
New York debates mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's plan for city-run grocery stores
City officials chose a public-private model not just for long-term sustainability but because the existing development incentives didn't encourage the private sector to step up, according to Laurie Prickett, a senior vice-president at Invest Atlanta, the city's economic development arm. If successful, Atlanta plans to expand its model, aiming to place every resident within a kilometre of fresh food by 2030, she said.
Government-supported grocery models aren't a new idea. They've taken the form of non-profits, co-ops, military-base commissaries, public-private partnerships, and municipally owned and operated stores - with varying results.
Boston's Daily Table, a non-profit grocery chain launched by a former Trader Joe's president, announced its closing in May after a decade of trying to sustain its mission of providing affordable food.
While its funding came from a variety of sources, federal cuts to food aid programmes was the catalyst for its demise. In Baldwin, Florida, a town-owned market folded for similar reasons.
But in rural St Paul, Kansas, which had been without a grocery retailer for more than 20 years before a public-private partnership opened a supermarket in 2008, the local government doubled down on its investment and became the store's sole owner in 2013.
A major difference between the models in other American cities and Mamdani's proposal is the scale.
Baldwin has fewer than 1300 residents; Atlanta is home to around 520,000, not far behind Boston's 673,000.
New York City has an estimated population of 8.48 million.
Also, Mamdani isn't proposing to have private operators run the stores. The enterprise would be fully owned by the city, which would sell the groceries at cost and source products from neighbourhood suppliers where possible.
Supporters of Mamdani's pilot programme call it a bold solution for New Yorkers struggling to afford the basics.
Critics warn of government overreach and unintended consequences, including harm to neighbourhood bodega owners.
Others question whether New York's bloated bureaucracy is even capable of running grocery stores.
Supply chains are complex, operating costs are high, and profit margins are thin. Even if city-run stores aim to break even at best, the savings for shoppers might be modest, said Sara John, who leads the Centre for Science in the Public Interest's work on federal policy and the private sector.
John doesn't view city-run grocery stores as a silver bullet but sees potential in a model accountable to consumers, not shareholders.
'Prioritising people over profits could make a difference,' she said, though she emphasised that execution would be challenging.
Zohran Mamdani while ordering an iced coffee from a deli after a campaign event in Queens in June. Photo / Adam Gray, Bloomberg via the Washington Post
Funding the pilot
Mamdani's plan comes after grocery costs in the city jumped nearly 9% in 2022 - the highest in 40 years - and climbed again in 2023, while wage growth failed to keep pace, putting basic necessities out of reach for a growing number of residents.
The financial strain is turning political; a recent poll found that nearly two-thirds of New Yorkers, including majorities across political lines, support the idea of city-run stores.
Funding for Mamdani's proposed plan largely relies on raising taxes on New York's wealthiest 1% and additional corporation tax.
The city already spends millions on Fresh, a programme launched in 2009 to tackle the lack of neighbourhood grocers in select communities.
There are now more than 50 Fresh-supported stores that are open or in development and receive a mix of zoning benefits and tax breaks. But a report from the comptroller's office found the programme's impact on food access has been limited at best.
Mamdani has jumped on those findings, criticising the programme for having little accountability for affordability, labour standards or acceptance among those eligible for food assistance.
'There's no guarantee those groceries are cheaper,' he said in an interview with Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast in May.
Benjamin Lorr, author of The Secret Life of Groceries, which examines the human labour that goes into the industry, said the idea of city-run stores may sound radical, but is a natural response to deep imbalances in the current grocery market.
If the market is failing to provide basic goods affordably and equitably, it's not unreasonable for the public to step in, Lorr said. 'The question is: Can it be done well? Is the juice worth the squeeze?'
Much of the criticism of Mamdani's plan comes because it risks threatening existing businesses, which have been pressured to increase prices due to rising costs.
Bodega owners, for example, worry they could be undercut by city-run groceries, which under Mamdani's proposal wouldn't have to pay rent or city license fees.
A spokesperson for Mamdani said the new stores would be placed in food deserts, where there isn't existing competition - but the genuine existence of true food deserts in the city is debated.
