Son of ‘car boot king' claims dad's dementia was so bad when he cut him out of £43m will he drove his car at 2 kids
Adam Scott, 62, is embroiled in an inheritance dispute with his step-mother as he pursues the £43 million fortune he alleges he was promised by his 'car boot king' father Richard.
4
A bitter family row has emerged following the death of multimillionaire Richard Scott
Credit: Macclesfield Express
4
Adam, the eldest of Richard's 19 sons, is suing his step-mother after he claims he was promised the farm
Credit: Champion News Service Ltd
4
Richard died in 2018 - leaving his fortune to second wife and former cleaner, Jennifer
Credit: Champion News Service
Richard died in 2018 at the age of 81, leaving his fortune to his second wife and former cleaner, Jennifer, 60.
He amassed his £43 million fortune through running a vast
Cheshire farm
where ITV's
Car Boot Challenge
was filmed.
Adam, the eldest of Richard's 19 sons, is now suing his step-mother after he claims he was promised the farm.
The disinherited "golden boy" - who worked on the farm for 40 years - argued that his father was not in his right mind when he signed the two final wills.
Read more News
London High Court heard that Richard's dementia was so bad that he "drove his car at some children during the car boot sale" and even attacked his own wife and kids.
Psychiatric expert Dr Hugh Series explained there were "objective indicators of changes in Richard's behaviour" around the time he signed the disputed wills.
He told the court Richard "drove his car at some children during the car boot sale" and "hit another car with his car".
Richard also displayed "poor behaviour" including "punching his wife, pushing and grabbing children...six years into a dementia diagnosis".
Most read in The Sun
Dr Series explained that there had been reports of him "attacking the door with a hammer and a screwdriver and [having] to be stopped by his children".
He added: "His wife was so worried about him, she slept in another room and locked the door.
"This seems to me to be quite extreme."
But Alex Troup KC told the judge that Richard had been on dementia drug Donepezil when he aimed his car at kids attending the car boot sale.
Earl loses bid for £85m estate after being cut from family fortune with dad disappointed by son's 'lack of achievement'
The barrister claimed it was the drug that caused his unusual behaviour and that his mental state had "improved" when he was taken off it after six months.
Mr Troup said: "He made a valid will afterwards.
"The fact that before making that will he drove a car at another car is not much evidence of lack of testamentary capacity.
"Richard always had a temper and could turn on anyone without warning.
"Dementia illnesses often have the effect of exaggerating peoples prior personality traits."
Professor Alistair Burns also disagreed that Richard showed signs of his capacity being impaired.
Professor Burns told Mr Justice Richards that Mr Scott's ability to express himself had been affected by the progressive disease rather than his ability to comprehend.
Adam also argued that his dad promised him he would have the right to take over the farm after his death.
He claimed that he sacrificed everything to commit to "a life of hard and unrelenting physical work" on the back of those promises.
But Jennifer's lawyers allege that Richard knew exactly what he was doing when he disinherited his first born.
They told the court that Adam's relationship with his dad "completely broke down" when he tried to get Richard sectioned.
Adam had previously tried to prevent Richard's wedding to Jennifer, claiming
his dementia
had incapacitated him.
It led to Richard being interviewed by four registrars and a lawyer from the local council, who confirmed he did have the capacity to marry.
They also say he has no claim to his dad's estate on the basis of the alleged promises having already been handed land and property worth over £10m by Richard before his death.
Through the court proceedings, Adam hopes to restore his father's 1995 will which granted him "a 40-year tenancy of his father's farm and an option to purchase the farm at its probate value".
When Richard amended the will in 2016, Jennifer's two sons, Gordon and William Redgrave-Scott, and Adam's sister Rebecca Horley also became beneficiaries.
