Trump Eyes Cuts to Top Spy Agency as He Sweeps Aside Iran Intel
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump is pressing ahead with plans to slash staff at the top US spy agency, determined to act at a time when he's openly challenged its director and rejected intelligence findings that contradict his public statements.
Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares
US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs
Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined
Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown
Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center
Trump has openly discussed dismantling the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, including when he nominated Tulsi Gabbard to lead it, according to people familiar with the situation, who asked not to be identified discussing private matters. He's floated the idea again more recently, they said.
Trump and members of his cabinet also appear to be pushing Gabbard to the sideline to work with Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe on intelligence matters instead, other people familiar with the matter said.
The deliberations to cut ODNI were already in motion before Trump rejected Gabbard's assessment that Iran wasn't actively seeking a nuclear bomb and then clashed with the intelligence community this week over early findings that suggested his strike on the country's nuclear sites didn't fully destroy them.
The White House denied Gabbard is being sidelined.
'President Trump has full confidence in his entire exceptional national security team,' White House spokesman Steven Cheung said. 'DNI Gabbard is an important member of the President's team and her work continues to serve him and this country well.'
Gabbard has already reduced staff by about 25% and has been in discussions for months with Congress to map out deeper cuts, another one of the people said. The former Democratic Congresswoman won Senate backing for the job in February in part due to her pledges to slim down the organization.
Many of those existing departures at ODNI were part of Elon Musk's cost-cutting efforts with staff opting into buyouts, two of the people said. The reduction includes both ODNI officers and detailees who will be returned to their home agencies.
Officials from both parties concede that the ODNI has become too bloated over the years and that the agency often duplicates work carried out by the independent intelligence agencies it oversees. At Gabbard's confirmation hearing in January, Senator Tom Cotton, a Republican from Arkansas who leads the intelligence committee, said the agency's staff are 'measured in the thousands, when it should be measured in the dozens, maybe a few hundred.'
On Friday, Cotton introduced legislation that would cap ODNI staff at 650. While exact staffing is classified, that's a third of the estimated 2,000 people it's believed to employ now.
'Created after the September 11th attacks, ODNI was intended to be a lean organization to align America's intelligence resources and authorities, not the overstaffed and bureaucratic behemoth that it is today, where coordinators coordinate with other coordinators,' Cotton said in a statement.
Listen: Here's Why Iran's Unaccounted for Uranium Worries Experts
In recent weeks, Trump has said Gabbard and the intelligence community were 'wrong' about the assessment that Iran wasn't seeking a nuclear weapon. She later said she and the president were on the same page, pointing to her previous comments that Iran's enriched uranium had reached unprecedented levels.
Gabbard also didn't participate in an administration briefing to lawmakers on the Iran strikes this week, according to Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat. A senior administration official declined to comment on why she didn't attend the Iran briefing but said the media was turning the issue into something it wasn't.
That briefing came about after the White House slammed the leak of a preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency that said strikes on Iran's nuclear facility may not have been as extensive as Trump claimed. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X Tuesday that the intelligence finding of limited impact was 'flat-out wrong.'
The confrontation with the intelligence community has echoes of Trump's first term when his antagonistic comments were largely driven by the agencies' warnings that Russia meddled in the 2016 election in his favor. He accused the 'deep state' of being 'weaponized' against him and his allies. In 2018, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin over his own agencies' assessments of Moscow's election interference.
Gabbard has had her own clashes with the intelligence community and has sought to root out 'politicization' by referring intelligence officers for prosecution over alleged leaks of classified information. Two top officials from the National Intelligence Council were reportedly fired in May after the release of a declassified memo that contradicted Trump's basis for deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members.
'The contentious relationship never went away,' Larry Pfeiffer, a former senior CIA officer now leading the Michael V. Hayden Center at George Mason University, said of Trump. 'He just does not fundamentally trust people in the intel community. He thinks they're out to get him.'
Unlike with the National Security Council — which the White House dramatically shrank overnight in May — Trump could face challenges in unilaterally closing down ODNI which was created by Congress after intelligence failures following the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Jane Harman, a former Democratic congresswoman from California who helped lead the legislation that established ODNI in 2004, said she would welcome 'an intelligent effort' to reform the size of the staff, but warned that being able to coordinate across government was particularly important in the aftermath of Trump's strikes on Iran.
'We need the biggest lens we could have with different disciplines all working and coordinated together,' she said. 'Having a way to connect the dots is still valid.'
