logo
US measles cases reach 33-year high as outbreaks spread

US measles cases reach 33-year high as outbreaks spread

Boston Globe16 hours ago
The nation surpassed infections reported in 2019, reaching the largest number of cases since 1992,
when officials recorded more than 2,100 infections, according to data published Friday
from the Johns Hopkins University Center for Outbreak Response Innovation (CORI).
'It's devastating,' said Claire Hannan, executive director of the Association of Immunization Managers, a national organization of state and local immunization officials. 'We worked so hard to eliminate the threat of measles and to keep it at bay.'
Authorities said at least 155 people have been hospitalized and three people have died of measles-related complications this year. The dead include two otherwise healthy children in Texas and a man in New Mexico, all of whom were unvaccinated. In contrast, only three measles deaths were reported between 2001 and 2024, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
About 92 percent of measles cases in 2025 were in people who were either unvaccinated or whose vaccination status was unknown, according to the CDC.
Advertisement
Data from the CDC does not yet reflect the record as it is updated weekly on Wednesdays, while the Johns Hopkins' site validates data every weekday.
The largest outbreak has been in West Texas, where officials have recorded more than 750 cases since late January and believe the true toll is much higher. Data shows that outbreak has slowed, but that it has spread to surrounding states.
Advertisement
Unrelated clusters of cases emerged elsewhere, usually originating with an unvaccinated person who traveled abroad.
Measles was officially eliminated from the United States in 2000 with high vaccination coverage
and rapid outbreak response. Cases still popped up periodically. But in recent years, large outbreaks with 50 or more cases have become more frequent, especially in close-knit communities with low vaccination coverage.
Public health experts say the country is on track to lose the elimination status if there is continuous spread of linked measles cases for more than 12 months.
'It's a harbinger of things to come,' said Eric Ball, a pediatrician who heads the California chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. 'Once we see a resurgence of measles, we know that other diseases are going to come behind it.'
Misinformation about the safety and effectiveness of the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine fueled the 1,274 cases recorded in 2019, according to public health officials and researchers.
The outbreaks that year were concentrated in ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities in New York, highlighting the risks in tight-knit communities where vaccine distrust takes hold.
Confidence in public health measures, especially vaccines, has fallen since then, and is sharply divided along political lines.
The national rate for MMR vaccination among kindergartners was slightly above 95 percent in 2019, the level of community protection scientists say is needed to prevent measles outbreaks. But that rate is now under 93 percent and falling, according to the CDC.
Even in states with high vaccination coverage, pockets of unvaccinated people tend to cluster together. Measles is so contagious that a person without immunity exposed to the virus is highly likely to be infected and to spread it days before they develop symptoms.
Advertisement
A recent study showed that if US vaccination rates continue to decline, the nation could face millions of cases over the next 25 years.
A poll conducted in March by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and the de Beaumont Foundation found that 79 percent of adults say parents should be required to have children vaccinated against preventable diseases such as measles, mumps, and rubella to attend school. Support was stronger among Democrats, 90 percent, than among Republicans, 68 percent.
Five years after the start of the coronavirus pandemic, less than half the public says it has at least some confidence in federal health agencies to carry out core public health responsibilities, according to a poll conducted in April by the health care think tank KFF.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime antivaccine activist who ascended to
be the top US health official, has offered mixed messages about measles and the vaccine to prevent it.
He initially downplayed the seriousness of the Texas outbreak after the first child died, saying: 'We have measles outbreaks every year.' He accompanied his calls for vaccination with caveats, raising concerns about the shots that public health experts called unfounded.
Nola Jean Ernest, a pediatrician in rural southeastern Alabama, said many of her patients trust others who share their political views more than her when it comes to vaccination.
She now sees patients who vaccinated older children refuse to vaccinate their infants.
'I've had several conversations in the last few months where they will say, 'We still trust you, we just don't trust the vaccines,'' Ernest said recently. 'That really breaks my heart.'
Advertisement
In Texas, infections in late January spread quickly within Gaines County's Mennonite community, some of whom educate their children at home or at private schools without vaccine mandates. The county had among the lowest kindergarten MMR vaccination rates in Texas, about 82 percent, according to state immunization data.
Public health officials said they faced challenges in controlling the outbreak because many people were not getting tested or vaccinated for measles.
Antivaccine groups mobilized quickly on the ground. Many Mennonite families turned to a prominent antivaccine doctor who offered unproven alternative treatments. Kennedy praised that doctor and his methods in a visit to the region.
Children's Health Defense, an antivaccine group founded by Kennedy, interviewed the parents of a 6-year-old girl who died of measles, blaming her death on medical error rather than vaccination status. The organization did not immediately return a request for comment.
Eventually, 36 Texas counties reported measles cases.
Young adults from El Paso who work in oil fields close to Gaines County were among those infected this spring.
El Paso went from five cases to 53 in a month, said Hector Ocaranza, director of the city and county health authority. Ocaranza said his community was vulnerable because a growing number of young adults, listening to what they see and hear on social media, are not getting vaccinated.
Lara Anton, a spokeswoman for the Texas Health Department, said last week that the reporting of new measles cases has slowed, crediting rising population
immunity from infections and increased vaccination.
But the outbreak is not over.
Advertisement
Transmission is continuing in Gaines County, as well as Lamar County, in northeast Texas bordering Oklahoma, according to health department data.
In Chihuahua, Mexico, which borders Texas and New Mexico, a child who visited Texas in February started a large measles outbreak that now exceeds 2,400 cases and eight deaths as of last week, according to data from the Pan American Health Organization.
Measles outbreaks require vast personnel, time, dollars, and messaging, public health experts say.
The 2019 outbreak cost New York City $8.4 million with 550 staff involved in the response, according to a 2020 report in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Funding for state and local public health agencies, including immunization programs, has been slashed after increasing during the pandemic. Public health workers have been laid off because of widespread budget cuts across the federal health agencies.
Because of the decreased funding, Texas
had to pull resources and staff from other parts of its health department to respond to the outbreak, David Sugerman, a senior CDC scientist, told a committee of agency vaccine advisers in April.
In Dallas, which has had one measles case this year, health officials had to lay off 16 immunization staff because of federal cuts, said
Philip Huang, director of the county's health and human services department.
'The fact that this is occurring at the same time that we are seeing more measles cases in Texas than we have seen in more than 30 years makes absolutely no sense,' Huang said.
Related
:
Related
:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. sued by doctors for creating dangerous public health risk
RFK Jr. sued by doctors for creating dangerous public health risk

