‘Sickening': Sydney unit owners face levies of up to $220,000 to replace flammable cladding
Sluggish remediation works, drawn-out legal battles and onerous retrospective changes to building codes have left many owners in a seemingly never-ending limbo.
Ferres Wang, 43, purchased her one-bedroom unit in Pyrmont's Harbour Mill Apartments off the plan in 2012 for $580,000.
The stunning development, built on the site of the old Edwin Davey & Sons Flour Mill near the Sydney Fish Markets, comprises 136 apartments across two 10-storey towers with a distinctive chequerboard exterior.
Ms Wang, a tech entrepreneur, said she was attracted to the location close to Darling Harbour.
'Also the design is quite cool,' she said.
The building, completed in 2015, was one of dozens identified as high-risk by the NSW government's cladding taskforce which undertook a survey of local properties in the wake of the 2017 Grenfell fire in London which claimed 72 lives.
But five years on from the initial fire safety order from the City of Sydney, and nearly two years after entering a contract with a cladding remediation firm, the multimillion-dollar works have stalled.
The builder, Hitech Remedial, has identified additional scope that will more than double its initial contract.
On Tuesday, owners will be asked to vote on variations totalling $5.96 million, including additional cladding removal, vertical cavity barriers and replacement balustrades.
The initial budget for the works was $7.8 million, $5.4 million of which was Hitech's contract. The works are being funded by a no-interest loan through the NSW government's Project Remediate, with up to $19.5 million available.
'The variations are required to properly undertake the work to remove and replace the ACP cladding, and deal with other issues identified during the repairs, and to comply with a fire order from City of Sydney Council to remove the ACP cladding,' Tuesday's strata meeting notice states.
Ms Wang said the huge additional cost has left residents stunned.
'On average, each owner here is now facing a $70,000 to $220,000 levy, and we've been warned that even more variations are coming next year,' said Ms Wang, who will be on the hook for $70,000 for her 60 square metre apartment if the variation is approved.
For penthouse owners, the bill will be up to $220,000.
'One is retired, he [told me] this is their entire life savings,' Ms Wang said.
It's expected residents will be required to begin paying special levies for the works in the first half of next year.
Ms Wang, who runs data and AI start-up DataNoLie, says she will be forced to divert money she would have used to invest in growing her business.
'For me this really is hardship,' she said.
'This is a systemic disaster for apartment owners across NSW. It feels like the entire system — strata, builder, tribunal, regulatory bodies — has failed us. The government's retrospective cladding laws place the full financial burden on owners, with no strong legal or audit mechanisms in place.'
Ms Wang filed a case with the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) seeking to block Tuesday's vote but her request for an urgent hearing before the meeting was denied.
'I was told this didn't qualify as 'hardship' despite the enormous financial burden and the lack of legal safeguards being followed,' she said.
Around 30 per cent of owners live in the building, and Ms Wang said meetings to approve the remediation budgets were only attended by around 30 people.
'More than 100 owners, they don't know, don't care or are Chinese investors overseas,' she said.
A spokeswoman for Hitech Remedial declined to comment, saying enquiries should be directed to Project Remediate.
The owners corporation has also commenced NSW Supreme Court proceedings against the original developer, Leichhardt-based Ceerose, over the cladding defects. That case is listed for a directions hearing in July.
'We confirm that there are legal proceedings brought by the owners corporation involving Ceerose which are currently in procedural directions stages and include claims related to cladding,' a Ceerose spokesman said. 'The proceedings are being defended by Ceerose.'
Similar stories are playing out across the state.
As of early 2023, the NSW government had inspected 4182 buildings, with remediation underway or ordered by the relevant authority for 192.
The NSW Audit Office found in April 2022 that most high-risk buildings in NSW had likely been identified.
A spokesman for the NSW Building Commission said Project Remediate was currently working with around 80 owners corporations to remove combustible cladding through packages of interest-free loans and construction program management services.
'The program also helps owners corporations to resolve underlying conditions that are sometimes revealed when cladding is removed, saving owners from potentially costly repairs in the future,' he said.
'This includes fixing issues with waterproofing or structural components of the building to ensure the new cladding system is safe, weatherproof and structurally sound. Where the underlying issues have been caused by defective work by the building's original builder or developer, NSW legislation allows owners to claim using statutory warranties and other protections available within the statutory periods specified under the legislation.'
Strata lawyer Amanda Farmer said since the closure of Project Remediate to new applications, owners had largely been left on their own.
'As far as I'm aware there is no state or federal grant program to help strata buildings cover the cost of replacement,' she said.
'What we're seeing is individual owners are now having to shoulder 100 per cent of these costs coming to them in the way of large special levies at are running into $30,000 a lot, $50,000, up to six figures. It's sickening.'