Isabella Weber, an associate professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, was one of 30 progressive economists (including Yanis Varoufakis) who signed a letter backing Mamdani's policies and sees municipally run grocery stores not as a cure-all, but as a necessary experiment amid what she calls an 'affordability crisis' engulfing food, housing and childcare.
This crisis, she said, is further exacerbated by overburdened food banks amid the eroding safety net of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (Snap), which will face deep cuts under President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
'These are things where you can't say, 'I'm not in the mood of eating today,'' Weber said. 'They're necessities of life.'
A public store could reduce prices by eliminating mark-ups, using public land and applying subsidies, she said. If scaled, it might also force private grocers to lower prices. 'But that's a big 'if,'' she said.
An alternative use of the funds could rely on a model seen in Mexico, where the government negotiated with major grocery chains to cap prices on essential goods. India has taken a different approach too through fair price shops, which offer high-calorie foods at subsidised rates.
If Mamdani is elected in November and able to enact his plan, the pilot stores will become an important case study for democratic socialists. Photo / Adam Gray, Bloomberg, via the Washington Post
The Venezuela comparisons
The mayoral candidate's idea has prompted sharp warnings from local supermarket operators.
John Catsimatidis, owner of the Gristedes and D'Agostino grocery chains (and a former Republican candidate for New York City mayor), threatened to leave the city if Mamdani is elected and warned of 'Soviet bread lines' if the plan goes forward.
'Everything Mr Mamdani is suggesting was already done by Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and Fidel Castro in Cuba,' Catsimatidis wrote in an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal.
Comparing the plan to Venezuela, whose food crisis is a cautionary tale of state-controlled food systems gone awry due to corruption and economic collapse, is not unique to the billionaire.
Francisco Rodriguez, a former economic adviser to the United Nations and longtime researcher of the Venezuelan crisis, said there are lessons to learn from the country's approach to operating city-run stores.
While the Chavez government's subsidised food stores initially helped reduce hunger and shore up political support, the model unravelled when oil prices collapsed and the country could no longer foot the bill, leading to extreme hunger.
'Those stores worked while the government was riding high on oil prices. Once that revenue fell - first from market forces, then sanctions - it couldn't keep subsidising food, and the whole system collapsed,' said Rodriguez, now a public affairs professor at the University of Denver.
New York, he said, would also have to contend with other problems that Venezuela faced, including exploitation of the subsidies by people who didn't need cheaper groceries and black markets that flourished as people bought products to resell.
'Most economists, and I would concur, say that universal subsidies aren't the most efficient use of public funds,' Rodriguez said. 'You end up helping people who don't need it.'
Instead, he recommends targeted support that delivers food directly to needy families, expansion of other programmes to those near poverty and social policies to support the middle class.
For now, Mamdani's proposal is still just a proposal. If he's elected in November and able to enact his plan, the pilot stores will become an important case study for democratic socialists. But their success will depend less on ideology than on execution.
'It's about trying, piloting, and seeing what works,' said Weber, the UMass Amherst professor. 'If it works, it can be scaled. If not, at least we've learned something valuable.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
15 hours ago
- 1News
Trump threatens Russia with tariffs and boosts US weapons for Ukraine
President Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened Russia with steep tariffs and announced a rejuvenated pipeline for American weapons to reach Ukraine, hardening his stance toward Moscow after months of frustration about unsuccessful negotiations for ending the war. The latest steps reflect an evolving approach from the Republican president, who promised to swiftly resolve the war Russian President Vladimir Putin started when he invaded Ukraine three years ago. Trump has often criticised Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for allowing the war to happen, but more recently has expressed growing irritation toward Putin. 'It just keeps going on and on and on,' Trump said. 'Every night, people are dying.' Trump said he would implement 'severe tariffs' unless a peace deal is reached within 50 days. He provided few details on how they would be implemented, but he described them as secondary tariffs, meaning they would target Russia's trading partners in an effort to isolate Moscow in the global economy. 'I use trade for a lot of things,' Trump added. 