Runner Moira Harding won't return to Comrades
The 54-year-old spent several days in hospital undergoing intensive treatment, and was eventually discharged after making what was described as a miraculous recovery.
Towards the end of June, The South African revealed that Harding has made encouraging recovery progress in her recovery, while she has confirmed to IOL that she has no plans to return to run the famed the endurance race again next year.
'I went missing at the end of the Comrades Marathon and was found 15 hours later, unconscious and unresponsive due to severe dehydration and extremely low sodium levels resulting in disorientation and delirium,' she explained in an emotional personal message posted on a runners community group.
Harding also shared a debt of gratitude to all those who assisted, supported and cared for her during 'one of the toughest moments' of her life.
'I would like to sincerely thank all those who supported me and prayed for me when I went missing… Your love and prayers carried me through one of the toughest moments of my life.'
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Smartphones may threaten children's mental health, advocates warn
Smartphone-Free Childhood SA (SFC-SA), a parent-led initiative, is calling for a more cautious and intentional approach to digital access during childhood, as a global study warns of serious mental health risks associated with early smartphone use in children. This follows the release of a comprehensive international study published in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, which analysed data from over 100 000 individuals across more than 160 countries. The study found that children who received smartphones before the age of 13 were significantly more likely to experience mental health challenges in early adulthood, including anxiety, depression, emotional instability, aggression, and social withdrawal. The research also highlights social media as the biggest contributing factor, accounting for 40% of the link between early smartphone ownership and declining mental health. Other contributors include disrupted sleep (12%), strained family relationships (13%), and cyberbullying (10%). SFC-SA's Claire Thompson tells Saturday Star that the findings should serve as a wake-up call for South African families. 'Children between 10 and 16 are in a critical stage of brain development. The emotional centres of the brain are in overdrive while impulse control and reasoning are still under construction. Giving them unfiltered access to the digital world during this time can be incredibly destabilising.' Thompson warns that smartphones, particularly when unsupervised, expose children to psychological stressors and inappropriate content they are not equipped to process. 'Being excluded from a group chat or receiving fewer likes on a post may seem minor, but for a child, it can feel like deep rejection. They don't yet have the tools to manage that kind of feedback.' She added that the dangers go beyond emotional strain. 'We've seen children stumble upon explicit content or fall prey to online predators. These are risks that require maturity and guidance to navigate safely.' In response, SFC-SA is advocating for community-wide support in delaying smartphone ownership, implementing digital literacy programs, and encouraging policies that protect young minds. The movement is part of a growing global push to reconsider how and when children are introduced to technology. 'Smartphones aren't going anywhere, but how we integrate them into our children's lives is still within our control. We're not anti-technology, we're pro-childhood.' As awareness of the issue spreads, the organisation aims to reshape the conversation around kids and tech, focusing on mental health, developmental readiness, and safer digital habits for the next generation. Lerato Ntwampe, an admitted attorney of the High Court involved with the movement, shares her insights from her interactions with schoolchildren. 'I think one of my biggest concerns when I engage with schoolchildren during talks is how unaware many of them are about the range of online harms that exist. It's not that they don't know these things happen; many are aware, but they don't always understand the legal implications. Some of these online behaviours are not just harmful; they're illegal. This includes hate speech, cyberbullying, sexting, and the sharing of child sexual abuse material (commonly referred to as child pornography in South Africa), and how this content is often circulated on WhatsApp groups and platforms like Instagram and TikTok. ' One parent, wishing to remain anonymous, voiced her agreement with SFC-SA and shared her own struggles in navigating smartphone access for her 10-year-old son. 'I've allowed my son to have a smartphone out of fear of him feeling left out among his peers. However, I implemented the Google Family Link app to monitor his usage,' she shares. Yet, she laments that technical issues have rendered her efforts ineffective, leaving her son free to explore the digital world without limitations. A teacher from a phone-free primary school in the Free State expressed her support for the cause stating, 'In my classroom, I recently used the topic 'At what age should a child get a smartphone?' for a speaking assessment. My aim was to encourage students to engage with their parents while also exploring factual information from credible studies. I hoped parents would take notice of the compelling research surrounding smartphone usage among children.' [email protected] Saturday Star
