Telangana: KCR Indicted in Kaleswaram Project ‘Irregularities'; BRS to Hold Special Assembly Session
N. Rahul
According to the commission of inquiry, KCR's 'involvement and directions minutely…' is the 'cause and result of irregularities and the cause of distress to these three barrages'.
Hyderabad: In the light of a severe indictment of former Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao by a commission of inquiry into charges of corruption and irregularities in the construction of much-touted Kaleswaram irrigation project during the previous Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) rule, the Congress-led Telangana government has decided to convene a special session of legislature shortly to debate the followup action.
The decision was taken at an emergency cabinet meeting headed by current chief minister, A. Revanth Reddy, on Monday (August 4). Flanked by the entire cabinet, Reddy told a media conference that both Houses of the legislature will seek suggestions from all their members, including from Chandrasekhar Rao if he was available, on the way forward. The cabinet approved the report, he said.
The 665-page report of the one-man commission, comprising Justice (retired) Pinaki Chandra Ghose, a former Supreme Court judge and first Lokpal of the country, will be tabled in the assembly and the legislative council.
The commission, which submitted its report after 16 months on July 31, held Chandrasekhar Rao "directly and vicariously" accountable for the irregularities and illegalities in planning, construction, completion, operation and maintenance of three barrages of over Rs. 1 lakh crore Kaleswaram lift irrigation project. A pier of one of the three barrages of the project, which was a key component, sank and developed a huge crack from top to bottom in October 2023 and has remained abandoned since.
His 'involvement and directions minutely…' is the 'cause and result of irregularities and the cause of distress to these three barrages,' the commission noted.
The report was studied by a team of three secretary-level officers and summarised for presentation to the cabinet on Monday. The meeting, chaired by chief minister Reddy, was convened solely to discuss the commission findings and follow up action.
The commission was instituted by the Congress government in March last year, months after the party was voted to power in Telangana. It started functioning from May and cross-examined 119 witnesses, including Chandrasekhar Rao and his erstwhile cabinet colleagues T. Harish Rao and Eatala Rajender, on the basis of a large quantity of sworn affidavits, official documents and communication. Several senior bureaucrats, engineers, officials and representatives of contracting firms deposed before the commission.
The project was founded in 2016 and completed on a war footing in 2019, with several cost overruns from its initial projection of Rs 71,436 crore to Rs 1.45 lakh crore as per the findings of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
The project was originally conceived by the previous Congress government in the name of Pranahita-Chevella link with a dam at Tummidihatti in Adilabad district. However, the BRS government, shortly after it was elected to power, shifted the site to Kaleswaram in erstwhile Karimnagar district in the name of reengineering existing projects. Pranahita is a tributary of Godavari river which had copious flood water.
A key finding of the commission, as per the condensed brief of the secretaries committee to the cabinet, was that Chandrasekhar Rao and his son-in-law Harish Rao, then irrigation minister, "intentionally have not considered the report of an expert committee".
The expert committee of five retired chief engineers, constituted in January 2015, explicitly rejected the proposal to construct a barrage at Medigadda, which eventually suffered damage, due to "prohibitive cost and time consumption". It suggested alternative sites. But, the report was "intentionally not considered" and kept in cold storage by Chandrasekhar Rao and Harish Rao.
The decision to construct the barrages at Medigadda, Annaram and Sundilla (the latter two also faced seepage issues) was the "sole and individual decision of Harish Rao and Chandrasekhar Rao". There was no formal decision of the government in the form of cabinet approval.
Initial administrative approvals for the construction of the three barrages were not placed before or approved by the cabinet, thus violating government business rules.
Chandrasekhar Rao, Harish Rao and Eatala Rajender, then finance minister, who is now a BJP MP, had, however, in their deposition before the commission claimed that the project was discussed and approved by the cabinet.
Rao's letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in February 2016, seeking financial aid, mentioned the Kaleswaram project cost at Rs 71,436 crore even before WAPCOS (Water and Power Consultancy Services), a consultancy firm of the Union government, submitted its final detailed project report.
The claim of non-availability of water at Tummidihatti as the reason for shifting the barrage to Medigadda, which is the key component of the project to lift water to the other two barrages and take it to parts of the State through balancing reservoirs and canal network, "does not appear to be sincere and honest", the commission noted.
The IAS officers panel wrote in its executive summary that the commission's report concluded with a scathing indictment, finding rampant procedural and financial irregularities, lack of proper planning, design flaws, construction defects and a complete absence of effective operation and maintenance.
The report pinned significant responsibility on key political and administrative figures, particularly then chief minister Rao, for direct involvement and disregard for established procedures, resulting in colossal public expenditure and the current distress to the barrages.
