Air India flight to Chennai returns to Mumbai mid-air after burning smell in cabin
Live Events
Two other mid-flight alerts on same day
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
An Air India flight bound for Chennai was forced to return to Mumbai shortly after takeoff on Friday, June 27, after the crew detected a burning smell inside the cabin, the airline confirmed in a statement released Saturday.According to an Air India spokesperson, as quoted by ANI, the crew of flight AI639 operating from Mumbai to Chennai on June 27, 2025, made a precautionary air-return to Mumbai due to a burning smell in the cabin.'The flight landed safely back in Mumbai, and an aircraft change was initiated. Our ground colleagues in Mumbai provided all necessary support to passengers to minimise the inconvenience caused by this unforeseen disruption,' the spokesperson added.These incidents come weeks after the crash of Air India Flight AI-171 in Ahmedabad on June 12, which was en route to London. The crash claimed the lives of 241 out of 242 people on board, prompting a series of inspections and internal safety reviews across India's aviation sector.In a separate incident the same day, Air India reported a non-specific security alert on one of its aircraft. The flight was later cleared after undergoing standard security checks.'A non-specific security alert was detected on one of our aircraft. Standard security procedures were duly carried out, and the aircraft has been cleared for the next flight. Air India accords top priority to the safety and security of its passengers and crew,' the Air India spokesperson said, as per ANI.Also on Friday, an Air India Express flight (IX2564) flying from Delhi to Jammu had to turn back mid-flight after a technical issue was identified. The Airbus A320 aircraft, which took off from Delhi at 11:04 AM, was originally scheduled to land in Jammu by 12:05 PM.'An alternative aircraft was arranged to operate our Delhi-Jammu flight after the original aircraft returned to Delhi due to a technical issue. We regret the inconvenience caused,' an Air India Express spokesperson said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Is the Trump 2.0 agenda deliberately aimed at companies' bottom line?
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Corporate America's profits are slipping. Last week, the Bureau of Economic Analysis confirmed that corporate post-tax profits dropped in the first quarter by 3.3% — by far their biggest fall since the companies make less money, it's often a harbinger of an economic slowdown. In this case, it also raises the more profound question of whether the Trump 2.0 agenda is deliberately aimed at companies' bottom sounds outlandish. The S&P 500 just hit an all-time high, so Corporate USA is worth more than ever. But it makes sense. After-tax profits account for an unprecedented 10.7% of gross domestic product, when in the last 50 years of the 20th century, they never exceeded 8%. The only time approaching their current share of the economy was in 1929 on the eve of the Great Crash. If the nation is to deal with inequality, money must be redistributed from somewhere; corporate profits are an obvious source of in the Trump coalition have long held an anti-corporate agenda. A few months ago, Adrian Wooldridge argued in this space that MAGA wanted to 'end capitalism as we know it.' Specifically, he contended that many leaders in the Trump coalition wanted to 'deconstruct the great workhorse of American capitalism: the publicly owned and professionally managed corporation.'These are strong words, but sound understated compared to the writings of Kevin Roberts, head of the Heritage Foundation and a lead creator of Project 2025, an ambitious and radical agenda for Trump 2.0. He argues that BlackRock, the world's largest fund manager and a pillar of contemporary US capitalism, is 'decadent and rootless' and should be burned to the ground — a fate it should share with the Boy Scouts of America and the Chinese Communist Marjorie Taylor Greene, an outspoken Trump supporter in Congress, 'the way corporations have conducted themselves, I've always called it corporate communism.' She has urged government investigations of companies that stopped donations to Republicans after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on Bannon, Trump's campaign chief in 2016, complained to Semafor that only $500 billion of the US government's $4.5 trillion came from corporate taxes. 'Since 2008, $200 billion has gone into stock repurchases. If that had gone into plants and equipment, think what that would have done for the country.'He advocated a 'dramatic increase' in taxes on corporations and the wealthy. 'For getting our guys' taxes cut, we've got to cut spending, which they're gonna resist. Where does the tax revenue come from? Corporations and the wealthy.'Several current policies are not explicitly anti-corporate, but more or less guaranteed to have that Lerner, head of the HOLT analytical service at UBS , points out that in data going back to 1870, the correlation between tariffs and companies' earnings yield (a measure of their core profitability) has been consistent. Tariffs hurt companies. Looking at the cash flow return on investment since 1950, it has risen (meaning companies grew more profitable) directly in line with rises in imports as a proportion of done jointly by Societe Generale Cross-Asset and Bernstein demonstrates that globalization has benefited US companies not only through international sales (40% of revenues for S&P 500 companies) but also through lower costs. In 2001, when China joined the World Trade Organization , the S&P's cost of goods sold accounted for 70% of the revenues generated by selling them. It had been around this level for many years. That has now dropped to 63% — a massive improvement of 7 percentage points in this basic margin. Technology, consumer and industrial firms have gained the most — and stand to lose the most from 2.0 policies so far have redistributed from shareholders to workers. Vincent Deluard, macro strategist at StoneX Financial, points out that the only tax not cut by the One Big Beautiful Bill currently before Congress is corporate income tax. 