logo
War of words grows over pro-Palestine protest at arts centre

War of words grows over pro-Palestine protest at arts centre

The Art Workers for Palestine Group has stepped up pressure for senior figures to be 'removed' amid claims that participants in a sit-in protest were 'kettled, brutalised and oppressed.'
Read more:
The CCA, which has been targeted over a refusal to publicly support a boycott of Israeli academic and cultural institutions, has expressed 'regret' over the impact of last week's protest.
However it has claimed it was forced to call in 'law enforcement' in response to a 'forced entry' of its building.
The CCA in Glasgow city centre has been running since 1992.
Social media posts by the campaign group on the morning of June 24 had urged supporters to 'mobilise' and 'enter the building' at 12 noon after the group was refused permission to stage a programme of their own events in a 'liberated zone.'
The CCA has claimed the group demanded that the venue agreed in advance that the police would not be called 'under any circumstances,' and was refused permission due to the venue's 'safeguarding responsibilities.'
The centre, which insisted the planned events would have 'breached' the venue's licensing and insurance obligations, said it had been advised to close the building by the police and security staff.
However the CCA has denied claims that it had 'colluded' with the police and 'pre-arranged' for officers to be in the area before the forced entry of the building.
Last month the CCA said that its board had been "unable to reach a consensus" over whether to endorse the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, despite calls from more than 800 supporters of an online petition.
At the time, the centre said it would be instigating a "transparent, values-based consultation with our staff and the broader CCA community to address the substantive issues."
The AWFPS group announced plans for five days of events at the CCA, saying: 'It is up to us to reclaim our arts institutions that are heading in an increasingly disturbing direction.'
On the morning of June 24, the group told supporters: 'We are shocked that the CCA are saying that they will not let art workers run our liberated zone programme or allow us to enter the building.
'We need as many people as possible to mobile at CCA at 12 noon to enter the building and reclaim the public courtyard so that the liberated zone can go ahead.'
A new statement issued by the CCA said: 'The CCA Board was unable to reach a consensus on publicly endorsing the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) at its last board meeting. This is due to the potential legal complexities and implications for a charity to do so.
'To fulfil its charitable aim, the organisation must remain independent politically. CCA is responsible for maintaining and supporting employment in the arts, including funding programmes of artist development, and must therefore always consider its financial and legal sustainability very carefully.
'The CCA does not hold any investment in companies, Israeli or international, that are involved in the violation of Palestinian rights. We also do not have any partnerships with Israeli academic or cultural institutions.
'We review commercial and programming decisions on a case-by-case basis and recognise the need to develop a formal ethical framework to guide these decisions in future.
'On June 23 Art Workers for Palestine Scotland (AW4PS) announced a week-long programme of events to take place in the CCA's courtyard space.
'AW4PS included in their notification that CCA would agree not to contact the police or security personnel under any circumstances, which in light of our safeguarding responsibilities and legal duties, we were not able to host.
'There was no agreement reached, and security, legal, and insurance concerns remained unresolved.
'AWFPS had not entered into an agreement with the CCA to ensure that contracting, safeguarding, risk assessment, and access considerations were in place for a five-day event, involving a wide range of participants, including children, which was announced with only 24 hours' notice.
'CCA would have been in breach of its legal obligations regarding licensing and insurance if we had allowed the event to go ahead.
'On the morning of June 24, the CCA was closed to the public, with access for staff, cultural tenants and contract hires only.
'AWFPS made a post on social media saying that they needed 'as many people to mobilise at CCA at 12 noon to enter the building and reclaim the public courtyard.'
'At noon, groups gathered outside both entrances. Only after a group entered the building, the police were called.
'We regret the impact on all those involved inside and outside of the building. We can confirm that CCA has not called for any charges that have been pressed, nor have we had further contact with police regarding this matter.'
The AWFPS group said it was 'deeply disturbed and appalled' at the CCA's latest statement, and stepped up its demand for the "removal" of interim director Steve Slater, chair Jean Cameron and board member Steve Slater.
It said: 'Rather than taking accountability for their actions, the CCA's leadership continues to misrepresent events, discredit organisers and align itself with a growing culture of state repression that seeks to delegitimise protest and Palestinian solidarity.
'Most importantly, the CCA fails to apologise to the many people that were kettled, brutalised and oppressed last Thursday.
'The CCA's invocation of 'safeguarding to justify their actions rings hollow when their immediate response was to call the police, a move that is inherently unsafe for many of the very communities they claim to support.
'Framing police involvement as care is not safeguarding, it is harm.
'We are not outsiders. We are arts workers, artists who have exhibited at the CCA, community members, and people who one imagined the CCA as a platform for sharing radical, thoughtful and collective practice.'
The CCA was opened in 1992 at the home of the former Third Eye Centre, which was founded in 1974.
Writers, artists and performers who have shown work or performed there include Allen Ginsberg, Whoopi Goldberg, John Byrne, Billy Connolly, Edwin Morgan, Kathy Acker, Damien Hirst, Sophie Calleite, Nathan Coley, Jacqueline Donachie, Louise Hopkins, Carol Rhodes, Richard Wright, David Shrigley and Ross Sinclair.
The venue has had a number of difficulties over the last decade, including being forced to close for several months due to the impact of the 2018 Glasgow School of Art fire, a long-running dispute over the pay and conditions of workers at its cafe-bar, and financial problems, which forced the venue to close temporarily in December.
The venue finally reopened in April after securing a new £3.4 million Scottish Government funding deal for the next three years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Motion would have aligned SNP foreign policy with Keri Starmer's
Motion would have aligned SNP foreign policy with Keri Starmer's

