logo
Legal challenge looms over $1.55m Liberal party loan

Legal challenge looms over $1.55m Liberal party loan

Perth Now26-06-2025
A legal challenge is looming over a state Liberal party's $1.55 million loan to save a former leader's political career.
The Victorian Liberals' administrative committee last week agreed to lend former leader John Pesutto $1.55 million to settle his debt to first-term MP Moira Deeming.
Mr Pesutto was ordered to pay $2.3 million in legal costs to Mrs Deeming after the Federal Court found he defamed her by implying she was associated with neo-Nazis.
It left him facing bankruptcy, which would have triggered his exit from parliament and a subsequent by-election in his marginal seat of Hawthorn, unless the debt was paid.
The payment deadline is Friday.
Mr Pesutto, who has already coughed up $315,000 in damages, had only raised about $750,000 through wealthy backers and a GoFundMe campaign.
A Liberal source with knowledge of the situation confirmed on Thursday that the $2.3 million had been transferred to Mrs Deeming's lawyers, including the $1.55 million loan from party entity Vapold.
However, a hearing to block the loan on the grounds it potentially breaches party rules has been listed for the Supreme Court on Thursday afternoon.
Documents connected to the proceedings are yet to be filed with the court.
Opposition Leader Brad Battin voted in favour of the loan, which must be repaid by Mr Pesutto at market-rate interest, and called for colleagues to drawn a line under the long-running feud.
Mrs Deeming was expelled from the Liberal party room over the furore but welcomed back in December as Mr Pesutto lost the leadership.
She offered to defer some of Mr Pesutto's legal bill in exchange for her guaranteed preselection and him swearing off trying to return as leader for three years, but the deal fell over.
Mrs Deeming and Mr Pesutto were contacted for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Webjet fined $9 million for excluding fees from ads, falsely confirming bookings
Webjet fined $9 million for excluding fees from ads, falsely confirming bookings

ABC News

time17 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Webjet fined $9 million for excluding fees from ads, falsely confirming bookings

Travel giant Webjet has been fined $9 million after it admitted it failed to include compulsory fees in some of its advertised airfare costs, and it provided misleading booking confirmations. In the Federal Court case, brought on by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Webjet admitted it made misleading statements in promotional emails and social media posts on airfare prices between 2018 and 2023. Webjet further admitted it provided false or misleading booking confirmations to 118 customers for flights it had not actually confirmed between 2019 and 2024, then asked for payments of up to $2,120 from consumers to complete the booking. Webjet has since refunded those customers. The consumer watchdog began investigating Webjet after a customer complained that an airfare advertised as "from $18" ended up costing triple that amount once all the compulsory fees were added. "We took this case because we considered that Webjet used misleading pricing by excluding or not adequately disclosing compulsory fees in its ads," ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said. Compulsory fees, including "Webjet servicing fee" and "booking price guarantee" fee, ranged from $34.90 to $54.90 a booking, depending on the destination. While fees were disclosed on the website, app and most emails, Webjet's social media posts did not disclose the additional fees. "Retailers must ensure their advertised prices are accurate. They should clearly disclose additional fees and charges," Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. Webjet's fees made up 36 per cent of its total revenue between November 1, 2018 and November 13, 2023. Webjet cooperated with the ACCC, admitted liability and agreed to make joint submissions to the court about orders, including the penalty. A statement published to the ASX by Webjet Group on Monday acknowledged the agreed penalties. "In accordance with the Federal Court's orders, and consistent with the agreement reached between the parties, Webjet Marketing has agreed to: In a February ASX statement, Webjet said it had "voluntarily and proactively implemented improvements to its fee disclosures". "Webjet Group is confident that any customer concern with its offering, disclosure, service, or pricing was limited," it said. "It has always prided itself on its high levels of trust with all customers and stakeholders and has fully cooperated and positively engaged with the ACCC to resolve this matter."

NT to reinstate use of spit hoods in youth detention, eight years after royal commission sparked ban
NT to reinstate use of spit hoods in youth detention, eight years after royal commission sparked ban

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

NT to reinstate use of spit hoods in youth detention, eight years after royal commission sparked ban

