logo
Hebron locals denounce sheikhs' plan to declare independence and recognise Israel

Hebron locals denounce sheikhs' plan to declare independence and recognise Israel

Middle East Eye20 hours ago
Palestinian residents of the occupied West Bank city of Hebron have disavowed a proposal by five purported local "sheikhs" to sever ties with the Palestinian Authority (PA) and establish an "emirate of Hebron" which would recognise the state of Israel.
The outrage was sparked by a Wall Street Journal article reporting that "five sheikhs" from Hebron penned a letter to the Israeli Economy Minister Nir Barkat, backing Israel as a Jewish state and proposing to establish their own emirate and join normalisation agreements with Israel.
The letter further suggested the creation of an Israeli-West Bank industrial zone and pledged "zero tolerance" for "terrorism by Palestinian workers".
"Accepting Israel as a Jewish state goes further than the Palestinian Authority ever has, and sweeps aside decades of rejectionism," the report said.
According to the report, the initiative was helmed by Wadee' al-Jaabari, who local city residents and its political leadership claim is unknown to them, and backed by "four other leading Hebron sheikhs".
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Palestinian city residents, including Jaabari's extended family members, roundly condemned the proposal, saying that its authors do not represent them.
Hebron-based activist and journalist Issa Amro said that the proposal and its authors are "complete fabrications".
"The so-called 'Hebron sheikhs' in this WSJ piece are complete fabrications - anonymous figures with zero political presence, social standing, family ties and community recognition," he told Middle East Eye.
'This isn't journalism - it's inventing Palestinian 'leaders' to fit an artificial narrative while real Hebronites endure occupation'
- Issa Amro, Hebron activist
"No media, no clans, no Palestinian factions acknowledge them because they simply don't exist as consequential actors. This isn't journalism - it's inventing Palestinian 'leaders' to fit an artificial narrative while real Hebronites endure occupation," he added.
Local political figures also expressed surprise at the report, noting that the authors of the letter had no real influence in the city and that Jaabari in fact lives in Jerusalem.
Jaabari's own family issued a statement denouncing the plan, saying that it "in no way represent the position of our respected family and does not reflect the will of its members".
"The Jaabari family has always been – and remains – part of the Palestinian national fabric, justly struggling for freedom and independence. We reject all attempts to normalise the occupation or grant it legitimacy."
The family told Haaretz that Jaabari "is known for his ties to settlers and Israeli institutions, which primarily serve his personal and business interests", and that his initiative enjoys "no public support".
In a post on X, Amro said the WSJ report "names no verifiable sources and ignores documented power structures" and constitutes "either shockingly poor journalism or deliberate misinformation".
"At a time when Hebron faces very real challenges - from expanding settlements to military closures - this fictional narrative does a grave disservice to readers and Palestinians alike," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour's surrender to Reform's narrative means Farage has already won
Labour's surrender to Reform's narrative means Farage has already won

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Labour's surrender to Reform's narrative means Farage has already won