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa's breastfeeding crisis: key reasons behind the decline and solutions for our babies
Breastfeeding isn't just about nutrition. As the Department of Health explains, it protects babies against infections, reduces the risk of obesity and type 1 diabetes, and even shields mothers from certain cancers and chronic diseases. Image: Serdi Nam /pexels There's something quietly powerful about breastfeeding. It's nature's golden elixir, a living substance scientists still can't replicate. Yet, as World Breastfeeding Week (WBW) reminds us each August, South Africa finds itself on the back foot, and babies could pay the highest price. While global exclusive breastfeeding rates have seen modest growth, South Africa's numbers have moved in the wrong direction. The country's exclusive breastfeeding rate dropped from 32% in 2016 to just 22% in 2024, according to the Department of Health. It's a worrying trend, especially when you consider the World Health Assembly's goal of at least 50% by 2025 and 70% by 2030. And unless real change happens beyond slogans and billboards, experts say we won't get there. Breastfeeding isn't just about nutrition. As the Department of Health explains, it protects babies against infections, reduces the risk of obesity and type 1 diabetes, and even shields mothers from certain cancers and chronic diseases. 'Breastfeeding is not just about reaching country and global targets, but also about supporting infant health and development, as well as maternal well-being,' said Dr Lynn Moeng-Mahlangu, chief director of Health Promotion, at the department panel in 2023. Yet despite these benefits, South African mothers are turning away from exclusive breastfeeding earlier than ever before. breastfeeding is not an isolated decision. It is influenced by the social and structural fabrics surrounding new mothers. Image: pexels Why are mothers stopping breastfeeding? According to Chantell Witten, health systems director at iLifa Labantwana, the reasons run deeper than 'lack of information'. Speaking to the "Daily Maverick", Witten said it's about lack of support at every level: from workplaces that don't give mothers time and space to express milk, to formula companies whose marketing quietly chips away at mothers' confidence. 'Given the lack of maternity protection and stable employment opportunities, South African mothers are not protected to enjoy a successful breastfeeding journey,' Witten explained. 'The insidious marketing of formula through health professionals undermines government efforts to promote, support and protect breastfeeding.' Formula marketing isn't a new challenge, but digital platforms have supercharged it. And for families struggling financially, formula can feel like a convenient solution, even if it isn't the healthiest one. Lactation issues Insufficient milk supply: Mothers may perceive that they are not producing enough milk to satisfy their baby. Painful nipples: Sore or cracked nipples can make breastfeeding uncomfortable and lead to early cessation. Infant refusal to breastfeed: Some infants may go through periods of refusing to breastfeed, known as "nursing strikes". Concerns about infant satisfaction: Mothers may worry that their baby is not getting enough milk or not being satisfied by breast milk alone. Need to take medication: Some medications are not compatible with breastfeeding, requiring mothers to stop or supplement with formula. Maternal illness: Mothers may need to stop breastfeeding due to their own health issues or postpartum depression. Social and support factors Unsupportive work policies: Lack of access to private lactation rooms or flexible work schedules can make it difficult to continue breastfeeding at work. Breastfeeding is a shared responsibility The Department of Health, supported by WHO, UNICEF, and organisations like the South African Breastmilk Reserve (SABR), emphasises that exclusive breastfeeding shouldn't rest only on mothers' shoulders. Fathers, grandparents, employers, communities, and even policymakers all play critical roles. Creating truly supportive environments means maternity leave that actually lasts, safe places to breastfeed in public, and workplaces that see breastfeeding not as a disruption, but as an investment in the next generation's health. The theme of World Breastfeeding Week 2025, 'Prioritise Breastfeeding: Create Sustainable Support Systems', isn't just a slogan. It's a call to build systems that protect mothers from pressure, shame, and misinformation. Malnutrition As breastfeeding rates fall, South Africa faces an alarming surge in childhood malnutrition. The Department of Health notes rising rates of stunting, wasting, and overweight in children under five. The irony? Breastfeeding could help prevent these outcomes. Globally, UNICEF reports that breastfed children have at least a sixfold greater chance of survival in the first months of life compared to non-breastfed infants. Yet, here at home, we still risk missing out on these life-saving benefits. Education campaigns alone aren't enough. Dr Moeng-Mahlangu has called for new strategies to encourage mothers to breastfeed exclusively for six months, and to continue up to at least 12 months. Breastfeeding saves lives, builds healthier children, and safeguards mothers. As we observe World Breastfeeding Week, it is vital that we engage with what should be seen as a public health crisis that matters to us all. Image: Anna Shvets /pexels This could mean everything from paid maternity leave to community-based peer support groups and better training for health workers to tackle formula marketing head-on. 