USDA withdraws plan to limit salmonella levels in raw poultry
The department on Thursday said it was withdrawing a rule proposed in August after three years of development. Officials with the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service cited feedback from more than 7,000 public comments and said they would 'evaluate whether it should update' current salmonella regulations.
The rule would have required poultry companies to keep levels of salmonella bacteria under a certain threshold and test for the presence of six strains most associated with illness, including three found in turkey and three in chicken. If the levels exceeded the standard or any of those strains were found, the poultry couldn't be sold and would be subject to recall, the proposal had said.
Advertisement
3 After three years of development, the Agriculture Department said it was withdrawing a rule proposed in August on limiting salmonella bacteria.
manjurul – stock.adobe.com
The plan aimed to reduce an estimated 125,000 salmonella infections from chicken and 43,000 from turkey each year, according to USDA. Overall, salmonella causes 1.35 million infections a year, most through food, and about 420 deaths, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The withdrawal drew praise from the National Chicken Council, an industry trade group, which said the proposed rule was legally unsound, misinterpreted science, would have increased costs and create more food waste, all 'with no meaningful impact on public health.'
'We remain committed to further reducing salmonella and fully support food safety regulations and policies that are based on sound science,' said Ashley Peterson, the group's senior vice president of science and regulatory affairs.
Advertisement
3 The rule would have required poultry companies to keep levels of salmonella bacteria under a certain threshold and test for the presence of six strains most associated with illness, with some found in chicken and turkey.
didesign – stock.adobe.com
But the move drew swift criticism from food safety advocates, including Sandra Eskin, a former USDA official who helped draft the plan.
The withdrawal 'sends the clear message that the Make America Healthy Again initiative does not care about the thousands of people who get sick from preventable foodborne salmonella infections linked to poultry,' Eskin said in a statement.
Advertisement
The proposed rule had been regarded as a food safety victory similar to a 1994 decision to ban certain strains of dangerous E. coli bacteria from ground beef after deadly outbreaks, said Sarah Sorscher, of the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
3 'Make no mistake: Shipping more salmonella to restaurants and grocery stores is certain to make Americans sicker,' Sarah Sorscher, of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said.
AP
'Make no mistake: Shipping more salmonella to restaurants and grocery stores is certain to make Americans sicker,' Sorscher said.
Advertisement
Earlier this month, the USDA said it would delay by six months the enforcement of a final rule regulating salmonella levels in certain breaded and stuffed raw chicken products. Enforcement, which was set for May 1, now begins Nov. 3.
That covers foods such as frozen chicken cordon bleu and chicken Kiev dishes that appear to be fully cooked but are only heat-treated to set the batter or coating. Such products have been linked to at least 14 salmonella outbreaks and at least 200 illnesses since 1998, according to the CDC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Why many women over age 52 have a higher risk of getting STIs
STIs are on the rise — but it's not just frat bros and free-lovers feeling the burn. While younger people still account for the majority of cases, studies show that some of the steepest spikes are happening in people 55 and up. Experts have offered several explanations for the surge, but research suggests there's a risk factor affecting many midlife and older women that has largely flown under the radar and could be playing a key role. Advertisement 4 More Americans are having sex in their senior years thanks to advancements in medicine. Monkey Business – More than a million American women hit menopause each year — and it's not just hot flashes and mood swings they're facing. The transition, which wraps up around age 52 on average, marks the end of reproductive years and is driven by a drop in estrogen as the ovaries slow hormone production. While vaginal dryness and loss of elasticity are well-known symptoms, research from Ohio State University (OSU) shows that menopause can also weaken the vaginal tissue itself, making it more prone to tearing. Advertisement That vulnerability comes down to changes at the cellular level. The vagina's surface is made up of multiple layers held together by key proteins like desmoglein-1 (DSG1) and desmocollin-1 (DSC1). 'These proteins strengthen the vaginal lining and restrict pathogen access to deeper tissue, reducing the risk of infection,' Dr. Thomas L. Cherpes, associate professor of otolaryngology at OSU, wrote in The Conversation. Advertisement 4 Menopause can bring a host of uncomfortable symptoms, including vaginal changes. – In their research, Cherpes and his colleagues found that postmenopausal women have significantly lower levels of DSG1 and DSC1 than women who haven't gone through the transition. To see how this might impact infection risk, the researchers removed the ovaries of mice in a lab to mimic estrogen loss in postmenopausal women. Compared to mice with intact ovaries, those without had far lower levels of DSG1 and DSC1 in their vaginal tissue. Advertisement The team also found that these mice were more vulnerable to infection with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), which causes genital herpes. They were less able to clear chlamydia infections from the lower genital tract as well. The findings help explain why postmenopausal women are more susceptible to STIs than their younger counterparts. Notably, when Cherpes and his colleagues applied estrogen cream to the mice without ovaries, it restored the vaginal lining's integrity and fully protected them from HSV-2 infection. 