
Govt winds up council reform storm
In 2010, four-term councillor Bryan Cadogan aimed to unseat sitting Clutha mayor Juno Hayes by running on a platform of tying rates to inflation and focusing on core services. Cadogan won by 354 votes, turning around the previous election result in the district hemmed in by Dunedin, Central Otago, and Southland.
Now, the Clutha mayor, who isn't running for re-election in October's elections, finds himself, and his sector, in the firing line of an interventionist Government considering rates caps, and introducing legislation to ensure councils focus on – that's right – core services.
The Local Government NZ conference in Ōtautahi/Christchurch was formally launched on Wednesday with a video address, of less than two minutes, by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon.
Councils need to get back to basics, he said, spending wisely and delivering value. What does that mean? 'Prioritising pipes over vanity projects,' explained the prime minister, flanked by national flags. 'It means roads over reports, and it means real outcomes.'
When the address finished, conference MC Miriama Kamo started clapping loudly, joined somewhat unenthusiastically by a smattering of conference attendees. 'I'm the only one clapping, I see,' Kamo quipped.
Cadogan says the Government's message landed 'pretty flatly' with him. 'It's getting a wee bit tedious getting asked time and time again to do the impossible.'
Chris Bishop, the minister overseeing resource management reforms, took a more fire and brimstone approach than his leader, saying there was shrinking evidence councils were cutting their cloth and enabling growth.
'You cry out for more financing and funding tools. We're giving them to you. You ask for a better, simpler planning system. We're giving this to you, too.
'We are getting our house in order. It's time you sorted yours out.'
(Some would have thought that line a bit rich, given analysis of May's Budget suggests Luxon's coalition will increase gross debt by more in five years than the Covid-affected previous government did in six.)
Bishop announced a 'plan stop', warning councils not to waste money and time reviewing city and district plans, and regional policy statements – with narrow exceptions – ahead of an overhaul of resource management laws due to land in 2027.
'The time for excuses is over,' Chris Bishop told the Local Government NZ conference in Christchurch. Photo: David Williams
Sam Broughton, mayor of Selwyn, just south of Christchurch, and president of Local Government NZ, says: 'It was really good to have that certainty.'
Is that just common sense? Broughton says the progress on reforms is pleasing, but adds: 'It feels like councils have been in this reform storm for six or seven years, and has just been ongoing change without actually landing something.'
Local Government Minister Simon Watts introduced the bill to focus councils on core services, which is expected to have its first reading on Thursday. ('It feels like the Government has a caricature of local government that isn't true,' Broughton says. He notes 80 percent of Selwyn council's capital spending is on pipes and roads.)
Watts' explanation of why it was necessary to force councils to concentrate on core services, like roads, water and rubbish, sent offended ripples through the conference crowd.
The minister used the analogy of setting boundaries for his children. Letting them do whatever they liked might lead to bad choices, he suggested. Instead, he might tell them, 'Hey, you've got these five things to do'.
Among the crowd's murmurs, one conference-goer shouted: 'Just a bit patronising, mate!'
From the conference stage, Watts appeared to pour cold water on the idea regional councils were about to be scrapped. 'We're thinking about it,' Watts said, adding ministers were cognisant 'there's already a huge amount of reform underway in your sector'.
Bishop tried to mollify concerns about potential environmental consequences from the audience, saying a new Natural Environment Act would focus on biodiversity, ecology and human health. Later, the minister tells Newsroom: 'There will be environmental limits that will be set through the new regime.'
(After a remit passed at Local Government NZ's annual general meeting on Wednesday, councils called for a review of local government's structure.)
Christopher Luxon beamed in to the Local Government NZ conference in Christchurch. Photo: David Williams
Government reforms for local government include the network-merging replacement for three waters, Local Water Done Well, waving city and regional deals under the noses of councils, and offering different funding and financing options for infrastructure to speed up house-building.
Back to Cadogan, the Clutha mayor, who talks to Newsroom while walking to a negotiation with other councils on water services.
