Sanjay Raut slams Maharashtra's Public Safety Bill as tool to suppress dissent
Writing in his weekly Rokhthok column in the party mouthpiece Saamana, Mr. Raut described the legislation as a tool crafted not for public safety, but to serve political and corporate interests. 'This is not a Jan Suraksha Bill, it is a BJP Suraksha Bill,' he wrote, alleging the government rushed the bill through the legislature without adequate debate.
According to Mr. Raut, the Bill—passed during the recently concluded monsoon session of the Assembly—grants sweeping powers to the police and government to arrest individuals for acts deemed to disturb 'public order,' a phrase he said is deliberately vague and prone to misuse. He warned that NGOs, civil society groups, tribal activists, and those opposing large corporate projects like Gautam Adani's mining operations spread from Chandrapur to Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand forests could now be easily targeted under the new law.
The Maharashtra Assembly on July 10, 2025, passed the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, aimed at preventing 'unlawful activities of Left Wing Extremist organisations or similar groups'. The Bill will now be tabled in the Legislative Council.
'I assure the House that we will not allow the misuse of this law. I request the House to pass this Bill unanimously,' Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who tabled the Bill.
Despite opposition from the Communist Party of India (CPI) and objections by other parties, Speaker Rahul Narvekar declared that the Bill, put to vote through a voice vote, was approved by a majority.
With the passage of the Bill in both Houses, Maharashtra will become the fifth State after Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha to enact a public security law. The law will impose punishments ranging from two to seven years in prison for members of unlawful organisations. Offences under the Act will be cognisable and non-bailable in nature, and grant the government the authority to seize and forfeit funds belonging to such groups.
Mr. Raut further criticised the government's intent behind the bill, saying it is aimed at silencing protests in areas such as Dharavi, where residents have been resisting redevelopment and displacement. 'The Dharavi Rehabilitation Project is the world's biggest land scam. The original residents will be uprooted from their rightful place and the leaders who are fighting for their rights will be labelled as 'Urban Naxalites' and imprisoned under the act. If people cannot protest peacefully against injustice, what remains of democracy?' the column said.
Highlighting the double standards of the ruling coalition, Raut questioned why the government was turning a blind eye to hate speeches and violent acts by right-wing elements, while seeking to criminalise dissent from marginalised communities and activists. He also accused the government of using the bill as a pretext to consolidate power before the upcoming civic elections, particularly in Mumbai. 'The law is being used to intimidate those who dare speak against the regime or its business allies,' he claimed.
'Such laws attack the soul of democracy. If this bill becomes law, it will be a dark day for Maharashtra,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Govt agrees to 16-hr discussion in House on Op Sindoor but next week, as PM away
The government has agreed to a 16-hour-long debate in Parliament on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, but next week, after Prime Minister Narendra Modi returns from an overseas visit. The decision was taken after the first day of the Monsoon Session on Monday was washed out in both Houses, with the Congress-led Opposition disrupting the proceedings seeking a discussion on the terror attack and the conflict with Pakistan. The Opposition wants the two issues to be taken up before the House gets into any other business. However, sources said, the Treasury Benches pointed out at the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) meeting that the Opposition wanted the PM and Defence Minister Rajnath Minister to be present during the debate. 'So the time is slotted for next week,' said a source. PM Modi is leaving for the UK and Maldives on Wednesday and is returning on July 26. The government wants to take up the Income Tax Bill, 2025, on priority, as per sources on the ruling side. However, the Opposition is yet to decide whether to allow any legislative business before a discussion on Pahalgam and Operation Sindoor. A meeting of INDIA bloc floor leaders has been scheduled for 10 am Tuesday at Lok Sabha Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi's chamber in the Parliament complex. On Monday, BJP MP Baijayant Panda-led Select Committee tabled its report on the Income Tax Bill. The BAC, which recommends allocation of time for discussions, has kept aside 12 hours for a debate on the Bill. The Select Committee has suggested over 285 amendments to offer relief to small taxpayers and for clarity on certain provisions, and the Bill is likely to be amended and get the clearance of the Cabinet before being brought to the House. The Union Cabinet is scheduled to meet on Tuesday. Congress general secretary K C Venugopal told reporters in the morning: 'Our demand is that there should be a discussion (on Pahalgam), this is an important issue. We are proud of our country. The Prime Minister should come and make a statement.' The Lok Sabha witnessed four abrupt adjournments Monday, with the Opposition ignoring the appeals of Rajnath Singh and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju when the House met at 12 noon to let the proceedings continue, saying the government was ready for a debate on every issue, and 'was ready to answer all questions'. Rijiju told the Opposition to place their demands during the BAC meeting, and let the Speaker take a call. 'But to raise slogans and not let the House function on the first day of the Monsoon Session is unacceptable.' Speaker Om Birla said he was ready to allow the members to raise all issues, including Operation Sindoor, but after Question Hour — the first hour of the day, set aside for MPs to raise questions related to different ministries and departments. 'The House will function according to rules and regulations. I cannot allow sloganeering and raising of placards,' he said, urging the members to give a notice if they wanted to speak. Rahul Gandhi claimed he was not allowed to speak in the House when he tried to on Monday. 'The Defence Minister is allowed to speak, but Opposition members, including me, who is the LoP, are not allowed to speak… This is a new approach… The convention states that if people from the government side can speak, then we should also be given space to speak,' Gandhi told reporters outside the House. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra added: 'If they are ready for a discussion, they should let the Leader of the Opposition speak. He stood up to speak, so he should be allowed to speak.' However, senior BJP leader Sanjay Jaiswal denied this, saying Gandhi was not even present when the House met at noon, after which papers on the agenda were tabled and the ministers spoke. 'Rahul Gandhi did not come to the House initially… He came late, but was seen talking to other Opposition leaders on the side. Not once did he ask the Chair to let him speak,' Jaiswal said. Before both the Houses met, PM Modi in his customary opening remarks said the government will be introducing Bills 'that will strengthen the country's development journey, strengthen the country's progress, and empower the citizens of the country'. 'The House will pass them after detailed discussions,' he said, urging the members to cooperate with the government. Modi met senior ministers Amit Shah, Rajnath Singh, Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Nirmala Sitharaman as well as Rijiju and Arjun Meghwal during the day. 'The PM was briefed about the decisions taken at the BAC and the Opposition's demand for his presence during the debate.' The Monsoon Session is scheduled till August 21, with a break from August 12 to August 18, and will have 21 sittings across 32 days.
