WWE facing another major lawsuit as infamous 'Ring Boys' scandal case allowed to proceed
The civil lawsuit, which claims the McMahons knowingly enabled the sexual exploitation of children by a longtime WWW employee, was subject to a temporary pause in the Maryland Supreme Court's ruling over the Child Victims Act.
On Monday, justices voted four-three to preserve the act, eliminating the statute of limitations for victims of child sexual abuse to sue their alleged abusers. The McMahon family denies all allegations.
The court's decision comes as Linda McMahon awaits her Senate confirmation hearing for Secretary of Education. Trump, who wants to dismantle the Department of Education, recently claimed McMahon should eventually 'put herself out of a job.'
It means the lawsuit filed in Baltimore County on October 23 on behalf of five anonymous ex-ring boys, young employees tasked with building the wrestling ring before events, accusing the McMahons and the WWE of negligence for allegedly fostering a culture of sexual abuse can go ahead.
DiCello Levitt, the law firm representing the victims, said additional ex-ring boys have since joined the suit, according to Fox Sports.
Per the complaint, the WWE co-founders looked the other way for years after allegedly learning of a longtime ringside announcer preying on minors.
Melvin Phillips, who died in 2012, is accused of targeting boys – as young as 12 or 13 years old – from disadvantaged backgrounds and hiring them to help with the preparations for wrestling matches, according to the filing.
The lawsuit alleges that between the late 1980s and early 1990s, Phillips would assault the ring boys in his dressing room, hotels and the wrestlers' locker room.
Because of his death, Phillips is not among the named defendants. Instead, the complaint targets the WWE, its co-founders and parent company TKO Holdings.
'That so many were aware of the sexual abuse of the Ring Boys and did nothing to prevent or stop it is simply unconscionable,' Greg Gutzler, an attorney from DiCello Levitt who represents the five unnamed plaintiffs, told The Independent in October.
McMahon's attorney Laura Brevetti told CNN in November that the the ring boy lawsuit is 'baseless'.
'Ms. McMahon will vigorously defend against this baseless lawsuit and without doubt ultimately succeed,' Brevetti said.
Another blockbuster lawsuit against the WWE and Vince McMahon by former employee Janel Grant also advanced in recent days after it was amended to include the name of a former WWE champion Brock Lesnar.
In the 104-page lawsuit, Grant now alleges that she was offered to Lesnar 'for a sexual encounter' during his contract negotiations with the WWE.
In addition, Grant alleges that she was told to send sexual content to the former WWE champion.
The lawsuit was submitted to the U.S. District Court in Connecticut. Grant alleges that the WWE was negligent in allowing McMahon's behavior to go on unchecked. One of the men previously named in the lawsuit, John Laurinaitis, claims that he too was a victim of McMahon.
Another WWE legend, Michael Hayes, is also named in the new filing with Grant alleging that McMahon told her to make pornographic content for him. At the time, Hayes worked as part of the wrestling company's creative team.
The Independent has contacted the WWE and Brevetti, Linda McMahon's lawyer, for more information.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
New £100 fines to tackle bad behaviour in Swindon town centre
New powers to tackle anti-social behaviour are to be rolled out in central Swindon, with the authorities now able to issue on-the-spot Public Spaces Protection Order gives police and community wardens the power to issue a £100 fixed penalty notice for anti-social behaviour, and coincides with a Wiltshire Police crackdown on Jim Grant said it was in response to concerns of some residents, who he said felt scared of going to the town centre because of drunkenness, harassment and illegal Borough Council said it was part of a range of measures which aimed to make the centre more appealing to residents and investors. "No-one's going to come if there are people drinking in the streets, drug dealing, women and girls being harassed, so we are addressing that," said Mr Grant, who is the council's cabinet member for communities. The council said reports of anti-social behaviour had dropped since the Swindon safety warden team started work a year order will now give them the ability to issue £100 fines to people caught drinking or being abusive in the town centre. "Sometimes people aren't going to want to give us names and addresses, but if they don't they can be taken to court," community warden Bradley Ellis said his team's interactions will be filmed on body-worn cameras, so people can be identified if they refuse to cooperate and leave the area."It's very satisfying knowing that you've done something in the town where you grew up and you can actually see a difference", Mr Ellis will also be handed out to people using e-scooters, which are illegal to use on public roads and only e-scooters which form part of government-backed trials can be used legally in the UK. There is no such trial in Wiltshire. Police and Crime Commissioner Philip Wilkinson said officers will spend a month stopping people using e-scooters in known hotspots, like Swindon town centre, and educating them on the law. They will then move to an "enforcement phase" at the beginning of August, with officers able to confiscate and destroy e-scooters and, where appropriate, e-bikes."E-scooters are illegal in Wiltshire, and we will make sure people know that", Mr Wilkinson added.
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Close the Education Department? Not so fast.
