Miami's decision to postpone 2025 election without voter approval unconstitutional, judge says
Earlier this year, former Miami City Manager Emilio Gonzalez filed a lawsuit against the City of Miami, claiming officials are unlawfully blocking his bid to run for mayor by postponing the scheduled November 2025 election and giving current elected officials an extra in office.
González had asked the court to find the city's ordinance "unlawful and invalid."
On Monday, Judge Valerie Manno Schurr issued a written opinion on his lawsuit. She noted in her opinion that the general law statutes do not grant the city the authority to enact the ordinance.
Miami-Dade County Commissioner, and Miami mayoral candidate, Eileen Higgins praised the judge's decision to restore the November 2025 municipal election.
"Today's court decision is a clear victory for democracy and for every Miami resident who believes elections should be decided by the people — not politicians. I've said from the start: moving elections must be done the right way, through a transparent process and with voter approval," she said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gilbert: Tony Evers' exit makes for a rare, truly open governor's race
Democrat Tony Evers' decision not to seek a third term means Wisconsin voters will experience something unusual in this political era — a truly 'open' race for governor. Nine of the past 10 gubernatorial contests in this state have involved a sitting governor. Now we know that the 2026 election will not. That makes the next campaign for governor more open-ended than it would have been, and harder to handicap. It also means there's a possibility both parties will have costly and hotly contested primaries for the state's highest office. Evers' decision not only alters the nature of the general election contest, but it also means the governor's race could serve as a platform for Democrats to debate their future in the aftermath of the party's momentous national defeat last year to Donald Trump and the GOP. For Democrats, a defeat for governor in 2026 in the nation's closest state would be hugely demoralizing. It also would be a major political failure, given the political advantage typically enjoyed in a midterm election by the party that is out of power in Washington. On the other hand, from a historical perspective, a Democratic victory would be groundbreaking. Coming as it would after Evers' two terms in office, it would produce the Democratic Party's longest hold on the governor's office in Wisconsin's nearly 180-year existence. Incredible as it sounds, Democrats have never occupied the office of governor for more than eight years in a row in Wisconsin. That is a testimony to several things: the dominance of the GOP in the state's first 100 years; the fact that until the 1970s, elections for governor here occurred every two years, not four; and the state's penchant for political swings in the current era of partisan parity and polarization. Let's look a little more closely at the history of governors' races here to put 2026 into some very broad perspective. Democrats have only once won three gubernatorial elections in a row in Wisconsin. It happened in the late 1950s and early 1960s when governors served two-year terms: Gaylord Nelson won in 1958 and 1960 and John Reynolds won in 1962. By contrast, Republicans have a history of longevity in power. There have been eight three-term Republican governors in Wisconsin's history, though only Tommy Thompson has done it since the four-year term was instituted beginning with the 1970 election. Thompson is the state's longest-serving governor (just over 14 years, from 1987 to 2001) and the only one to win four elections in a row. Only one other politician has tried to win three four-year terms, Republican Scott Walker, but he lost his bid for a third term to Evers in 2018. That Walker defeat illustrates some of the challenges a party faces staying in power in the current era. There is voter fatigue, which caught up with Walker after a drama-filled eight years, including a polarizing recall fight in 2014 and the failed bid he launched for the presidency in 2015. There is the cyclical nature of modern politics. Wisconsin has a history in mid-terms of voting against the party of the president, which worked against Republicans in 2002, against Democrats in 2010, and against Republicans in 2018. (Evers broke this pattern in 2022). In other words, America's frequent presidential swings have also produced frequent mid-term swings at the state level here. And finally, there is the state's extreme competitiveness. It was easier for a single party to stay in power when Wisconsin was dominated by one party. Since Wisconsin became a state in 1848, the governor's office has been held by four different parties: Republican, Democratic, Whig, and Progressive. But Republicans have been dominant for most of that history, at one point (between 1857 and 1930) winning 34 out of 37 contests for governor. Republicans have never been shut out of the governor's office for more than eight years in a row (a streak now in jeopardy). And there have been five different periods when Republicans held the office of governor for longer than eight years: ∎ 1987-2001, the Tommy Thompson era. It only ended when Thompson left office halfway through his fourth term to be health secretary under President George W. Bush. His lieutenant governor, Scott McCallum, filled the remainder of that term before losing the 2002 election to Democrat Jim Doyle. ∎ 1943-1959, when four different GOP governors served and Republicans won seven elections in a row for governor (again, these were two-year terms). ∎ 1895-1933. This was the longest period of Republican governance. Ten different Republican governors served, including both Fighting Bob La Follette and his son Philip. The GOP won 19 consecutive elections for governor. ∎ 1876-1891. ∎ 1856-1874. That history of lopsided control is long gone in Wisconsin, replaced not only by frequent partisan swings