4 The vaginal tissue is more vulnerable to tearing after menopause, opening the door to infection. megaflopp – 'While additional research is needed, findings from our lab suggest that estrogen-containing compounds used to relieve vaginal irritation and other symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause can also reduce susceptibility to STIs among older adults,' Cherpes wrote. Sex doesn't stop — and neither do the risks Americans might not like to talk about it, but older adults are still very much having sex. A 2018 survey found nearly 40% of people aged 65 to 80 are sexually active, and almost two-thirds remain interested in sex. Advertisement More recent AARP data shows that 26% of 60- to 69-year-olds and 17% of those 70 and older have sex weekly. 'Hormone-replacement therapy, vaginal lubricants and the approval of sildenafil (Viagra) and its relatives have extended people's sex lives,' Dr. Sandra Adamson Fryhofer told the American Medical Association. But while more people are living longer and staying sexually active, more are also paying the price. 4 Sex-crazed seniors are fueling a major spike in STIs nationwide. David – Advertisement 'Rates are highest in the under 25 age group, which accounts for about 50% of STIs, but we're definitely seeing a rise in infections in the older population, particularly in people over 65,' Dr. Angelina Gangestad said in an interview with University Hospitals. Between 2010 and 2023, the number of Americans over 65 diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis rose by roughly three-, five- and sevenfold, respectively, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Research also suggests women over 50 are at greater risk for HIV than their younger peers. Advertisement In addition to the effects of menopause, experts say several other factors are likely fueling the rise. Condom use is significantly lower among older adults compared to younger people. One study found that just 3% of Americans aged 60 and older have used a condom in the past year. Older adults also tend to have less knowledge about STIs, including how they spread, what symptoms look like and how to prevent them. Advertisement To make matters worse, research suggests that many doctors don't ask older patients about their sex lives — and seniors aren't exactly jumping to bring it up with their family or friends, either. 'No one wants to think about grandma doing this,' Matthew Lee Smith, an associate professor at the Texas A&M School of Public Health, told NBC News. 'You certainly aren't going to ask grandma if she was wearing condoms — and that's part of the problem, because every individual regardless of age has the right to intimacy.'
UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
Deaths among young people who inhale 'laughing gas' are soaring
Children and teenagers in the U.S. are increasingly inhaling nitrous oxide, or laughing gas, to get high -- and deaths linked to use of the legal inhalant have increased 578% in the last 13 years. Photo courtesy FDA/HealthDay News It's no laughing matter: Kids and teens across America are increasingly inhaling nitrous oxide, better known as "laughing gas," to get high. Too often, this ends in tragedy. U.S. deaths linked to misuse of the common, legal inhalant climbed nearly sevenfold -- 578% -- between 2010 and 2023, a new report finds. In 2023, 156 Americans, many of them children, died from huffing nitrous oxide, according to a new study. "This is not local to one area; it's everywhere," said study co-author Andrew Yockey, assistant professor of public health at the University of Mississippi. "And it absolutely deserves national surveillance," he added in a news release. "The numbers are still small right now, but they're growing and they're growing fast." There are no age restrictions on buying nitrous oxide, and it "is available online and in gas stations across the country, so, these products become an easy way to get high, and the companies know that," Yockey said. "How long do we have to wait before we consider this a problem?" he asked. His team published its findings July 30 in JAMA Network Open. Nitrous oxide, often referred to as "whippets," is usually sold in canisters and access appears to be growing. "From about 2020 on, you really started to see two things: nitrous oxide products appearing in gas stations, online, etc., and then in 2023, the U.K. banned nitrous oxide," Yockey said. "I think that's when some of those products started creeping in globally." He noted that many nitrous oxide products come in flavors that are especially enticing to kids: Berries or cotton candy, for example. Products often come with flavored nozzles. "These flavored nozzles -- bubblegum, mango -- tell me these aren't being marketed to kids?" Yockey said. Unsurprisingly, kids and teens are most prone to experimenting with nitrous oxide. In fact, eighth-graders make up a big proportion of users, the research showed. However, use comes with risks: Blood clots, frostbite, asphyxiation, heart palpitations, hallucinations and even paralysis, brain damage or death, according to the study authors. The research focused on 14 years of U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data on nitrous oxide-related deaths. Fatalities were rare and relatively stable until about 2010, when there were 23 deaths nationwide. But after that point, death rates began to climb. "What's especially concerning is how accessible and deceptively safe nitrous oxide seems," said study co-author Rachel Hoopsick, assistant professor of health and kinesiology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. "It's legal, easy to buy and often viewed as harmless. But frequent or high-volume use can lead to serious neurological damage, psychiatric symptoms or even death." She said researchers are particularly worried about young people experimenting without understanding the risks. "The rise in harm calls for not only prevention," Hoopsick said in a news release, "But also stronger harm-reduction strategies." The U.S. Food and Drug Administration did issue a warning earlier this year, highlighting the dangers of inhaling nitrous oxide. That warning lists 15 nitrous oxide