Miami Herald

time40 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

RFK Jr. sued by doctors for creating dangerous public health risk

There are many controversial figures in the Trump Administration, but Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is certainly near the top of the list. A member of the storied Kennedy family, RFK has long been a prominent Democrat and even ran for president in 2024 as a Democrat before crossing the aisle and famously endorsing President Donald Trump. Kennedy was rewarded for his endorsement, with President Trump appointing him as Secretary of Health and Human Services. RFK Jr.'s appointment was a controversial one, because while he has pledged to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA), he also has some controversial views on things like vaccines. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Now, Kennedy has acted on some of those views, and he is being sued by medical professionals, including the American Academy of Pediatrics. The coalition of medical professionals that is taking legal action against Kennedy is pursuing litigation in federal court because they believe that a recent directive he issued poses a danger to public health. Here's what the lawsuit is about, along with some details on how the medical groups are trying to stop Kennedy from, as they see it, putting people at serious risk. Image source: Shutterstock The lawsuit against Kennedy stems from an announcement that the government made last month to alter the vaccine recommendations from the CDC. On May 27, Kennedy posted a video to X announcing a big change. Appearing with U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and National Institute of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Kennedy said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would no longer recommend that either children or healthy pregnant women receive a Covid-19 vaccine. Related: TSA's most-hated policy quietly ends after 23 years Both Makary and Bhattacharya were notorious during the Covid pandemic for skepticism about mask policies and their opposition to vaccine mandates, and now, along with Kennedy, they have made it official government policy not to recommend that these two groups receive vaccines protecting against the deadly virus. The lawsuit questions the appropriateness of Kennedy's decision and raises questions about a May 19 "Secretarial Directive," which documented his reasons for removing the Covid vaccine recommendations from the immunization schedule published by the CDC. According to the doctors who are suing, the directive did not include any change to existing evidence, nor any emergency powers to support the move. "The Secretarial Directive is contrary to the wealth of data and peer-reviewed studies that demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Covid vaccines for children and pregnant women," the lawsuit reads. Plaintiffs in the suit against Kennedy made clear that the revised recommendations could not only create safety risks for women and kids, but also make it more difficult for medical professionals to do their jobs. The plaintiffs allege that the directive has placed medical professionals "in the untenable position of telling their patients that the country's top-ranking government health official's advice and recommendations are wrong and that we are right. This erodes trust, which is the foundation of a healthy physician-patient relationship and vital to the success of [American Association of Pediatrics (AAP)] members' medical practices." Related: TSA issues stern warning forbidding popular summer item In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs have requested that a federal judge order that Covid-19 vaccines be put back onto the immunization schedule for children and pregnant women, and have asked the judge to prevent Health and Human Services from publishing or enforcing the May directive that Kennedy put into place. "Pediatricians cannot stay silent as the system we rely on to support lifesaving vaccines is chiseled away piece by piece," said AAP President Susan Kressly. "With Secretary Kennedy leading efforts to sow doubt and distrust in the American success story of vaccines, we are on a dangerous path." Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Even if you've never smoked, you could still be at risk of lung cancer, doctors warn
Even if you've never smoked, you could still be at risk of lung cancer, doctors warn

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Even if you've never smoked, you could still be at risk of lung cancer, doctors warn

