Proof that high overseas immigration DOESN'T make your city richer
A 2023 study by the Centre for Population partnered with the OECD found that Australian-born workers benefitted from boosted labour productivity, wages and employment rates in regions that had high migration.
According to the report, on average a region with 10 per cent larger migrant share had a 1.3 per cent larger regional wage difference, while a 1 per cent rise in annual migrant inflow, lead to a 0.53 per cent increase in employment for all genders and ages.
Sydney and Melbourne last year accommodated 61 per cent of the 340,800 new migrants who relocated to Australia.
But instead of boosting prosperity in Australia's two biggest cities, rapid population growth from those who have relocated from overseas appears to only be causing a big exodus to other states - limiting economic activity.
Victoria last year housed 100,503 new overseas migrants or 29.4 per cent of the new permanent and long-term arrivals into Australia.
Australia's most populous state, covering Melbourne, is home to 26 per cent of the nation's 27.4million people but only comprises 22 per cent of the national gross domestic product.
Commonwealth Bank associate economist Lucinda Jerogin noted Victoria's economic growth pace has lagged as 3,203 residents left for another part of Australia last year.
She said in Victoria, the 'net number of interstate migration' or the amount of people moving from within Australia to the state, 'has been around zero for the last few quarters'.
'This is well below the pre-Covid trend where Victoria was a popular destination for internal migrants.'
'Victoria's economy is also weak. The unemployment rate is the highest of any state or territory,' she said.
Victoria's unemployment rate of 4.4 per cent is well above the national average of 4.1 per cent.
The state's continuing exodus to other states and a weak economy also kept a lid on house prices with values falling by one per cent in the year to May.
They continued soaring in Brisbane and Perth - two cities receiving a big influx of interstate migration.
NSW is home to 31 per cent of Australia's population but makes up 30 per cent of national GDP. Last year it received 106,730 foreign migrants, and 28,113 people left for another part of Australia.
'Growth in the country's largest state economy is sluggish,' Ms Jerogin said.
By contrast, WA has Australia's strongest population growth pace of 2.4 per cent, based on attracting 12,612 new interstate migrants last year on top of the 45,124 overseas migrants moving in.
The mining-rich state makes up 11 per cent of Australia's population but makes up 17 per cent of the national economy, thanks to lucrative revenue streams from exporting iron ore to China.
WA is also resilient to Donald Trump's tariffs, with exports of gold to the United States soaring by 31.6 per cent during the first three months of 2025.
'WA exports have fallen off its peak, however, US destined exports have skyrocketed,' Ms Jerogin said.
Queensland houses 20.5 per cent of Australia's population and makes up 20 per cent of the national economy.
But some provincial states are contributing less to the economy.
SA makes up 7 per cent of Australia's population but only 5 per cent of GDP.
It also saw 1,582 residents leave for another part of Australia.
'The smaller states and territories are all also seeing negative interstate migration, a return to more normal trends that were present pre-Covid,' Ms Jerogin said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How just 15 undersea cables could leave Australia digitally stranded if war breaks out
Australia's former Deputy Secretary of Defence Mike Pezzullo has warned that the risk of war between China and Taiwan is growing rapidly - and if it breaks out, Australia will be forced to join in. 'We don't really have a choice,' he says. 'Our military, ports, bases, intelligence systems - they're all deeply tied to Americas,' he told 7News. Pezzullo also warned that Australia's internet could be crippled if conflict breaks out. He revealed the country is dangerously exposed, with 99 per cent of internet traffic funnelled through just 15 undersea cables. If they were destroyed by enemy submarines or unmanned vessels, the nation would be digitally isolated, opening the way for targeted strikes on military infrastructure. 'You'd want to ensure those are protected,' Mr Pezzullo said. 'But we have no missile defence systems. We're completely bereft in that area.' He also warned Australia's fuel security is dangerously fragile, with 90 per cent of oil and petrol coming through the South China Sea and only 60 days of reserves in storage. Australia's big-ticket defence projects, including AUKUS nuclear submarines and new frigates, are progressing, but Mr Pezzullo says they remain years away from completion. 'That technology is improving almost monthly, but we're playing catch-up.' Opponents of a harder stance on China point to the economic risks, but Mr Pezzullo claims that's a moot point: 'In a world war, every economy would suffer together.' He warned that defence funding must increase to three or even three-and-a-half per cent of GDP if Australia is serious about deterring adversaries. 'Plan A is always peace through diplomacy. But if you want peace, prepare for war.' He said Taiwan's defence spending, a little above two per cent of GDP, is nowhere near adequate for the threats it faces. His comments come as more than 30,000 personnel from 19 countries hone their skills in the biennial military exercise Talisman Sabre, including live-fire drills and air combat operations. The exercises are being held against the backdrop of the US pressing allies such as Australia to make clear what role they would play in a real conflict, like a potential war between America and China over Taiwan. The US is also carrying out a review of the AUKUS security pact. Defence analysts say it's unlikely the review would result in the $368 billion submarine program being scrapped altogether, it may mean more demands of Australia to contribute to America's industrial base. The military drills off the coast are also expected to be monitored by China, as it has for the past four Talisman Sabre exercises.