The commission fixed responsibility on over a dozen officials and engineers, name-wise for various lapses that were identified. They are:
Eatala Rajender: As finance minister demonstrated "lack of commitment and integrity in safeguarding the financial and economic health of the newly formed State, pleading ignorance of crucial decisions related to the project".
S.K. Joshi, former chief secretary, who also served as principal irrigation secretary and chairman of Kaleswaram Irrigation Project Corporation Limited (KIPCL): Liable for suppressing the expert committee report, violation of business rules in administrative approvals and for the failure of KIPCL.
Smita Sabharwal, secretary to chief minister, who looked after irrigation in CMO: Found "not diligent, negligent and irresponsible in the discharge of her duties for failure to ensure business rules compliance regarding Cabinet approvals.
C. Muralidhar, retired engineer-in-chief of irrigation (now lodged in jail in an assets case): Liable for suppressing the expert committee report, providing false information to Central Water Commission (CWC) on permissions for the project, proposing malicious revised estimates and failing in operations and maintenance.
B. Hari Ram, chief engineer and KIPCL managing director (also in jail now in an assets case): Liable for suppressing the expert committee report and providing information to CWC. Despite being managing director of KIPCL, he disclaimed knowledge of the barrages.
B. Nagender Rao, engineer-in-chief (operations and maintenance): Failed absolutely in carrying out O&M duties from January 2021 onwards. Liable for perpetuating damage to all three barrages.
T. Pramila, chief engineer, State Dam Safety Organisation: Found ignorant of the basic responsibilities of her post.
At least half-a-dozen other senior engineers were also found in the wrong or deposed falsely before the commission.
The project, initially conceived at Rs 38,500 crore for Pranahita-Chevella link, landed in a massive cost overruns. It got unjustified revised administrative approvals by alleged variations due to shifting of locations of Annaram and Sundilla barrages, increased length, flood banks and design changes.
The decision to shift the location of the two barrages by a high power committee, of which Muralidhar was a member, was done after contracts were concluded and without consulting WAPCOS.
When the revised administrative approvals were further revised, the project cost went up again for reasons of increased water quantity, change in specification, design and drawings, duly incorporating additional items of work such as staff quarters, guesthouse, taxes and cost escalation.
The proposals for revised administrative approvals were made with malicious intention to unduly favour the contracting agencies and wrongfully syphoning the amount from the public exchequer.
There was absolutely no operations and maintenance of whatsoever nature, including periodical checks or inspection, pre- and post-monsoon inspection of the three barrages at any time.
Chandrasekhar Rao directed continuous impounding of water in the barrages to their full capacity for lifting water through pump houses even though the barrages are typically diversion structures with low head, not as storage structures. This continuous impounding was a major cause of distress to the barrages.
"The Chief Minister was pre-determined and bent upon constructing the barrage at Medigadda at his free choice. Authorities facilitated his decision". This was not the decision of the government but of individuals.
The barrages, designed on permeable foundations, were utilised as storage structures which is against standard practice. Crucial studies on backwaters were not done at shifted locations. The quality control aspects were observed to be inadequate.
The certificates of completion given for work at Medigadda were wrong, illegal and tainted with malice to do undue favour to contractors as work was not fully completed and defects detected.
The commission recommended recovery of Rs 6.77 crore paid to WAPCOS as its report was "brushed aside". It said the project authorities and the work agencies were hand-in-glove and acted with concerted malicious intention in pursuit of their unfair and ulterior motive to unduly benefit and make unlawful gain from the project.
At the cabinet meeting and media conference later, state irrigation minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy gave a power point presentation on the commission's report. He said the BRS government borrowed Rs 87,449 crore at high interest rates and low repayment tenures from non-banking financial institutions which had become a huge burden for the present government. The government was yet to repay Rs 1.05 lakh as principal and interest.
