Another Commission? Mr President, Did You Forget Zondo?
Image: GCIS
On Sunday night, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced the establishment of yet another commission — this time to investigate the failings of law enforcement agencies. But South Africans have every right to ask: Did no one in the Union Buildings remind him that we already spent over R2 billion on the Zondo Commission to uncover exactly this?
Zondo Already Warned Us
The Commission of Inquiry into State Capture, chaired by Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, spent nearly four years documenting how corruption hollowed out our public institutions — and how law enforcement and intelligence agencies were deliberately weakened to enable it.
Zondo's report didn't simply expose corruption. It laid bare how SAPS, the NPA, and the State Security Agency (SSA) were systematically captured to protect looters and punish whistleblowers. This wasn't just administrative failure — it was strategic sabotage.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Clear Recommendations Were Already Made
Zondo made detailed, practical, and urgent recommendations: Reform and strengthen law enforcement and intelligence services
End political interference in senior appointments
Restore independence and credibility to oversight institutions
Prosecute those implicated in state capture
These recommendations weren't vague. They were actionable. And yet, they have largely been ignored.
Why Are We Paying for Déjà Vu?
Instead of implementing the Zondo Commission's findings, government has chosen repetition over reform. What is this new commission going to tell us that Zondo didn't already reveal?
We don't need more talk. We need consequences. We need a functioning justice system that doesn't bend to political power. We need prosecutions that don't take ten years. We need a President who acts — not one who commissions.
Commissions Are Not Accountability
Let's be clear: real reform means acting on what we already know. Real accountability means putting the corrupt behind bars — not creating more platforms for media statements and photo ops. South Africans are exhausted by inquiry fatigue. We want results. We want justice.
Start with Accountability at the Top
If the President truly wants to restore public trust, perhaps he should begin by putting his own Minister of Justice and senior advisors on special leave — for failing to implement Zondo's recommendations, and for failing to warn him that this new commission is a political embarrassment.
Accountability doesn't begin with a new commission. It begins with consequences.
Tahir Maepa writes with over R2 billion spent on the Zondo Commission already, many South Africans are left questioning the need for yet another inquiry.
Image: Supplied / Tahir Maepa
* Tahir Maepa, Secretary General – Public Service and Commercial Union of South Africa (PSCU), Founder – Resistance Against Impunity Movement (RAIM) NPC.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
30 minutes ago
- IOL News
IFP advocates for Zulu king recognition through National Dialogue
The National Dialogue will discuss the role and the powers of Zulu King Misuzulu and other kings in the country. Image: Archives Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) said it will use the National Dialogue to relaunch its fight for full recognition of Zulu King Misuzulu and traditional leaders, which deadlocked during the Convention for the Democratic South Africa (Codesa) talks in the early 90s. In a media briefing on Monday, the party said it fully supported the dialogue, which was proposed by its late founder, inkosi Mangosuthu Buthelezi, eight years ago. Buthelezi died in 2023. Emphasising the importance of dialogue, the party president, Velenkosini Hlabisa, said it was a matter of historic record that Codesa fell short in many respects in wholly transitioning South Africa into democracy, as political freedom has not, among other things, translated into economic justice for South Africans. Hlabisa said since 1994, his party has continuously advocated for meaningful conversation, through a National Dialogue, on these critical issues because national unity and social stability depend on the collective ability to address these outstanding matters. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'The Inkatha Freedom Party firmly believes that South Africa's future depends on open, inclusive, and honest dialogue among all its citizens. As Shenge reminded us, a national dialogue is not just about talking — it is about listening, understanding, and finding common ground to address the nation's most pressing challenges. We want the outstanding matters of Codesa to be addressed in the National Dialogue, such as the powers of the king and amakhosi,' said Hlabisa He said in times of economic, political, and social crossroads, dialogue offers a consensus-seeking path to nation-building. It emphasises the importance of engaging diverse voices across all segments of society, from government and traditional leaders to ordinary citizens, to forge solutions rooted in mutual understanding. 