'But it's great for settling wars.' ADVERTISEMENT See more on this story on TVNZ+ Trump also said that European allies would buy 'billions and billions' of dollars of US military equipment to be transferred to Ukraine, replenishing the besieged country's supplies of weapons. He made the announcement in the Oval Office alongside NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Included in the plan are Patriot air defence systems, a top priority for Ukraine as it fends off Russian drones and missiles. Doubts were recently raised about Trump's commitment to supply Ukraine when the Pentagon paused shipments over concerns that US stockpiles were running low. Rutte said Germany, Finland, Canada, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom and Denmark would be among the buyers to supply Ukraine. He said: 'Speed is of the essence here,' and he said the shipments should make Putin 'reconsider' peace negotiations. Trump exasperated with Putin President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office of the White House (Source: Associated Press) ADVERTISEMENT Trump has long boasted of his friendly relationship with Putin, and after taking office in January, repeatedly asserted that Russia was more willing than Ukraine to reach a peace deal. At the same time, Trump accused Zelensky of prolonging the war and called him a 'dictator without elections'. But Russia's relentless onslaught against civilian areas of Ukraine wore down Trump's patience. In April, Trump urged Putin to 'STOP!' launching deadly barrages on Kyiv, and the following month said in a social media post that the Russian leader 'has gone absolutely CRAZY!' as the bombardments continued. Meanwhile, Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, met with Zelensky in Kyiv on Tuesday. Zelensky said he had 'a productive conversation' with Kellogg about strengthening Ukrainian air defences, joint arms production and purchasing US weapons in conjunction with European countries, as well as the possibility of tighter international sanctions on the Kremlin. 'We hope for the leadership of the United States, because it is clear that Moscow will not stop unless its ... ambitions are stopped by force,' Zelensky said on Telegram. Talks on sending Patriot missiles People look at a damaged residential building following Russian air attack in Lviv, Ukraine (Source: Associated Press) ADVERTISEMENT Russia has pounded Ukrainian cities, including the capital, Kyiv, with hundreds of drones and cruise and ballistic missiles that Ukraine's air defences are struggling to counter. June brought the highest monthly civilian casualties of the past three years, with 232 people killed and 1343 wounded, the UN human rights mission in Ukraine said. Russia launched 10 times more drones and missiles in June than in the same month last year, it said. At the same time, Russia's bigger army is making a new effort to drive back Ukrainian defenders on parts of the 1000-kilometre front line. Trump confirmed the US is sending Ukraine more badly needed Patriot air defence missiles and that the European Union will pay the US for the 'various pieces of very sophisticated' weaponry. While the EU is not allowed under its treaties to buy weapons, individual EU member countries can and are, just as NATO member countries are buying and sending weapons. Germany has offered to finance two Patriot systems, government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said Tuesday in Berlin. As for other European countries financing more systems, that would have to be discussed in talks, he said. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius was travelling to Washington on Monday to meet with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Germany has already given three of its own Patriot systems to Ukraine, and Pistorius was quoted as saying in an interview with the Financial Times that it now has only six. ADVERTISEMENT 'Weapons flowing at a record level' Firefighters work at the site of Russian air attack in Lviv, Ukraine, Saturday, July 12, 2025. (Source: Associated Press) A top ally of Trump, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said Monday that the conflict is nearing an inflexion point as Trump shows growing interest in helping Ukraine fight back against Russia's full-scale invasion. It's a cause that Trump had previously dismissed as being a waste of US taxpayer money. 'In the coming days, you'll see weapons flowing at a record level to help Ukraine defend themselves,' Graham said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' He added: 'One of the biggest miscalculations Putin has made is to play Trump. And you just watch, in the coming days and weeks, there's going to be a massive effort to get Putin to the table.' Kirill Dmitriev, Putin's envoy for international investment who took part in talks with US officials in Saudi Arabia in February, dismissed what he said were efforts to drive a wedge between Moscow and Washington. 'Constructive dialogue between Russia and the United States is more effective than doomed-to-fail attempts at pressure,' Dmitriev said in a post on Telegram. 'This dialogue will continue, despite titanic efforts to disrupt it by all possible means.'


