
Entire oppn with govt after Pahalgam attack: Rahul in Rae Bareli
Congress MP Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday said the entire opposition was supporting the measures being taken by the government in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack.
'There was a terror attack in Pahalgam a few days ago. You must have heard of the same. We have made it clear to the government that the entire opposition is with you. Take whatever action you want to,' Gandhi said while addressing booth level workers of the party at Dalmau in Rae Bareli on Tuesday.
Also, Gandhi, who's the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha, has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi stating that the incident had outraged every Indian. He demanded that a special session of parliament be convened at the earliest to discuss the terror attack and demonstrate a collective resolve.
At Dalmau, he said the Congress was undergoing a revamp to ensure that the party's government was formed at the Centre and the way to do so went via Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. 'We want to bring about a change and give voice to the poor... We need to get our party strengthened in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. We will form a strong government of INDIA bloc in Bihar and then in Uttar Pradesh. The BJP will be voted out in the next election and INDIA bloc will form the government in Uttar Pradesh.'
'Har Ghar Jal a failure in Rae Bareli'
The Rae Bareli MP appeared on a mission as he questioned officials about the implementation of several central schemes in his constituency.
Besides questioning the implementation of Rae Bareli Deen Dayal Upadhyay Grameen Kaushal Yojana there, he also asked officials concerned to form a team with public representatives and check the implementation of Har Ghar Jal scheme in his constituency.
He asked the officials to get a reality check done on those who were given skill training and then a job, and stated that the scheme was not benefiting the people.
'This scheme has failed completely. We got a survey conducted of 25 of those given skill training under the scheme. Out of them, only three have got placement,' said Gandhi while presiding over a meeting of District Development Coordination and Monitoring Committee (DISHA) at Bachat Bhawan here, according to some members who attended the meeting.
Some BJP representatives, present in the meeting, opposed the observations that the scheme was a failure and said some vendors might be responsible for lapses and action may be taken against such vendors. A district officer said: 'We have requested the Rae Bareli MP to provide us the details of the survey conducted by him.'
Those aware of the development said the district officials had claimed that nearly 1,100 beneficiaries imparted training in several skills had been placed.
Gandhi also asked the officers to check the implementation of Har Ghar Jal scheme, which aims to provide piped water to households under the Jal Jivan Mission. He said he got nearly 180 piped water supply connections checked in Rae Bareli and many of them have been verified. He said the district officials should work out a visit of UP Jal Nigam officials and public representatives for joint inspection.
He questioned the district administration over Union minister Nitin Gadkari's announcement on March 2 last year about the four-laning of the Rae Bareli-Lalganj Road and the proposed construction of a bypass between Lalganj and Bachhrawan in Rae Bareli. A member who attended the meeting said the officers had no response.
Gandhi asked the officers to check whether the '181' women's helpline was responsive, So, an officer dialed the number to verify and handed over the phone to Gandhi there. Those aware of the development said the helpline did not work the last time when Gandhi presided over the meeting of DISHA in 2024.
Uttar Pradesh minister of state (Independent charge) for horticulture and agriculture marketing Dinesh Singh and Amethi MP KL Sharma also had some arguments over the agenda of the meeting with the minister claiming that some of the items had been incorporated therein in violation of the guidelines of Union ministry of rural development.
Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi unveiled a statue of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose at Civil Lines and inaugurated a solar roof plant and a charging station in his constituency. He also visited the Rail Coach factory in Lalganj area.