Lung cancer, the second-most common cancer in the U.S., is often associated with smoking — but even those who have never had a cigarette could be at risk of the deadly disease. While it's true that those who smoke face a much higher risk, up to 20% of lung cancers affect people who have never smoked or have smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Despite this, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) does not recommend lung cancer screening for those who have never smoked, as the agency states the risks may outweigh the potential benefits. Most lung cancers fall into two groups: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), according to the American Cancer Society. NSCLC, which encompasses about 80% to 85% of all lung cancers, includes adenocarcinoma (common in non-smokers), squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma. 7 While it's true that those who smoke face a much higher risk, up to 20% of lung cancers affect people who have never smoked. Tetiana – The remaining lung cancers are classified as SCLC, a more aggressive type that tends to spread faster and has a poorer prognosis. Mohamed Abazeed, M.D., Ph.D., chair of radiation oncology and the William N. Brand Professor at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, agrees that the share of lung cancers diagnosed in never-smokers is increasing, particularly among women and patients of Asian ancestry. 'While overall incidence is declining due to reduced smoking rates, the relative share of never-smokers is growing and is reflected in clinical practice, where we increasingly diagnose patients without a traditional smoking history,' he told Fox News Digital. 7 Most lung cancers fall into two groups: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). utah51 – Dr. Lauren Nicola, a practicing radiologist and chief medical officer at Reveal Dx in North Carolina, said she is also seeing an increase in the rate of newly diagnosed lung cancer in non-smokers, particularly among women and younger adults. The main factor driving up the share of non-smokers among lung cancer patients, according to Abazeed, is the successful drive to reduce tobacco consumption in the U.S. 'Other factors include improvements in imaging and broader use of CT scans that have enhanced early-stage tumor detection,' he noted. 'Evolving environmental factors may also be contributing to this change, with pollutants potentially driving lung inflammation, which in turn has been implicated in cancer development.' Modifiable risk factors 7 The main factor driving up the share of non-smokers among lung cancer patients is the successful drive to reduce tobacco consumption in the U.S. New Africa – Some of the biggest non-smoking risk factors for lung cancer include ambient air pollution and secondhand smoke, according to Abazeed. Exposure to thoracic radiation (high-energy radiation in the chest area) — along with occupational hazards like radon, asbestos and diesel exhaust — can also increase the risk. Lifestyle-related inflammation, which is often linked to poor diet and sedentary behavior, can also play a role, Nicola noted. 7 Some of the biggest non-smoking risk factors for lung cancer include ambient air pollution and secondhand smoke, according to Abazeed. utah51 – 'Some of these, like radon and air quality, can be addressed at the household or policy level,' Abazeed said. 'Lifestyle interventions — such as exercise, diet and avoidance of indoor pollutants — may play a modest protective role.' Both doctors pointed out that former smokers, especially those who smoked more often and for longer periods of time, remain at elevated risk even decades after quitting. 'The greater the number of pack-years, the higher the risk,' said Nicola. 'Risk declines over time after quitting, but never returns to the baseline of a never-smoker.' Genetic risk factors 7 Doctors pointed out that former smokers remain at elevated risk even decades after quitting. – Some people inherit a higher risk of developing lung cancer due to their DNA. 'It is estimated that about 8% of lung cancers are inherited or occur because of a genetic predisposition,' Abazeed told Fox News Digital. 'Inherited predisposition is an area of active investigation, particularly in younger patients or those with a strong family history.' Having a first-degree relative with lung cancer roughly doubles the risk of developing the disease, even after controlling for smoking exposure, according to Nicola. 'Cancers in non-smokers are more often associated with specific genetic mutations and genomic profiles,' she said. 'This suggests that these malignancies have a different underlying biology compared to tumors in smokers.' Screenings in question 7 Having a first-degree relative with lung cancer roughly doubles the risk of developing the disease, even after controlling for smoking exposure. didesign – Current U.S. screening guidelines call for annual low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals based on age and smoking history, Abazeed reiterated. The USPSTF recommends screening for 'adults aged 50 to 80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.' 'There is a growing interest in expanding eligibility to include non-smoking risk factors,' Abazeed noted. 'Evidence is accumulating that could potentially change current population-wide guidelines.' 7 Current U.S. screening guidelines call for annual low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals based on age and smoking history. Doodeez – There are some potential risks linked to expanding screening, experts say, including the potential for overdiagnosis and false positives. 'The problem with screening everyone for lung cancer is that up to 50% of all chest CTs will detect at least one pulmonary nodule,' Nicola noted. 'The vast majority of these nodules are benign, but a small percentage will turn out to be cancer.' Based primarily on the size of the nodule, the clinician may recommend follow-up imaging or biopsy. 'New tools are being developed that can help us better characterize the malignancy risk of a nodule, which will decrease the potential for harm associated with overdiagnosis in screening,' Nicola said.

