NFL has shown no inclination to have a draft lottery
A draft lottery.
The NBA's recent draft lottery, which saw the Dallas Mavericks overcome 1.8 percent odds to win the rights to 18-year-old Duke phenom Cooper Flagg, sparked claims that the lottery was rigged. (No lottery has ever been rigged.)
It also sparked arguments in some circles that the NFL should have a draft lottery. And, as we've argued in the past, the NFL should have one.
Beyond the intense interest a draft lottery would generate (it would land somewhere between the show-about-nothing draft and the show-about-nothing schedule release), a lottery would create a system that would reduce the incentive to tank by not guaranteeing the first pick to the worst team.
Here's the problem. Merely having a lottery legitimizes the reality that, at some point in a lost season, it's good to be bad. With the NFL stubbornly pushing the notion that every team tries its best to win every game of every regular season, anything that would crystallize the perception that losing leads to winning would take a sledgehammer to the façade of competitive integrity.
One way to eliminate that would be to give, for example, each of the 18 non-playoff teams an equal shot at the first pick, the second pick, and so on. The only risk from that approach would be the possibility that an owner of a team with a snowball's chance of scaling the playoff mountain a 5.5 percent shot at a potentially transformational talent.
Unlike the leagues that have lotteries, the NFL maintains a clear firewall between being at the bottom of the standings and the top of the draft order. While it's obvious that the worst picks first, the league prefers to draw as little attention as possible to the very real strategic benefit of embracing the suck.
What's the difference between 2-15 and 3-14? What's the difference between 3-14 and 4-13? A lost season is a lost season, and no one will care about the final number of wins. The only way to make chicken salad in such a chickenshit circumstance is to let nature take its course.
Or, as the case may be, to nudge nature along a little by using late-season games to 'evaluate' young backups.
The temptation to tank is very real. Some firmly believe that it should be avoided because it introduces losing into the culture of the team. Some don't care about that. (Which is one of the reasons why they keep losing.)
In 2014, the Buccaneers clearly tanked in the second half of a Week 17 game against the Saints to ensure that a double-digit lead evaporated, delivering the top pick in the 2015 draft.
The cost of trading up highlights the value of not having to. If the Jaguars had finished with the second overall pick and not the fifth overall pick, they wouldn't have had to give up next year's first-round pick (among other things) to get Travis Hunter.
The 2024 finale also introduced counter-tanking to the equation. Plenty believe that the Bills threw their Week 18 game against the Patriots to keep a division rival from landing the No. 1 overall pick. (Buffalo started quarterback Mitch Trubisky in the game, and removed him for no apparent reason for Mike White late in the third quarter, after the Patriots had taken a 17-16 lead.)
Winning that game hurt the Patriots. They could have traded the rights to the No. 1 overall pick (quarterback Cam Ward) for multiple other picks and/or players. And they still could have gotten tackle Will Campbell, plus a lot more stuff.
The NFL doesn't want anyone to connect losing games and getting dibs on the sorting hat process. Having a draft lottery acknowledges the link, making it harder for the NFL to perpetuate the ruse that every team tries to win every game, every week of every year.
Without that concern, the NFL surely would have a multi-network, three-hour, prime-time event from the league meetings in March that would draw 10 million or more viewers to see where the bouncing balls will land — and that could be sold to the highest bidder at a massive profit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Packers Trade for T.J. Watt of Pittsburgh Hinted at By ESPN Insider
Packers Trade for T.J. Watt of Pittsburgh Hinted at By ESPN Insider originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The T.J. Watt situation with the Pittsburgh Steelers is an ugly mess; there is no argument there. Advertisement And ESPN has come up with yet another possible solution, this one with a homey twist. Reporter Jeremy Fowler has suggested the big solution is a trade to the Green Bay Packers. What is the logic? In part, it's because Watt - who has led the NFL in sacks in three of the past five seasons, who is a four-time First-Team All-Pro selection, who is the 2021 Defensive Player of the Year and who is an institution in Pittsburgh - is a native of Wisconsin. Yes, really. A homecoming for Watt? That's the logic? 'I'm gonna make T.J. Watt happy, the player, 'Hey, come home to Wisconsin,' Fowler theorized this week on ESPN's Get Up. 'Play for the hometown, home area Packers. The Green Bay Packers are actually low-key looking at the pass rush market around free agency, potential trades, potential signings. They have some new cap space after they moved on from Jaire Alexander, the star cornerback. Advertisement "Why not use that money and make T.J. Watt the highest paid edge rusher?' Why not? Because this scenario seems completely manufactured by ESPN as a way of being "cute.'' Watt, 30, is presently entering the final year of his four-year, $112 million deal he signed in 2021. He really might become the highest-paid ever among non-QB's, surpassing Cleveland Browns star Myles Garrett by signing a deal totaling more than $40 million per year. But the two holes in Fowler's logic are gaping ones. First, we doubt that he's surveyed Watt about his passion for "coming home to Wisconsin.'' Does T.J. feel that way? We have no idea. Advertisement And second, Fowler is calling Green Bay's approach to adding a pass rusher a "low-key'' one. Umm, T.J. Watt being traded by the Steelers to the Packers would be anything but "low-key.'' Related: Steelers Are Lying About Trading T.J. Watt, Hints Mike Florio This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 5, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFL Insiders Disagree on Bills Ex Gabe Davis Signing Rumor with Steelers
