Microsoft to shut down Skype on May 5
Skype will become the latest in a series of high-flying bets that Microsoft has mishandled, such as the Internet Explorer web browser and its Windows Phone. File photo: AFP
Skype will ring for the last time on Monday as owner Microsoft retires the two-decade-old internet calling service that redefined how people connect across borders.
Founded in 2003, Skype's audio and video calls quickly disrupted the landline industry in the early 2000s and made the company a household name boasting hundreds of millions of users at its peak. But the platform has struggled to keep up with easier-to-use and more reliable rivals such as Zoom and Slack in recent years.
The decline was partly because Skype's underlying technology was not suited for the smartphone era.
When the pandemic and work-from-home fuelled the need for online business calls, Microsoft batted for Teams by aggressively integrating it with other Office apps to tap corporate users.
Skype will become the latest in a series of high-flying bets that Microsoft has mishandled, such as the Internet Explorer web browser and its Windows Phone.
Other big tech firms have also struggled with online communication tools, with Google making several attempts through apps including Hangouts and Duo.
Microsoft declined to share the latest user figures for Skype and said there would be no job cuts due to the move. It added that Teams has about 320 million monthly active users.
When Microsoft bought Skype in 2011 for US$8.5 billion after outbidding Google and Facebook – its largest deal at the time – the service had around 150 million monthly users.
By 2020, that number had fallen to roughly 23 million, despite a brief resurgence during the pandemic. (Reuters)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
20 hours ago
- AllAfrica
China happily and aggressively filling Trump's climate vacuum
When President Donald Trump announced in early 2025 that he was withdrawing the US from the Paris climate agreement for the second time, it triggered fears that the move would undermine global efforts to slow climate change and diminish America's global influence. A big question hung in the air: Who would step into the leadership vacuum? While it's still too early to fully assess the long-term impact of the United States' political shift when it comes to global cooperation on climate change, there are signs that a new set of leaders is rising to the occasion. The US first committed to the Paris Agreement in a joint announcement by President Barack Obama and China's Xi Jinping in 2015. At the time, the US agreed to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions 26% to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025 and pledged financial support to help developing countries adapt to climate risks and embrace renewable energy. Some people praised the US engagement, while others criticized the original commitment as too weak. Since then, the US has cut emissions by 17.2% below 2005 levels – missing the goal, in part because its efforts have been stymied along the way. Just two years after the landmark Paris Agreement, Trump stood in the Rose Garden in 2017 and announced he was withdrawing the US from the treaty, citing concerns that jobs would be lost, that meeting the goals would be an economic burden, and that it wouldn't be fair because China, the world's largest emitter today, wasn't projected to start reducing its emissions for several years. Scientists and some politicians and business leaders were quick to criticize the decision, calling it 'shortsighted' and 'reckless.' Some feared that the Paris Agreement, signed by almost every country, would fall apart. But it did not. In the US, businesses such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and Tesla made their own pledges to meet the Paris Agreement goals. Hawaii passed legislation to become the first state to align with the agreement. A coalition of US cities and states banded together to form the United States Climate Alliance to keep working to slow climate change. Globally, leaders from Italy, Germany and France rebutted Trump's assertion that the Paris Agreement could be renegotiated. Others from Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand doubled down on their own support of the global climate accord. In 2020, President Joe Biden brought the US back into the agreement. Amazon partnered with Dominion Energy to build solar farms, like this one, in Virginia. They power the company's cloud-computing and other services. Photo: Drew Angerer / Getty Images via The Conversation Now, with Trump pulling the US out again – and taking steps to eliminate US climate policies, boost fossil fuels and slow the growth of clean energy at home – other countries are stepping up. On July 24, 2025, China and the European Union issued a joint statement vowing to strengthen their climate targets and meet them. They alluded to the US, referring to 'the fluid and turbulent international situation today' in saying that 'the major economies … must step up efforts to address climate change.' In some respects, this is a strength of the Paris Agreement – it is a legally nonbinding agreement based on what each country decides to commit to. Its flexibility keeps it alive, as the withdrawal of a single member does not trigger immediate sanctions, nor does it render the actions of others obsolete. The agreement survived the first US withdrawal, and so far, all signs point to it surviving the second one. From what I've seen in international climate meetings and my team's research, it appears that most countries are moving forward. One bloc emerging as a powerful voice in negotiations is the Like-Minded Group of Developing Countries – a group of low- and middle-income countries that includes China, India, Bolivia and Venezuela. Driven by economic development concerns, these countries are pressuring the developed world to meet its commitments to both cut emissions and provide financial aid to poorer countries. Diego Pacheco, a negotiator from Bolivia, spoke on behalf of the Like-Minded Developing Countries group during a climate meeting in Bonn, Germany, in June 2025. Photo: IISD / ENB via The Conversation | Kiara Worth China, motivated by economic and political factors, seems to be happily filling the climate power vacuum created by the US exit. In 2017, China voiced disappointment over the first US withdrawal. It maintained its climate commitments and pledged to contribute more in climate finance to other developing countries than the US had committed to – US$3.1 billion compared with $3 billion. This time around, China is using its leadership on climate change in ways that fit its broader strategy of gaining influence and economic power by supporting economic growth and cooperation in developing countries. Through its Belt and Road Initiative, China has scaled up renewable energy exports and development in other countries, such as investing in solar power in Egypt and wind energy development in Ethiopia. While China is still the world's largest coal consumer, it has aggressively pursued investments in renewable energy at home, including solar, wind and electrification. In 2024, about half the renewable energy capacity built worldwide was in China. China's interest in South America's energy resources has been growing for years. In 2019, China's special representative for climate change, Xie Zhenhua, met with Chile's then-ministers of energy and environment, Juan Carlos Jobet and Carolina Schmidt, in Chile. Photo: Martin Bernetti / AFP via Getty Images / The Conversation While it missed the deadline to submit its climate pledge due this year, China has a goal of peaking its emissions before 2030 and then dropping to net-zero emissions by 2060. It is continuing major investments in renewable energy, both for its own use and for export. The US government, in contrast, is cutting its support for wind and solar power. China also just expanded its carbon market to encourage emissions cuts in the cement, steel and aluminum sectors. The British government has also ratcheted up its climate commitments as it seeks to become a clean energy superpower. In 2025, it pledged to cut emissions 77% by 2035 compared with 1990 levels. Its new pledge is also more transparent and specific than in the past, with details on how specific sectors, such as power, transportation, construction and agriculture, will cut emissions. And it contains stronger commitments to provide funding to help developing countries grow more sustainably. In terms of corporate leadership, while many American businesses are being quieter about their efforts, in order to avoid sparking the ire of the Trump administration, most appear to be continuing on a green path – despite the lack of federal support and diminished rules. USA Today and Statista's 'America's Climate Leader List' includes about 500 large companies that have reduced their carbon intensity – carbon emissions divided by revenue – by 3% from the previous year. The data shows that the list is growing, up from about 400 in 2023. The Paris Agreement isn't going anywhere. Given the agreement's design, with each country voluntarily setting its own goals, the US never had the power to drive it into obsolescence. The question is whether developed and developing country leaders alike can navigate two pressing needs – economic growth and ecological sustainability – without compromising their leadership on climate change. This year's UN climate conference in Brazil, COP30, will show how countries intend to move forward and, importantly, who will lead the way. Shannon Gibson is professor of environmental studies, political science and international relations, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences Research assistant Emerson Damiano, a recent graduate in environmental studies at USC, contributed to this article. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
Amazon shares slide as cloud growth falls behind Microsoft and Google
dropped in late trading after projecting weaker-than-expected operating income and trailing the sales growth of its cloud rivals, leaving investors searching for signs that the company's huge investments in artificial intelligence are paying off. Advertisement Operating profit would be US$15.5 billion to US$20.5 billion in the quarter ending in September, compared with an average estimate of US$19.4 billion. Sales would be US$174 billion to US$179.5 billion, the company said on Thursday in a statement. Analysts, on average, expected US$173.2 billion. CEO Andy Jassy is engaged in an AI infrastructure arms race with Microsoft and Alphabet that requires heavy spending on data centres. Both of those rivals earlier reported strong earnings showing they are benefiting from the AI boom. Amazon spent a record US$31.4 billion on capital expenditures in the quarter, up about 90 per cent from the same period a year earlier. Chief financial officer Brian Olsavsky said that spending would be 'reasonably representative' of what the company planned for the second half of the year. In the second quarter, revenue jumped 13 per cent to US$167.7 billion, handily beating estimates. But Amazon Web Services (AWS), the largest seller of rented computing power, gained a little more than 17 per cent to US$30.9 billion, just ahead of analysts' average estimate of US$30.8 billion. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy. /TNS The AWS sales increase was 'very disappointing' given the higher growth rates reported by Microsoft and Google, said Gil Luria, an analyst at DA Davidson. Microsoft's Azure posted a 39 per cent rise in sales during the three months ended in June. Google Cloud revenue rose by 32 per cent.
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
Why do mainland China's wealthiest families pick Hong Kong courts to mediate their feuds?
An increasing number of wealthy mainland families have been opting to come to Hong Kong for mediation services to solve disputes instead of going to court, according to an expert. Advertisement 'There is an increased demand for family mediation services in Hong Kong in recent years, particularly from [mainland] Chinese families,' said Ann Cooley, founder of Hong Kong-based Cooley Family Office, which has offered mediation services to help family offices handle their disputes for three decades. 'Hong Kong is going to benefit from such a trend because the city is an international mediation centre with many experts in this area,' Cooley said in an interview on Thursday. 'Being part of China and the Greater Bay Area means that many wealthy mainland families can take the high-speed train to travel to Hong Kong within an hour to meet their bankers to manage their wealth, as well as to find experts to resolve their family disputes,' she said. Ann Cooley, founder of Pacific Hawk Asset Management Limited, Cooley Family Office, on July 24, 2025. Photo: Edmond So The hidden disputes of wealthy mainland families have come under the microscope recently with the legal battle surrounding the family of Zong Qinghou, the late founder of China's biggest beverage company, Hangzhou Wahaha Group, barely 12 months after his death.
