
If Trump and the GOP keep this up, AOC is going to be president
If President Trump and congressional Republicans keep this up, it will only be the start of the progressive takeover.
Left-wing populists are already winning over voters by raising hell about the rising price of clothes and groceries due to tariffs. The growing appetite for populist left voices damning the high cost of living made headlines earlier this year in the successful ' Fighting Oligarchy,' tour featuring Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Ocasio-Cortez.
Poll numbers also make the case that voters are frustrated with Trump's failed promise to deal with inflation. The same angst is evident in declining c o nsumer confidence.
And now Scott Bessent, Trump's Treasury secretary, is floating the idea of replacing Social Security with a thousand-dollar gift to American babies. Those 'Trump Savings Accounts' are included in the Republicans' newly passed tax-and-spending plan. Bessent is now suggesting that a one-time payment, far smaller than monthly outlays for current benefits, is all that is needed to replace Social Security.
Bessent openly said the 'Trump Savings Accounts' for newborns is 'a backdoor for privatizing Social Security' at an event sponsored by the conservative news outlet Breitbart.
Bessent excitedly asked his audience to imagine that the thousand-dollar gift to an infant will grow until 'you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement — then that's a game changer too.'
'A stunning admission,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the Senate floor. 'Bessent actually slipped and told the truth: Donald Trump and his government want to privatize Social Security.'
Schumer identified Bessent's musings as a politically potent message for Democrats going into next year's midterms. Have congressional Republicans forgotten the political pain they suffered when President George W. Bush tried to privatize Social Security in 2005? The party lost its majority in the following year's midterms, in part due to public outrage.
Bessent's search for a way to end Social Security is a longstanding fixation among Republicans. They see the program as contrary to capitalism, a public welfare program sending the message that government has a role in preventing poverty.
Former Republican Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) became a conservative hero for daring to talk about privatizing Social Security. When he ran for vice president on the GOP ticket in 2012, liberal groups famously responded with dramatic depictions in advertising of Republicans 'throwing grandma off a cliff.'
Now, with the passage of Trump's budget reconciliation bill, which got congressional Republicans to buy into substantial cuts in Medicaid spending, the Treasury secretary feels free to again openly discuss an idea for eliminating Social Security.
This comes at a time when the richest 10 percent of Americans own 90 percent of stock market wealth.
'Calling this a five-alarm fire is an understatement,' stated Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). 'Between Bessent's comments and the harm DOGE has already done to the [Social Security Agency], it's clear Trump was lying all along about protecting Social Security. Like every Republican administration going back multiple generations, Trump and his billionaire cabinet want to privatize Social Security to give their Wall Street buddies a payday.'
Let's not forget: During the campaign, Trump pledged to bring down inflation and 'make America wealthy again.' But a recent Fox poll found that 56 percent of Americans gave a negative rating to their family finances, and 67 percent rated Trump's handling of the economy negatively.
In the Trump Cabinet, Bessent has company in floating ideas for undermining Social Security.
'What do you think [about] paying no taxes on Social Security … fantastic!' exclaimed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick recently, with a bright, wide, television grin on Fox News Sunday.
Just one problem, Mr. Secretary. The proposal for 'no taxes on Social Security' didn't make it into the final version of the Trump spending bill (it was turned into a temporary deduction for seniors). The truth revealed by his misleading comment is that the Commerce secretary — a billionaire, like the Treasury secretary — is preoccupied with ending Social Security.
Earlier this year, Lutnick implied that Americans who complain about missing a Social Security check are likely fraudsters. 'If Social Security didn't send out their checks this month, my 94-year-old mother-in-law wouldn't complain,' he said. 'She'd think something got messed up and she'd get it next month. A fraudster always makes the loudest noise, screaming and yelling. Anybody who knows payments knows you stop the checks, and whoever screams is the one stealing.'
That brutal disrespect for everyone who benefits from safety net protection against poverty is increasingly being heard in public.
Earlier this year, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) dismissed a constituent who expressed fear about the tax bill's cuts to health care support provided by Medicaid with a flip comment, replying, 'Well, we all are going to die.'
Ernst then doubled down on her callous indifference in a grotesque campaign video filmed in a cemetery, mocking the woman's concern. 'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth,' Ernst said. 'So, I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.'