NZ Herald
17 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Drones are key to winning wars now. The US makes hardly any of them
For four days last month, they tested prototypes of one-way drones by trying to crash them into programmed targets, while soldiers tried to stop the drones with special electronic equipment. The exercise aimed to help US defence contractors and soldiers get better at drone warfare. But it illustrated some of the ways in which the US military could be unprepared for such a conflict. The nation lags behind Russia and China in manufacturing drones, training soldiers to use them and defending against them, according to interviews with more than a dozen US military officials and drone industry experts. 'We all know the same thing. We aren't giving the American war fighter what they need to survive warfare today,' said Trent Emeneker, project manager of the Autonomy Portfolio at the military's Defence Innovation Unit, which organised the exercise in Alaska and paid for the development of the drone prototypes that flew there. 'If we had to go to war tomorrow, do we have what we need? No. What we are trying to do is fix that.' Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has acknowledged that the country has fallen behind, and he announced a series of new policies and investments in drones that he vowed would close the gap. In a video last week, he cited outdated rules and procurement processes as making it too difficult for commanding officers to buy drones and train their soldiers to use them. 'While our adversaries have produced millions of cheap drones,' he said, 'we were mired in bureaucratic red tape.' The video came on the heels of an executive order signed by President Donald Trump last month called 'Unleashing American Drone Dominance', which directs federal agencies to fast-track approvals for American drone manufacturers and protect the US drone supply chain from 'undue foreign influence'. But it will take time and money to grow a domestic industry capable of producing enough drones to meet the needs of the US military. Although the US has excelled in developing large, complex unmanned aircraft such as the Predator and Reaper drones, which cost tens of millions of dollars apiece, today's conflicts have been dominated by swarms of smaller, inexpensive drones that are largely produced with components from China. The Defence Department did not respond to requests for comment. Drones have become a weapon of choice on modern battlefields. In the early days of the war in Ukraine, soldiers beat back the Russian invasion by adding deadly modifications to the Mavic, a drone sold to hobbyists by DJI, a Chinese company that is the world's largest drone manufacturer. Versions of the Mavic cost between US$300 and US$5000, according to online retailers. DJI, of Shenzhen, China, accounts for about 70% of all commercial drones sold globally for hobby and industrial use, such as aerial photography, package delivery, and weather research. The privately held company sells its equipment to customers in the US — there's even an authorised store on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan — but US law bars the military from buying Chinese drones. The company declined to share market data, but industry experts estimate that DJI's output far exceeds that of any other drone manufacturer. 'No one even comes close,' said Bobby Sakaki, chief executive of UAS NEXUS, a drone industry consultant. 'DJI can make millions of drones per year. That is a hundred times more than anybody in the US can make.' Although DJI is not a military company and said it cuts off customers who use its drones for armed conflict, its near-total dominance of the market for drones and drone components has caused alarm in Washington, where some lawmakers want to ban its products so that a domestic industry can flourish. But it will take time and money to grow a domestic industry capable of producing enough drones to meet the needs of the US military. A drone made by Neros, a start-up in El Segundo, California, during a military exercise in the Yukon Training Area in Alaska, last month. A four-day test in the Alaska wilderness shows how far the US military and American drone companies lag behind China in the technology. Photo / Ash Adams, the New York Times Enter Silicon Valley investors who have been pouring money into American drone companies, anticipating that the Defence Department will place a large order for American-made drones. Peter Thiel's Founders Fund has invested more than US$1 billion in Anduril Industries, an American defence technology company that specialises in advanced autonomous systems. Trump's son Donald Trump jnr joined the board of Unusual Machines, another US drone maker, last year. About 500 companies manufacture drones in the US, producing fewer than 100,000 a year, according to Ryan Carver, communications manager for the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International, a non-profit organisation of industry professionals. But many are start-ups without a track record of production or sales. Founders jockey for the chance to show off their wares to military units that are beginning to work with drones. The changes Hegseth announced last Friday, which make it easier for commanders to buy drones, will intensify that competition. 