On Wednesday, the MP is scheduled to visit Amethi, which he won in 2004, 2009 and 2014 but lost in 2019, and inaugurate an open-heart surgery operation theatre at Sanjay Gandhi Hospital in Munshiganj there. He is likely to pay a visit to Indira Gandhi Nursing College at Munshiganj. He will visit the ordnance factory project at Korwa in Amethi. The ordnance factory produces AK-203 assault rifles, a Kalashnikov variant, as part of Indo-Russian joint venture. He is likely to make a brief stop in Kanpur where he will meet the family of Shubham Dwivedi, who was one of the tourists killed in Pahalgam by terrorists on April 22.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Defence attache's IAF loss in Op Sindoor remark sparks row: What happened
The Embassy of India in Jakarta, Indonesia, issued a clarification on Sunday, June 30, regarding comments made by India's Defence Attaché to Indonesia Captain Shiv Kumar on Operation Sindoor that suggested that the alleged losses incurred by the Indian Air Force (IAF) in Pakistan were caused by "political constraints". In a video that surfaced on social media, Captain Kumar purportedly suggested that political leadership, and not air defence capabilities, were responsible for the loss of India's aircraft. Opposition leaders seized on the remarks, accusing the government of concealing crucial details about the operation. Here's what happened. What defence attaché said about aircraft losses in Pakistan On June 10, Captain Kumar addressed a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power' at a university in Jakarta. In a clip that surfaced online on Sunday, June 29, the naval officer can be heard responding to an earlier comment made by a speaker at the same event claiming that India lost "a lot of aircrafts", Kumar said, "I may not agree with him that India lost a lot of aircrafts, but I do agree ee did lose some aircraft and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defence system.' He further explained, 'But after the loss, we changed our tactics and we went for the military installations. So we first achieved suppression and destruction of enemy air defence and then all our attacks could easily go through using surface-to-air missiles and BrahMos surface-to-surface missiles.' Congress accuses Centre of withholding military details Referencing the comment, Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh questioned the government's silence and transparency. 'First the Chief of Defence Staff makes important revelations in Singapore. Then, a senior defence official follows up from Indonesia. But why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence?' he asked in a post on X . ऑपरेशन सिंदूर पर पहले सिंगापुर में चीफ ऑफ डिफेंस स्टाफ (CDS) ने अहम खुलासे किए। फिर इंडोनेशिया में एक कार्यक्रम के दौरान एक वरिष्ठ रक्षा अधिकारी ने उन बातों को आगे बढ़ाया। लेकिन प्रधानमंत्री सर्वदलीय बैठक की अध्यक्षता करने और विपक्ष को भरोसे में लेने से क्यों इनकार कर रहे हैं?… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) June 29, 2025 Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera also accused the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government of deliberately withholding information. 'The Modi government has misled the nation from the start – failing to disclose the aircraft losses during Operation Sindoor,' he said. Khera referred to earlier briefings where losses were only indirectly acknowledged, such as when Air Marshal Awadhesh Kumar Bharti described the situation as a 'combat scenario' where losses were expected. The Modi government has misled the nation from the start - failing to disclose the aircraft losses during Operation Sindoor. There were oblique references to losses in air combat on 6/7 May, during a briefing by the DG Air Ops (Air Marshal Awadhesh Kumar Bharti) when he said -… — Pawan Khera ???????? (@Pawankhera) June 29, 2025 'Taken out of context': Indian Embassy responds to controversy Amid the controversy, the Indian Embassy in Jakarta issued a statement on X stating that the officer's remarks were taken out of context. 'His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' the statement read. "The presentation conveyed that the Indian Armed Forces serve under civilian political leadership unlike some other countries in our neighbourhood. It was also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure and the Indian response was non-escalatory," the embassy added. We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attache at a Seminar. His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a mis-representation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker. The presentation… — India in Indonesia (@IndianEmbJkt) June 29, 2025 Opposition calls for special Parliament session on Op Sindoor On May 31, Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan confirmed with Bloomberg TV that the IAF had lost fighter jets during Operation Sindoor. While specifics regarding losses have not been disclosed, authorities have repeatedly refuted claims, made by Pakistan, of losing six aircraft.


Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Canada cancels digital services tax to restart US trade negotiations
Canada has canceled its digital services tax aimed at US tech companies in an effort to move trade talks forward with the United States, the finance ministry said in a statement on Sunday. This decision came just days after US President Donald Trump ended the ongoing trade negotiations. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Trump will start the trade talks again to try and make a deal by July 21, 2025, the ministry said.(AFP) In a statement Sunday night, the Canadian government said it was withdrawing the tax in an effort to encourage both countries to return to negotiations. 'To support those negotiations, the Minister of Finance and National Revenue, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, announced today that Canada would rescind the Digital Services Tax (DST) in anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement with the United States,' according to the statement. Prime Minister Carney and President Trump will resume negotiations 'Consistent with this action, Prime Minister Carney and President Trump have agreed that parties will resume negotiations with a view towards agreeing on a deal by July 21, 2025.' Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Trump will start the trade talks again to try and make a deal by July 21, 2025, the ministry said. On Friday, Trump suddenly called off trade discussions with Canada over the tax on US tech firms. He said it was a 'blatant attack' and said he would put a new tariff on Canadian products within the next week. Also Read: 'This is the reality of Canada': Indian woman shares video of massive job fair queues for just 5 positions The digital services tax was 3% of the revenue a company makes from Canadian users over $20 million in a year, and it was supposed to be applied retroactively to 2022. Canada, second-largest trading partner of the US Canada is the second-largest trading partner of the United States, behind Mexico. It is also the biggest buyer of US exports. Last year, Canada bought $349.4 billion in American goods and sold $412.7 billion to the US, based on figures from the US Census Bureau. The tax and trade tension had created concern among officials, but the move to drop the tax could ease talks.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Testimony to the enduring spirit of Indian democracy
On a summer evening in 1976, a group of people were enjoying a friendly chat at the bungalow of a prominent figure in Mainpuri city, when a frail man approached the host and prostrated at his feet. The man, a washerman from a village nearby, had a harrowing tale to tell. His ordeal started with an altercation—the person with whom he had tangled, turned out to be a relative of a police sub-inspector. This, the washerman learnt when, a few days after the incident, a police team raided his house to apprehend him for 'conspiring to uproot railway tracks with the aim of bringing about armed revolution". Fortunately for him, he was away visiting a distant relative when the raid was conducted. Else he would have landed in prison on charges framed under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (Misa). Though the group initially doubted the story, they found it to be true and got district authorities to resolve the matter. The washerman's case was not an aberration. Nationwide, about 35,000 people were detained under Misa (Maintenance of Internal Security Act), and more than 75,000 under the equally notorious Defence of India Rules (DIR) during the Emergency. Millions more, ranging from as young as nine to over 90 years of age, were arrested under various other laws. Politicians of all hues, barring those of the Congress and Left parties, were among the detainees. Also read | Firm and focused leadership keeps India on course What nurtured such extremes during the Emergency? The bureaucracy had turned alarmingly autocratic working hand in glove with the government. Paradoxically, the initial days of the Emergency had brought a sense of order that many welcomed. Trains began running on time. Buses adhered to schedule. Crime rates plummeted. Government employees were punctual, and the insidious practice of 'bribes" to expedite files seemed to vanish. Classes in schools ran regularly, and street hooliganism largely disappeared. Vinoba Bhave, a close associate of Mahatma Gandhi, even lauded the Emergency as an anushasan parv (festival of discipline). Middle-aged and elderly people then said it felt as if the time of the British bahadur had returned, an era where sher aur bakri ek hi ghat se paani peete the (the lion and the goat used to drink water from the same source), implying a return to strict but fair governance. It might seem astonishing to read this in 2025, but many at the time indeed considered such actions necessary. This week marks 50 years since the beginning of the anushasan parv, and the memories of those days continue to stir me. Apparently, Indira Gandhi imposed the Emergency after the Allahabad high court annulled her election. However, other darker forces were at play. In the 1971 general elections she coined the slogan garibi hatao (remove poverty), fielded 442 Lok Sabha candidates and won 352 seats. But she failed to eradicate poverty and unemployment, and a disillusioned student community and labourers took to streets in protest. A woman who was called Durga during the victorious Bangladesh campaign was now a failed ruler and the Emergency was the last gambit of a terrified ruler. Also read | A nation falling for the lure of majoritarianism Tragedies such as the Turkman Gate incident unfolded in New Delhi. The government machinery, armed with 10 bulldozers and a large police contingent, descended upon the Turkman Gate area in the name of 'beautification". When residents resisted, they were fired at, resulting in an undisclosed number of deaths and injuries. The government never released the exact figures, and a muzzled media could not effectively report on it. Those were truly dark days for India. Pupul Jayakar, Indira's friend, later wrote in her book how even Indira was disturbed by these aberrations. She sought counsel from the philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti, and it was only after this spiritual reflection that she decided to lift the Emergency and call for elections. The Congress lost the general elections in 1977, and the Janata Party came to power. How Indira later returned to power is another story for another day, but 50 years on, while there is regret in remembering those days, there is also immense pride that despite such a tremendous stumble, we Indians stood up, brushed the dirt and went on to not only preserve our democracy but also to achieve new milestones of development over the following decades. We can all be proud of this enduring democratic and never-say-die spirit of our countrymen. Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan. Views are personal. Also read | This may be the nail in the coffin of Maoist menace