'Eight years ago, on 05 May 2017, our founder, Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi, emphasised the importance of National Dialogue on issues like land reform, traditional leadership, poverty alleviation, and social cohesion. He pointed out almost prophetically that 'South Africa has reached a crossroads, economically, politically, and socially. We cannot move blindly into the future, accepting the current trajectory as fixed. It is not. We are, after all, masters of our own destiny',' concluded the party. The IFP vigorously fought for the greater powers of the then-king Zwelithini during the Codesa talks to the point that the party boycotted the first democratic elections in 1994. It only entered elections a few days before the election date after international peace brokers promised to revisit the outstanding matters after the elections, which never happened.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Serious Accusations Against South Africa: Alleged Collaboration with Hamas Sparks Diplomatic Storm
US-based lawsuit worth $400 million is being prepared against President Cyril Ramaphosa and other officials. Image: Supplied/Presidency A lawsuit alleges that South Africa, alongside Iran, engaged in active coordination with Hamas that ultimately led to the October violence, which claimed the lives of hostages of at least forty‑seven American citizens. Image: Supplied/Presidency South Africa is facing serious accusations of collaborating with Hamas in the lead-up to the October 7 attacks on Israel. These grave claims have ignited controversy both at home and abroad. Journalist Paula Slier, in a blog post published in the Times of Israel on July 11, 2025, reported that a US-based lawsuit worth $400 million is being prepared against President Cyril Ramaphosa and other officials. The suit alleges that South Africa, alongside Iran, engaged in active coordination with Hamas that ultimately led to the October violence, which claimed the lives of hostages of at least forty‑seven American citizens. The allegations are primarily based on the work of UK consultant Justin Lewis, who claims to have uncovered evidence of diplomatic collusion. Lewis argues that South African officials not only provided rhetorical support but also facilitated Hamas's access to international legal platforms, specifically the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice — access that Hamas would not have otherwise enjoyed. Dirco Rejects Allegations as Baseless In an open letter responding to Slier and the Times of Israel, Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) spokesperson Chrispin Phiri expressed 'bemusement' at the publication's decision to elevate what he described as 'extreme, dangerous and unverified assertions.' Phiri criticised the amplification of Lewis's claims, noting that they are unsupported by any credible evidence. He emphasised that South Africa's diplomatic efforts in support of Palestinian rights are rooted in international law, not political alignment with Hamas. According to Phiri, raising such serious allegations without verifying facts not only undermines public trust but also jeopardises the reputation of both South Africa and the global media. Legal Framework: South Africa's Case Against Israel The South African government's approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict has always been anchored in legal rather than ideological grounds. Cape Town lodged a case at the International Court of Justice, alleging that Israel has violated the Genocide Convention and breached multiple UN resolutions and human rights treaties. South Africa contends that Israeli settlement expansion, forced displacements, and disproportionate use of force in Gaza constitute a clear pattern of settler colonialism and ethnic persecution. These claims are framed entirely within the ambit of international humanitarian law. Phiri stressed that South Africa's legal case against Israel is not directed at Judaism or the Jewish people. Nor is it politically motivated. Instead, it relies on documented evidence of rights violations with a historical basis extending back decades. The government's stance is one of accountability under international legal norms. ANC's Longstanding Relationship with the Jewish Community Historically, the ANC has had close ties to South Africa's Jewish community. Many Jewish anti-apartheid activists stood side-by-side with ANC leaders during the liberation struggle. Notable figures such as Helen Suzman and others actively supported the fight against apartheid. In recognition of this shared history, the ANC has consistently acknowledged the contributions of Jewish individuals in advancing democracy in South Africa. The ANC leadership often highlights this legacy to counter claims that South Africa's foreign policy is motivated by anti-Jewish sentiment. On the contrary, the party asserts that its support for Palestine is informed by a deep commitment to human rights and justice — not ethnicity or religion. Ongoing Media Scrutiny and Commitment to Investigative Due Diligence Despite the weight of Dirco's denial, Slier has made clear that she intends to continue her investigative work. She acknowledged that Lewis is not personally filing the lawsuit but serves as an adviser to third parties contemplating legal action. Slier stressed that the situation remains fluid, and she is committed to pursuing credible sources, legal experts, and scholars to determine whether there is any basis to the allegations of