logo
Police probing nine offences

Police probing nine offences

Daily Express5 days ago

Published on: Tuesday, June 24, 2025
Published on: Tue, Jun 24, 2025
By: Sherell Jeffrey Text Size: Jauteh said the students could have chosen alternative methods to voice their concerns. - Pic by Rahim Matnin | Daily Express. Kota Kinabalu: Organisers of the Perhimpunan Aman Gempur Rasuah Sabah 2.0 did not require any police permit but must abide by the stipulated conditions of the rally, said Sabah Police Commissioner Datuk Jauteh Dikun. The rally, organised by Suara Mahasiswa Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) over the weekend, resulted in police reports and investigations after the organisers failed to comply with the conditions. 'We received six reports related to incidents during the rally. 'Three investigation papers have been opened involving nine offences, including sedition, burning materials in public places, bringing dangerous materials like fuel to the rally and issues related to race, religion and royalty (3R),' Jauteh told a media conference at the State Police Contingent Headquarters, Monday. He said police have begun calling individuals to provide statements as part of their investigation. 'There is no approval but rather feedback from police on the notification made by the organisers,' he said, pointing out the legal framework governing peaceful assemblies while addressing misconceptions about police approval.
Advertisement He said under the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, organisers must notify police at least 10 days before holding any assembly, providing details including the applicant's name, route to be taken and purpose of the assembly. 'The law does not require a permit or licence. The notification is simply to inform authorities, not seek permission. Police have five days to respond with feedback,' he said. 'In the case of Gempur Rasuah Sabah 2.0, the police took the initiative to issue feedback regarding the notification. The purpose of issuing the feedback is to inform the organisers to comply with the conditions or restrictions,' he added. He said the Kota Kinabalu District Police Chief had set 15 conditions for the organisers to comply with. However, police investigations found that the organisers failed to meet the conditions. Asked about potential charges, he said investigations would proceed under various laws, including the Penal Code and Sedition Act. Addressing claims that the students had received special approval from police, Jauteh said: 'I think the students did not convey the truth. They said they received extraordinary approval from the police. 'Even though lawyers were present with the students, they should have understood what the police had actually provided under the Peaceful Assembly Act, which was feedback with conditions, not approval.' Asked about a counter-rally group that also gathered, Jauteh said they were also under investigation. 'We have not said they violated the law. But we are investigating police reports,' he said. Jauteh said the students could have chosen alternative methods to voice their concerns. 'If they want to express grievances, they could have prepared letters and meet in groups with relevant parties to state their intentions and call reporters to convey what they want to convey,' he said. The rally coincided with the Head of State's Birthday Ceremony, though Jauteh noted that under Section 4 of the Peaceful Assembly Act, any Malaysian citizen above 15 years old can participate in assemblies. 'Let the public know. There is no approval. No permit in this matter. There is no such thing as approval,' he said, reiterating that police response was merely feedback on the notification along with conditions for public order and safety. For the record, the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 removed the previous requirement for police permits that existed under Section 27 of the Police Act 1967. Under current law, no permit or licence is required to hold a peaceful assembly. The notification system is designed to facilitate the right to peaceful assembly rather than restrict it. Police cannot outright ban or reject an assembly notification. They can only impose reasonable restrictions on time, place and manner for security and public order purposes. Even failure to notify police, while potentially incurring a fine of up to RM10,000, does not make an assembly illegal or unlawful. The Act emphasises that peaceful assemblies cannot be deemed illegal merely due to lack of permits or notices, reflecting a constitutional shift towards protecting citizens' right to peaceful assembly. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Businessman loses over RM930,000 to college scam
Businessman loses over RM930,000 to college scam

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Businessman loses over RM930,000 to college scam

KUALA TERENGGANU: A businessman lost RM932,300 after falling victim to a bogus college procurement project in Kemaman. Kuala Terengganu OCPD Asst Comm Azli Mohd Noor said the 52-year-old victim received a WhatsApp message on May 28 from a man claiming to be a representative of the college. He said the suspect offered the victim a closed tender for the supply of portable generator sets. 'The victim made deposits totalling RM932,300 into two different bank accounts using company funds and personal savings. 'However, upon checking with the college, the victim discovered that no such tender had been offered,' ACP Azli said in a statement, Bernama reported. The victim lodged a police report at 11.53pm on Friday, and the case is being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code.

Impeachment panel dismisses Sara's plea
Impeachment panel dismisses Sara's plea

Daily Express

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Express

Impeachment panel dismisses Sara's plea

Published on: Sunday, June 29, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jun 29, 2025 By: Philstar Text Size: Sara Duterte MANILA: After Vice President Sara Duterte asked the impeachment court to dismiss the charges against her, the House prosecution panel submitted its response, debunking her claims and accusing her of forum shopping and misleading the court. 'Public officials must be held accountable impeachable offenses. Only exchanges of civility and a formal examination of evidence before an impartial court is required. The Filipino people have a fundamental right to witness this process unfold,' the prosecution said in their reply. 'No bloodbath is necessary. Let the trial begin,' they added. Here's a breakdown of how the House prosecutors negated Sara's claims in her response: The Senate did not have the Articles of Impeachment. House says: The Senate itself said the impeachment was not dismissed. The prosecution called this claim 'false.' They argued that the Senate returning the articles does not mean it gave up jurisdiction over the trial. 'The fact that respondent Duterte was able to file an Answer As Cautelam contravenes her arguments. It is rather strange for respondent Sara to argue that the Honorable Impeachment court did not have in its possession of the Articles of Impeachment when she admitted having received the same,' the prosecution said. The Senate's order was also clear: the Articles of Impeachment were returned to the House without dismissing or terminating the case. The House prosecutor pointed out that the only time constraint the Constitution imposes on impeachment is the one-year ban on initiating another complaint. The Supreme Court also recognized in Pimentel Jr. v. Joint Committee of Congress that there is a distinction between Congress' legislative and non-legislative functions. 'When the Senate sits as an impeachment court, it does not become functus officio, even if its composition changes,' the prosecution said. 'Functus officio' means that there would be no legal authority to act. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

Three police reports filed over Kuala Lumpur rally scuffle
Three police reports filed over Kuala Lumpur rally scuffle

The Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Sun

Three police reports filed over Kuala Lumpur rally scuffle

KUALA LUMPUR: Police confirmed receiving three reports linked to a rally in the city today, which saw a flare being lit and a brief scuffle leaving a personnel with minor injuries. Dang Wangi district police chief ACP Sulizmie Affendy Sulaiman stated the gathering drew around 100 participants. It began at 3.02 pm outside a shopping mall on Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman before moving to Dataran Merdeka. At approximately 4.30 pm, a participant ignited a flare, producing thick smoke that posed potential risks to public safety and health. Authorities intervened, but a physical altercation ensued, resulting in minor injuries to an officer. Investigations are underway under Section 353 of the Penal Code and Sections 3(5) and 14 of the Minor Offences Act 1955. The public is urged to avoid speculation and report relevant details via the KL police hotline at 03-2115 9999 or Dang Wangi police headquarters at 03-2600 2222.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store