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
UN urges Australia to step up climate action
SYDNEY, July 28 (Reuters) - The United Nations climate chief has called on Australia to set an ambitious 2035 emissions target and accelerate its clean energy transition, warning a failure to act risks eroding living standards and regional stability. Simon Stiell, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said Australia should "go for what's smart by going big". "Don't settle for what's easy. Bog standard is beneath you," he said at a Smart Energy Council event in Sydney. Australia faces scrutiny for backing new fossil fuel projects while seeking to co-host the UN COP31 climate summit with the Pacific next year. The centre-left Labor government, which took power in 2022 with a mandate to reduce carbon emissions, cleared the country's largest gas plant to run until 2070 in May – a decision that critics said called into question Australia's commitment to tackling climate change. Australia is also among the highest polluting countries per capita due to its coal power generation. Consultancy Wood Mackenzie has projected Australia is set to fall far short of its target of 82% renewable generation by 2030 due to state-level rollbacks, grid connection delays and inadequate investment. Stiell said the country's 2035 emissions reduction target, due in September, would be a 'defining moment' that could send a message that 'this country is open for clean investment, trade, and long-term partnerships'. Australia also had the opportunity to become a global leader in renewables and that 'doubling down on clean energy is an economic no-brainer', he said. He warned that a lack of action would erode living standards and destabilise Australia's neighbours in the Pacific and Southeast Asia, which were more susceptible to rising sea levels and extreme weather. 'This is the moment: to get behind a climate plan that doesn't just write that vision into policy – but delivers in spades for your people,' Stiell said.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE I ordered an everyday item of clothing from overseas when it was seized at the Australian border... then came the $2,500 bill to get it back
An Australian business owner has lashed out after his clothing shipment was seized at the border and he was forced to pay more than $2,500 before he could get it back. Andy Lowry, who runs clothing store Pamboes, had ordered a shipment of 'blanket hoodies' from China before they were withheld by the Australian Border Force. Authorities had searched the clothing for illegal materials, however they found nothing suspicious inside of them. Mr Lowry was slugged with a $2,524 bill for airport storage fees and informed he would not be able to collect the items until he settled it. 'Apparently because I'm the importer on record, I had to pay that $2,524 bill and they pretty much told me to get stuffed,' he said. 'This is like the cost of doing business essentially.' Mr Lowry claimed the seizure put him behind schedule for marketing the new clothes. 'I can confirm that [Master Air Waybill number] is subject to border processing and we're unable to provide a timeframe as to when it may be available,' an official advised in an email. 'At this point I'm getting stressed cause they like can't give me a timeframe. I'm like how long are they going to keep it for?' Mr Lowry said. In correspondence from the ABF, Mr Lowry was told he could not collect his items until he paid to lift the storage fees. He believed it would cost a few hundred dollars. 'After I wait a week and a half, I get my storage charges and it's storage for $2,524. For what? A hoodie?' Mr Lowry said. 'Then I sort of had this huge back and forth on why I'm having to pay for this, and lo and behold, it is legal. 'The Australian Border Force can do that to any person who is importing.' Mr Lowry said to chase a reimbursement he was deferred to the Department of Home Affairs. He was told he would have to lodge an investigation and complain. Mr Lowry told Daily Mail Australia any fee 'coming out of nowhere' makes it 'tough' to do business. He said the 'seasonal' business relies on customers purchasing his products at the beginning of winter, and estimates the border mishap in June cost him dearly. Mr Lowry began selling the loungewear during the Covid pandemic before realising there was a market for 'blanket'-style clothes. 'This delay cost us two weeks in June, which would be above a six-figure loss in lost sales,' he said. 'Understandably customers do their winter shopping at the beginning of winter so they can get full use out of whatever they have bought.' When he tried to chase an investigation, Mr Lowry found there was no way around paying the fees, as the importer on record is liable for the costs. 'In the time Australian Border Force is checking your goods, your shipping company is forced to hold the goods at their warehouses until Australian Border Force is finished and storage charges are imposed,' he said. 'Some companies may be kind enough to waive these charges, but understandably they are a business too.' Mr Lowry said the costs around occupying commercial real estate are expensive as port space is in high demand. In general, importing can be 'quite difficult' he said. He added Pamboes has thankfully had few issues but acknowledged he had heard 'horror stories'. 'Border holds cost companies millions each year and it's not something you can really prepare for, it's almost a random check,' he said. 'We understand they have to keep our borders safe, but we pay taxes at the border. You would think part of those taxes we pay would cover ABF's work.' He said it hasn't put him off doing business as Pamboes moves into more fashionable blanket-wear and tries to sell off remaining stock in a winter sale.