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Motion would have aligned SNP foreign policy with Keri Starmer's

Normally, the policy formulation dimension represents tweaks to existing policy. On occasion, more pressing issues are debated. Last month's meeting was of the latter type. In the background, subsequently confirmed days later, was the prospect of the US weighing in on the Israeli side in its war with Iran. An act, as the secretary-general of the UN pointed out, that ran a coach and horses through the international rules-based order. In Perth, on the auditorium screen was a topical motion on the issue in the name of Stephen Gethins MP. Had it passed unamended, it would have upended SNP policy in several areas – not only on the party's position on international nuclear disarmament treaty architecture, but broader issues of national security and indeed adjacent economic policy. READ MORE: Protesters stage demonstration inside Reform UK's headquarters Unamended, it would have positioned the SNP group at Westminster behind Keir Starmer and David Lammy's position on the Israel-Iran crisis. It would have also represented a softening of the tone, possibly even the substance, of the critical statements made by other SNP parliamentarians at Westminster and in Holyrood. The unamended motion read: 'MIDDLE EAST SITUATION – National Council abhors the ongoing violence in the Middle East and recognises that destabilisation in the region is a threat to us all; calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and full access for humanitarian relief; further agrees that Iran should not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons but that the best means of stopping that and finding a sustainable solution is through diplomatic means.' The motion only mentioned Iran and not Israel and was presented in the name of a former professor of international relations. Stephen was not in attendance, so his motion was subsequently moved by another delegate. I proposed that three words – 'be allowed to' – be excised. In the end, my suggestion was acceded to and political embarrassment averted. Other amendments pertaining to the, frankly, barely condemnatory tone on what is going on in Gaza, would have been appropriate but timescales and procedures precluded that. (Image: Anadolu Agency via Getty Images) At first, I wanted to accept the cock-up theory but after a few days of reflection and being faced with some irrefutable facts, the record needs to be put straight. This must be reflected upon by SNP spokespersons, particularly on matters of war and peace. It's interesting how in the repertoire of those who used to promote a 'rules-based order that's not the United Nations', they and the mainstream media are very quick to gaslight anyone who says historical context is important. However, when the historical airbrush is applied to the signature diplomatic achievement of Barack Obama, I must speak out. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the deal that ensured Iran gave up any notion of developing nuclear weapons, was ditched by Donald Trump. My 'textual amendment' reaffirmed SNP adherence to the spirit of the Obama plan. During his first term as president, Trump of course trashed the JCPOA. Now, bizarrely, he appears to want to bomb Iran into a JCPOA-without-the-safeguards. The SNP seek to achieve the restitution of a sovereign Scottish state. It will be a small state and, as such, on the journey to independence, the recognition of the UN will be indispensable. However, I am no naive idealist. The world is a dangerous and uncertain place, particularly when you share a border with the Russian Federation or Israel. Only politicians with links to the arms trade would want to use fear as a key electoral driver. Arguing that man-made global dangers and instability are uniform throughout the world is an understandable though rather unethical marketing tool for arms companies. The truth is, in the bigger scheme of things, some places are a bit safer than others, and Scotland is one of those – a fortunate reality that the independence movement should unapologetically make more of. Bill Ramsay SNP CND

One year under Labour and we still have a chaotic and cruel government
One year under Labour and we still have a chaotic and cruel government