He says despite Government rhetoric, councils can't be expected to achieve the triumvirate of lower rates, infrastructure upgrades and under-control debt. 'The Government know it, we know it, but we just keep on getting this.'
Clutha council's experience puts those financial management challenges in stark relief.
In 2019, its external borrowings were $5 million. Five years later, it had ballooned to $123m. To add salt to the financial wound, this year's average rates rise was an 'ungodly' 16.59 percent.
How did this happen? 'Three waters, wholly and solely,' Cadogan says.
(Last year, the mayor predicts the financial consequences of the 'three waters debacle' will hit. In the latest annual plan, he says 89.4 percent of this year's rates rise is attributable to roads, rubbish and three waters.)
Clutha's unfortunate figures are: the third-longest water reticulation network in the country, with 27 sewage or water plants on 30-year consents, and, crucially, only 18,500 people to pay for it.
Of the country's 565 drinking water quality breaches last year, 338 or 60 percent were in Clutha.
'We all want lower rates increases,' says Sam Broughton, the Selwyn district mayor and Local Government NZ president. Photo: David Williams
Cadogan gives the example of a water upgrade for the tiny town of Waihola: running an 18.5km pipeline from Milton's water treatment plant oto the reservoir cost $6.3m. After years of problems with water quality and quantity, boil water notices were removed for all but 20 of the town's 247 houses.
'Then we go to Heriot, and then we go to Tapanui, then Owaka, then Clinton,' Cadogan says. 'It's a financial delusion that you can have rates cap, you can have debt ceilings, and you have to do this infrastructure update.'
It would have been better for the National-led coalition to lift the hood on Labour's three waters policy and chuck out what they didn't like, Broughton says, instead of scrapping it and starting again. He thinks resolving water across the country might take seven or eight more steps.
Policy lurches and delays cost millions of dollars and can, of course, increase council rates.
Many councils might feel aggrieved by the ministerial attack given the National Party's pre-election commitment to devolution and localism. Luxon promised to reshape the relationship between central and local government.
'It does feel like every party in opposition is a localist,' Broughton says, 'and then as soon as they're in power, they become a creature that draws all the more power to themselves.'
Broughton was applauded by conference attendees for his opening comments – made before Bishop's address.
'We all want lower rates increases. I want lower rates increases, I know you want lower rates increases, I hear from my community they want lower rates increases. But it can't be at the expense of our children picking up the tab because of our negligence today.'
The Selwyn mayor tells Newsroom a key problem is councils have few alternatives to raise money.
The best tool the Government could give councils, in his opinion, is to return GST spending on new houses locally. 'That would be a game-changer for us,' he says, noting between 1000 and 3000 houses have been built each year in Selwyn over the past five or six years.
Broughton's also a fan of bed taxes, something Queenstown's council has, for years, been pushing for. Luxon said this week the Government's not actively considering a bed tax.
'It has just been an avalanche of unstoppable figures. Unstoppable.' Bryan Cadogan, Clutha mayor
This is the second year ministers have used the Local Government NZ conference to berate councils for spending on 'nice-to-haves'.
Last year, the venue, Wellington's $180m Tākina centre, was in the crosshairs. But Christchurch's half-billion-dollar monolithic convention centre, Te Pae, is of a different ilk – paid for by taxpayers as a post-quake anchor project.
Luxon, Watts and Bishop did miss a trick in Christchurch, though.
A 15-minute walk away from Te Pae is the new stadium, Te Kaha – a loss-making facility that will cost ratepayers $453m to build. The city's ratepayers face a three-year, cumulative rates rise of 24.66 percent that without the stadium, that would have been 19.43 percent.
Using Luxon's words, the stadium isn't roads, rubbish or water, and tends, perhaps, more towards a vanity project.
The last word goes to Cadogan, the outgoing Clutha mayor. He hopes a water services 'umbrella' with other councils will help his district save on infrastructure spending.
'We've been basically a stand-alone council for the last five years. Have a look what that did to our debt,' he says.