prior knowledge or collusion. "I will report on any credible evidence of collaboration, foreknowledge, or financial transactions linked to South African officials," Slier said, "but only after rigorous verification." She also noted that some colleagues questioned the credibility of Lewis, pointing to a lack of legal credentials and an absence of evidence supporting his claims. ANC Denounces Allegations as Meritless Amid the ongoing uproar, the ANC has issued a firm statement dismissing the allegations as meritless and politically motivated. The party said the claims are part of a broader campaign to discredit its principled stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The ANC urged the media and legal representatives to investigate carefully and vet sources before making sensational claims. "The ANC strongly rejects these allegations," the party noted. "They are baseless, reckless and run counter to our long-standing commitment to justice, human rights and international law." Wider Implications for South Africa's Global Role The controversy is raising broader questions about South Africa's role in global diplomacy. Critics argue that if the allegations were true, they would signal a troubling trend: the use of state influence to support militant organisations. Allies warn that such perceptions could hamper South Africa's ability to work with Western partners and international organisations. Supporters counter that South Africa has a right to pursue legal remedies through international justice mechanisms and to speak out against what it considers violations of international law, regardless of political or strategic fallout. They argue that South Africa has always used its UN membership and moral authority to promote peace and human dignity. Looking Ahead At present, there is no legal proceeding underway in any court against South African officials. The alleged lawsuit remains an exploratory effort by unnamed US citizens, reportedly based on unverified evidence. Dirco insists that no formal case has been initiated or filed. Meanwhile, the ANC and Dirco maintain a united front: they reject the allegations and reaffirm South Africa's unwavering commitment to the rule of law. Journalist Slier remains vigilant, promising to continue her investigation. As the country navigates this diplomatic minefield, the integrity of its legal processes, journalistic scrutiny, and media standards will come under intense focus.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
SASSA distances itself from 'Ubuntu Life,' warns public against fraudulent activities
SASSA warns the public about a fraudulent group, Ubuntu Life, illegally using its name and logo. The agency confirms it has no affiliation with this entity. Image: File The South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) has issued a public warning regarding the unauthorised and illegal use of its name, logo, and brand by an organisation identified as 'Ubuntu Life.' The agency has categorically denied any association with this entity and is taking legal steps to address the misuse. In a statement, SASSA clarified that it 'wishes to unequivocally distance itself from any association with this entity and to refute any claims or suggestions that Ubuntu Life is affiliated, endorsed, or contracted by SASSA in any capacity.' SASSA, a statutory body responsible for administering and paying social grants in South Africa, emphasised that any attempt to misrepresent a connection with the agency constitutes a violation of South African law, including the Trademarks Act and applicable fraud legislation. Chief Executive Officer Themba Matlou has urged the public to remain vigilant and not engage with any individuals or organisations that claim to operate on behalf of SASSA without official verification. 'SASSA does not outsource grant applications or beneficiary services to private companies such as Ubuntu Life or any other company for that matter. ''We appeal to the members of the public, especially our beneficiaries, not to fall prey to these fraudulent acts committed in SASSA's name. Please exercise vigilance and verify the authenticity of such acts with SASSA before partaking in them,' said Matlou. Matlou also reminded South Africans that SASSA services are free and only provided by employed officials. 'SASSA does not charge any fees for social grant services as the services are rendered for free only by employed SASSA officials. All official SASSA communications come via its official platforms and service points.' ''If anyone is approached or misled by Ubuntu Life or similar entities is urged to report the matter to the nearest police station or contact SASSA directly at 0800 60 10 11 or via email at [email protected].'' Motlou said SASSA's legal team has begun formal action against the misuse of its brand and has committed to pursuing all legal avenues to safeguard its services and protect the interests of beneficiaries. SASSA has also released the official social grant payment schedule for August 2025: Old Age Grant: August 5 Disability Grant: August 6 All Other Grants (including Child Grants): August 7 Beneficiaries are reminded to ensure their bank cards and accounts are active ahead of their payment dates to avoid any disruptions. [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News
