Impeachment panel dismisses Sara's plea
Published on: Sunday, June 29, 2025
Published on: Sun, Jun 29, 2025
By: Philstar Text Size: Sara Duterte MANILA: After Vice President Sara Duterte asked the impeachment court to dismiss the charges against her, the House prosecution panel submitted its response, debunking her claims and accusing her of forum shopping and misleading the court. 'Public officials must be held accountable impeachable offenses. Only exchanges of civility and a formal examination of evidence before an impartial court is required. The Filipino people have a fundamental right to witness this process unfold,' the prosecution said in their reply. 'No bloodbath is necessary. Let the trial begin,' they added. Here's a breakdown of how the House prosecutors negated Sara's claims in her response: The Senate did not have the Articles of Impeachment. House says: The Senate itself said the impeachment was not dismissed. The prosecution called this claim 'false.' They argued that the Senate returning the articles does not mean it gave up jurisdiction over the trial. 'The fact that respondent Duterte was able to file an Answer As Cautelam contravenes her arguments. It is rather strange for respondent Sara to argue that the Honorable Impeachment court did not have in its possession of the Articles of Impeachment when she admitted having received the same,' the prosecution said. The Senate's order was also clear: the Articles of Impeachment were returned to the House without dismissing or terminating the case. The House prosecutor pointed out that the only time constraint the Constitution imposes on impeachment is the one-year ban on initiating another complaint. The Supreme Court also recognized in Pimentel Jr. v. Joint Committee of Congress that there is a distinction between Congress' legislative and non-legislative functions. 'When the Senate sits as an impeachment court, it does not become functus officio, even if its composition changes,' the prosecution said. 'Functus officio' means that there would be no legal authority to act. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ukraine F-16 pilot killed in large-scale Russian attack, Zelenskiy calls for US help
KYIV/LVIV (Ukraine): A Ukrainian F-16 fighter pilot died in a crash while repelling a Russian air attack that involved hundreds of drones, cruise and ballistic missiles, authorities said today, as Moscow intensifies night-time air barrages in the fourth year of war. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy called for more support from Washington and Western allies to bolster Ukraine's air defences after the attack, which damaged homes and infrastructure across the country and injured at least 12 people, according to local authorities. In Kyiv, families huddled in metro stations for shelter after air raid sirens rung out. Machine-gun fire and explosions were heard across the capital and in the western city of Lviv, where such attacks are less common. The governor of the Lviv region, bordering Poland, said the raid targeted critical infrastructure. Ukraine has now lost three F-16s since it began operating the U.S.-made jets last year. Kyiv has not revealed the size of its F-16 fleet, but they have become a central and heavily used part of Ukraine's defences. The pilot flew the damaged jet away from a settlement but did not have time to eject before it crashed, the Ukrainian Air Force said. "The pilot used all of his onboard weapons and shot down seven air targets. While shooting down the last one, his aircraft was damaged and began to lose altitude," the Air Force said on Telegram. The Ukrainian military said in total Russia launched 477 drones and 60 missiles of various types to Ukraine overnight. Ukrainian forces destroyed 211 of the drones and 38 missiles, it said, while 225 more drones were either lost due to electronic warfare or were decoys that carried no explosives. "Moscow will not stop as long as it has the capability to launch massive strikes," Zelenskiy said on X. He said Russia had launched around 114 missiles, 1,270 drones, and 1,100 glide bombs just in the past week. Russia's state-run RIA Novosti news agency said one person was killed by a Ukrainian drone in the Russian-controlled part of Ukraine's Luhansk region. Both Ukraine and Russia say they do not attack civilian targets. POLITICAL WILL Ukraine says recent attacks highlight the need for further support from Washington, which under President Donald Trump has not committed to new military aid for Ukraine. Trump said he was considering a Ukrainian request for more Patriot missile batteries after he met Zelenskiy at a NATO summit last Wednesday. "This war must be brought to an end - pressure on the aggressor is needed, and so is protection," Zelenskiy said in his X post on Sunday after the attack. "Ukraine needs to strengthen its air defence - the thing that best protects lives." He said Ukraine was ready to buy the American air defence systems and it counts on "leadership, political will, and the support of the United States, Europe, and all our partners." Russia has launched large scale strikes on Ukrainian cities every few days in recent weeks, causing widespread damage, killing dozens of civilians and injuring hundreds more. During the latest barrage, explosions were heard in Kyiv, Lviv, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Cherkasy and the Ivano-Frankivsk regions, witnesses and regional governors said. The Ukrainian military said air strikes were recorded in six locations. Eleven people, including two children, were injured in the central Cherkasy region, the governor Ihor Taburets said on Telegram. Three multi-storey buildings and a college were damaged in the attack, he said. One woman was injured in western Ivano-Frankivsk region. Rescuers evacuated residents from apartment blocks with charred walls and broken windows, images released by authorities in Cherkasy showed. Industrial facilities were hit in the southern Ukrainian Mykolaiv and central Dnipropetrovsk regions, officials said. Railway infrastructure was damaged in Poltava city in the centre of the country. - REUTERS
Borneo Post
7 hours ago
- Borneo Post
US Senate opens debate on Trump's controversial spending bill