4
ITV's Car Boot Challenge was filmed on Richard's £43 million vast farm in Cheshire
Credit: Champion News Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
a day ago
- The Irish Sun
Son of ‘car boot king' claims dad's dementia was so bad when he cut him out of £43m will he drove his car at 2 kids
THE son of a multimillionaire claimed his dad's dementia was so bad when he cut him out his will that it caused him to drive his car at kids. Adam Scott, 62, is embroiled in an inheritance dispute with his step-mother as he pursues the £43 million fortune he alleges he was promised by his 'car boot king' father Richard. 4 A bitter family row has emerged following the death of multimillionaire Richard Scott Credit: Macclesfield Express 4 Adam, the eldest of Richard's 19 sons, is suing his step-mother after he claims he was promised the farm Credit: Champion News Service Ltd 4 Richard died in 2018 - leaving his fortune to second wife and former cleaner, Jennifer Credit: Champion News Service Richard died in 2018 at the age of 81, leaving his fortune to his second wife and former cleaner, Jennifer, 60. He amassed his £43 million fortune through running a vast Cheshire farm where ITV's Car Boot Challenge was filmed. Adam, the eldest of Richard's 19 sons, is now suing his step-mother after he claims he was promised the farm. The disinherited "golden boy" - who worked on the farm for 40 years - argued that his father was not in his right mind when he signed the two final wills. Read more News London High Court heard that Richard's dementia was so bad that he "drove his car at some children during the car boot sale" and even attacked his own wife and kids. Psychiatric expert Dr Hugh Series explained there were "objective indicators of changes in Richard's behaviour" around the time he signed the disputed wills. He told the court Richard "drove his car at some children during the car boot sale" and "hit another car with his car". Richard also displayed "poor behaviour" including "punching his wife, pushing and grabbing years into a dementia diagnosis". Most read in The Sun Dr Series explained that there had been reports of him "attacking the door with a hammer and a screwdriver and [having] to be stopped by his children". He added: "His wife was so worried about him, she slept in another room and locked the door. "This seems to me to be quite extreme." But Alex Troup KC told the judge that Richard had been on dementia drug Donepezil when he aimed his car at kids attending the car boot sale. Earl loses bid for £85m estate after being cut from family fortune with dad disappointed by son's 'lack of achievement' The barrister claimed it was the drug that caused his unusual behaviour and that his mental state had "improved" when he was taken off it after six months. Mr Troup said: "He made a valid will afterwards. "The fact that before making that will he drove a car at another car is not much evidence of lack of testamentary capacity. "Richard always had a temper and could turn on anyone without warning. "Dementia illnesses often have the effect of exaggerating peoples prior personality traits." Professor Alistair Burns also disagreed that Richard showed signs of his capacity being impaired. Professor Burns told Mr Justice Richards that Mr Scott's ability to express himself had been affected by the progressive disease rather than his ability to comprehend. Adam also argued that his dad promised him he would have the right to take over the farm after his death. He claimed that he sacrificed everything to commit to "a life of hard and unrelenting physical work" on the back of those promises. But Jennifer's lawyers allege that Richard knew exactly what he was doing when he disinherited his first born. They told the court that Adam's relationship with his dad "completely broke down" when he tried to get Richard sectioned. Adam had previously tried to prevent Richard's wedding to Jennifer, claiming his dementia had incapacitated him. It led to Richard being interviewed by four registrars and a lawyer from the local council, who confirmed he did have the capacity to marry. They also say he has no claim to his dad's estate on the basis of the alleged promises having already been handed land and property worth over £10m by Richard before his death. Through the court proceedings, Adam hopes to restore his father's 1995 will which granted him "a 40-year tenancy of his father's farm and an option to purchase the farm at its probate value". When Richard amended the will in 2016, Jennifer's two sons, Gordon and William Redgrave-Scott, and Adam's sister Rebecca Horley also became beneficiaries. 4 ITV's Car Boot Challenge was filmed on Richard's £43 million vast farm in Cheshire Credit: Champion News Service
The Irish Sun
01-07-2025
- The Irish Sun
Dog home boss mauled by rescued American bulldog SUES charity for £200k
A DOG home boss is suing for more than £200,000 after being savaged by a rescued American Bulldog in a violent attack at a rehoming centre. Karla Haines, 34, says she was left traumatised and permanently scarred after the Bulldog , named Jester, suddenly latched onto her arm and wouldn't let go during an incident at a Dogs Trust rehoming centre. 4 Ms Haines alleges that safety protocols were not followed — and that she was effectively exposed to danger in the line of duty Credit: Champion News Service 4 The horror unfolded at the charity's Harefield site in west London, where Ms Haines was working as assistant operations manager Credit: Dogs Trust 4 The court will now decide whether Ms Haines is entitled to the full amount she's seeking — or whether the payout will be reduced Credit: Dogs Trust The horror unfolded at the charity's Harefield site in She had been called in to help deal with the misbehaving Despite requesting that the dog be put on a lead, court papers say Jester – described as a 'fierce and mischievous' Ms Haines, who holds a degree in animal behaviour and welfare, says the injuries have left her with long-term sensitivity in her arm and Read more News She is now taking legal action against her former employer, claiming Dogs Trust failed to properly manage and restrain the aggressive animal, despite being aware of the risks. Her lawyers argue the dog should have been kept in a secure area or tied to a fixed lead point to prevent attacks on staff. The Harefield centre, which is set in 16 acres of countryside, houses up to 150 dogs at a time in swanky