Soviet spacecraft Cosmos 482 crashes without incident into Indian Ocean
The 50-year-old lander probe returned to Earth early Saturday, May 10, entering the atmosphere at about 2:24 a.m. ET (9:24 a.m. Moscow time) over the Indian Ocean west of Jakarta, Indonesia, and falling into the Indian Ocean, the Russian space agency Roscosmos said.
The European Space Agency is monitoring Cosmos 482's uncontrolled descent. The spacecraft was last spotted on radar over Germany between 12:30 a.m. ET and 2:04 a.m. ET.
"We have not received so far any reports on visual direct observations of the final re-entry, or on any impacts on ground," the ESA said.
Skywatching: May 2025 full moon is a flower moon and micromoon. Here's when to see it.
The EU Space Surveillance and Tracking agency said, "Object Cosmos-482 Descent Craft decayed within the last estimated re-entry window."
Scientists had not been concerned about Cosmos 482's return to Earth causing a danger risk to humans because of the craft's small size – about 3 feet in diameter and around 1,190 pounds, Space.com reported.
The space news site reported that Virtual Telescope Project astronomer Gianluca Masi posted an image of the spacecraft as it passed over Rome early May 10. The probe was "visible as a trail entering the field of view from the top and pointing to the bottom right corner," Masi wrote on his website.
Cosmos 482, also known as Kosmos 482, was one of a pair of identical Venus atmospheric lander probes launched by the Soviet Union in 1972. The other spacecraft, Venera 8, arrived at Venus and made scientific measurements of the planet's soil before ceasing operation.
According to NASA, Cosmos 482 suffered an apparent launch malfunction and failed to achieve the velocity needed to reach Venus' atmosphere. Cosmos 482 separated into four pieces, two of which remained in Earth's low orbit and decayed within 48 hours, and the other two pieces went into a higher orbit.
Contributing: Greta Cross, Eric Lagatta and Anthony Robledo, USA TODAY
Mike Snider is a reporter on USA TODAY's Trending team. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
'Jurassic World Rebirth' movie review: Dinos still rule over rickety plot
Over the years, the 'Jurassic Park' movies have settled into a tried-and-true formula: celebrate the dinosaurs, tolerate the humans. With 'Jurassic World Rebirth' (★★½ out of four; rated PG-13; in theaters July 2), that song – specifically, the roar of a hungry T. rex – remains the same, although director Gareth Edwards at least tries something different by throwing a heist movie into the usual perilous adventure. But homages to Steven Spielberg's 1993 original, a starry cast (including Scarlett Johansson, Jonathan Bailey and Oscar winner Mahershala Ali) and dinos aplenty can only do so much when saddled with generic characters and a rickety plot. Join our Watch Party! Sign up to receive USA TODAY's movie and TV recommendations right in your inbox Some time has passed since Chris Pratt and Jeff Goldblum led an epic team-up in 'Jurassic World Dominion.' The planet's environmental conditions have proven unkind to the prehistoric animals unleashed all over the world, while humanity has pretty much lost all interest in these majestic creatures. That's the setup for one heck of a thought-provoking movie but why do that when we can return to a lush remote island (again) for more dangerous shenanigans (again). Shady pharmaceutical guy Martin Krebs (Rupert Friend) is in need of live dino DNA to produce a potential miracle cure for heart disease. He taps covert operative Zora Bennett (Johansson) to lead a team and help paleontologist Henry Loomis (Bailey) to snag some blood from three giant species: one each from land, sea and air. On a boat captained by Zora's good-hearted pal Duncan Kincaid (Ali), they head to a former research facility near the equator – where dinos thrive – and rescue a vacationing family that's been marooned in the Atlantic Ocean by a mosasaur. That ends up complicating the narrative as they separate and 'Rebirth' turns into two movies: Zora and Co. on their genetic mission, and the other folks trying not to get eaten by various toothy critters. One positive to that lack of focus means more screen time with different dinos, which really is the main reason why anybody's going to watch this movie outside of Bailey's new 'Wicked' superfans. Of all the human roles, his Loomis is the only one that seems like someone put some thought into the character. He's a throwback to the days of Sam Neill's Alan Grant, a smart dude who much like the audience sees the dinos for how awesome they are. And they are really cool. The T. rex is back, of course, and gets pretty irked when woken up from a nap. A baby Aquilops named Dolores is the most adorable little thing ever. The mosasaur has henchman spinosaurs – a nice touch – while a titanosaurus couple shares a loving moment (which gets interrupted by some pesky humans). There's also a new big bad dino called the D. rex (or Distortus rex, if you're fancy), a mutated monster that looks like a combo of the Elephant Man and a T. rex. It's got a large set of arms and an extra set of tiny arms to go with its ginormous forehead. Most of the time you'll be rooting for those guys over the humans. (And if you want to see some people get eaten rather viciously, you're in luck!) Edwards has a penchant for large spectacle movies with a big budget and a bigger message (see: 'Godzilla,' 'Rogue One'), and while this 'Rebirth' isn't exactly a thinking man's 'Jurassic,' there's enough B-movie craziness to keep it enjoyable. This franchise probably should have been extinct a while ago. We're stuck with it, though, so might as well go with the pterosaur flow. How to watch 'Jurassic World Rebirth' "Jurassic World Rebirth" is in theaters July 2 and is rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association "for intense sequences of violence/action, bloody images, some suggestive references, language and a drug reference." The six previous "Jurassic" movies are all streaming on Peacock.