Ms Farmer cautioned against taking the legal route.
'The problem with suing is it takes many years to progress through the court system and you may end up with something of a Pyrrhic victory if the builder and developer have nothing, are straw companies by the end of it,' she said.
Other owners have previously sought remedy from builders and developers alleging breaches of statutory warranties under NSW's Home Building Act 1989.
In 2020, NSW passed the Design and Building Practitioners Act, which imposed new statutory obligations to ensure designs and building work are compliant with the Building Code of Australia (BCA), with a 10-year duty of care period.
'There may be now in NSW the opportunity to claim under a 10-year warranty period, [but] that's very new and still being tested through the courts,' Ms Farmer said.
'I think buildings should rightly be very careful commencing any litigation now. It can take years to resolve and in the meantime you're sitting in a building with potentially dangerous cladding.'
The harsh reality is owners in affected buildings have few options.
'A building has a very strict legal obligation to properly repair its common property, so if it has received advice from an expert fire safety engineer that this is dangerous combustible cladding then the law is very well settled, the owners corporation has to act on that and protect its occupants,' Ms Farmer said.
'It's a really unenviable position for strata owners to be in but from a legal perspective they don't have a choice.'
With remediation quotes typically running into multiple millions, many buildings are opting to take out strata loans offered by a handful of boutique lenders.
'It can be a 10 or 20-year loan at interest rates over 9 per cent,' Ms Farmer said.
'In my experience that is usually what most buildings are opting for because they're finding most owners don't have the cash funds. Having a strata loan on the books then impacts the value of everybody's investment. Purchasers looking to buy [will knock the price down].'
Ms Farmer said many owners were being forced to simply sell.
'That is sometimes the only option, and as I said it's a really difficult decision because you're going to be taking a hit on your sale price,' she said.
'If you're in a position you have to sell, you have to take what you can get. I'm definitely seeing more of that, not just in the cladding context but all around with our ageing buildings that need a lot of work very fast.'
In NSW, former Building Commissioner David Chandler oversaw the most extensive reforms to the state's defect-plagued apartment building sector in response to years of high-profile disasters, like the mass evacuation of residents from Opal Tower in Sydney Olympic Park on Christmas Eve 2018.
While the crackdown on dodgy developers was long overdue, concerns have been raised that the onerous requirements under the Design and Building Practitioners Act have sent remediation costs for older buildings soaring.
'The side effect of that very strict legislation is that it also applies to existing buildings, much older buildings that are doing remedial work,' Ms Farmer said.
'Works are now three times, four times more expensive under this new legislation. A leaking balcony that may have cost $50,000 to fix in 2020 is now costing $200,000. That is a big problem, and there's a fair bit of advocacy being done to government at the moment trying to get some relief.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
43 minutes ago
- News.com.au
German supermarket giant Aldi launches Australian delivery trial
German supermarket giant Aldi has announced a major shake up to the way customers shop, in a move Aussies have been asking for since the Covid-19 pandemic. In an Australian first for the supermarket chain, Aldi has partnered with DoorDash and will now offer grocery delivery services. Starting from July 9, Aldi shoppers will be able to get access to Aldi's full range of products that will be delivered directly to their door. Aldi Australia's group buying director Simon Padovani-Ginies told NewsWire the partnership will help save customers money at the checkout. 'Our customers have been asking for us to go online for quite some time now as there are times when you simply can't get to a grocery store,' Mr Padovani-Ginies he told NewsWire. 'Without having Aldi participate in that convenience channel, (customers) are paying higher prices. 'They wanted Aldi to go online so they can help make more affordable grocery options in that convenience space and that is what we are really excited about.' Mr Padovani-Ginies says Tuesday's announcement is not due to competition in the supermarket space but simply as a way to meet customer demand. 'It is certainly a growing market but our customers have been telling us for a number of years, particularly after Covid that they would love to be able to access our product more conveniently online. 'We have been monitoring customer sentiment and have also been looking at the ongoing growth and success of the online channel. 'We now have a partnership that allows us to deliver it to our customers in a way that benefits the efficiency of the business and provides our customers exactly what they are looking for. ' Acting like other services on delivery app, Aldi customers are being told they will need to download DoorDash before searching for 'Aldi' on the platforms. Customers then add times to their cart and order on demand or choose a delivery window that they would prefer. The partnership is currently in a trial phase limited to Canberra but is expected to roll out across the country, bringing this new way to shop Aldi to more Australians nationwide. Eventually Aldi plans for 85 per cent of Australian households to have access to the service. It was also confirmed to NewsWire prices might vary for shoppers using the app compared to shopping in store. 'But there will be some price variances that customers will experience when they shop the app versus what they are used to paying in store,' Aldi said. 'DoorDash also applies delivery and service fees. 'Those delivery and service fees are standardised across all grocers in the vertical so no matter which grocery supermarket you are buying through on DoorDash those delivery and service fees are aligned.' Despite the price variance, Aldi said it was committed to having the cheapest products available. 'The people of Canberra will have access to our full grocery assortment, so there are over 1800 products spanning fresh Aussie fruit and vegetables, fresh meat and seafood, all of the chiller, the freezer and our ambient range, so it's a large range letting Aussies feed their family for less,' Aldi said. 'It is our intention to make sure that we are the most affordable alternative whether that is bricks and mortar or buying online.'