but also by routinely close elections. The past two races for governor have been the two closest of the past 60 years. The fact that this is now an open-seat race, without a sitting governor on the ballot, adds to the suspense. The last time this happened was 2010, when Walker was first elected. But the last time before that was more than 40 years ago in 1982. Evers would have been a formidable candidate for re-election as the most popular politician in the state, according to polling by the Marquette Law School. At the same time, his age (73) and the challenges of winning a third term were potential election wild cards. Without Evers on the ballot, this race will still be hugely influenced by the national political climate next year and by public opinion toward Trump. Democrats will still go into this race with the historic advantage of running against the party of the president. But historical patterns don't dictate the outcomes of elections; they just put them in context. Candidate quality matters. And in 2026, that is now a big unknown for both sides. Craig Gilbert provides Wisconsin political analysis as a fellow with Marquette University Law School's Lubar Center for Public Policy Research and Civic Education. Prior to the fellowship, Gilbert reported on politics for 35 years at the Journal Sentinel, the last 25 in its Washington Bureau. His column continues that independent reporting tradition and goes through the established Journal Sentinel editing him on Twitter: @Wisvoter. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Gilbert: Tony Evers' exit makes for a rare, truly open governor's race
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Doesn't Rule Out Pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell
On his way out the door to a weekend golf trip that's set to cost American taxpayers at least $10 million, Trump stopped to answer a couple questions from reporters ― and he was awfully cagey when asked about Ghislaine Maxwell. Asked if he would pardon or commute the sentence of Maxwell, sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's onetime girlfriend, Trump sure didn't say 'no.' 'I'm allowed to do it,' he told reporters. He then claimed that 'it's something I've not thought about.' Presumably, Trump wouldn't pardon Maxwell, who was convicted for helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls, unless it benefited him personally — perhaps by buying her silence or otherwise somehow distracting the country from his own past relationship with Epstein. Trump deflected further when pushed on the subject. 'I don't want to talk about that,' he said. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence at a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with her on Thursday in an attempt to quell a firestorm over the Trump administration's backtracking on promises to release additional records from the Epstein investigation. 'What I do want to say is that Blanche is a great attorney,' Trump told reporters. Then he launched into one of his classic redirects and encouraged the press not to investigate his own connection to Epstein, but everyone else's. He proceeded to list names that may or may not be in the Epstein files and speculated about 'hedge fund guys' and former President Bill Clinton going to Epstein's island. (Clinton has denied knowing anything about the 'terrible crimes' allegedly committed by the billionaire financier.) In the same back and forth, Trump also denied that he'd written a lewd birthday message for Epstein that featured a drawing of a naked woman and remarked how 'enigmas never age' while wishing that 'may every day be another wonderful secret.' The Wall Street Journal published a copy of the note last week. Related... Justice Department Officials Meet With Ghislaine Maxwell Trump Told By Bondi His Name Is In The 'Epstein Files': Report Fox News Apparently 'Largely Obeyed' This Trump Order On Epstein, New Report Finds Trump Once Gave Epstein A Racy Birthday Card With A Strange Note: Report
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NYC Mayor Eric Adams takes a swipe at Mamdani trip to Uganda, then says he was only kidding around
NEW YORK — Mayor Adams, after taking a jab at Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani's decision to take a trip to Uganda after 'winning half an election' in a video released Thursday, said Friday he was joking and conceded politicians need a getaway every once in a while. 'People are going to travel, particularly after a race, a hard race, and we're just making fun at him,' Adams, who's running for re-election on an independent line, said in an interview on Fox5. 'They're going to make fun at me. This is going to be an exciting campaign.' Adams, who has often caught flack for his own many trips abroad, added that after the November general election, he is thinking of taking a 'nice vacation' to Italy. 'I love Pompeii, and Portofino is one of my favorite locations,' he said. 'So, sometimes you just got to download. And that's just the reality of this business.' In the short-form video on Thursday, Adams made a tongue-in-cheek reference to his now-dismssed indictment on charges of taking illegal donations from Turkish nationals, suggesting he'd like to go on a trip to Istanbul or Ankara. But he said he wouldn't, because he has to run the city. 'I realized I'm not a wannabe mayor,' Adams says in the video. 'I'm the actual mayor. I just can't get up and leave. If I'm gone, there won't be an Eric Adams keeping things under control. 'Somebody has to keep us safe and get stuff done,' he said. Adams also took a jab at mayoral opponent Andrew Cuomo, musing that maybe the mayor could also write a book on 'failed leadership.' The press also took a shot in the video, with the mayor suggesting if he weren't around they 'might actually need to report the news.' Mamdani and his wife traveled to Uganda earlier this week to celebrate their recent marriage with family and friends, according to the campaign. Mamdani was born in the country.