'Everyone wants to win the Army's big drone contract, get their billion-dollar cheque and go retire on an island somewhere,' said Nathan Ecelbarger, chairman of the US National Drone Association, which promotes the rapid advancement of drone and counter-drone technologies. The exercise in Alaska showed how hard it can be to develop homegrown drone capabilities. The first two days of testing were full of setbacks. Two companies were testing prototypes of a long-range unmanned craft that could fly for hours, navigate without GPS or a human operator, and crash into a target that it had been trained to recognise. They were among four finalists — out of more than 100 applicants — to get the money from the Defence Innovation Unit to develop the systems. Two other companies were set to test their prototypes in Ukraine. The craft made by Dragoon, a start-up in Tucson, Arizona, experienced engine trouble and then issues with navigation. It failed to hit a target. On the final day, it recognised a target — an M113 armoured personnel carrier — and swooped down to crash into it. The hit was considered a success, even though the target had not been the one intended. 'We have got a lot of work to do to make it operational, for sure,' said Jason Douglas, one of three co-founders of Dragoon. 'But those were huge steps.' AeroVironment fared worse. At first, its drone failed to launch. Then one crashed into a mountain after its navigation system was blocked, narrowly missing a group of soldiers who stood with their jamming equipment. Although one of its drones flew long distances and successfully crashed into a target with the help of GPS, the prototype never hit a target once its GPS was blocked. Paul Frommelt, a spokesperson for the company, noted that the exercise was a chance to collect data on 'an experimental variant of one of our products'. While many small drones are controlled by human operators, the Defence Innovation Unit has been trying to develop semiautonomous systems that can be trained by artificial intelligence to recognise targets — enemy tanks, for instance — and attack them even if communication with the human operator is cut. 'Do we need a capability like this? Yes. I think that is very clear in the modern battlefield,' said Emeneker, who is a civilian contractor for the DIU. But he acknowledged that the project might not succeed. 'Things haven't gone as smoothly as I wanted. It's clear that there are some still really hard technological challenges to overcome.' The soldiers who participated in the exercise, most of them from the Electromagnetic Warfare Platoon of the Army's 11th Airborne Division, experienced their own problems. On a mountaintop, they set up six tall electronic jammers, which looked like slender microphones attached to black tripods. They emitted radio signals that were supposed to overpower the signals sent by the drone operators. Those jammers — some of which were designed more than a decade ago to fight the war on terror — had hardly any effect. Neither did the backpacks containing newer drone-disarming equipment that some soldiers wore. Soren Monroe-Anderson, centre, chief executive and co-founder of Neros, a start-up based in El Segundo, California, during a military exercise in the Yukon Training Area in Alaska. Photo / Ash Adams, the New York Times The team had a drone-buster, too — a huge gun-like device that looked like something from the movie Ghostbusters. But no one bothered to try it. 'That thing never worked,' one man said. Over time, the soldiers improved. By the fourth day of the exercise, they had figured out how to use their jamming equipment more effectively. A black suitcase-sized box called a Magpie worked particularly well, they said. But Lieutenant-Colonel Scott Smith, director for the non-lethal effects section of the 11th Airborne Division, said the exercise highlighted how much more work Americans needed to do to prepare for a conflict involving drones. 'Their equipment just doesn't have the desired effect against the latest technology,' he said. Chris Bonzagni, a drone industry consultant with Contact Front Technologies who helped put on the Alaska test, said many of the American drones that were initially delivered to Ukraine failed on the battlefield because they were outdated or easily jammed by the Russians. 'In Ukraine, the companies delivering tech to the war fighters are with them all the time, observing first-hand what is working and what is not,' he said. Ukraine has also become a drone-making hub because its soldiers and engineers are forced to master drone technology to survive, something Americans have not experienced yet. The US event was held at the Yukon Training Area, a military site about an hour south of Fairbanks, because it was the only place where organisers could get permission to fly the drones while soldiers tried to try to jam them, Emeneker said. The electronic signals used to disrupt drones can wreak havoc with civilian aircraft, radios and cellphones, making it difficult to get clearance to conduct such exercises in populated areas. Some US drone companies do their testing and development in Ukraine. That may be why one drone stood out in Alaska: a small, short-range quadcopter created by Neros, a start-up in El Segundo, California, with an office in Ukraine, which was testing a radio. That drone, called the Archer, managed to