America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried
How to Steal a House
Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push
Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1
Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NC Republican Sen. Thom Tillis says he won't vote for Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican, broke with his party Saturday and said he would not support the federal 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' the sweeping budget package that would enact much of President Donald Trump's agenda. In a statement, Tillis cited the bill's expected impacts on Medicaid and rural hospitals as key reasons for his decision. 'I did my homework on behalf of North Carolinians, and I cannot support this bill in its current form. It would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities,' Tillis' statement read. 'This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population.' The Huntersville resident, a former speaker of the state House first elected to the U.S. Senate in 2014, is running for a third term. He has mostly — though not always — avoided publicly breaking with Trump this year. His vote on Trump's top legislative priority is sure to be an issue in 2026, both in a Republican primary election and in a general election against a Democrat. The Senate is set to consider the Trump-backed bill this weekend after releasing it Friday evening. Tillis told reporters he would vote against a procedural measure to advance the bill, as well as the bill itself, NBC News reported. The House approved its own version of the bill last month. The Senate's version of the bill would need to be approved by the House before it heads to Trump's desk. Trump has said he wants the bill finalized by July 4. The key goal of the bill is to cut taxes, as tax breaks approved during Trump's first term expire later this year, the Associated Press reported. The bill would also provide billions of dollars for the president's immigration and border agendas, including deportations. In order to pay for many of the bill's proposals, the AP reported, the measure would enact cuts on several longstanding government programs — including Medicaid. The House's version of the bill included less severe cuts to Medicaid, but would still leave more than 10 million people without health care coverage, the AP reported. That includes more than 260,000 in North Carolina, according to one estimate. In a June 12 letter to Trump, House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune — all Republicans — Senate Democrats cited data from the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at UNC-Chapel Hill to show that five rural hospitals in North Carolina could be at risk of closing under the bill's proposed cuts to Medicaid. 'There is a lot for North Carolinians to love about the rest of the One Big Beautiful Bill, including extending the historic Trump Tax Cuts, increasing the child tax credit, providing historic funding for border security, and ending wasteful spending,' Tillis said Saturday. 'We can and must accomplish this without hurting our rural communities and hospitals, and without jeopardizing access to care for hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians who need it the most.' Ken Martin, chair of the Democratic National Committee, told The News & Observer this week that the bill would cost North Carolina billions in federal funding and potentially see hundreds of thousands in the state lose their insurance coverage. 'As it relates to health care access throughout this state ... it's going to be harder for people, particularly in the rural parts of North Carolina to find hospitals and clinics to actually get their health care,' Martin said. Martin also identified Tillis as 'one of the most vulnerable Senate Republicans.' Tillis' counterpart, Sen. Ted Budd, also a North Carolina Republican, said he would vote in favor of the procedural step to move the bill forward to floor debate. 'I support moving to debate on the One Big Beautiful Bill because it includes major reforms to slow the ballooning cost of government programs and root out waste, fraud, and abuse,' Budd said on X. 'There's more work to be done, but I strongly agree with President Trump that we must unleash America's full economic potential.' At the state level, Senate leader Phil Berger, an Eden Republican, said on X Saturday he supports the bill and that 'the legislature will work through any implementation issues.' Politics reporter Kyle Ingram contributed to this report.
Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Taiwan Says ‘Constructive Progress' Made in US Trade Talks
Taiwan said it's made 'constructive progress' in a second round of trade talks with the US, which are aimed at avoiding tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. 'It is believed that constructive progress has been made in the negotiations so far,' said an official Taiwanese statement on Sunday. The talks were held in recent days in Washington, it said.
CBS News
37 minutes ago
- CBS News
San Francisco's Crane Cove Park playgrounds back on track after nonprofit scandal
After weeks of uncertainty and disappointment, there's finally good news for families in the Dogpatch neighborhood. The long-promised playgrounds and a dog park at Crane Cove Park are finally moving forward, despite a financial scandal that nearly derailed the project. Located at 18th and Illinois Streets near the Chase Center, Crane Cove Park opened in 2020 with plans for two children's play areas and a dedicated dog park. But last month, residents were stunned to learn that most of the private donations meant to fund those amenities had been mismanaged by the San Francisco Parks Alliance, a prominent nonprofit that works closely with the city on public space initiatives. The revelation left many neighbors frustrated and skeptical, including RJ Andrews, a nearby resident and father of two young children. "Initially, it was a reaction of suspicion because it's taken so long to develop," Andrews said. "We were concerned that the fences would go up and nothing would happen." The Parks Alliance had received a $3 million donation from the Baker Street Foundation, a philanthropic group led by board member Nicola Miner and her family, specifically earmarked for the Crane Cove improvements. While nearly $1 million of that was transferred to the Port of San Francisco, the nonprofit admitted that it spent the remainder on its own operating expenses. The disclosure and other concerning financial revelations triggered investigations by both the San Francisco City Attorney and District Attorney. The Parks Alliance has since ceased operations. Despite the setback, the Port of San Francisco has confirmed that construction on the promised amenities is now officially underway. Two playgrounds — one for toddlers, the other for older children — are in progress, along with a fenced dog park. According to Port Communications Director Eric Young, the project is now expected to cost $2.51 million, less than originally projected. With $975,000 already received from the Parks Alliance, the Port plans to fund the remaining $1.54 million internally. "The project is underway," Young said in a written statement. "The Port is reviewing capital budgets to identify where we can reprogram funds to complete the kids and dogs play areas at the park. We are working closely with the City Attorney's Office and city partners to assess our legal and financial options. Staff will return in July to the Port Commission to discuss tradeoffs and next steps as we ensure the park improvements are delivered." Port staff are expected to present the funding source to the commissioners at their July 8 meeting. Miner expressed relief at the update. "I think it's fantastic. I can't believe it. It's amazing that the Port still held strong to its mission," she said. "I am really happy in how San Francisco responded. It was actually better than I expected." For Andrews and his family, including a newborn daughter, the timing couldn't be better. "She'll be maybe one of the first and youngest patrons of the new playgrounds," he said. "Sometimes, dreams do come true." Other residents shared in the optimism. "The fact that there's some more things that are geared toward little ones like Mason is just extremely exciting to us," said local resident Gerry Mudjer, referring to his eight-month-old son. "I think we'll be here a lot more often because of it." "I don't think there's a lot of dog parks in this area generally. There's a beach. They have public access, but [the dogs] don't really have their own specific place to play. So it'll be nice to have a contained area where you know you can let them off leash," added Savannah Schulze, a dog owner. Construction fencing and groundwork are already visible at the site, a promising sign for neighbors who feared the project might be abandoned. The Port hopes to complete the playgrounds and dog park by February 2026, with a possibility of opening as soon as the end of this year.