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka High Court notice to State govt. on plea challenging constitutional validity of Greater Bengaluru Governance Act
The High Court of Karnataka on Monday ordered issue of notice to the State government and the State Election Commission (SEC) on a PIL petition questioning the constitutional validity of the Greater Bengaluru Governance (GBG) Act, 2024. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Joshi passed the order on the petition filed by well-known Kannada film director T.S. Nagabharana and three others. The petitioners have also sought a direction to the State Election Commission to hold elections to the existing Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Pailke (BBMP) while pointing out that the last election to the BBMP was held 10 years ago, in 2015, and both the government and the SEC have failed to hold timely elections to the BBMP as per the constitutional provisions despite expiry of term of the elected body about five years ago. Pointing out that Section 9 of the GBC Act provides for establishment of a Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) consisting of Chief Minister as ex-officio chairperson, Minister in charge of Bengaluru development as vice-chairperson, Ministers representing greater Bengaluru area, Minister in charge of urban development and various officials as ex-officio members, the the petitioners have contended that the 'GBA is an unconstitutional body', which holds power to exercise control over city corporations to be created under the Act. As the GBG Act entrusts power with the GBA, which is an unconstitutional body, to control the city corporations consisting elected representatives, the Act is contrary to the 74th Amendment to the Constitution of India, which provides power for local self-government, which is the basic purpose of the provisions contained in the 74th Amendment, the petitioners have claimed. The GBG Act gives powers for executing major infrastructure projects, collection and distribution of taxes, to make model bye-laws, to the GBA by taking away these powers from the corporations to be created under the Act, it has been pointed out in the petition.
India.com
15 minutes ago
- India.com
US Stablecoin Law Sends Ripples To India: How New Dollar-Backed Era Challenges Financial Sovereignty
New Delhi: A signature in Washington has stirred up serious questions in New Delhi. When US President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law, it kicked off a shift that could redraw the global financial map in addition to giving a greenlight to dollar-backed stablecoins. What looks like a domestic crypto law is now reverberating in central banks, fintech firms and policy circles around the world, especially in emerging economies like India. The Act, at its core, gives formal structure to stablecoins that are pegged to the US dollar. It demands full reserve backing, regular audits, KYC checks and anti-money laundering protocols. All the ingredients of traditional finance now wrapped around a digital asset. With this one move, the United States has set the tone for a new generation of money – which is private, programmable, borderless and unmistakably dollar-based. Stablecoins like USDC (a regulated digital currency) and USDT (a blockchain-enabled platform) were already popular. Now they have the seal of legitimacy. It is no longer a crypto trading tool but emerging as real-world instruments of exchange. Payment platforms, remittance services, e-commerce firms and even small traders could begin using them as alternatives to banks. What is being built is a parallel channel as well as a potential competitor to traditional money systems. India is paying attention. Officials at the Reserve Bank of India know what this means. The efficiency of stablecoins is attractive. Instant cross-border payments, cheaper remittances and faster settlements are something that the traditional banking network has struggled to deliver. India's vast fintech ecosystem, from UPI to Paytm, is built for scale. But scale may not be enough. Dollar-based stablecoins could sneak into India's economy in invisible ways. Exporters and importers could begin settling trades using them. Freelancers and tech workers might accept payments in digital dollars. And slowly, the rupee could lose its grip in corners of the economy where the RBI once ruled without question. Behind the scenes, policymakers are nervous. Stablecoins can be hard to track. Their mobility makes them hard to tax. And when demand for digital dollars rises, local currencies can take a hit. What the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) calls 'cryptoisation' is not merely a theory anymore, it is a warning. If this parallel system gains traction, India's central bank tools, which are interest rates, liquidity controls and capital flow regulations, might not be enough. The RBI has its pilot projects for the e-rupee. They are promising. But the competition is not waiting. The United States is moving fast. It may not have a digital dollar yet, but it has something just as powerful. For India, the road ahead is foggy. One option is to create a strong rupee-backed stablecoin that can compete on global platforms. Another is to impose strict controls on foreign stablecoins before they embed themselves too deeply. And third is to find a middle ground that supports innovation while protecting the core of monetary policy. The stakes are economic and geopolitical. The GENIUS Act is about control. If the old world was built on petrodollars and treasury bonds, the new one may run on digital tokens that carry the stars and stripes. Every stablecoin minted under U.S. regulation is another extension of its soft power. Meanwhile, Europe is working on a digital euro. China is expanding the e-CNY. And in parts of Africa and Southeast Asia, gold-backed and commodity-tied tokens are being tested. The world is preparing for the next phase of money. But the United States has already made its first big move. India must decide soon. Will it shape its own path, or will it play by rules written elsewhere? One thing is certain – the dollar is not retreating. It is evolving. And it is not knocking on the door anymore. It is already inside the house.