The Northern Territory government has flagged it will reinstate the use of spit hoods on young people in youth detention centres, almost eight years after the practice was banned. The proposal is one of several changes to the Youth Justice Act 2005 and Youth Justice Regulations 2006 expected to be introduced and debated in NT parliament this week by the Country Liberal Party (CLP) government. In a statement on Monday, the government said the proposed changes would also include: The CLP pledged during last year's NT election to reintroduce the use of spit hoods on youths if elected to government. On Monday, NT Deputy Chief Minister and Corrections Minister Gerard Maley said the legislative changes would be introduced to parliament as a matter of "urgency", following the stabbing at the weekend of a 15-year-old boy at the Royal Darwin Show. Mr Maley said the "community have had enough" when it came to youth crime in the territory. "This is another piece of legislation we're going to do to make sure Territorians can go to work, go to the show and live in the Northern Territory safely," he said. NT Corrections Commissioner Matthew Varley said the proposed amendments were about ensuring "safety and security" for staff and young people in youth detention centres. "These amendments this week are about making sure our staff have the tools, the powers and the procedures to make sure that environment is safe and secure,' he said. "We're wanting to see a change to the past where our officers have been exposed to risk, our officers have been exposed to assault and harm, and our youth detention centres have been damaged and destroyed. Controversy over the NT's use of spit hoods received significant media attention in 2016 following an ABC Four Corners report into the Don Dale Youth Detention Centre, which led to then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull announcing a royal commission into juvenile justice and child protection in the territory. In 2017, following the federal government's formal endorsement of a United Nations protocol against torture and inhumane punishments, the NT government stopped the use of spit hoods and restraint chairs in youth detention centres. However, it was not until 2022 that the use of spit hoods for youth in police custody was also banned by the then-Labor government, though the ban was never formalised in legislation. In a statement on Monday, an NT Police Force (NTPF) spokesperson confirmed that since October 2024, spit hoods had once again been made available to use on youths in police watch houses and cells. "The NTPF have strict policies in place for their use", the spokesperson said. NT Children's Commissioner Shahleena Musk said the proposed amendments to the Youth Justice Act reflected a "failure" by the government "to meet with key stakeholders, including legal and social service experts". "It goes against all the evidence of what actually works to try to reduce challenging behaviours, particularly in a custodial setting," she said. "We're the only jurisdiction that is now going back to using spit hoods on children. Ms Musk said she was also concerned about the planned change to ensure detention was no longer a last resort. "[It] is against international law, it's against child rights. It can lead to unjust dispositions by the court, that is not able to then balance the needs of that child against other considerations," she said. Opposition Leader Selena Uibo labelled the government's decision a "reactive, knee-jerk response" that would not have a "holistic impact when it comes to improving community safety". "Everything that these millions and millions of dollars of royal commissions or reports have shown not to do, the CLP is doing," she said. In a statement, the National Network of Incarcerated and Formerly Incarcerated Women and Girls also condemned the proposed amendments and called for "the urgent withdrawal of this legislation". "These proposed changes represent a punitive attack on the rights, dignity, and lives of children in the Northern Territory," said Debbie Kilroy OAM, chief executive of Sisters Inside. Ms Kilroy labelled the re-introduction of spit hoods as a "grotesque failure of leadership", and cited the interstate cases of Wayne Fella Morrison and Selesa Taifaifa — who both died following incidents involving the use of spit hoods — as examples of their "deadly consequences". "Let us be clear: spit hoods are instruments of torture. They are used to degrade, control and silence," Ms Kilroy said. Ms Kilroy also criticised the planned removal of the principle of detention as a last resort. "Many of the children who appear before the courts are themselves victims — victims of violence, poverty, neglect, racism and state failure," she said. "They are not born 'offenders', they are criminalised by a system that was never designed to protect them." The proposed amendments will be introduced to the NT parliament on Tuesday.

Disgraced abuser MP to face parliamentary ouster
Disgraced abuser MP to face parliamentary ouster

Perth Now

time3 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Disgraced abuser MP to face parliamentary ouster

A parliamentary push could begin within weeks to remove a disgraced state MP after his conviction for sexually abusing two young men. NSW Premier Chris Minns said it would be "ridiculous" for independent MP Gareth Ward to be allowed to continue serving the state after he was found guilty of the crimes. He called on the representative for the south coast seat of Kiama to immediately resign but added he had received legal advice that the former Liberal could be expelled from parliament if required. "It is completely ridiculous to be in a situation where someone has been not accused, not charged, but convicted of incredibly serious sexual assault convictions and stay as a member of parliament," Mr Minns told reporters on Monday. "This is just an untenable situation." The "integrity" of the oldest parliament in Australia needed to be protected, the premier added, and action should be taken "as soon as possible" when parliament returned in early August. "Many voters will say, are you really suggesting that someone who's been convicted of these incredibly serious charges continues on as a member of parliament, even if they're in jail," Mr Minns said. Under the NSW constitution, state MPs will have their seat vacated if convicted of offences punishable with a term of more than five years' imprisonment. The most serious charge for which Ward was found guilty carries a maximum 14-year jail term, but he still has the ability to appeal his convictions. He was accused of inviting a drunk 18-year-old man - whom he met a year prior - to his South Coast home in February 2013. The man told a jury that Ward, then a first-term Liberal MP, plied him with drinks before indecently assaulting him three times in one night despite his attempts to resist. Two years later, Ward sexually assaulted an intoxicated political staffer after a mid-week event at NSW Parliament House. The man, who was 24 at the time, said Ward climbed into bed with him, groped his backside and sexually assaulted him despite him repeatedly saying "no". The coalition also condemned the conduct of the former minister for families, communities and community services, suggesting they would back any move to drive him out of parliament. "There is no way he can effectively represent his constituents," Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said. "If the power is there to expel Mr Ward he should be expelled." Ward has held the Kiama electorate since 2011, winning three elections under the Liberal banner before securing the seat at the 2023 poll as an independent. He remains on bail under strict conditions ahead of a detention application due to be heard in court on Wednesday. He is yet to be sentenced. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store