Scientific American
7 hours ago
- Scientific American
Russia's Space Program Is Another Casualty of the War in Ukraine
As president, Donald Trump has made no secret of his desire for a U.S. rapprochement with Russia, in distinct contrast with the policies of previous administrations. On June 16, for instance, he called Russia's expulsion from the elite Group of Seven (G7) forum of major advanced economies a 'mistake.' (The nation was expelled in 2014 after it annexed Crimea in Ukraine.) And Trump has been far more lenient than his presidential predecessors in pursuing sanctions on Russia related to its war with Ukraine while also imposing relatively minimal tariffs on the nation as part of his overarching effort to realign global trade. Some experts have speculated that this high-level thaw in U.S.-Russia relations could extend to the nations' cooperation on the high frontier. The U.S. and Russia are already close partners on the International Space Station (ISS); NASA and the Russian space agency, Roscosmos, have worked together for more than 30 years to build and operate the orbital habitat. Despite ongoing geopolitical tensions, in April Roscosmos's director general Dmitry Bakanov and NASA associate administrator for space operations Ken Bowersox met at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan to discuss the status of the ISS partnership, which includes 'cross-flights' of U.S. astronauts on Russian rockets—and vice versa. Soon afterward, NASA confirmed the agencies had coordinated crew changes for upcoming cross-flights and extended the corresponding agreement through 2027. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. 'NASA, Roscosmos and our other international partners remain focused on the continued safe and professional operation of the International Space Station in low-Earth orbit,' a NASA spokesperson tells Scientific American. 'International Space Station cooperation continues smoothly, as it has throughout the continuous presence of our joint crews for nearly 25 years.' Even so, this partnership has an expiration date: NASA's current plan is for the ISS to be abandoned and deorbited by 2031. And apart from the ISS, these days, the two countries have minimal collaboration on space science and exploration. For instance, Russia has been conspicuously absent from the long-simmering U.S. efforts to return astronauts to the moon via NASA's Artemis program. Instead Roscosmos is pursuing an independent plan for robotic and crewed lunar exploration, and in 2021 it announced a partnership with China to construct a crewed moon base. Although neither Russia nor China have been especially forthcoming about the finer details and status of such plans, recent statements from Gennady Krasnikov, president of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), during a general meeting of RAS members at the end of May suggest that Russia is attempting to accelerate its lunar program, which will unfold across multiple missions. 'As for the lunar program, it includes seven lunar missions with various scientific objectives,' Krasnikov said. 'At the first stage of the study, our research works will be based on automatic flights.' Some, if not all, of these missions will target the moon's north and south poles, where significant deposits of water ice have been discovered. 'We also plan to send lunar rovers to study the area and prepare for the placement of a future lunar station,' Krasnikov said. 'This is a large and very important program and, of course, a serious challenge for our academic institutions.' Lev Zelenyi, chief research officer of the Space Research Institute, the leading organization within RAS on space exploration, tells Scientific American he has modest hopes for deeper cooperation between the U.S. and Russia in the space sector. 'Naturally, I see potential and hope that it will be realized in something concrete—although it is difficult to say what it will be yet,' Zelenyi says. 'However, in the case of the Russian lunar program, it is going its own way, and I do not see great prospects for cooperation here.' One potential area ripe for partnership, he adds, is Venus—a world that only the Soviet-era Russian space program has ever managed to land on. It remains a tempting destination for Russia's modern-day interplanetary probes. Bakanov, for example, treats Russia's return there as a foregone conclusion. In a recent Telegram post, he declared, 'We will explore Venus; we are the only country that has landed a device on it.' 'It seems promising to me to resume cooperation in Venus exploration programs,' Zelenyi says. 