'The grand bargain of the Big Beautiful Bill is to compensate for the tariffs' inflationary shock with personal income tax cuts,' he says. 'If exchange-rate adjustments, foreigners, and consumers do not pay for tariffs, corporate profits will.'Beyond that, eliminating illegal immigration and restricting foreign students raises labor costs. Threats to tax foreign investments in section 899 of the bill — which now appear likely to be withdrawn — risked reducing capital inflows and make it harder to raise own behavior has contributed to these trends. Over history, their share of GDP has tended to oscillate with the economy, rising when labor organizations' negotiating power is weak. But in this century, their profits grew less susceptible to the economic cycle, surging higher after the Edwards, a macro strategist for SocGen, argues that they pushed through margin-expanding price increases 'under the cover of two key events, namely 1) supply constraints in the aftermath of the Covid pandemic, and 2) commodity cost-push pressures after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.'Margins matter more in an environment where people are conscious of the damage inflation can do to their standard of living. That gave rise to the concept of 'greedflation' — which Edwards thinks is deserved. Politicians have increasingly felt emboldened to intervene in companies' pricing decisions, something that's been off-limits since Richard Nixon's ill-fated price controls in the early 1970s. Kamala Harris proposed 'anti-gouging' policies in her unsuccessful presidential campaign; more recently, Trump forced a climbdown by companies like Amazon that proposed to itemize the impact of tariffs on the prices they to the top of a company never used to be a ladder to mega-wealth. That was reserved for entrepreneurs who founded their own firms. Modern executive pay has changed that and allowed CEOs to become billionaires by meeting unchallenging targets for their share price. The gulf between their pay and workers' wages shrieks of injustice; according to the Economic Policy Institute, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio reached 399-1 in 2021; in 1965, it was only 20-1. From 2019 to 2021, CEO pay rose 30.3% while those workers who kept their jobs through the pandemic got a raise of 3.9%.This can easily be dismissed as the politics of envy, but executive compensation now arguably skews the entire economy. Andrew Smithers, a veteran London-based fund manager and economist, and nobody's idea of a leftist, has long inveighed against the bonus culture, which he holds responsible for a disastrous misallocation of argued that America's problem was 'two decades of underinvestment':The major cause has been a change in the way company managements are paid. The 1990s saw the arrival of the bonus culture, which massively shifted management incentives and thus changed management behavior. Sadly, the change did immense damage to the economy. Managements were encouraged to invest less and, with lower investment, growth argues that companies increased their investment in response to corporate tax cuts in earlier generations, but stopped doing this once executives were paid to prioritize their share price. That led them to cut back on investment, spending money on acquisitions and share buybacks. That dampened growth, but also ensured better returns in the short run for investing in stocks is still primarily a game for those who are already wealthy, this stoked inequality still further. Opposition to high executive pay is often couched as a populist class-warrior position, but there is far more to it than Trump coalition always had anti-corporate elements, but this didn't stop his first administration from delivering for the private sector in a big way. In 2024, Trump added the support of Silicon Valley, and took the oath of office for the second time in front of a serried rank of billionaires. But he's also losing old corporate Koch, the industrialist hated by Democrats as the architect of libertarian Republican policies, has lost patience. After funding Nikki Haley's run against Trump in last year's Republican primaries, he told the Cato Institute earlier this year that too many institutions had lost their libertarian principles, and 'people have forgotten that when principles are lost, so are freedoms.' How will people like Koch respond if the administration clamps down on companies?America's key political developments tend to happen within parties, not between them. The current Republican coalition is no stranger in concept than Lyndon Johnson's Democratic Party of the 1960s, the New Deal coalition that combined multi-racial liberals from the North and West with pro-segregationist whites from the South. Once Johnson decided to choose one wing over the other, with his civil rights acts, that alliance now, the MAGA coalition includes both America's largest corporations and their most trenchant critics. The policy choices of the next few months, and their effects, will determine whether that can continue.