products, with names like Baking Bad, Cloud 9ine, Cosmic Gas and Whip-It!, but Yockey and Hoopsick are convinced there are dozens more. "We started researching nitrous oxide misuse after seeing headlines about young people dying from what many believed was a harmless substance," Hoopsick said. "Around the same time, we were both hearing anecdotal reports of nitrous oxide use among students on our respective campuses. These weren't just isolated incidents; they pointed to a larger, overlooked public health issue." Much more needs to be done to get the word out to parents and kids that "laughing gas" is far from harmless, the team said. "Public awareness is far behind where it needs to be," Hoopsick said. "Most people -- including parents, educators and even some health care providers -- don't realize how common nitrous oxide use has become or how dangerous it can be. "I want them to know that legal doesn't mean safe and that early, nonjudgmental conversations can make a real difference," she added. More information Find out more about the dangers of nitrous oxide at the Cleveland Clinic. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
For some, return of Presidential Fitness Test revives painful memories
'I never did a pullup,' she said. 'My jam was just to hang there and cut jokes.' President Donald Trump's announcement Thursday that he was reviving the fitness test, which President Barack Obama did away with in 2012, has stirred up strong feelings and powerful memories for generations of Americans who were forced to complete the annual measure of their physical abilities. Advertisement While some still proudly remember passing the test with flying colors and receiving a presidential certificate, many others recoil at the mere mention of the test. For them, it was an early introduction to public humiliation. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'You would see it,' Burnett said. Her classmates 'would feel body shamed if they didn't perform as well.' Born of Cold War-era fears that America was becoming 'soft,' the test was introduced by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1966. Although it changed forms over the years, the most recent version included a 1-mile run, modified situps, a 30-foot shuttle run, the sit-and-reach flexibility test and a choice between pushups or pullups. Children who scored in the top 15% nationwide earned a Presidential Physical Fitness Award. Advertisement When Obama abolished the test, he replaced it with the FitnessGram, a program that emphasized overall student health, goal setting and personal progress -- not beating your classmates on the track or the pullup bar. Trump signed an executive order that revived the test and reestablished the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition. The order cited 'the threat to the vitality and longevity of our country that is posed by America's declining health and physical fitness.' The health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., said at a White House event where Trump signed the order that he had fond memories of taking the fitness test as a child. 'It was a huge item of pride when I was growing up, and we need to re-instill that spirit of competition and that commitment to nutrition and physical fitness,' he said. Trump did not say what elements the new test would include, but the announcement came as his administration has also rolled out new physical fitness standards for soldiers in combat roles. News that the test was returning sent many Americans back to a time when they were frightened children in gym shorts and sneakers. Robin Gray, 60, who grew up in Tempe, Arizona, said she remembered being marched into her elementary school gym and told to complete a series of physical tests that she had never prepared for. As a bookish, asthmatic child, she struggled. 'There was this hanging on a bar,' she said. 'We weren't built up to learn how to hang on a bar. It was just how long can you hang here on this one random day?' The test did not encourage her to become physically active, something she did later in life by taking up swing dancing and yoga, she said. Advertisement 'It was survive or fail,' she said. 'It was Darwinist.' Some gym teachers said they never liked giving the test, knowing the effect it had on children who did not excel at sports. 'To tell you the truth, I dreaded it because I knew for some kids, it was one of the units they hated,' said Anita Chavez, who retired last year after 33 years as an elementary school physical education teacher in Minnesota. Chavez said she would offer some students the option of taking the test in the morning without other students present, so they would not feel embarrassed. She also set up stations in the gym so children would stay on the move and not gawk as their classmates struggled to do a pullup. Megaera Regan, who retired in 2021 after 32 years as an elementary school physical education teacher in Port Washington, New York, on Long Island, called the return of the test 'a giant step backward.' 'It really breaks my heart that it's coming back,' she said. 'If our mission is to help kids love being physically active and love moving, we have to do more than testing them in ways in which the majority are going to fail, and they're going to feel ashamed, and they're not going to like physical education.' Still, the test has its supporters, who describe it as a rite of passage -- and even a transformative experience. Steve Magness, 40, an author of books about performance and the science of running, said that he 'wasn't your typical athlete' as a child growing up outside Houston. Advertisement Then he won the mile run and the shuttle run during the Presidential Fitness Test in second grade. Pretty soon, he was known as the fastest runner in his class. He went on to run a 4:01 mile in high school and win a state championship in track, he said. 'That was my introduction to, 'Oh, I'm good at something,' and it pushed me into endurance sports and running,' he said. But even he found one part of the test to be insurmountable. 'I would ace everything else but couldn't touch my toes,' he said. 'That was my nemesis.' This article originally appeared in
