North East older buses 'offset' green benefits
In response to a freedom of information request, the North East Combined Authority (NECA) said its latest statistics on the issue were dated to February 2024 and it could only provide data for the area's three major bus firms.Additionally, 15% of buses in the region were operated by smaller companies for which it did not have figures.Of the big three, NECA said 33% of vehicles complied with the older Euro V engine standards rather than the latest Euro VI mark, but a further 6% had more outdated engines.
Prof Anil Namdeo, from Northumbria University, said: "Hybrid and electric buses are the way to go, but that requires commitment from the local and combined authorities."Mayor McGuinness said by March 2026 there would be 113 electric buses across the region, making up about a 10th of the entire fleet.She called on bus firms to speed up plans to bring in greener vehicles, adding she wants to introduce "binding targets".Prof Prashant Kumar, at the University of Surrey, said nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions produced by vehicles which were Euro V compliant or lower were likely to be "substantial"."The continued presence of older, higher emitting buses significantly offsets the benefits of newer Euro VI and electric vehicles," he said.Nitrogen oxide can cause a range of respiratory and cardiovascular health problems, especially for those with pre-existing conditions like asthma and heart disease.Prof Jill Belch from Dundee University said children in particular experience ill effects at lower levels than adults."Environmental air pollution is a major determinant of childhood asthma," she said.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Drivers should be ‘very pessimistic' over car finance claims, say lawyers
Drivers should be 'very pessimistic' about getting any compensation for taking out a car loan after a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court, experts have warned. Industry analysts also said on Friday that banks will 'breathe a sigh of relief' after the Supreme Court ruled they are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes. Nevertheless, the financial watchdog has said it is still considering whether to launch a redress scheme for consumers who potentially receive compensation. Lawyers have also indicated that some consumers should still consider pursuing their claims over 'unfair' treatment. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, went to the UK's highest court to challenge a Court of Appeal ruling which found 'secret' commission payments paid by buyers to car dealers in agreements before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent were unlawful. The ruling last year found three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, should receive compensation. But in a decision on Friday, justices at the UK's highest court overturned the Court of Appeal, though some customers could still receive payouts by bringing claims under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). Lawyers for the lenders told the Supreme Court at a three-day hearing in April the decision was an 'egregious error', while the Financial Conduct Authority intervened in the case and claimed the ruling 'goes too far'. However, the judges upheld a claim brought by one driver under the CCA that his relationship with the finance company had been 'unfair', awarding him the commission amount of £1,650.95 plus interest. Lizzy Comley, chief operating officer of consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, said the ruling still reinforces the right of many consumers to pursue claims. She said: 'This landmark ruling is positive news for the millions of people who have lost money due to the car finance mis-selling. 'The court confirmed that for years, consumers have potentially been unfairly overcharged on car finance agreements, and this ruling reinforces their right to pursue justice and recover the compensation they deserve.' However, others have said that the ruling will make it harder for most claims. Nicola Pangbourne, partner at Kennedys law firm, said: 'If I was a driver, I would be very pessimistic about getting compensation. There's now quite a few hurdles they've got to get through.' Industry experts have suggested the ruling will be broadly seen as a success for lenders, who had been preparing for significant compensation payments. Caroline Wayman, global head of financial Services at PA Consulting, said: 'Lenders will breathe a sigh of relief at the ruling, but it should still be a wake-up call for firms to scrutinise any large, undisclosed commissions in their business. 'Firms should ask themselves whether it still feels justifiable or could be considered unfair, particularly if they haven't disclosed commercial ties to the broker and it won't be enough to expect customers to have read and understood the fine print.' On Friday, a spokesperson for the Financial Conduct Authority said after the ruling that it would confirm whether it will consult on any such scheme by 8am on Monday. They said: 'We want to bring greater certainty for consumers, firms and investors as quickly as possible.'
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Lime loses contract to operate e-bikes in Hounslow
A west London council has ended a two-year trial allowing Lime e-bikes in the Council has instead offered a contract to rival e-bike rental firms Forest and Voi, listing "stricter enforcement for designated bay use" as one of the benefits of the updated scheme. BBC London reported complaints from a resident in 2023 who claimed Lime bikes were deliberately being parked in "dangerous places".A Lime spokesperson said: "We're disappointed by Hounslow Council's decision. We're proud of our bid, which we believe offered the best overall value for Hounslow residents." The contract, which will give Voi and Forest exclusive operating rights in the borough, will begin on 11 August. A council spokesperson said the decision followed a competitive procurement process "shaped by widespread community feedback" requesting stronger parking compliance and more affordable pricing. There are more than 250 e-bike parking bays across Hounslow and the council said it is "reviewing enforcement procedures to "maintain clear pavements and discourage poor parking behaviour". The move follows a wider crackdown on poor e-bike parking across London's boroughs - with all firms facing some degree of criticism. Transport for London (TfL) said in June it had begun issuing fixed penalty notices to Lime and Forest for abandoned e-bikes on the capital's February, the City of London seized more than 100 e-bikes to tackle pavement firms have said they are working to address issues around users' poor parking. Hounslow Council's spokesperson said that since the e-bike scheme began in 2023, more than 1.7 million journeys have been made, with 127,000 made in June this year alone. The Lime spokesperson said: "We're also disappointed for the thousands of Hounslow residents that rely on our bikes daily to connect to other areas of London. "Built over seven years operating in the capital, Lime's service has allowed people living in Hounslow to access all parts of the city, and cycle as far as Hackney and Lewisham in one easy journey."They added that since launching in the borough, the number of Lime rides has more than doubled year-on-year.
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Aston Martin May Sell Stake in Formula 1 Racing Team and Go Private in Turnaround Efforts
Tesla is falling behind BYD in several key international markets, but its rival's recent operational struggles are opening a door of opportunity. Despite coming up with some compelling vehicles in recent years, Aston Martin has continued to struggle financially, leading it to some tough decisions as it plots a path forward. Among other efforts, the storied British automaker reportedly plans to sell its stake in its Formula 1 racing team, and some expect the company to delist itself from the London Stock Exchange. Aston only owns 4.6 percent of the racing team, but the sale would raise $146 million for the company, which desperately needs cash. The automaker cited tariffs and a slowdown in China for its struggles, saying it would only break even this year, which caused a drop in its share prices. The company's stock market valuation has dropped from almost $6 billion in late 2018 to just over $1 billion today. That said, the F1 team sale valued the company at $3.2 billion. While Aston Martin won't have a stake in the F1 team after the sale, it will continue a relationship with the sport through naming and branding agreements, so we won't see a change on the grid. The automaker's car lineup is one of the most compelling in its history, so there are reasons for Aston to be encouraged. Its first SUV, the DBX has grown to account for almost half of its sales, and other new models have received stellar reviews from customers and critics. 2025 Aston Martin DBX 707 — Source: Kyle Edward Lawrence Stroll acquired the Force India F1 team in 2018 and transformed it into the Aston team we know today. Stroll and his partners have continue investing in the business, but many credit Netflix's Drive to Survive with bringing the sport's value to an all-time high. About the Author Chris Teague View Profile