hover about 3m over the soldiers' heads, despite their jamming equipment. Its radio toggled between multiple frequencies, switching every time soldiers tried to jam it. It carried a jar of strawberry jam, a joke from Soren Monroe-Anderson, the 22-year-old chief executive and co-founder who piloted it with what looked like a video game controller. Neros, which is providing about 6000 drones to Ukraine this year and produced the drone that appeared in Hegseth's video, has been described by some US military leaders as their best alternative to China's DJI. The Archer sells for about US$2000 each, making it one of the most affordable models. Neros produces only about 1500 Archers per month in a factory where 15 workers assemble them by hand. Monroe-Anderson, a former drone racer, said he was ramping up production and wanted to build a factory capable of making a million drones a year. He aspires to compete with DJI but acknowledged the daunting odds. 'It is so much better than really any other company in the world,' he said of DJI. 'That's the reason why it is important to do what we are doing.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Farah Stockman Photographs by: Tyler Hicks and Ash Adams ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES


NZ Herald
17 hours ago
- NZ Herald
New York debates mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's plan for city-run grocery stores
Atlanta is set to open two grocery stores later this year through a public-private alliance backed by a US$8m ($13m) grant and operated in partnership with regional chain Savi Provisions. The stores are slated for so-called food deserts, where availability of fresh, affordable food is scarce. City officials chose a public-private model not just for long-term sustainability but because the existing development incentives didn't encourage the private sector to step up, according to Laurie Prickett, a senior vice-president at Invest Atlanta, the city's economic development arm. If successful, Atlanta plans to expand its model, aiming to place every resident within a kilometre of fresh food by 2030, she said. Government-supported grocery models aren't a new idea. They've taken the form of non-profits, co-ops, military-base commissaries, public-private partnerships, and municipally owned and operated stores - with varying results. Boston's Daily Table, a non-profit grocery chain launched by a former Trader Joe's president, announced its closing in May after a decade of trying to sustain its mission of providing affordable food. While its funding came from a variety of sources, federal cuts to food aid programmes was the catalyst for its demise. In Baldwin, Florida, a town-owned market folded for similar reasons. But in rural St Paul, Kansas, which had been without a grocery retailer for more than 20 years before a public-private partnership opened a supermarket in 2008, the local government doubled down on its investment and became the store's sole owner in 2013. A major difference between the models in other American cities and Mamdani's proposal is the scale. Baldwin has fewer than 1300 residents; Atlanta is home to around 520,000, not far behind Boston's 673,000. New York City has an estimated population of 8.48 million. Also, Mamdani isn't proposing to have private operators run the stores. The enterprise would be fully owned by the city, which would sell the groceries at cost and source products from neighbourhood suppliers where possible. Supporters of Mamdani's pilot programme call it a bold solution for New Yorkers struggling to afford the basics. Critics warn of government overreach and unintended consequences, including harm to neighbourhood bodega owners. Others question whether New York's bloated bureaucracy is even capable of running grocery stores. Supply chains are complex, operating costs are high, and profit margins are thin. Even if city-run stores aim to break even at best, the savings for shoppers might be modest, said Sara John, who leads the Centre for Science in the Public Interest's work on federal policy and the private sector. John doesn't view city-run grocery stores as a silver bullet but sees potential in a model accountable to consumers, not shareholders. 'Prioritising people over profits could make a difference,' she said, though she emphasised that execution would be challenging. Zohran Mamdani while ordering an iced coffee from a deli after a campaign event in Queens in June. Photo / Adam Gray, Bloomberg via the Washington Post Funding the pilot Mamdani's plan comes after grocery costs in the city jumped nearly 9% in 2022 - the highest in 40 years - and climbed again in 2023, while wage growth failed to keep pace, putting basic necessities out of reach for a growing number of residents. The financial strain is turning political; a recent poll found that nearly two-thirds of New Yorkers, including majorities across political lines, support the idea of city-run stores. Funding for Mamdani's proposed plan largely relies on raising taxes on New York's wealthiest 1% and additional corporation tax. The city already spends millions on Fresh, a programme launched in 2009 to tackle the lack of neighbourhood grocers in select communities. There are now more than 50 Fresh-supported stores that are open or in development and receive a mix of zoning benefits and tax breaks. But a report from the comptroller's office found the programme's impact on food access has been limited at best. Mamdani has jumped on those findings, criticising the programme for having little accountability for affordability, labour standards or acceptance among those eligible for food assistance. 