Hans India
4 hours ago
- Hans India
Dreamliner crash exposes India's aviation weak links
India's aviation ambitions are also being undermined by inadequate Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) infrastructure — especially for wide-body aircraft. The Black Box—comprising the Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) — of Air India Flight 171 was recovered on June 13, a day after the crash. The device has suffered extensive damage, and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) lab at Udaan Bhawan, Delhi, will work on retrieving the information. The lab, billed as a ₹9-crore 'state-of-the-art' facility, was inaugurated just two months ago. If it fails to retrieve the data, the Black Box may be sent to the United States for decoding. While major players like Air India Engineering Services Limited (AIESL), GMR Aero Technic, and Tata Advanced Systems have a strong presence in the MRO space, most of their expertise is centered on narrow-body aircraft like the Airbus A320 and Boeing 737. There is a serious shortage of facilities equipped to handle wide-body aircraft and the latest generation of engines. In addition, many existing MROs need major upgrades to meet international standards. Industry insiders also point to a lack of skilled engineers and high import duties on essential spare parts. Indian carriers continue to rely heavily on foreign facilities for major repairs — delaying turnarounds and raising costs. Airframe & Wing Parts: Firms like Aequs, Dynamatic Technologies, Gardner, and Mahindra Aerospace supply parts for the Airbus A320neo, A330neo, and A350 programs. Cargo doors: Tata Advanced Systems manufactures cargo and bulk cargo doors for the A320neo. Rear Fuselage: Dynamatic Technologies has tied up with Deutsche Aircraft to produce the rear fuselage for the D328eco regional turboprop. Helicopter Fuselages: Tata (in partnership with Boeing) is making fuselages for Apache helicopters, while Mahindra Aerostructures is building those for Airbus' H130. Composite Parts: Boeing sources high-end composite parts from its Bengaluru facility to support its global supply chain. India's aircraft components market touched $16.22 billion in 2024 and is projected to nearly double by 2033, propelled by localisation drives, policy support, and growing global partnerships. Over $2 billion worth of components are exported annually to global giants like Airbus and Boeing—thanks to Indian MSMEs and aerospace start-ups. The Dreamliner crash has jolted India's aviation sector out of its comfort zone. As the country aims for the skies, it must further strengthen the ground it takes off from. India Moves Towards Defence Self-Reliance, Cuts Imports, Boosts Exports Traditionally heavily reliant on foreign suppliers for defence equipment, India has significantly reduced its dependence on defence imports over the last 14 years, marking a major shift in its defence strategy and policy.
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
Elon Musk renews criticism of Trump's big bill as it faces key Senate vote
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Elon Musk on Saturday doubled down on his distaste for US President Donald Trump 's sprawling tax and spending cuts bill, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries."The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country," Musk wrote on X on Saturday as the Senate was scheduled to call a vote to open debate on the nearly 1,000-page bill."It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future."The Tesla and SpaceX CEO, whose birthday is also Saturday, later posted that the bill would be "political suicide for the Republican Party".The criticisms reopen a recent fiery conflict between the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency and the administration he recently also represent yet another headache for Republican Senate leaders who have spent the weekend working overtime to get the legislation through their chamber so it can pass by Trump's Fourth of July previously made his opinions about Trump's "big, beautiful bill" after he left the federal government last month with a laudatory celebration in the Oval Office, he blasted the bill as "pork-filled" and a "disgusting abomination"."Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he wrote on X earlier this another post, the wealthy GOP donor who recently forecasted that he'd step back from political donations threatened to fire lawmakers who "betrayed the American people".When Trump clapped back to say he was disappointed with Musk, back-and-forth fighting erupted and quickly escalated. Musk suggested without evidence that Trump, who spent the first part of the year as one of his closest allies, was mentioned in files related to sex abuser Jeffrey ultimately tried to make nice with the administration, saying he regretted some of his posts that "went too far".Trump responded in kind in an interview with The New York Post, saying, "Things like that happen. I don't blame him for anything."It's unclear how Musk's latest broadsides will influence the fragile peace he and the president had enjoyed in recent weeks. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for has spent recent weeks focused on his businesses, and his political influence has waned since he left the the wealthy businessman poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Trump's campaign in 2024, demonstrating the impact his money can have if he's passionate enough about an issue or candidate to restart his political spending.