The minister recalled that then Union mInister for water resource, Uma Bharti, had communicated to the state government about Union government's willingness to give hydrology clearance for Pranahita-Chevella link project as 205 thousand million cubic feet (TMC ft) water which was more than the required 180 TMC ft was available at Tummidihatti. But, Chandrasekhar Rao had his own way.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
2 minutes ago
- Hans India
AP aqua farmers in tight spot as US tariffs take toll
Rajamahendravaram: Andhra Pradesh's vital aquaculture sector is facing an unprecedented crisis following the recent imposition of increased tariffs on shrimp imports by US President Donald Trump. This move, described by local farmers as a plunge 'from the frying pan into the fire', has significantly jeopardised the Rs 18,000-crore aqua export industry in the state. Andhra Pradesh is the undisputed leader in India's shrimp production and exports, contributing roughly 75 per cent of the nation's total shrimp output and about 32-33 per cent of the value of India's seafood exports. Over 10 lakh families in the state are directly or indirectly reliant on this sector, with major production hubs in West Godavari, Konaseema, Kakinada, and other districts. On July 31, the US President announced 25 per cent tariff on imports from India. The immediate consequence of the new US tariff was a sharp drop in shrimp prices. Farmers in the Godavari districts, including Konaseema and West Godavari, lament that prices have fallen by up to Rs 40 per kg. This steep decline means export prices, typically ranging from Rs 270-Rs 300 per kg, have now plummeted to Rs 220-Rs 230, resulting in a loss of Rs 40-Rs 50 per kg for farmers. The industry, which produces 4 lakh tonnes annually with 3.5 lakh tonnes earmarked for international markets, is grappling with a severe crisis. Farmers stated that by July 31, the price of 100-count shrimp had already dropped by Rs 40 per kg. According to a farmer, with new tariffs, exporting Rs 1 lakh worth of shrimp to the US could attract a tax outgo of Rs 26,000, potentially pushing the total burden further when factoring in other costs. This will not only hit cultivators hard but also the livelihoods of lakhs of daily wage labourers in associated sectors like packing, processing, and transportation, he added. Aqua sector experts warn that this price collapse would put farmers at a high risk of being unable to recover investments, leading to a debt trap. A decline in exports will also force processing units to reduce operations, potentially resulting in significant job cuts across the state. However, T Jagadeesh, a leading exporter from Bhimavaram, expressed his optimism that the aqua sector in AP would overcome the crisis. Speaking to The Hans India, Jagadeesh acknowledged the severe anxiety prevalent in the region's aqua industry, comprising nearly 200 exporters. He stated that the new US tariffs, combined with existing duties, would impose an additional burden of nearly 35 per cent on exporters. He, however, pointed out that the aqua sector is no stranger to crises and has consistently overcome challenges with determination. He further explained that state's aquaculture industry was not solely dependent on the American market, noting the availability of several alternative market opportunities. In response to this looming crisis, the state government is said to be actively considering strategies to mitigate the impact. An official confirmed that measures such as rebranding shrimp products, boosting internal marketing, and diversifying export opportunities were being explored to increase local consumption and find new markets for the beleaguered industry.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Netanyahu hints at wider war in Gaza, former military & spy chiefs object
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted at wider military action in devastated Gaza on Tuesday, even as former Israeli army and intelligence chiefs called for an end to the nearly 22-month war. The new pressure on Netanyahu came as Gaza's Health Ministry said the Palestinian death toll had surpassed 61,000. Health officials reported new deaths of hungry Palestinians seeking food at distribution points. As desperation mounts, the Israeli defence body coordinating aid announced a deal with local merchants to improve aid deliveries. Among those speaking out were former leaders of Israel's Shin Bet internal security service, Mossad spy agency and the military -- and also ex-Prime Minister Ehud Barak. In a video posted to social media this week, they said far-right members of the government are holding Israel "hostage" in prolonging the conflict. Netanyahu's objectives in Gaza are "a fantasy", Yoram Cohen, former head of Shin Bet, said in the video. "If anyone imagines that we can reach every terrorist and every pit and every weapon, and in parallel bring our hostages home -- I think it is impossible," he said. Possible tougher military action Netanyahu convened his Security Cabinet to direct the military on the war's next stage, hinting that even tougher action was possible. However, the meeting wrapped up hours later without any announcements about Israel's plans. US President Donald Trump, asked by a reporter whether he supported the reoccupation of Gaza, said he was not aware of the "suggestion" but that "it is going to be pretty much up to Israel". Netanyahu said his objectives include defeating Hamas, releasing all 50 remaining hostages and ensuring Gaza never again threatens Israel after the Hamas-led 2023 attack sparked the war. Israeli media reported disagreements between Netanyahu and the army chief, Lt Gen. Eyal Zamir, on how to proceed. The reports, citing anonymous officials in Netanyahu's office, said the prime minister was pushing the army, which controls about three quarters of Gaza, to conquer the entire territory -- a step that could endanger hostages, deepen the humanitarian crisis and further isolate Israel internationally. Zamir reportedly opposes this step and could step down or be pushed out if it is approved. Israeli officials did not respond to requests for comment on the reports. More aid-seekers killed Health officials in Gaza said Israeli forces opened fire on Tuesday morning toward Palestinians seeking aid and in targeted attacks in central and southern Gaza, killing at least 45 people. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military, which has said after previous shootings around aid distribution that it only fired warning shots at people who approached its forces. The dead include at least 26 people killed in the Morag Corridor, an Israeli military zone where looters and desperate crowds unloaded UN aid convoys. Six people were killed in Teina, near a road leading to a site run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American contractor. Morgue records at the nearby Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies, detailed the deaths and locations. The hospital is part of the Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between militants and civilians but says roughly half the dead from the war have been women and children. The ministry operates under the Hamas government. The United Nations and other international organisations see it as the most reliable source of casualty data. Sami Arafat, a father of seven, described the chaos in the Morag Corridor early on Tuesday, saying crowds rushed toward a convoy of UN aid trucks and Israeli forces fired toward them. "There are no buildings to shelter us from the shooting," he said. "The area is all rubble." He said looters brandishing knives climbed aboard the trucks first and tore into the aid boxes, taking sugar that could be resold at the market while leaving less expensive rice behind. Elsewhere in central Gaza, Al-Awda hospital said it received the bodies of six Palestinians who were killed when Israeli troops targeted crowds near another GHF aid distribution site. The GHF said there were no incidents at its sites on Tuesday and that most of the recent violence has been linked to UN aid deliveries. Several hundred Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire since May while heading toward food-distribution sites, airdropped parcels and aid convoys, according to witnesses, local health officials and the UN human rights office. Israel's military says it only has fired warning shots and disputes the toll. The Israeli defence body in charge of coordinating aid, COGAT, said on social media there will be a "gradual and controlled renewal of the entry of goods through the private sector in Gaza". It said a limited number of local merchants were approved for the plan. 'Stained with humiliation and blood' Mohammed Qassas from Khan Younis said his young children are so hungry that he is forced to storm aid trucks, which rarely reach warehouses these days because they are stopped by hungry crowds. "How am I supposed to feed them? No one has mercy," he said on Monday. "If we fight, we get the food. If we do not fight, we do not get anything." It has become routine to see men returning from aid-seeking carrying bodies as well as sacks of flour. Israel's blockade and military offensive have made it nearly impossible to safely deliver aid, contributing to the territory's slide toward famine. Aid groups say Israel's week-old measures to allow more aid in are far from sufficient. Families of hostages in Gaza fear starvation affects them too, and blame Hamas. As international alarm has mounted, several countries have airdropped aid over Gaza. The UN and aid groups call such drops costly and dangerous for residents, and say they deliver far less aid than trucks. 'The entire world is watching' Palestinians gather daily for funeral prayers. "We are unarmed people who cannot endure this," shouted Maryam Abu Hatab in the yard of Nasser hospital. Ekram Nasr said her son was shot dead while seeking aid near the Morag Corridor. "I had to go alone to carry my son," she said, tears in her eyes. "I collected the remains of my son like the meat of dogs from the streets." "The entire world is watching," she added. "They are watching our patience, our strength and our faith in God. But we no longer have the power to endure.


India.com
2 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump's new visa rule to make travel to US nearly impossible, Indians may have to pay in lakhs just to enter US, visa bond policy to roll out soon
Donald Trump's administration has proposed new changes to the U.S. visa rules this week. If these new rules are approved, people from certain countries may have to pay a large amount of money as a security bond to enter the U.S., no matter why they are visiting, whether for business or tourism. As per a report by Reuters news agency, the U.S. State Department is planning to launch a pilot program where visa applicants will need to deposit a bond ranging from USD 5,000 to USD 15,000. In Indian currency, this would be around Rs. 4.2 lakh to Rs. 12.5 lakh. This rule could apply to people traveling for work, business, or even just for holidays. The main purpose of this bond is to act as a financial guarantee which is to make sure that people who come to the U.S. return to their home country on time. It is meant to prevent visitors from staying in the U.S. illegally after their visa expires. In simple words, visa holders must leave the U.S. before their allowed time ends and should not try to seek asylum or stay there without permission. U.S. State Department officials were informed about this plan on August 4, and the official notification has already been sent to the Federal Register. The final version of the new rule is expected to be made public by Tuesday, and this new program might start from August 20. Few countries to be part this pilot project Trump's administration has said that this new visa rule will first be tested as a pilot project. But what's surprising is that it will apply only to a few selected developing countries and India is likely to be one of them. U.S. Senator Marco Rubio said that the State Department is planning to start a 12-month pilot program. Under this, adults applying for a U.S. visa may need to pay a bond of USD 10,000, and for children, the bond could be USD 5,000. If the traveler leaves the U.S. on time, they might get their money back. Once the visa is approved, travelers will be required to enter the U.S. within 30 days, and they must also leave the country before their visa expires. Trump's new visa policy may create problems for India If India is included in this list, Indian citizens, no matter why they are visiting the U.S., may have to pay over Rs. 12 lakh just as a bond before even stepping into the country. This proposal has already started facing criticism. Experts believe that such a high bond amount will make it nearly impossible for people from developing countries to travel to the U.S. This could lead to a sharp decline in the number of tourists and business travelers going to the US. And this isn't the first time the Trump administration has suggested such a move. A similar limited pilot program was proposed back in 2020 as well, but it was never implemented by the Biden administration.