'We need to move beyond awareness to real, structural change,' she emphasised. Breastfeeding isn't an individual choice made in a vacuum. It happens or doesn't because of the world we build around new mothers. South Africa's breastfeeding numbers aren't just statistics. They're a mirror reflecting how well or how poorly we support the earliest, most fragile months of life. Breastfeeding saves lives, builds healthier children, and protects mothers. And maybe, as World Breastfeeding Week reminds us, that's the real crisis we should all care about
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Smartphones may threaten children's mental health, advocates warn
Smartphone-Free Childhood SA (SFC-SA), a parent-led initiative, is calling for a more cautious and intentional approach to digital access during childhood, as a global study warns of serious mental health risks associated with early smartphone use in children. This follows the release of a comprehensive international study published in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, which analysed data from over 100 000 individuals across more than 160 countries. The study found that children who received smartphones before the age of 13 were significantly more likely to experience mental health challenges in early adulthood, including anxiety, depression, emotional instability, aggression, and social withdrawal. The research also highlights social media as the biggest contributing factor, accounting for 40% of the link between early smartphone ownership and declining mental health. Other contributors include disrupted sleep (12%), strained family relationships (13%), and cyberbullying (10%). SFC-SA's Claire Thompson tells Saturday Star that the findings should serve as a wake-up call for South African families. 'Children between 10 and 16 are in a critical stage of brain development. The emotional centres of the brain are in overdrive while impulse control and reasoning are still under construction. Giving them unfiltered access to the digital world during this time can be incredibly destabilising.' Thompson warns that smartphones, particularly when unsupervised, expose children to psychological stressors and inappropriate content they are not equipped to process. 'Being excluded from a group chat or receiving fewer likes on a post may seem minor, but for a child, it can feel like deep rejection. They don't yet have the tools to manage that kind of feedback.' She added that the dangers go beyond emotional strain. 'We've seen children stumble upon explicit content or fall prey to online predators. These are risks that require maturity and guidance to navigate safely.' In response, SFC-SA is advocating for community-wide support in delaying smartphone ownership, implementing digital literacy programs, and encouraging policies that protect young minds. The movement is part of a growing global push to reconsider how and when children are introduced to technology. 'Smartphones aren't going anywhere, but how we integrate them into our children's lives is still within our control. We're not anti-technology, we're pro-childhood.' As awareness of the issue spreads, the organisation aims to reshape the conversation around kids and tech, focusing on mental health, developmental readiness, and safer digital habits for the next generation. Lerato Ntwampe, an admitted attorney of the High Court involved with the movement, shares her insights from her interactions with schoolchildren. 'I think one of my biggest concerns when I engage with schoolchildren during talks is how unaware many of them are about the range of online harms that exist. It's not that they don't know these things happen; many are aware, but they don't always understand the legal implications. Some of these online behaviours are not just harmful; they're illegal. This includes hate speech, cyberbullying, sexting, and the sharing of child sexual abuse material (commonly referred to as child pornography in South Africa), and how this content is often circulated on WhatsApp groups and platforms like Instagram and TikTok.' One parent, wishing to remain anonymous, voiced her agreement with SFC-SA and shared her own struggles in navigating smartphone access for her 10-year-old son. 'I've allowed my son to have a smartphone out of fear of him feeling left out among his peers. However, I implemented the Google Family Link app to monitor his usage,' she shares. Yet, she laments that technical issues have rendered her efforts ineffective, leaving her son free to explore the digital world without limitations. A teacher from a phone-free primary school in the Free State expressed her support for the cause stating, 'In my classroom, I recently used the topic 'At what age should a child get a smartphone?' for a speaking assessment. My aim was to encourage students to engage with their parents while also exploring factual information from credible studies. I hoped parents would take notice of the compelling research surrounding smartphone usage among children.' Saturday Star