CDC ends emergency response for bird flu as infections decline
CDC ends emergency response for bird flu as infections decline

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

CDC ends emergency response for bird flu as infections decline

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Monday it has ended its emergency response for H5N1 bird flu, owing to a decline in animal infections and no reports of human cases since February. The emergency response was deactivated on July 2, the agency told Reuters, adding that surveillance and response for bird flu cases will continue under the purview of its influenza division. The updates for bird flu was merged with routine updates for seasonal influenza, the agency's website showed on Monday. The number of people monitored and tested for bird flu will be reported on a monthly basis, the agency said, adding that it will no longer report infection rates in animals on its website. The virus has infected 70 people, mostly farm workers, and killed one person over the past year as it spread aggressively among cattle herds and poultry flocks. Experts have warned that further spread of bird flu raises the risk of it becoming more transmissible to humans. The current public health risk from H5N1 bird flu remains low, CDC said, adding that it will continue to monitor the situation and scale up activities as needed. The country's response to bird flu has faced several disruptions this year, including from staff exodus at the U.S. Department of Agriculture as part of the Trump administration's wider efforts to shrink the federal workforce and the government cancelling a more than $700 million contract awarded to Moderna MRNA.O for the late-stage development of its bird flu vaccine for humans. Bloomberg News first reported that CDC has ended its emergency response for bird flu. Emergency activation allows for additional support for a public health response, including staffing and other resources, to increase testing, surveillance and communications during an outbreak, according to CDC. The CDC H5N1 bird flu response was activated on April 4, 2024. (Reporting by Mariam Sunny in Bengaluru, additional reporting by Kamal Choudhury; Editing by Shilpi Majumdar and Shailesh Kuber)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store