manipulated for political reasons, he fired Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labour Statistics - a Biden appointee. He provided no evidence for his claim, which is presumably actionable. "I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump said on Truth Social. "She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified." Trump later posted: "In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad." 2. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears Asked why anyone should trust numbers in future in a gaggle outside the White House last night, Trump said: "You're right. Why should anyone trust numbers?" 3. Did Ghislaine Maxwell get her sex offender status waived? It was reported overnight that for Ghislaine Maxwell to get transferred to a minimum security camp in Texas, she'd have to have her sex offender status waived. Bureau of Prisons policy is that anyone with a sex offender determination known as a "public safety factor" are required to be housed in at least low-security prisons - like the one she was held in in Florida - unless they receive a special waiver. 4. Trump's favourite news channel is rolling the pitch for a Maxwell pardon Meanwhile, Newsmax - one of Trump's favourite news channels - has been making the case for Maxwell's innocence... Host Greg Kelly said on air last night: "There's something else going on here. "It's an injustice ... people are horrified when I say that this individual just might be innocent. "But think about it. Who told us about her? The most reviled institutions in America. The media and the Biden justice department." This all seems to be going in a horrifying direction... 5. Epstein survivors and families are angry "President Trump has sent a clear message today: Pedophiles deserve preferential treatment and their victims do not matter," the family of Virginia Giuffre and other Epstein accusers said in a statement, expressing "outrage" at Maxwell's move to a cushier prison. The statement added: "This move smacks of a cover up. The victims deserve better." 6. It's OK though, he's probably not going to pardon he was mean Asked in an exclusive interview for - wait for it - Newsmax last night whether he'd consider a pardon for Sean "Puff "Diddy" Daddy" Combs, Trump said: "Well he was essentially half innocent. I don't know, he's still in jail or something... " You know, I was very friendly with him. I get along with him great. Seemed like a nice guy. "I didn't know him well. But when I ran for office, he was very hostile...I don't know, it makes it more difficult to do." He said, as a result, it was "more likely a no." 7. What's on JD Vance's playlist? So let's take a break for a moment of levity - and laugh at JD Vance's Spotify playlist. An anonymous website named "the Panama Playlists" claims to have identified and scraped data from high profile figures in the Trump administration, revealing their favourite tunes. The VP's "Making Dinner" playlist includes I Want It That Way by the Backstreet Boys and and One Time by Justin Bieber. Another of his playlists includes What Makes You Beautiful by One Direction. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has a playlist entitled "baby shower", which includes A Bar Song by Shaboozey. And Attorney General Pam Bondi's playlist includes Nelly's Hot in Herre and Foreigner's Cold As Ice. 8. Trump creepy about Leavitt And here's Donald Trump being creepy about Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's lips. 9. Trump paved over the rose garden and Four Seasons Total Landscaping is not impressed A weird thing about Trump's return to the White House is the amount of building work he's doing to a property he legally has to move out of in three and a half years. And the first of these projects was to pave over the White House's world famous, historically significant Rose Garden. Well, Four Seasons Total Landscaping - where Rudy Giuliani held a deeply weird press conference by mistake the day Trump lost the 2020 election - is unimpressed. 10. Well, thats a metaphor The drainage holes on the new patio are in the shape of American flags. Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. 11. Trump's ballroom looks awfully familiar. Also, just awful The design proposals for the other big construction project Trump wants to undertake on the White House look awfully familiar. The huge ballroom he wants to tack on to the East Wing is designed to look remarkably similar to the main ballroom at Mar A Lago, Trump's club in South Beach, Florida. It's almost as if he's never planning to leave.
Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I was told my tiny mole was 'nothing to worry about' by GPs for seven years - but it was the deadliest skin cancer. This is the hidden sign to look out for
For seven years Sam Crook gave the mole on his back very little thought. The freckle, no bigger than his little finger nail, was on his right shoulder blade. He was only reminded of it when, on occasion, he'd catch a glimpse of it in the mirror after a shower.
Spectator
14 hours ago
- Spectator
Is David Williams the MoD's fall guy?
Yesterday the Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed that its permanent secretary, David Williams, will be stepping down in a matter of weeks. He has served for just over four years, almost exactly the average tenure of his predecessors since the department was created in 1964, but it is difficult to regard the timing as a coincidence. It is still not yet three weeks since the catastrophic loss of data on Afghan nationals and others, and the MoD's use of a super-injunction, were disclosed to parliament by defence secretary John Healey. Williams is not explicitly being sacked: permanent secretaries very rarely are. The Ministry of Defence is being very careful and measured in its language to refer to his impending departure: according to the BBC, Healey had a 'conversation' with Williams before the Afghan data loss story became public knowledge, and 'made clear that this was the right time to make a change'. There is a plausible argument that we should not draw a line directly from the data loss to Williams's departure. The MoD has also briefed that this is 'an appropriate time for a transition' of leadership; under Healey's Defence Reform programme, the senior levels of the Ministry of Defence have been rearranged and streamlined into a 'leadership quad' which will supervise all aspects of defence policy and the armed forces. This is the biggest reorganisation of the MoD for half a century, and it need not be any reflection on Williams that he chooses to step down before implementing the reforms in full, or that the defence secretary would prefer a fresh approach and a new top civil servant. Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton will be taking over as Chief of the Defence Staff next month, while the recruitment for a permanent national armaments director is taking longer than expected. While Madelaine McTernan, Chief of Defence Nuclear, has been in post since 2022, replacing Williams at this stage could make sense. Equally, Williams's departure could be seen as part of a wave of changes at permanent secretary level which often happen in the first year or so of a new government. Simon Case (Cabinet Secretary), Sir Matthew Rycroft (Home Office), Dame Tamara Finkelstein (Defra), Sir Philip Barton (FCDO), Dame Bernadette Kelly (Transport), Sarah Munby (DSIT) and Sir Jim Harra (HMRC) have all left the civil service within the past 12 months. And yet… while the MoD is making no explicit connection between Williams's departure and the data loss, it is hard to escape the feeling that we are being invited to join the dots, and that the permanent secretary is an expiatory offering to the political gods. The whole scandal did, after all, take place on his watch, and he was in charge of the overall management and leadership of the Ministry of Defence, as well as formally being principal accounting officer responsible to parliament. The MoD should under no circumstances be allowed to wipe the slate clean with Williams's departure. There is still a great deal we do not know about the Afghan data loss scandal, though the Intelligence and Security Committee, the House of Commons Defence Committee and the Public Accounts Committee will all be inquiring into the issue. But Williams – whatever his individual culpability – cannot be the fall guy. Even based on what we currently know, the MoD has a shameful inability to prevent the loss of secret data, and data breaches have increased threefold over the past five years. There is also a systemic lack of accountability, particularly in relation to a number of disastrous equipment procurement projects. The readiness with which the department accepted the comfort blanket of a super-injunction for nearly two years speaks to a deeply ingrained culture of secrecy and dislike of scrutiny. The Ministry of Defence is secretive, inefficient, unaccountable and almost pathologically unable to learn from its mistakes. That has been common currency in defence circles for decades, but the Afghan data loss cut through to the consciousness of the wider public. There is now a major issue of public trust, already a rare, valuable but rapidly disappearing commodity. If ministers try to usher Williams off stage, bring in a new permanent secretary and assume that previous disasters can then be written off, they must have their feet held to the fire. This is not a failing individual. This is an ingrained, systemic, cultural malaise. And it has to be fixed.