'There's no guarantee those groceries are cheaper,' he said in an interview with Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast in May. Benjamin Lorr, author of The Secret Life of Groceries, which examines the human labour that goes into the industry, said the idea of city-run stores may sound radical, but is a natural response to deep imbalances in the current grocery market. If the market is failing to provide basic goods affordably and equitably, it's not unreasonable for the public to step in, Lorr said. 'The question is: Can it be done well? Is the juice worth the squeeze?' Much of the criticism of Mamdani's plan comes because it risks threatening existing businesses, which have been pressured to increase prices due to rising costs. Bodega owners, for example, worry they could be undercut by city-run groceries, which under Mamdani's proposal wouldn't have to pay rent or city license fees. A spokesperson for Mamdani said the new stores would be placed in food deserts, where there isn't existing competition - but the genuine existence of true food deserts in the city is debated. Isabella Weber, an associate professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, was one of 30 progressive economists (including Yanis Varoufakis) who signed a letter backing Mamdani's policies and sees municipally run grocery stores not as a cure-all, but as a necessary experiment amid what she calls an 'affordability crisis' engulfing food, housing and childcare. This crisis, she said, is further exacerbated by overburdened food banks amid the eroding safety net of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (Snap), which will face deep cuts under President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'These are things where you can't say, 'I'm not in the mood of eating today,'' Weber said. 'They're necessities of life.' A public store could reduce prices by eliminating mark-ups, using public land and applying subsidies, she said. If scaled, it might also force private grocers to lower prices. 'But that's a big 'if,'' she said. An alternative use of the funds could rely on a model seen in Mexico, where the government negotiated with major grocery chains to cap prices on essential goods. India has taken a different approach too through fair price shops, which offer high-calorie foods at subsidised rates. If Mamdani is elected in November and able to enact his plan, the pilot stores will become an important case study for democratic socialists. Photo / Adam Gray, Bloomberg, via the Washington Post The Venezuela comparisons The mayoral candidate's idea has prompted sharp warnings from local supermarket operators. John Catsimatidis, owner of the Gristedes and D'Agostino grocery chains (and a former Republican candidate for New York City mayor), threatened to leave the city if Mamdani is elected and warned of 'Soviet bread lines' if the plan goes forward. 'Everything Mr Mamdani is suggesting was already done by Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and Fidel Castro in Cuba,' Catsimatidis wrote in an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal. Comparing the plan to Venezuela, whose food crisis is a cautionary tale of state-controlled food systems gone awry due to corruption and economic collapse, is not unique to the billionaire. Francisco Rodriguez, a former economic adviser to the United Nations and longtime researcher of the Venezuelan crisis, said there are lessons to learn from the country's approach to operating city-run stores. While the Chavez government's subsidised food stores initially helped reduce hunger and shore up political support, the model unravelled when oil prices collapsed and the country could no longer foot the bill, leading to extreme hunger. 'Those stores worked while the government was riding high on oil prices. Once that revenue fell - first from market forces, then sanctions - it couldn't keep subsidising food, and the whole system collapsed,' said Rodriguez, now a public affairs professor at the University of Denver. New York, he said, would also have to contend with other problems that Venezuela faced, including exploitation of the subsidies by people who didn't need cheaper groceries and black markets that flourished as people bought products to resell. 'Most economists, and I would concur, say that universal subsidies aren't the most efficient use of public funds,' Rodriguez said. 'You end up helping people who don't need it.' Instead, he recommends targeted support that delivers food directly to needy families, expansion of other programmes to those near poverty and social policies to support the middle class. For now, Mamdani's proposal is still just a proposal. If he's elected in November and able to enact his plan, the pilot stores will become an important case study for democratic socialists. But their success will depend less on ideology than on execution. 'It's about trying, piloting, and seeing what works,' said Weber, the UMass Amherst professor. 'If it works, it can be scaled. If not, at least we've learned something valuable.'