kennels fitted with underfloor heating, exercise paddocks and a sensory garden. But behind the scenes, Ms Haines alleges that safety protocols were not followed — and that she was effectively exposed to danger in the line of duty. Most read in The Sun Court documents state: 'The dog is and was of a fierce and mischievous disposition and/or was likely, unless restrained, to bite anyone on the defendant's premises or to cause severe injury when defending what it regarded as its own territory.' Although Dogs Trust has admitted a breach of duty through its insurers, the charity disputes the full amount of damages being claimed and says the extent of Ms Haines' injuries are 'not admitted'. Veterinarian Reveals the Worst Dog Breeds to Own The Trust also insists that Ms Haines was on Jester's 'safe list' — a group of approved staff members considered capable of handling the animal without issue. In a legal response, their solicitor Chrissie Paphitis said: 'It is averred that Jester had been placed on a lead prior to the claimant entering the compound. 'It is admitted that Jester nevertheless grabbed onto the claimant's arm and bit her.' But she added: 'No admissions are made in respect of causation, and the claimant is put to strict proof in relation to any and all allegations of loss and damage.' Which dog breeds are banned in the UK? THERE are specific regulations in place that prohibit certain dog breeds from being owned or bred in the UK. So what are the Which dog breeds are illegal in the UK? People tend to think of large, vicious dogs when they imagine being bitten by one. But the truth is that many types of dogs are known to bite humans, whether provoked or not. However, it's important to remember that just because a breed tends to bite humans, that doesn't mean that they all do. British law determines five breeds of dog are illegal to own, breed, sell or give away. These are an XL Bully, Pit Bull Terrier, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino and Fila Brasileiro. Ms Haines' legal team originally valued the claim at around £60,000, but this has since ballooned to more than £200,000 as the extent of her physical and psychological injuries became clearer. A judge at a brief pre-trial hearing earlier this month confirmed the full trial will go ahead unless a settlement is reached before then. It's understood the case is being closely watched by other animal welfare professionals, who say it raises serious concerns about staff safety when working with rescue dogs that may have violent histories. Dogs Trust, which was founded in 1891, is the UK's largest dog welfare charity and rehomes thousands of dogs each year. It has not commented publicly on the legal claim. The court will now decide whether Ms Haines is entitled to the full amount she's seeking — or whether the payout will be reduced. 4 Her lawyers argue the dog should have been kept in a secure area or tied to a fixed lead point to prevent attacks on staff Credit: Champion News Service
The Irish Sun
20-06-2025
- The Irish Sun
Fireman who won £200k on scratchcard battling ‘spendaholic' ex after she claimed he ‘lovebombed' her with lavish gifts
A FIREMAN who won £200,000 on a scratchcard is battling his "spendaholic" ex after she claimed he "lovebombed" her with lavish gifts. Heather Douglass splurged on exotic holidays and household renovations after Craig Titchener gave her a five-figure sum. Advertisement 2 Heather Douglass claimed she was gifted £45,000 of the win Credit: Champion News Service Ltd The nurse claimed Titchener gifted her the cash from his lucky win to "get back into her good books " after they rowed. But he insisted the money was supposed to be ploughed into premium bonds which they could both share the interest on. The pair battled it out in court over three cash transfers totalling £45,000 that were made in 2022. District Judge Charlotte Hart ruled that £40,000 of the money transferred was intended to be invested as Titchener intended. Advertisement Read more news But she found a cash transfer of £5,000 was a thank you gift to Douglass, along with a £300 bottle of Lancome perfume. The court was told airport firefighter Titchener scooped the £200,000 win on a Winter Wonderlines scratchcard in 2019. He said he wanted to use the money to buy a house for him and his kids but after beginning a "volatile" 11-month relationship with Douglass, he handed her £45,000 of his cash in 2022. When the pair split, Titchener tried to claim the money back and believed it had been invested by Douglass. Advertisement Most read in The Sun But she failed to pay up - claiming her ex had "lovebombed" her with generous presents and cash. She told him: "You sent me money because you were desperate to be in a relationship with me". But Titchener questioned in court why he would send "half my live savings just to be in a relationship with you". Douglass replied: "You want women to be with you and you struggle when you're on your own. Advertisement "You're very controlling and this was a relationship wholly based on control. You believe that you can buy people." The nurse also claimed her ADHD gave her "an addiction to over-spending". She told the judge that with her ex's agreement, she spent the cash on holiday to Thailand for them both and household works. Douglass said: "When I'm elated I will buy extravagant things. I have a tendency to overspend. Advertisement "If you came to my house, you'd see there are things coming there every day." But Titchener said he has "always fought hard for a better life" for him and his children. He continued: "When I won that £200,000 on the scratchcard, I didn't see it as just luck but as a life-changing opportunity. "I thought that now I can finally buy the family home I've always wanted and that intention to invest in a home has been consistent from the start." Advertisement The judge said there was "very little evidence to support claims of a controlling or harassing relationship" and ruled that Douglass had failed to prove that the £40,000 was gifted to her. But she said Titchener had also tried to bolster his case by concocting a digital document that he claimed was a signed agreement between him and Douglass confirming that the transferred money was earmarked for investment. The case will return to court for an investigation into where the £40,000 went. 2 Craig Titchener scooped the win in 2019 Credit: Champion News Service Ltd Advertisement
