Oisin Murphy gets away with a slap on the wrist as BHA refuse to take stronger action
Oisin Murphy seemed pretty relaxed as he greeted a group of photographers who were waiting for him to arrive at Reading Magistrates' Court on Thursday lunchtime.
2
His arrival had been signalled when his driver was spotted peering around a corner to check if the coast was clear. It wasn't.
There was barely a spare seat in the public gallery as Oisin was called into Court 3, where one member of the press raised concerns to the clerk about being able to hear what was being said.
'There are microphones,' he replied. 'And there is nowhere else for you to go, unless you want to go in the dock?'
While many in the racing fraternity would probably enjoy seeing journos up in front of the beak, the moment of levity lasted briefly as we were all here for a very serious reason.
Oisin only spoke to confirm details such as his name and date of birth, and to plead guilty to drink driving after he crashed a Mercedes into a tree just after midnight on April 27.
He was only breathalysed by cops SEVEN hours after the crash, and he was still nearly twice the legal limit at seven in the morning.
It is unclear why he wasn't asked for a plea on the second charge — failing to provide a sample at the roadside — which was described as a 'misunderstanding' by the prosecutor Richard Atkins.
The resulting sentence was a 20-month driving ban and a £70,000 fine. For a very wealthy young jockey who has his own driver, you could argue it's no more than a firm slap on the wrist.
I found it most surprising the BHA, bar adding some new conditions to Oisin's licence and expressing their 'disappointment', have decided to take no further action. For now, at least.
As I mentioned last week, time and again his issues have been brushed under the carpet and others have fallen over themselves to make excuses for him.
A glaring example came on last weekend's Luck On Sunday show, when Jayne McGivern, a stud owner who is overseeing a multi-million pound construction project in Saudia Arabia, gave her view.
She said: 'He's a wonderful guy, an absolute superstar. Jockeys risk their lives every time they get on a horse. We can't possibly understand the pressures.
'He has battled demons and sometimes the demons win. We need more understanding and empathy in this case for Oisin.
'It didn't happen on a racecourse or near a horse. It's his private life and it's nothing to do with us.'
That, in a nutshell, is what's wrong with so many in this sport — especially racing's elite or establishment figures.
They do not take it seriously, many excuse and indulge Oisin and, quite frankly, enable his destructive behaviour.
And Joe Public can't possibly criticise or comment because, well, jockeys are under pressure. Another excuse.
I'm of the view that this 'nothing to see here' attitude sends a message to Oisin that he can keep pushing the limits while retaining all his privilege, which is a very dangerous place to be.
So I'm not sure why the BHA felt it wasn't necessary to take firmer action — I think it's weak and I don't think it's helpful to Oisin.
After all, they were the ones who put conditions on his licence in the first place when he returned from his ban in February 2023 and emphasised the strict requirement to 'remain sober'.
There are plenty of examples out there of tough BHA action but here is one I thought I'd share, for all it's not a perfect comparison.
In 2020, they banned conditional jockey Callum McKinnes for 56 days for a riding offence which the judicial panel said brought racing 'into disrepute'. He was riding a 150-1 shot at Hereford that finished a distant fifth, but they reckon he 'should have finished fourth'.
So not riding with enough vigour to finish fourth on a rank outsider is considered disreputable, but crashing a car while carrying a passenger and nearly twice the drink-drive limit isn't? Hmm.
2
The drama continued after Oisin had left to fly to the US. A member of the public had taken photos of him in court and was hauled into the dock Oisin had just been occupying, given a severe bollocking by the judge and threatened with arrest.
What a circus — which is pretty apt considering the last few years of Oisin's turbulent career.
Commercial content notice: Taking one of the offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. You should be aware brands pay fees to appear in the highest placements on the page. 18+. T&Cs apply. gambleaware.org.
Remember to gamble responsibly
A responsible gambler is someone who:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Elite royal protection cops called in to work Notting Hill Carnival amid growing concerns over event safety
Hundreds of elite cops who usually work protecting the royals and senior politicians are set to be deployed at Notting Hill Carnival this year. The personal protection officers are being brought in over fears of violence or crowd-crushing at the three-day street party. They will work alongside approximately 7,000 Met Police officers at the carnival, which is expected to attract crowds of upwards of two million people, The Telegraph reported. Since many of the officers in the Royal and Specialist Protection (RaSP) command are plain clothes officers, they have had to squeeze into old ill-fitting uniforms or be issued new ones specially for the event. A number have also required training on how to use bodycams, since body-worn video (BWV) is not mandatory in some RaSP roles. The decision to employ the vast majority of the elite officers as 'glorified stewards' has not been received well by those working within these units. One source said: 'They will essentially be working as glorified stewards but they don't have any choice in the matter. It's an order from the top but it could hardly be less welcome.' 'Notting Hill is the least popular job of the year. It's not an exaggeration to say that the vast majority of officers hate working at Notting Hill, even those who do regular public order work. 'The shifts are very long, the conditions are really stressful and it is a pretty thankless role. The crowds seem to get bigger every year and it is extremely difficult to move around.' Nearly 90 per cent of Metropolitan Police officers who responded to a survey last year said they had felt unsafe while working at the annual festival, while 28.78 per cent had been assaulted. Descriptions of working at the event ranged from 'Hell. It's a war zone we are sent into year after year' to 'Dangerous. Officers are treated as lambs to slaughter'. One officer said the police operation was 'overstretched, ineffective and an exercise in self-torture', while another claimed they 'would rather crawl naked through broken glass'. Two million revellers flock to the streets of west London over the August bank holiday weekend every year to enjoy the festival, which is rooted in Caribbean culture. However, the celebration has been marred by serious violence, excessive drinking, drug use and destruction of property. There were two murders, eight stabbings and 349 arrests this year and 