Is it any wonder that figures like AOC and Zohran Mamdani are gaining traction?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans make gains in New Mexico voter registration, including in Santa Fe County
While New Mexico remains solidly blue territory, Republicans continue to make gains in the state's voter registration rolls. The GOP even added more voters in Santa Fe County, one of the most liberal and Democratic-performing areas in the state. Granted, the 5.8% year-over-year increase in registered Republicans in Santa Fe County equates to only about 1,000 voters, but it reflects a statewide trend. The number of registered Republicans across New Mexico grew from 421,653 in July 2024 to 436,647 last month, an increase of nearly 15,000 voters, according to the latest voter registration data. At the same time, Democrats lost just over 11,000 voters. Despite Republicans' gains, the proportion of voters in each major political party remains relatively flat in the state, with Democrats accounting for about 43% of the electorate and Republicans 32% — although, the GOP added a percentage point and Democrats lost one. The increase in Republican voters may reflect a Democratic Party struggling to find its message, Brian Sanderoff, an Albuquerque political analyst and respected pollster, said Monday. "I think the Democratic Party is trying to find its way, especially at the national level, and that can impact voter registration statistics," he added. The Republican Party of New Mexico started the year with the ambitious goal of registering 25,000 new voters, and Sanderoff said it has been doing a good job registering voters at the "grassroots level." The party's executive director, Leticia Muñoz, said everything the party does revolves around voter outreach. "RPNM takes great pride in the work being done by grassroots volunteers to register voters around the state over the last 5 years," she said in a statement. Muñoz also credits the commander in chief. "President [Donald] Trumps' policies continue to benefit New Mexicans greatly, which is another reason we're seeing many voters registering Republican," she said. A spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico downplayed the increase in registered Republicans. "There is a significantly smaller number of Republicans in New Mexico anyway, so any percentage change will look more dramatic than the reality of the total numbers," Daniel Garcia said in a statement. "I suppose the New Mexico GOP has to spin something to look like good news," he added. "They're obviously in a tough place trying to explain why voters should support quid pro quo immunity deals for child predator Ghislaine Maxwell and the GOP's signature accomplishment — their unpopular 'Big Beautiful Bill' that will close hospitals, eliminate health care coverage, and take away food assistance right here in New Mexico. Not to mention they'll have to explain to voters why they think tariffs, inflation, and privatizing Social Security will make us 'great again.' ' Voter registration data shows a slight increase in independent or "decline-to-state" voters, a number that grew from 315,772 to 320,988. The percentage of unaffiliated voters has been rising over the past decade and a half, a trend that will likely continue after New Mexico adopted a "semi-open primary" system, which allows voters who don't state a party affiliation to cast a ballot in a Democratic or Republican primary without changing their registration. In the state's most populous counties — Bernalillo, Doña Ana and Santa Fe, which are crucial in a statewide race — Democrats have a comfortable edge over Republicans. In those three counties combined, there are 324,152 registered Democrats and 177,070 registered Republicans. Independents are closing in on Republicans, though. The data show 168,351 "decline-to-state" voters in those three counties. Muñoz said Republicans are intent on gaining even more ground. "RPNM will continue our goal to flip New Mexico," she said, adding it's taken six to eight years to flip other blue states red. Asked whether Republicans' gains would affect the governor's race next year, Sanderoff said changes in voter registration are used to measure the direction of the state, but he noted Democrats maintain an advantage. "If you're consistently seeing Republicans make voter registration gains and Democrats stagnating on voter registration statistics, that is a barometer that one looks at to measure the political mood," he said. "It can be a predictor, but it's all relative, and you still have the lopsided voter registration edge that the Democrats have in terms of the actual numbers."
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures make slight gains as Wall Street eyes earnings with trade tensions ahead
US stock futures held steady as Wall Street regained its balance after a tumultuous week and braced for the next wave of corporate earnings. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) ticked up 0.1%. Palantir (PLTR) stock rose in after-hours trading after the company's earnings report beat expectations and revealed its revenue had topped $1 billion in a quarter for the first time. On Monday, stocks sharply rebounded after tanking on Friday in the aftermath of a number of market-shaking events, including a weak jobs report, fresh tariffs, new signs of rising prices, and the firing of the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. President Trump continued to amp up pressure on trade Monday, threatening to hike tariffs on India. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Wall Street is now focused on the continuation of earnings season. On Tuesday, AMD (AMD) and Rivian (RIVN) are set to report their results. McDonald's (MCD) and Disney (DIS) earnings land Wednesday. However, another trade blow looms at the end of the week, with Trump's latest iteration of global tariffs set to take effect. Oil flattened from multi-day drop after Trump's India rebuke Oil prices steadied from a three-day decline following a ramping up of threats from Trump to India over the Asian nation's continued use of Russian crude. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Oil flattened from multi-day drop after Trump's India rebuke Oil prices steadied from a three-day decline following a ramping up of threats from Trump to India over the Asian nation's continued use of Russian crude. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Oil prices steadied from a three-day decline following a ramping up of threats from Trump to India over the Asian nation's continued use of Russian crude. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Corrections: Aug. 5, 2025
Because of an editing error, an article on Saturday about the impact of President Trump's shifting tariff levels on the African nation of Lesotho misstated the day Lesotho's 15 percent tariff rate was announced. It was Thursday night, not Friday night. An article on Monday about a city in Kansas suing over a planned ICE detention center misstated the language in a poster seen at a protest of an immigration detention facility in Leavenworth, Kan. The poster said that Leavenworth is 'more than a prison town,' rather than 'not just a prison town.' An article on Friday about Ford Motor announcing that it lost money in the second quarter as tariffs took a toll on its business misstated the day that Ford reported its second-quarter earnings. It was Wednesday, not Tuesday. A picture from the streaming outlet TBPN published with an article on Friday about A.I. researchers' pay packages misidentified a Microsoft employee who used to work at Google's DeepMind lab. The person shown in the image was not Amar Subramanya. An article on Saturday about the negative impact that the Trump administration's tariffs are having on businesses they were meant to help misstated the month that the United States lost 11,000 manufacturing jobs. It was July, not June. The article also misstated the number of manufacturing job losses in June, based on initial estimates. The revised number was 15,000, not 6,000. The earlier estimate was 6,000. An article on Sunday about a veteran lifeguard's Friday routine misstated, in some instances, Javier Rodriguez's surname on second reference and that of his three adult children. Their surname is Rodriguez, not Hernandez. Errors are corrected during the press run whenever possible, so some errors noted here may not have appeared in all editions. To contact the newsroom regarding correction requests, please email nytnews@ To share feedback, please visit Comments on opinion articles may be emailed to letters@ For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637) or email customercare@