The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
ITM eyes EM target at Reward
ITM finds potential drill target after conducting EM survey at Reynolds Range The target could highlight gold and polymetallic prospectivity at Reward prospect Company plans drilling later this year Special Report: iTech Minerals has found a new compelling drill target at the Reward gold prospect of its Reynolds Range project in the Northern Territory. The project area is part of the >42km long Stafford gold trend with 50 kilometres of strike coincident with the Trans-Tanami regional structure. The latest find was due to a recently completed moving loop electromagnetic (EM) survey which spotted the target beneath high-grade polymetallic copper-gold-silver-lead-zinc mineralisation. The EM target extends for more than 1.3km and increases in conductivity to the north past the current survey boundary – it's also largely untested by shallow historic drilling. iTech Minerals (ASX:ITM) said the EM target, plus recent rock chip sampling and a review of historical drilling, suggested the Reward prospect was not a base metals deposit as historically suggested, but rather a gold-rich polymetallic massive sulphide system. Rock chip results include: 5% copper, 3.15g/t gold and 2,090g/t silver; 6% Cu and 12.2g/t Au, and 785g/t Ag; and 8% Cu and 19.4g/t Ag. Additionally, results from two diamond holes at the Scimitar prospect (6km from Reward) have intersected thin polymetallic mineralised veins dominated by lead, zinc and silver. While it's not clear if the EM target was intersected in this drilling, the company plans to conduct downhole EM in the coming weeks. Once the down hole EM is completed, the company will determine if there are any nearby conductors worth drill testing. Compelling drill target at Reward iTech is in the midst of a large-scale geophysical program at Reynolds Range, targeting gold-antimony systems at Pine Hill, Sabre, Falchion and Lander prospects. Once completed, drill target generation is next on the cards with the aim to begin drilling later this year. MD Mike Schwarz said the coincidence of a strong EM target directly beneath high-grade, polymetallic surface mineralisation at Reward provided a compelling drill target for inclusion in the upcoming program. 'Our ongoing program of geophysical surveying at Reynolds Range has identified a compelling EM conductor beneath the outcropping high-grade polymetallic mineralisation at the Reward gold prospect,' he said. 'Extending for over 1.3km and increasing in strength to the north beyond the current survey boundary, the target sits below the bulk of historic drilling and remains largely untested. 'High-grade copper-gold-silver-lead-zinc mineralisation in historical workings provide direct evidence for massive sulphide style mineralisation as the source.' This article was developed in collaboration with iTech Minerals, a Stockhead advertiser at the time of publishing. This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions.

The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
Best&Less baby sleepsuit recalled for serious injury, death risks
A range of baby sleepbags sold at Best&Less has been recalled due to serious risks, with parents warned to stop using the products immediately. Product Safety Australia issued the recall for the Best&Less printed velour sleeveless sleepbag range, after it was revealed that the shoulder snap could come off during use and become detached. This poses a serious hazard, Product Safety Australia warned, as there could be a risk of serious injury of death from choking if a child swallows the small shoulder snap part. The shoulder snap could become detached and pose a serious danger. Picture: ACCC Product Safety Parents who bought the sleepsuit were warned to 'stop using the product immediately' by Product Safety, and to return it to Best&Less for a full refund. The products were sold between 22 May 2025 and 18 June 2025, and were sold online and in-store. Some of the sleepbags featured cherry and blue stars, and can be identified by the SKU code on its tag. The codes are as follows: 1717056, 1717057, 1717058, 1717053, 1717054, and 1717055. Brendan Kearns Cadet Journalist Brendan Kearns is a cadet journalist with News Corp Australia. He has written for The Australian, the Herald Sun, the Geelong Advertiser, CHOICE, Cosmos, and The Citizen. He won Democracy's Watchdogs' Student Award for Investigative Journalism 2024 and hosted the third season of award-winning podcast Uncurated. He studied as Master of Journalism at The University of Melbourne, before that he worked as a video producer and disability worker. @brendandkearns Brendan Kearns