
In recent layoffs, AI's role may be bigger than companies are letting on
IBM was an outlier when its CEO told the Wall Street Journal in May that 200 HR employees were let go and replaced with AI chatbots, while also stating that the company's overall headcount is up as it reinvests elsewhere.
Fintech company Klarna has been among the most transparent in discussing how AI is transforming – and shrinking – its workforce. "The truth is, the company has shrunk from about 5,000 to now almost 3,000 employees," Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told CNBC's "Power Lunch" in May. "If you go to LinkedIn and look at the jobs, you'll see how we're shrinking."
But employment experts suspect that IBM and Klarna are not alone in AI-related purges. It's just that firms often limit their explanations to terms like reorganization, restructuring, and optimization, and that terminology could be AI in disguise.
"What we're likely seeing is AI-driven workforce reshaping, without the public acknowledgment," said Christine Inge, an instructor of professional and executive development at Harvard University. "Very few organizations are willing to say, 'We're replacing people with AI,' even when that's effectively what's happening."
"Many companies are relying on these euphemisms as a shield," said Jason Leverant, chief operating officer and president of AtWork Group, a national staffing franchise that provides over 40,000 workers to companies across a variety of sectors. Leverant says it is much easier to frame workforce reductions as a component of a broader operational strategy than admitting that they are tied directly to efficiencies found as a result of AI implementation. "Companies laying off as they embrace large-scale AI adoption is much too coincidental to ignore," Leverant said.
Candice Scarborough, director of cybersecurity and software engineering at Parsons Corporation, said it is clear from recent strong earnings that layoffs are not a response to financial struggles. "They align suspiciously well with the rollout of large AI systems. That suggests that jobs are being eliminated after AI tools are introduced, not before," Scarborough said.
She added that the use of vaguer terms can be better messaging. Restructuring sounds proactive; business optimization sounds strategic; and a focus on cost structures feels impartial. "But the result is often the same: displacement by software. Sandbagging these cuts under bland language helps companies avoid 'AI backlash' while still moving ahead with automation," Scarborough said.
Many companies are cutting roles in content, operations, customer service, and HR — functions where generative AI and agentic tools are increasingly capable — while messaging the corporate decisions as "efficiency" moves despite healthy balance sheets.
"This silence is strategic," Inge said. "Being explicit about AI displacement invites blowback from employees, the public, and even regulators. Staying vague helps preserve morale and manage optics during the transition behind the scenes."
Inge and other experts say there is also a measure of risk management in decisions to de-emphasize AI in job elimination. Even companies eager to leverage AI to replace workers often realize they overestimated what the technology can do.
"There's absolutely an AI undercurrent behind many of today's 'efficiency' layoffs, especially in back-office and customer service roles," said Taylor Goucher, vice president of sales and marketing at Connext Global, an IT outsourcing firm. Companies are investing heavily in automation, Goucher says, but companies are sometimes forced to backpedal.
"AI might automate 70%–90% of a process, but the last mile still needs the human touch, especially for QA, judgment calls, and edge cases," Goucher said.
Sticking to a hybrid model of human plus AI would make more sense for the early adoption phase, but once the jobs are gone, companies are more likely to turn to third-party hiring firms or overseas markets before any U.S.-based jobs come back. "When the AI doesn't work out, they quietly outsource or rehire globally to bridge the gap," Goucher said.
Most firms will limit information about these labor market strategic shifts.
"They fear backlash from employees, customers, and investors skeptical of half-baked AI promises," Goucher said. Many companies tout their AI strategy publicly, while quietly hiring skilled offshore teams to handle what AI can't, he added. "It's a strategy, but not always a complete one. Leaders need to be more honest about where AI adds value, and where human expertise is still irreplaceable," he said.
Inge agrees that while AI can do a lot, it can't replace a whole human, yet.
"AI can do a lot of things 90%. AI writes better ad copy, but human judgment is still required. That 10% where human judgment is needed, we are not going to see that replaced in the near term. Some companies are getting rid of 100% of it, but it will come back to bite them," Inge said.
Mike Sinoway, CEO of San Francisco software company LucidWorks, said the limitations with current AI — and a more pervasive lack of certainty in the C-suite about adoption — are reasons to believe AI has not been directly responsible for many layoffs yet. Rather than ducking the issue of where AI is already replacing workers, Sinoway said his firm's research suggests "higher-ups are panicking because their AI efforts aren't panning out."
Starting two to three years ago, freelancers were among the first employees that companies were direct with in discussing AI's role in job cuts.
"Often, they are being told they are being replaced with an AI tool," Inge said. "People are willing to say that to a 1099 person," she added.
Copywriting, graphic design, and video editing have borne the brunt of the changes, according to Inge, and now the labor shift has begun to work its way into the full-time force. Inge says that transparency is the best policy, but that may not be enough. She pointed to the backlash that language learning company Duolingo faced when CEO Luis von Ahn announced plans earlier this year to phase out contractors in favor of AI, and then was forced to walk back some of his comments.
"After the huge backlash that Duolingo faced, companies are afraid to say that is what they are doing. People are going to get angry that AI is replacing jobs," Inge said.
For now, the job market is solid, if showing some signs of softening in the first half of the year. The U.S. unemployment rate fell to 4.1% in June 2025, which according to Trading Economics, signals broad labor market stability. But there is also general agreement that over time, the pace of AI-linked job change will accelerate. According to the World Economic Forum's 2025 Future of Jobs report, 41% of employers worldwide intend to reduce their workforce in the next five years due to AI automation. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently predicted generative AI like his firm's Claude large language model could wipe out up to half of entry-level officer worker jobs.
There will be a tipping point in the future when companies will be more uniformly transparent, but by that time, AI's role in the labor market will be obvious.