61 officers were assaulted, the Metropolitan Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers and carried out the survey, said. However, while much of the focus has been on crime and violence, many top ranking officers also fear a crush scenario given the number of attendees squeezed into a relatively small area. In a report from April 2025, the Met Police's Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist said his biggest fear was 'crowd density and the potential for a mass casualty event.' Susan Hall, the vice chairman of the London Assembly police and crime committee, also claimed that policing the array of pro-Palestine protests had placed an additional burdern on the force. Yesterday Pro-Palestine activists disrupted the London Pride parade, covering a float with red paint - as almost 30 people were arrested for expressing support for the banned Palestine Action group a day after it was banned. Four Youth Demand protesters targeted CISCO's truck as they charged the US-based company with 'genocide' and said they have 'no place' at the event. It comes less than 24 hours after Palestine Action was banned and designated as a terrorist organisation.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Hungarian gang is forging wills to fleece families out of inheritances by posing as the rightful heirs
A criminal gang is stealing Britons' homes shortly after they die by forging wills and posing as the rightful heirs. The fraudsters are exploiting Britain's soft probate system, stealing from both grieving families and taxpayers. A BBC investigation found the gang targets individuals with no immediate family, producing fake wills after they die to falsely claim their estates. They then strip homes of valuables before selling them quickly for below market value to avoid inheritance tax. But the probate service has refused to investigate instances of suspected fraud, saying relatives must challenge such claims through the civil courts – a process that can cost tens of thousands of pounds. Sisters Lisa and Nicole discovered they were entitled to inherit a near £1million house in Wimbledon from their late aunt Christine Harverson, who they had not seen since childhood. But their inheritance was blocked when a Hungarian, Tamas Szvercsok, contacted the probate service with a will dated 2016, describing him as her 'dear friend' and naming him sole executor and beneficiary. Close inspection of the document revealed serious irregularities: Mrs Harverson was housebound in 2016 and being cared for by her husband Dennis, who died in 2020. As co-owner of the Wimbledon property, Mr Harverson's consent would have been required for it to be bequeathed. Also, the address provided for Mr Szvercsok in the will did not exist in 2016. Lisa said: 'There's nothing really we can do. I'm sure they've done it to others, which is really sad. 'Some people haven't got relatives to fight their corner. They're just getting away with making all this money off the dead. It's disgusting.' When someone dies with no known relatives, their estate eventually passes to the Treasury. Before that happens, it appears on a public list known as Bona Vacantia – Latin for 'vacant goods' – allowing anyone with a claim to come forward. Private firms scour the list daily in search of long-lost heirs. If successful, they take a share of the estate, a process featured in the BBC TV daytime series Heir Hunters. Tory ex-minister Sir Bob Neill said digitising the probate system to cut costs had created vulnerabilities being exploited by criminals. 'When you had regional offices you had human scrutiny that was better suited to pick up cases where things went wrong,' he said. 'An automated system isn't good at doing that.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Driver who crashed into primary school killing two eight-year-old girls could face criminal charges two years on - after new witnesses come forward
A woman driver who crashed into a school killing two eight-year-old girls could face criminal charges, two years on – as significant new witnesses have come forward. Police are preparing a file of evidence for prosecutors to consider charges against Claire Freemantle, 48, who had avoided prosecution after saying she had suffered her first ever epileptic seizure at the wheel. The development comes on the second anniversary of Nuria Sajjad and Selena Lau dying after the Land Rover Defender veered off the road and smashed through a fence into The Study Prep School in Wimbledon, south-west London, as children and staff were enjoying an end-of-term tea party. Nine children and three adults were also seriously injured in the crash on the morning of July 6, 2023. Today, the grieving families and community are holding a memorial event to commemorate the girls. In a poignant reminder, Nuria and Selena's classmates marked the end of their time at the prep school on Friday before moving on to secondary education. Ms Freemantle was arrested at the scene and investigated by police. But prosecutors decided not to bring any criminal charges in June 2024 after Ms Freemantle said she had suffered an epileptic seizure. In October, the Mail revealed Met Police had decided to reopen the probe after a serious case review uncovered significant flaws in the way officers conducted the initial inquiry, including consideration of medical evidence which led to the case being dropped. One of the key issues in the original investigation was the diagnosis of epilepsy, which is notoriously difficult to detect without brain scans shortly after a seizure, and a detailed consideration of a patient's medical history. The review is also understood to have been critical of missed opportunities by the original investigation team in the Road Traffic Collisions Unit who failed to interview key witnesses at the scene about the driver's behaviour in the immediate aftermath. The case was subsequently reopened and handed to a top detective superintendent from Specialist Crime Command. Police then made a successful appeal for people who witnessed the crash to come forward to help officers understand whether the driver's behaviour was consistent with her diagnosis. In January, Ms Freemantle was rearrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving. She remains on bail. The bereaved families welcomed the case being reopened 'into the death of our beautiful girls and the harm caused to those injured and who witnessed the tragedy'. Ms Freemantle has said she had no recollection of what happened after losing consciousness. She said last year: 'Since I became aware of the terrible event that took place on July 6, the devastating consequences for all those affected have not left my thoughts and will be with me for the rest of my life. 'I have since been diagnosed as having suffered an epileptic seizure with loss of consciousness. 'This was not a pre-existing condition,' she added. 'As a result of losing consciousness, I have no recollection of what took place.' Met Police said: 'Our thoughts are with Nuria and Selena's loved ones at this time.