Last week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government won the vote on its controversial welfare reform bill, but not without major concessions. The government agreed to soften proposed disability benefit cuts and delay harsher assessments under pressure from its own MPs. The bill, set to return to the House of Commons on Wednesday for further scrutiny, reflects an ideological shift so sharp it would have been unthinkable for a centre-left party just five years ago. But this is not just a welfare reform bill - it is a symptom of something far deeper. Labour is no longer simply fending off challenges from the populist right. It is actively absorbing its talking points and even adopting its policies. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'Dickensian cuts' Labour MP Rachael Maskell, who led the backbench revolt over the bill, voiced her opposition in stark terms: "These Dickensian cuts belong to a different era and a different party - they are far from what this Labour Party is for." Yet the language used to sell the welfare bill - about cracking down on benefit fraud, getting people "back to work", and tackling a system "ripe for abuse" - mirrors Reform UK's own narrative. Reform leader Nigel Farage recently declared the disability system "nonsense", claiming people are "taking the mickey" and exploiting short virtual consultations to gain financial support. That a Labour government is not just echoing but keen to enforce Reform UK's ideas tells us more about the country's political direction than any opinion poll could That a Labour government is not just echoing but keen to enforce these ideas tells us more about the country's political direction than any opinion poll could. It should set off alarm bells for what it signals about the future of British politics. Even with just five MPs and no time in government, Reform UK is already shaping policy. The far right does not need to win seats if it can normalise the narrative it has been peddling - othering and demonising those living on the margins of society. And right now, it seems to be succeeding. A June 2025 poll from UK survey firm Ipsos' relaunched Political Monitor found that Reform UK is now leading in national voting intention with 34 percent - a full nine points ahead of Labour. That is the highest figure Ipsos has ever recorded for them, and the lowest for Labour since October 2019. The Conservatives, once Labour's chief rival, have slumped to a record low of 15 percent. This is not just a blip - it signals a tectonic shift. Shifting the centre For now, Farage does not need to win a majority to influence national policy. Just as pressure from his earlier outfit, Ukip, led to Brexit, Reform UK's current momentum is shifting the political centre of gravity rightward - especially on welfare and immigration. That is why Labour is now pushing reforms that disproportionately affect the very people who have traditionally formed its base: the working class, ethnic minorities, the disabled. In a bid to appeal to potential Reform voters, Starmer's Labour is reshaping its image. Starmer's fear is not unfounded. Reform UK hit the ruling Labour Party hard as recently as May this year, sweeping local councils from Kent to County Durham. According to the Ipsos data, Labour has retained only 54 percent of its 2024 voters, losing a notable 12 percent directly to Reform UK. The Conservatives have fared even worse, retaining just 48 percent - with a massive 37 percent defecting to Reform. Even more telling is that nearly one in four non-voters in 2024 now say they would back Reform UK. The populist right is becoming the political home for Britain's alienated - and Labour is chasing them. Instead of neutralising Reform, it is legitimising it. Take Starmer's decision to abandon Labour's flagship £28bn ($38.2bn) green investment pledge. The party now plans to spend just £23.7bn ($32.4bn) over five years - a move that brings it closer in line with Reform UK's climate rollback agenda. And while Labour MPs are rebelling, with dozens voicing concern over the welfare bill alone, their warnings are unlikely to reverse the broader trend: a party drifting rightward, willing to trade its identity to keep Reform UK's support base from growing. Now Labour's immigration rhetoric has taken a populist turn. In May, Starmer warned that Britain "risked becoming an island of strangers" unless immigration was curtailed. His statement sparked comparisons to Enoch Powell's infamous "rivers of blood" speech, with London Mayor Sadiq Khan warning that Starmer was treading dangerously close to the far-right framing of the conversation. Once again, Reform UK has not needed to win power to win the argument because Labour seems to be doing its bidding. Capitulation This is how populism wins: not through ballots alone, but through capitulation - by overhauling the political narrative, setting the tone of the debate and making previously radical views feel like common sense. The implications are enormous. Labour appears willing to sacrifice its core principles to appease swing voters leaning toward Reform. The party leadership has made its direction clear: it is better to risk betraying its values than to risk bleeding votes to the right. How Starmer careened from honourable left to racist right Read More » Meanwhile, Britain faces urgent challenges, including housing shortages, a crisis-stricken NHS, record levels of inequality, and record-high food bank use. Yet the national conversation is focused on cutting benefits, stopping the migrants, and scaling back green targets - all at the heart of Reform UK's agenda. Labour is no longer leading the national conversation. It is reacting to the noise that Reform is creating. It will be a tragedy if Britain continues to sleepwalk into this ideological convergence. The question now is whether the public - and Labour itself - will realise this before it is too late. If the country's only alternative to right-wing populism is a party busy enacting it, then the far right has already won. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Israeli military arrests Palestinian editor in chief in West Bank
Israeli military arrests Palestinian editor in chief in West Bank

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israeli military arrests Palestinian editor in chief in West Bank

The Israeli military arrested the editor in chief of the Palestinian Ma'an news agency, Dr Nasser Laham, this morning at his home in the village of Al-Duheisha, near Bethlehem in the occupied West Bank, the agency said. "Israeli forces arrested journalist Dr Nasser Laham after storming his home in Bethlehem. His home was entirely ransacked and electronic devices and mobile phones were confiscated," a message posted on his Meta page said. Laham also serves as the manager of the Lebanese channel Al-Mayadeen's offices in the West Bank. He is expected to be brought to Ofer military court on Thursday for a hearing on the extension of his detention, according to Haaretz.

Israel attacks Houthi targets in three Yemeni ports and power plant
Israel attacks Houthi targets in three Yemeni ports and power plant

Dubai Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Dubai Eye

Israel attacks Houthi targets in three Yemeni ports and power plant

Israel has attacked Houthi targets in three Yemeni ports and a power plant, the Israeli military said early on Monday, marking the first Israeli attack on Yemen in almost a month. The strikes on Hodeidah, Ras Isa and Salif ports, and Ras Qantib power plant were due to repeated Houthi attacks on Israel, the military added. Hours after the strikes, the Israeli military said two missiles were launched from Yemen and attempts were made to intercept them, but the results of interception were still under review. The Israeli ambulance service said it had not received any calls regarding missile impacts or casualties following the launches from Yemen. Since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023, the Houthis have fired at Israel and at shipping in the Red Sea, disrupting global trade, in what it says are acts of solidarity with the Palestinians. Most of the dozens of missiles and drones fired toward Israel have been intercepted or fallen short. Israel has carried out a series of retaliatory strikes. Israel also attacked Galaxy Leader ship in Ras Isa port, which was seized by Houthis in late 2023, the military added on Monday. "The Houthi regime's forces installed a radar system on the ship, and are using it to track vessels in international maritime space, in order to promote the Houthi regime's activities," the military said. The Houthi military spokesperson said following the attacks that Houthis' air defences confronted the Israeli attack "by using a large number of domestically produced surface-to-air missiles". Residents told Reuters that the Israeli strikes on the Red Sea port city of Hodeidah put the main power station out of service, leaving the city in darkness. There were no immediate reports of casualties. Houthi-run Al-Masirah TV reported that Israel launched a series of strikes on Hodeidah, shortly after the Israeli military issued an evacuation warning for people at the three Yemeni ports. The assault comes hours after a ship was attacked off of Hodeidah and the ship's crew abandoned it as it took on water. No one immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, but security firm Ambrey said the vessel fits the typical profile of a Houthi target.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store