'I'm gutted as a mayor. I pride myself on really understanding figures. I understand them all right. It has just been an avalanche of unstoppable figures. Unstoppable.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
‘Dramatic Shift' That Could Leave KiwiSaver Members Better Off
Article – RNZ The proportion of KiwiSaver in funds with high volatility has quadrupled in three years. , Money Correspondent A 'dramatic' shift of KiwiSaver investments into riskier funds should make New Zealanders better off in the long run, if past trends hold true. The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) released research this week noting the significant shift in risk of KiwiSaver investments. The proportion of KiwiSaver in funds that are risk category five, with high volatility, has quadrupled from 10 percent in 2021 to more than 40 percent in 2024. Riskier funds can be expected to be more volatile but over the long term should produce better results. They are generally recommended for investors who still have a significant period of time until they need to access their investments. Morningstar data shows that aggressive funds have returned 10.89 percent a year over five years, and 9.34 percent over 10 years. That is compared to 3.07 percent a year over 10 years for conservative funds, 4.47 percent for moderate funds, 6.18 percent for balanced and 7.68 percent for growth. Data director Greg Bunkall said cash investments' returns had lagged the rate of inflation over that time. The FMA said the proportion of KiwiSaver investments in lower risk funds dropped from 30 percent to 10 percent over the same 2021-to-2025 period. Part of this was due to the change to default funds, which now require them to be balanced. But it said there were other factors at play, too. 'In the period prior to the Covid-19 global pandemic, interest rates were historically low, and inflation was low and stable. As a result, many fixed-income assets provided low returns. On the other hand, stock markets have performed very well in most years since 2017, and the few periods of weakness quickly reversed. 'The strong performance and relative stability of stock markets may have therefore made higher-risk investments more attractive to investors. The persistence of this situation over several years may have contributed to the observed shift in preference for higher-risk investments, illustrating adaptive expectations among investors.' It said market performance could also have affected the risk rating of funds. Spikes of volatility in 2020 and earlier this year affect funds' performance history. A number of providers have recently launched 'high growth' funds that invest almost solely in equities. FMA director of markets, investors and reporting John Horner said the FMA was not necessarily implying that people were in the wrong fund or that providers were advising members towards higher-risk funds. 'The observed increase in the risk categorisation of KiwiSaver funds appears to reflect a combination of factors including policy settings, investor behaviour, and market volatility. 'KiwiSaver is a long-term savings regime for retirement, and for most long term investments a higher risk strategy will be appropriate. 'We note that as KiwiSaver has been in existence for a while and become more mature there are more options available, including higher risk options, and there is also more material available to allow investors to educate or inform themselves about risk vs reward.' Fisher Funds general manager of KiwiSaver David Boyle said the increase in investments in riskier funds was a good thing for investors wanting to grow retirement savings over the long term. He said consumers knew more about the role of growth assets in a long-term savings scheme like KiwiSaver. Fund mangers were responding to consumer interest and providing education on the risks and benefits of different fund types. Investors had experienced the Covid downturn and seen the recovery. 'The advent of platforms that allow investors to build their own portfolios allows providers to launch single sector specialist offerings that are often at the riskier end of the spectrum.' He said members still had choice and there were many lower-risk and savings options available. Booster chief executive Di Papadopoulos agreed New Zealanders were becoming more sophisticated in assessing their time horizons and figuring out if they could handle more risk to target higher returns. 'It appears people are moving to higher risk funds that align with them not needing their KiwiSaver money for retirement anytime soon,' she said. 'At Booster, we have seen the benefit of these decisions. Moving from a balanced fund to a growth fund increases projected balances at retirement significantly. 'A key factor is how soon or long in the future your might need to access your KiwiSaver, such as if you want to use it to buy your first home, or for your retirement. 'If you're unsure about whether you are in the right fund it's a good idea to check in with a financial adviser.' How much difference might your outlook be? Based on Sorted's retirement calculator… A 20-year-old joining KiwiSaver now with no investment, earning $60,000 and contributing 4 percent of their salary plus an employer's contribution of 4 percent could expect to have at 65: $381,354 in a balanced fund $477,814 in a growth fund $606,456 in an aggressive fund This accounts for inflation.


Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
‘Dramatic Shift' That Could Leave KiwiSaver Members Better Off
The proportion of KiwiSaver in funds with high volatility has quadrupled in three years. A 'dramatic' shift of KiwiSaver investments into riskier funds should make New Zealanders better off in the long run, if past trends hold true. The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) released research this week noting the significant shift in risk of KiwiSaver investments. The proportion of KiwiSaver in funds that are risk category five, with high volatility, has quadrupled from 10 percent in 2021 to more than 40 percent in 2024. Riskier funds can be expected to be more volatile but over the long term should produce better results. They are generally recommended for investors who still have a significant period of time until they need to access their investments. Morningstar data shows that aggressive funds have returned 10.89 percent a year over five years, and 9.34 percent over 10 years. That is compared to 3.07 percent a year over 10 years for conservative funds, 4.47 percent for moderate funds, 6.18 percent for balanced and 7.68 percent for growth. Data director Greg Bunkall said cash investments' returns had lagged the rate of inflation over that time. The FMA said the proportion of KiwiSaver investments in lower risk funds dropped from 30 percent to 10 percent over the same 2021-to-2025 period. Part of this was due to the change to default funds, which now require them to be balanced. But it said there were other factors at play, too. 'In the period prior to the Covid-19 global pandemic, interest rates were historically low, and inflation was low and stable. As a result, many fixed-income assets provided low returns. On the other hand, stock markets have performed very well in most years since 2017, and the few periods of weakness quickly reversed. 'The strong performance and relative stability of stock markets may have therefore made higher-risk investments more attractive to investors. The persistence of this situation over several years may have contributed to the observed shift in preference for higher-risk investments, illustrating adaptive expectations among investors.' It said market performance could also have affected the risk rating of funds. Spikes of volatility in 2020 and earlier this year affect funds' performance history. A number of providers have recently launched 'high growth' funds that invest almost solely in equities. FMA director of markets, investors and reporting John Horner said the FMA was not necessarily implying that people were in the wrong fund or that providers were advising members towards higher-risk funds. 'The observed increase in the risk categorisation of KiwiSaver funds appears to reflect a combination of factors including policy settings, investor behaviour, and market volatility. 'KiwiSaver is a long-term savings regime for retirement, and for most long term investments a higher risk strategy will be appropriate. 'We note that as KiwiSaver has been in existence for a while and become more mature there are more options available, including higher risk options, and there is also more material available to allow investors to educate or inform themselves about risk vs reward.' Fisher Funds general manager of KiwiSaver David Boyle said the increase in investments in riskier funds was a good thing for investors wanting to grow retirement savings over the long term. He said consumers knew more about the role of growth assets in a long-term savings scheme like KiwiSaver. Fund mangers were responding to consumer interest and providing education on the risks and benefits of different fund types. Investors had experienced the Covid downturn and seen the recovery. 'The advent of platforms that allow investors to build their own portfolios allows providers to launch single sector specialist offerings that are often at the riskier end of the spectrum.' He said members still had choice and there were many lower-risk and savings options available. Booster chief executive Di Papadopoulos agreed New Zealanders were becoming more sophisticated in assessing their time horizons and figuring out if they could handle more risk to target higher returns. 'It appears people are moving to higher risk funds that align with them not needing their KiwiSaver money for retirement anytime soon,' she said. 'At Booster, we have seen the benefit of these decisions. Moving from a balanced fund to a growth fund increases projected balances at retirement significantly. 'A key factor is how soon or long in the future your might need to access your KiwiSaver, such as if you want to use it to buy your first home, or for your retirement. 'If you're unsure about whether you are in the right fund it's a good idea to check in with a financial adviser.' How much difference might your outlook be? Based on Sorted's retirement calculator… A 20-year-old joining KiwiSaver now with no investment, earning $60,000 and contributing 4 percent of their salary plus an employer's contribution of 4 percent could expect to have at 65: $381,354 in a balanced fund $477,814 in a growth fund $606,456 in an aggressive fund This accounts for inflation.


Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
'Dramatic Shift' That Could Leave KiwiSaver Members Better Off
A "dramatic" shift of KiwiSaver investments into riskier funds should make New Zealanders better off in the long run, if past trends hold true. The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) released research this week noting the significant shift in risk of KiwiSaver investments. The proportion of KiwiSaver in funds that are risk category five, with high volatility, has quadrupled from 10 percent in 2021 to more than 40 percent in 2024. Riskier funds can be expected to be more volatile but over the long term should produce better results. They are generally recommended for investors who still have a significant period of time until they need to access their investments. Morningstar data shows that aggressive funds have returned 10.89 percent a year over five years, and 9.34 percent over 10 years. That is compared to 3.07 percent a year over 10 years for conservative funds, 4.47 percent for moderate funds, 6.18 percent for balanced and 7.68 percent for growth. Data director Greg Bunkall said cash investments' returns had lagged the rate of inflation over that time. The FMA said the proportion of KiwiSaver investments in lower risk funds dropped from 30 percent to 10 percent over the same 2021-to-2025 period. Part of this was due to the change to default funds, which now require them to be balanced. But it said there were other factors at play, too. "In the period prior to the Covid-19 global pandemic, interest rates were historically low, and inflation was low and stable. As a result, many fixed-income assets provided low returns. On the other hand, stock markets have performed very well in most years since 2017, and the few periods of weakness quickly reversed. "The strong performance and relative stability of stock markets may have therefore made higher-risk investments more attractive to investors. The persistence of this situation over several years may have contributed to the observed shift in preference for higher-risk investments, illustrating adaptive expectations among investors." It said market performance could also have affected the risk rating of funds. Spikes of volatility in 2020 and earlier this year affect funds' performance history. A number of providers have recently launched "high growth" funds that invest almost solely in equities. FMA director of markets, investors and reporting John Horner said the FMA was not necessarily implying that people were in the wrong fund or that providers were advising members towards higher-risk funds. "The observed increase in the risk categorisation of KiwiSaver funds appears to reflect a combination of factors including policy settings, investor behaviour, and market volatility. "KiwiSaver is a long-term savings regime for retirement, and for most long term investments a higher risk strategy will be appropriate. "We note that as KiwiSaver has been in existence for a while and become more mature there are more options available, including higher risk options, and there is also more material available to allow investors to educate or inform themselves about risk vs reward." Fisher Funds general manager of KiwiSaver David Boyle said the increase in investments in riskier funds was a good thing for investors wanting to grow retirement savings over the long term. He said consumers knew more about the role of growth assets in a long-term savings scheme like KiwiSaver. Fund mangers were responding to consumer interest and providing education on the risks and benefits of different fund types. Investors had experienced the Covid downturn and seen the recovery. "The advent of platforms that allow investors to build their own portfolios allows providers to launch single sector specialist offerings that are often at the riskier end of the spectrum." He said members still had choice and there were many lower-risk and savings options available. Booster chief executive Di Papadopoulos agreed New Zealanders were becoming more sophisticated in assessing their time horizons and figuring out if they could handle more risk to target higher returns. "It appears people are moving to higher risk funds that align with them not needing their KiwiSaver money for retirement anytime soon," she said. "At Booster, we have seen the benefit of these decisions. Moving from a balanced fund to a growth fund increases projected balances at retirement significantly. "A key factor is how soon or long in the future your might need to access your KiwiSaver, such as if you want to use it to buy your first home, or for your retirement. "If you're unsure about whether you are in the right fund it's a good idea to check in with a financial adviser." How much difference might your outlook be? Based on Sorted's retirement calculator… A 20-year-old joining KiwiSaver now with no investment, earning $60,000 and contributing 4 percent of their salary plus an employer's contribution of 4 percent could expect to have at 65: $381,354 in a balanced fund $477,814 in a growth fund $606,456 in an aggressive fund This accounts for inflation.