The U.S. Capitol on June 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. Senate Republicans overnight released a new version of the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill,' as they approach U.S. President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline. – AFP photo WASHINGTON (June 29): US senators debated into the early hours of Sunday Donald Trump's 'big beautiful' spending bill, a hugely divisive proposal that would deliver key parts of the US president's domestic agenda while making massive cuts to social welfare programs. Trump is hoping to seal his legacy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which would extend his expiring first-term tax cuts at a cost of $4.5 trillion and beef up border security. But Republicans eyeing 2026 midterm congressional elections are divided over the package, which would strip health care from millions of the poorest Americans and add more than $3 trillion to the country's debt. The Senate formally opened debate on the bill late Saturday, after Republican holdouts delayed what should have been a procedural vote — drawing Trump's ire on social media. Senators narrowly passed the motion to begin debate, 51-49, hours after the vote was first called, with Vice President JD Vance joining negotiations with holdouts from his own party. Ultimately, two Republican senators joined 47 Democrats in voting 'nay' on opening debate. Trump has pushed his party to get the bill passed and on his desk for him to sign into law by July 4, the United States' independence day. 'Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform after the vote to begin debate. 'Republicans must remember that they are fighting against a very evil, corrupt and, in many ways, incompetent (Policywise!) group of people, who would rather see our Country 'go down in flames' than do the right thing,' he said in an earlier post. Democrats are bitterly opposed to the legislation and Trump's agenda, and have vowed to hold up the debate. They began by insisting that the entirety of the bill be read aloud to the chamber before the debate commences. The bill is roughly 1,000 pages long and will take an estimated 15 hours to read. 'Republicans won't tell America what's in the bill,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. 'So Democrats are forcing it to be read start to finish on the floor. We will be here all night if that's what it takes to read it.' If passed in the Senate, the bill would go back to the House for approval, where Republicans can only afford to lose a handful of votes — and are facing stiff opposition from within their own ranks. – Divisive cuts – Republicans are scrambling to offset the $4.5 trillion cost of Trump's tax relief, with many of the proposed cuts to come from decimating funding for Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income Americans. Republicans are split on the Medicaid cuts, which will threaten scores of rural hospitals and lead to an estimated 8.6 million Americans being deprived of health care. The spending plan would also roll back many of the tax incentives for renewable energy that were put in place under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. On Saturday, former Trump advisor Elon Musk — with whom the president had a public falling out this month over his criticism of the bill — called the current proposal 'utterly insane and destructive.' 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future,' said Musk, who is the world's richest person, and owns electric vehicle company Tesla and space flight firm SpaceX, among others. Independent analysis also shows that the bill would pave the way for a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest 10 percent of Americans to the richest. The bill is unpopular across multiple demographic, age and income groups, according to extensive recent polling. Although the House has already passed its own version, both chambers have to agree on the same text before it can be signed into law. – AFP donald trump One Big Beautiful Bill politics US Senate
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ramkarpal backs tenure extension for Tengku Maimun, two senior judges
KUALA LUMPUR A DAP member of parliament has expressed his backing for extending the tenure of Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat and two other senior judges, saying it would end uncertainty over their positions and help advance the unity government's reform agenda. Bukit Gelugor MP Ramkarpal Singh, who is also DAP national legal bureau chairman, said there appeared to be no compelling reason not to extend the tenures of Tengku Maimun, Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, and Federal Court judge Tan Sri Datuk Nallini Pathmanathan. "The government has stated on many occasions that institutional reform remains one of its top priorities and it is difficult to comprehend why the extension of the tenures of the said judges does not align with such an agenda, particularly at a time when many Federal Court judges have retired or are due to retire. "In the circumstances, it is imperative to allow for a continuation of the status quo of the current administration of the judiciary in order to ensure a smooth transition when the new batch of Federal Court judges takes over," he said in a statement today. Ramkarpal added that the Federal Constitution provides for the extension of Federal Court judges' tenure, and that such a provision must have been intended, among other things, to facilitate the administration of justice. This, he said, is precisely what needs to be done now, given the number of vacancies that will arise following the mandatory retirement of several Federal Court judges, as previously mentioned. "It must also be pointed out that this is not a case of the extension of one judge but three, two of whom are the top two judges in our judicial hierarchy, which makes it all the more important for the government to explain why their tenures are not being extended if that was the case. "The said three judges have performed their duties well and have preserved, protected and defended the Constitution in accordance with their oaths of office and as such, there certainly is merit in extending their tenures for a further six months. "The government should seriously consider doing so as this would certainly enhance the perception of its commitment to reform," he said. It was previously reported that the Malaysian Bar had expressed concern over the uncertainty surrounding the extension of tenure for Tengku Maimun, Abang Iskandar and Nallini. Its vice-president Anand Raj had said it was unusual for the Chief Justice, President of the Court of Appeal or a senior Federal Court judge not to be granted a six-month extension.