NFL Insiders Disagree on Bills Ex Gabe Davis Signing Rumor with Steelers originally appeared on Athlon Sports. There is a media debate about the Pittsburgh Steelers' next the rumors attached to it. Advertisement They made their biggest signing of the offseason with QB Aaron Rodgers coming to town to play his final season, hoping to guide the Steelers to their first playoff win since 2016. Of course, "biggest'' doesn't mean "only.'' Not around here. Not this offseason. After also trading for Seattle Seahawks star receiver DK Metcalf and acquiring cornerback Darius Slay from the Super Bowl-winning Philadelphia Eagles, Pittsburgh this week did it again with the trade for cornerback Jalen Ramsey and tight end Jonnu Smith, late of the Miami Dolphins. So... are the Steelers done? We bet not, and here's why: DK's entrance coincided with the trade of George Pickens to the Dallas Cowboys. So in a way, the wideout group is back to where it began the offseason on the perimeter. (We say that while understanding that Smith has a lot of offensive versatility.) Advertisement So ... what about veteran receiver Gabe Davis, who recently visited the facility in hopes of finding a spot in the passing offense. Amid rumors that it might be a match ... he left without a deal. While that doesn't necessarily mean he is removed from the team's plans, Steelers insider Mark Kaboly set the expectation for a potential deal. In short, he won't count on Davis being the late addition to the receiving corps. "I don't think it will be Gabe Davis," Kaboly said on 'Kaboly + Mack.' "I just got the feeling when I was there, and people were talking the other day. He just came in for a visit. A … visit like a mint on your pillow." Advertisement Now, ESPN has updated that info, saying that Davis might be a signing that happens according to a timetable for later in training camp, depending on how the incumbents work According to ESPN's Jeremy Fowler, Davis is 'still an option' for Pittsburgh. So… which is it? Our view of Davis' big-play ability — well established when he was a Josh Allen playoff weapon with the Buffalo Bills but then lost last year in Jacksonville - is that it could be enticing for an offense that lacks potency outside of Metcalf. Robert Woods, Roman Wilson, Scotty Miller and Ben Skowronek are competing for boundary roles, and Davis, at his best, would add a downfield threat to that rotation. Advertisement In fairness, Davis was released just one season into a three-year deal with the Jaguars as he was tagged with a failed physical designation. A torn meniscus is complicating his free agency. "Maybe they were just trying to give him the once-over because of that knee," Kaboly said. "I don't know how aggressive they were in trying to sign him. I think they move on from Gabe Davis. I don't think we will hear from him again." Given the need at receiver, it's no surprise Pittsburgh gave Davis a look. But if he's not fully healthy, there's little reason for the Steelers to be interested, especially as Rodgers' preferences play into their late-offseason strategy. At least until later in training camp. Related: Packers Trade for T.J. Watt of Pittsburgh Hinted at By ESPN Insider This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bills Making Major Camp Decision on Josh Allen Backup
Bills Making Major Camp Decision on Josh Allen Backup originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Buffalo Bills will go as far as Josh Allen takes them. That much is evident for the league MVP and the roster around him. Advertisement But while Allen's standing as Buffalo's franchise quarterback is unchallenged, who will be his backup is a bigger question. As it happens, on paper? The Bills have a Pro Bowl quarterback as Allen's backup. That would be Mitchell Trubisky. So, what's the setup? The former Chicago Bears starting quarterback will compete for a roster spot at this training camp with Mike White. While Trubisky certainly had more experience as a starting quarterback, White has had moments of being a serviceable starter in his own right. It's why Bills' general manager Brandon Beane has clarified that the team won't simply give Trubisky the backup job with a recent announcement. Advertisement Said the GM: "We don't lock a lot of spots in here. Obviously, we know No. 17 is locked in, but every year, you pretty much have to come in and earn your job. I know Mitch knows that. He doesn't expect any different." Trubisky appeared in nine games last year with a completion number of over 73 percent with two touchdowns and no interceptions. He has been a quality backup quarterback since his time with the Bears ended. White, meanwhile, is 2-5 as a spot starter, with a 61-percent completion total, plus nine touchdowns and 13 interceptions. As things stand, is it safe to assume that Trubisky will be Allen's immediate backup? Some may think way, but Buffalo is telling both Trubisky and White to think of it another way altogether. Advertisement Related: Bills Buzzing About Commanders' Terry McLaurin Trade Rumor for Josh Allen Related: NFL Insiders Disagree on Bills Ex Gabe Davis Signing Rumor with Steelers This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