'Both Russia and the United States have great interest in this planet and have serious programs for its study. In my opinion, a meeting of Russian and American scientists to discuss all these issues would be useful. It could be held under the auspices of our [respective] academies of sciences, as both have their own space councils.' Still, despite such measured optimism, independent analysts of Russia's space activities believe it will be difficult for the nation to resume large-scale cooperation with the U.S. in this domain. In the case of Venus, one obstacle is that the White House has signaled it has other priorities for NASA. For instance, it has proposed to cancel the space agency's two planned Venus-focused missions, and to eliminate NASA's involvement in Envision, a Venus mission led by the European Space Agency (ESA). More broadly, Russia's war in Ukraine remains the chief stumbling block—not only because of the backlash it fostered from the U.S. and European allies but also because the war effort has strained Russia's coffers and distracted its scientific and technical workforce. All this has contributed to recent financial cuts and technical delays for Russia's space program. Vadim Lukashevich, an aerospace expert and a former designer at aerospace design bureau Sukhoi, tells Scientific American that because Russia's modern lunar program was developed before the Russian-Ukrainian war and the associated unprecedented international sanctions on Russia's economy, the planning had assumed active international cooperation, including with NASA. 'The first joint projects of NASA and Roscosmos in lunar orbit were considered possible as early as 2024,' Lukashevich says, referring to NASA's Gateway project, which is meant to be a 'way station' of sorts in high lunar orbit (and which the White House also has targeted for cancellation as part of its sweeping proposed cuts). 'It was expected that Russia had the most serious competencies in the field of creating habitable modules, which, together with a new [crewed] ship and superheavy rocket, would provide Russia with a strategically advantageous role in the international program for the exploration of the moon.' According to Lukashevich and other Russian scientists interviewed for this story, Russia's invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, upended those carefully laid plans, dramatically changing the nation's prospects for near-term progress in space. Now funding cuts and technical problems have curtailed plans for a new crewed spacecraft. Called Orel —Russian for 'eagle'—the project has been officially in development for more than a decade, and its first uncrewed test flight was targeted for 2023. That flight has now slipped to no earlier than 2028—and its intended launch vehicle, a modified Angara-A5 rocket, is still being designed. A similar cascade of delays and cuts is affecting other parts of Russia's space infrastructure, too. The superheavy Yenisei rocket intended for the nation's lunar missions had reached a critical milestone, the approval of its preliminary design, in late 2019. But today Yenisei's development is on hiatus because of a lack of funds, and the projected time frame for the first crewed flight to the moon has receded to an ill-defined target date in the 2030s. And in November 2024 Roscosmos announced that the already approved draft design of Yenisei 'will be finalized at the technical design stage' and that 'flights of Russian cosmonauts to the moon are postponed.' Hoped-for bright spots in this gloomy outlook have failed to materialize. In April 2022 the ESA, responding to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, pulled out of multiple planned Russian robotic lunar missions. In August 2023, under the management of Zelenyi, Russia plowed ahead on its own, launching its robotic Luna-25 lunar lander, but the spacecraft malfunctioned during an orbital maneuver and crashed to the moon's surface. In July 2022 ESA also officially nixed Russia's participation in ExoMars, an ESA-led robotic mission to the Red Planet. To relay ESA's Rosalind Franklin rover to the Martian surface, Roscosmos had been due to deliver a lander called Kazachok; ESA subsequently turned to NASA for a lander, although those plans are now in question because of the White House's proposed cuts to NASA's budget, and the mission is unlikely to launch before 2028. The demonstrable diminution of Russia's space-exploration capabilities and plans makes the nation's need for partnerships all the more urgent—and, some analysts say, all the harder to come by because Russia seemingly has less to offer potential partners. This is a departure from previous eras in which Russia's prowess with rocketry and space stations enticed even the U.S., its cold war adversary, into multiple human spaceflight collaborations, with the jointly operated ISS as the relationship's crown jewel. And back then, even if the U.S. had been unable or unwilling to partner with Russia in support of its peaceful space activities, a more subtle partnership was inescapable because some workhorse U.S. rockets relied upon Russian-made engines. Now, however, that's no longer the case, says Pavel Koshkin, a senior research fellow at the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies. 'While the program of cross-flights to the ISS still exists, the United States abandoned Russian RD-180 engines for its Atlas V launch vehicles in 2024, finding a domestic alternative to them of its own production,' Koshkin says. 'And this trend is unlikely to change in the near future despite Trump's favorable attitude towards Russia.'