"By then it won't matter," Inge said. "Job losses will be extremely large, the only thing we can do as individuals is adapt."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
10 hours ago
- Business Insider
IONQ CEO Says ‘The Era of Quantum Supremacy Is Just Around the Corner'
IonQ (IONQ) CEO Niccolo de Masi stated during a CNBC interview with Jim Cramer that the era of quantum supremacy, meaning when quantum computers will solve problems impossible for classical computers, is just around the corner. He expects major advances in quantum computing within a few 'quarters or within low single-digit years.' This, he says, is generating excitement about how quantum computing will impact every area of applied science. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. A Quick Look at Quantum Computing IonQ is one of the leading players in the quantum computing space, competing for dominance with others, including Rigetti Computing (RGTI), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), and Quantum Computing (QUBT). Notably, IonQ is on track to develop both quantum computers and quantum networking equipment. Quantum networking refers to highly secured communication networks that are critical in fields such as banking, government, and telecommunications. Moreover, the CEO noted that IonQ is racing ahead of China in cracking current encryption methods like RSA, giving it a competitive edge and aligning with national security interests. Over the past year, IONQ stock has surged over 453% on the hope of this breakthrough. Why Is Quantum Computing the Next Big Thing? De Masi believes that quantum computing will soon provide a narrow commercial advantage, then progress to broader advantages, and ultimately achieve quantum supremacy. He highlighted that IonQ's systems operate at room temperature with high accuracy, scale rapidly, and have strong revenue growth. Quantum technology holds promise for breakthroughs in applications like healthcare and pharmaceuticals, including drug discovery. IonQ has a partnership with Nvidia (NVDA), Amazon Web Services (AMZN), and AstraZeneca (AZN), which aims to explore molecules through a quantum lens. To conclude, IonQ's CEO forecasts that quantum supremacy is imminent and will revolutionize applied science sectors by solving problems beyond classical computing's reach, with real-world applications emerging soon. There is growing interest in quantum computing from Wall Street and tech giants such as Alphabet (GOOGL), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon, and IBM (IBM), as well as from the U.S. government, underscoring the commercial and scientific potential of this technology. Is IONQ Stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell? average IONQ price target of $43 implies 2.1% downside potential from current levels.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
New solar farm will power major technology campus
A new solar farm will soon power a major technology campus. Xela Energy has received full planning permission to build a 5MW solar installation that will supply renewable electricity directly to IBM's Hursley site. This project is the first in the UK to connect a data centre to a dedicated solar farm via a private-wire system. Alexander Goodall, founder and CEO of Xela Energy, said: "This project represents a major milestone in how large power users can decarbonise with certainty, speed and integrity. "It's a blueprint for how the UK can decarbonise its most energy-intensive industries at scale. "If our energy is unsustainable, so is our existence. "That's why Xela Energy exists – to make clean, cost-effective power available directly at the point of use; without waiting for policy, grid reform or subsidies. "Projects like this show we don't have to choose between economic growth and environmental responsibility – it's possible to have both." READ MORE: Southampton MPs hit out at Southern Water CEO over 'massive payout' Located on nearby agricultural land, the solar farm will supply traceable, renewable energy to the Hursley campus without relying on the national grid or government subsidies. Xela Energy said the project will reduce IBM's demand on the UK electricity grid, helping to improve energy security and free up capacity for other users. The Hursley solar farm is expected to produce nearly five million kWh of electricity each year. Over its lifetime, the project will save around 46,000 tonnes of CO2 – the equivalent of planting 60,000 trees. The solar farm will also lower the carbon footprint of IBM's 27,000 square-foot data centre, which has been in operation since 1977. The project will include landscaping and areas dedicated to biodiversity improvements. Xela Energy said the solar farm supports its broader goal of helping major energy users decarbonise amid rising demand from generative artificial intelligence and high-performance computing.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
IBM earnings were strong, so why is the stock price sliding today? Here's what has investors spooked
IBM announced strong second quarter 2025 earnings that beat expectations on many points, helped in part by response to its new AI-focused mainframe computer. So why is the stock sliding today? First, a look at the results. Here's what happened when Albuquerque made riding the bus free Here's why Trump's proposed 401k executive order may be very bad news for your retirement Chipotle's CEO just shared the reason why sales have been down. Many fast food fans will relate IBM Q2 2025 earnings results Shares in the stock (NYSE: IBM) were down over 8% on Thursday in midday trading, after the tech giant beat expectations for 'revenue, profit, and free cash flow' this quarter. The company reported revenue of $16.98 billion, topping expectations of $16.59 billion, with earnings-per-share (EPS) of $2.80, beating expectations of $2.64. It also raised its full year forecast. 'With our strong first-half performance, we are raising our full-year outlook for free cash flow, which we expect to exceed $13.5 billion,' IBM chief executive Arvind Krishna said in a statement. 'IBM remains highly differentiated in the market because of our deep innovation and domain expertise, both crucial in helping clients deploy and scale AI. Our generative AI book of business continues to accelerate and now stands at more than $7.5 billion.' That's all good news for investors. In fact, IBM's revenue increased nearly 8% year-over-year in the quarter, according to its earnings statement. So why the stock dive? IBM stock price slides as earnings miss on software revenue The answer: software revenue. While revenue from software rose about 10% to $7.39 billion, it fell short of analyst expectations of $7.43 billion, CNBC reported. 'You're seeing the stock pull back, because there's just not a lot of room to miss,' Dan Morgan, senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust, told Reuters. 'This would be more evidence that software is not growing at the pace that the Street was expecting.' At the time of this writing, the company had a market capitalization of $239.39 billion. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Sign in to access your portfolio