The National

time4 hours ago

  • The National

One year under Labour and we still have a chaotic and cruel government

A YEAR ago today, the UK went to the polls in the Westminster general election in which millions were desperate to get rid of a chaotic and cruel Conservative government which was widely reviled and had lost all credibility. One year on and we still have a chaotic and cruel conservative government which is widely reviled and has lost all credibility. That's democracy, Westminster style. The Labour in name only government of Keir Starmer has relentlessly pursued the Tory line on Brexit, it has chosen to make the elderly, the poor and disabled pay for Tory mismanagement of the government's finances because making the super rich pay more in tax is too tough a choice for a Prime Minister who loves to boast about his willingness to take tough choices, choices which invariably entail bein tough on the vulnerable. We've had a continuation of uncritical British Government support for a genocidal Israeli Government which openly touts its wish to ethnically cleanse Gaza, slaughters tens of thousands of civilians and which is intensifying the expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank in open defiance of international law and human decency. READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn confirms launch of new party – read the full statement We have also had a continuation of the previous Tory government's increasing assault on the right to demonstrate and protest, which culminated this week in the grotesque decision to lump the direct action protest group Palestine Action in with violent extreme right neo-nazi organisation and proscribe it as a "terrorist organisation". Chucking red paint on Donald Trump's golf resort and on an RAF plane suspected of preparing to carry British military equipment to Israel where it would be used to further the genocide in Gaza are now deemed to be terrorist offences on a par with plotting suicide bombings. It makes a gross travesty of what these powers were originally intended for, the kind of overreach which the government vowed when framing these laws would never come to pass. Allowing the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation to stand not only makes a mockery of anti-terrorism legislation, it also represents an intolerable breach of civil liberties and the right to protest. It opens the door to the proscription as a supposedly terrorist organisation of any non-violent protest group which creates a public nuisance or inconvenience, which is essentially the entire point of protest. With this precedent, groups like the Suffragettes, the Aids and HIV awareness organisation Act Up, and hunt saboteur organisations, could all have been proscribed as "terrorists". If the proscription of Palestine Action is allowed to stand, climate change activists are likely to be next in line. Lawyers for Palestine Action have launched a legal bid to temporarily block the banning of the group as a terrorist organisation. The case is set to be heard at the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday, ahead of a potential legal challenge against the move. Even pro-Israel groups oppose the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. Mark Birbeck, of the pro-Israel Our Fight organisation, stood across the street from the Royal Courts of Justice in London with a small group holding a banner saying 'Stop the lies, there is no genocide in Gaza'. Birbeck said: 'We don't actually support proscribing Palestine Action. We don't think they are a terrorist organisation and in fact, our argument is that it makes a mockery of what terrorism is. 'It's bizarre that (the Government) is presenting this as some kind of aggressive step. 'My suspicion is that Palestine Action are going to run rings around them. 'These people know what they are doing. I don't agree with them, I don't agree with their politics, but they've been doing this for years. 'Our argument against Palestine Action though, is not that they are terrorists, but what we do believe they are doing is trying to claim the moral high ground and effectively they are doing that to isolate Israel.' Coventry South MP Zarah Sultana, who was suspended from the Parliamentary Labour party for voting in support of an SNP motion calling for the abolition of the two child cap on benefits, has announced that she has left the Labour party to join Jeremy Corbyn's Independent Alliance. John McDonnell, the now independent, but former Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington and shadow chancellor for Labour under Corbyn from 2015 to 2020, said Labour needs to 'ask themselves' why someone like Zarah Sultana would choose to leave. Like Sultana McDonnell had the Labour whip removed for voting to abolish the two child benefit cap, but as a prominent member of the old Labour left with a high profile position under Corbyn, he remains persona non-grata with Starmer and his centre-right faction On Twitter, McDonnell wrote: "The people running Labour at the moment need to ask themselves why a young, articulate, talented, extremely dedicated socialist feels she now has no home in the Labour party and has to leave." Jeremy Corbyn has welcomed Sultana's decision, saying in a post on social media: 'Real change is coming. 'One year on from the election, this Labour Government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. Our country needs to change direction, now. 'Congratulations to Zarah Sultana on her principled decision to leave the Labour Party. I am delighted that she will help us build a real alternative. 'The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. Discussions are ongoing - and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve. 'Together, we can create something that is desperately missing from our broken political system: hope.' It will be interesting to see if this new political grouping recognises Scotland's right to self-determination and will agree to facilitate a second Scottish independence referendum should the people of Scotland give yet another mandate for one. The victory of Zohran Mamdani in the recent New York Democrat primary and an opinion poll showing that a left-populist party would be the most popular choice amongst younger voters, picking up 32% of votes amongst 18 to 24 year olds hint that such a party could become a significant political force and the real antidote to the toxic politics of the populist right.

More than 600 killed in Gaza while seeking aid near sites run by US/Israeli-backed group, says UN
More than 600 killed in Gaza while seeking aid near sites run by US/Israeli-backed group, says UN

ITV News

time8 hours ago

  • ITV News

More than 600 killed in Gaza while seeking aid near sites run by US/Israeli-backed group, says UN

More than 600 people have been killed in Gaza while trying to reach aid at sites run by an Israeli and US-backed group, the UN has said. Of the 613 deaths recorded by the UN human rights office, 509 of them were at aid distribution points of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The group first began its humanitarian convoys and aid distribution points in late May. The UN has previously criticised the GHF's plans and warned that Israel is trying to "weaponise aid". The UN argued that Israel's endorsement of the GHF gives it the power to choose who receives aid, as well as forces people to move to specific areas to collect it. UN Spokesperson Ravina Shamdasani said that the rights office is not able to attribute responsibility for the killings, but "it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points" operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Ms Shamdasani added that the figures had been vetted but were not likely to tell the complete picture of the situation. "We will perhaps never be able to grasp the full scale of what's happening here because of the lack of access" for UN teams to the areas." The information is based on an internal situation report at the office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store