Scientific American
8 hours ago
- Scientific American
See Earth's Forests as Never Before in Biomass Satellite's First Images
Just two months after its launch, the European Space Agency (ESA) Biomass satellite is already showing us Earth in a whole new light. On June 23 the ESA released the mission's first images, which showcase its unique capability to peer through dense vegetation to study our planet's forests and other ecosystems as never before. Using cutting-edge radar technologies, the satellite is on a five-year mission to survey forests across sprawling swaths of the globe, looking beneath their canopies to accurately assess their total woody biomass—trunks, limbs, stems, and so on. By measuring all that material and how it's changing over time, scientists can better monitor deforestation trends and track the flow of carbon through ecosystems to enhance our understanding of Earth's rapidly changing climate. The satellite is still in its six-month-long commissioning phase, but now we have a taste of what is to come. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The image shown above displays a section of the Amazon rainforest in Bolivia with the Beni River meandering through. Each color represents a different ecosystem feature: black for rivers and lakes, pink for wetlands and floodplains, green for rainforests, and purple for grasslands. The World Resources Institute's Global Forest Review ranks Bolivia among the top 10 countries with the most tree cover loss between 2001 and 2024. During this time, Bolivia lost the equivalent of 15 percent of the total forest cover it had in 2000, in large part to encroaching agricultural plots and cattle ranches. These images and their associated data can help researchers keep careful tabs on deforestation and its impacts on local and global ecosystems. The image below highlights the satellite's power by comparing its observations with those gathered by a Biomass predecessor, ESA's Copernicus Sentinel-2 mission, in the same location. The new pictures represent a significant increase in detail that is primarily owed to Biomass's main instrument: the P-band synthetic aperture radar. P-band radio waves are longer than others more typically used in such radar systems, allowing them to pass through layers of foliage, soil and other materials to create accurate three-dimensional maps of otherwise hidden landscape features. Because of engineering challenges as well as diplomatic ones, this is the first time P-band radar has been used in orbital Earth observations—the P-band radio frequency is typically reserved for American and European missile-detection systems. (In order to ensure it will not interfere with the U.S. Department of Defense's space-object-tracking radar systems, Biomass will not observe North and Central America, Europe, and some Arctic regions.) The next three images below demonstrate just how deep the P-band radar can go. They display topographic features of rainforests in Indonesia, the Sahara Desert in Chad and the Transantarctic Mountains adjacent to the Nimrod Glacier in Antarctica, respectively. Pictured above is Indonesia's mountainous Halmahera rainforest, featuring rugged topography shaped by outpourings from the numerous volcanoes that pockmark the region. One of them, the active volcano Mount Gamalama, can be seen off the coast on the far left. Though the main goal of the Biomass satellite is to catalog forests, it will also study other environments. Above is a portion of the Tibesti Mountains situated in the central Sahara Desert in northern Chad. Able to map features as far as five meters beneath dry sand, the satellite can reveal ancient geologic details, such as dried-up riverbeds and lakes, now buried below the Sahara's ever-shifting dunes. These data can help researchers understand past ecological changes in such regions—and could even help unearth hidden pockets of precious groundwater in arid, remote deserts. Biomass can also penetrate into ice, pictured below, and collect information about ice-sheet structure and movement that could be used to better understand what controls the slide of glaciers into the sea. Below, another image features jungle-covered terrain in Gabon and prominently displays the Ivindo River, which nurtures the surrounding rainforest. The predominantly green color of the image indicates dense vegetal growth—a sign of a healthy rainforest. The final image shown here, below, is the very first one the satellite produced. It displays a portion of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, highlighting the topography of the region alongside features such as rivers, wetlands and grasslands. Only a small portion of the vast Amazon has been studied in-depth and on the ground. This is largely because of its scale and the associated difficulty of reaching some of its most remote regions. Innovative satellites like Biomass could greatly increase our knowledge of these overlooked places and similar ones around the world, helping researchers better understand—and protect—our changing planet and its myriad beautiful ecosystems.