But there's one obstacle that's less evident: the so-called "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act." Starting next year, the law will create two brand-new federal student loan repayment plans. It also expands Pell Grants, a staple of college financial aid, to include weekslong post-high school training programs. And it binds colleges to a fresh set of rules meant to protect students and save taxpayers money. Under the law, there's one person ultimately responsible for carrying out those directives: Education Secretary Linda McMahon. Her entire department will be required to mobilize its depleting resources to execute the wishes of Congress and the president. That dynamic puts Trump in an awkward position. In February, he said he wanted McMahon to "put herself out of a job." (In order to legally do that, he'd need the support of Senate Democrats, which he doesn't have.) But by signing his signature spending law, Trump gave McMahon a laundry list of important things to do. And those asks won't be simple or easy to turn into a reality, experts and former Education Department employees have said, without the right people to make them work. Trump has already cut the agency's workforce in half this year, and the Supreme Court on July 14 allowed more than 1,000 workers to stay fired while their layoffs are challenged in court. "I do have significant concerns that the speed of the cuts will have left us with a department that is unable to effectively implement this legislation," Beth Akers, a senior fellow at the right-leaning think tank the American Enterprise Institute, told USA TODAY during a recent webinar. Those worries were echoed by Jon Fansmith, senior vice president for government relations and national engagement at the American Council on Education, the country's main higher education association. "You can definitely anticipate a lot of problems," he said. College financial aid administrators are warning of "significant disruption" for students who rely on help to pay for school. Read more: How FAFSA 'fixes' have turned College Decision Day into chaos In spite of that unease, top officials at the Education Department have stressed that the agency is well-positioned to enact the law. On July 18, the agency published some guidance for implementation, and more information would be provided "in the weeks and months ahead," said Jeffrey Andrade, a top agency official. "Just within President Trump's first six months, the Department has responsibly managed and streamlined key federal student aid features," deputy press secretary Ellen Keast said in a statement to USA TODAY. "We will continue to deliver meaningful and on time results while implementing the President's OBBB ('One Big Beautiful Bill') to better serve students, families, and administrators." New student loan repayment plans, Pell Grant expansion For anyone who takes out new federal student loans after July 1, 2026, the law eliminates all current repayment programs and replaces them with only two: a standard plan and a plan based on borrowers' incomes. The more than 40 million Americans who already have federal student loan debt will still have access to some old repayment plans. But the 8 million borrowers enrolled in President Joe Biden's signature repayment plan will have to be switched to a different one by 2028. All of that work will be carried out by the Federal Student Aid office, a branch of the Education Department. The "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" also creates a special type of Pell Grant. It will be made available to students enrolled in short-term programs between eight and 15 weeks long in fields like cosmetology and welding. The Education Department has to start vetting and allowing schools to receive that money by July 2026. Different college oversight rules Trump's new legislation additionally tasks the Education Department with enforcing a framework for holding colleges and universities accountable for getting students well-paying jobs after graduation. Republicans call the measure a "do no harm" test. Put simply, it takes away the ability of some college programs to let students take out federal loans if those schools aren't providing a good return on investment. To fully implement the program, staffers at the Education Department have a lot of number-crunching to do. They'll likely need data from colleges, the Internal Revenue Service, the Bureau of Labor Statistics and states, Fansmith said. All of that information will need to be aggregated and calculated across tens of thousands of programs, and thousands of schools, over a yearslong period. Robert Jason Cottrell, who was a data coordinator in the Office of Postsecondary Education before he was laid off in March, said he fears the Education Department may rely too heavily on contractors to get it all done. "I don't know if that's going to work," he said. Echoes of FAFSA challenges It's not the first time in recent years that the Education Department has been tasked with implementing big changes for students. The last time, it didn't go very well. In December 2020, Congress passed a law to simplify the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, a form that most students must fill out each year to get financial aid. But the rollout went haywire, jeopardizing the college dreams of millions. There were many reasons the agency bungled the law's implementation. Some federal officials blamed outside contractors, who were doing the bulk of the work because the Education Department was short-staffed. Other critics said former President Joe Biden spent too much time prioritizing student loan forgiveness. Read more: How did the FAFSA rollout go so wrong? A look at the key events Regardless of the cause, the effects were devastating: Some students decided to delay college or forgo it altogether. Parents made important decisions without enough information. And universities lost trust in the federal financial aid system. Things turned around, though. After Biden's Education Department brought in a special team to focus on the FAFSA, the form got better. Now, it's easier than ever to fill out. In many college financial aid offices, the wounds from the FAFSA crisis are still fresh. And since the Education Department layoffs, schools have struggled to get in touch with the government for routine requests. Those issues are already affecting their ability to help students. Read more: Colleges report widespread problems with financial aid since Education Department layoffs In a statement on July 14, Melanie Storey, the president of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, emphasized that students and schools need more clarity about what comes next. "With significantly more work on the horizon to implement the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, we reiterate our concerns that the Trump administration has not shared the details of a plan to redistribute the Department's work in a way that does not cause significant disruption for America's college students," she said. Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
North Wales Chronicle
4 days ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Coroner criticises senior care home managers over teenage girl's death
Maria Voisin, the senior coroner for Avon, said there was a 'catalogue of failures' that allowed Jason Conroy to strangle Melissa Mathieson at a care home in Bristol in October 2014. The teenager was attacked by Conroy, then aged 18, at Alexandra House, which provided residential care for adults with autism and Asperger's syndrome. Conroy, now aged 28, was jailed for life for the sexually motivated killing. Avon Coroner's Court heard how he once tried to strangle a teacher so he could abuse her and had also attempted to kill his mother. Conroy, originally from Guernsey, moved to Bristol from a boarding school in the Midlands following the incident with the teacher. The school had commissioned a report from a forensic psychologist which concluded that he posed a physical risk to others because of his sexualised behaviour. They warned the managers of Alexandra House about the risk, but this was not reflected in his care plans, which only listed basic information. The directors of the company which ran the home later pleaded guilty to a health and safety offence and were fined £125,000. Ms Voisin said the conduct of senior managers at Alexandra House in failing to understand the danger Conroy posed to others amounted to a 'gross breach of duty'. 'This I consider to be reckless conduct at senior management level,' she said. 'The support plan and risk assessment drafted by Alexandra House's senior management was not sufficient to protect Melissa. 'The risk was, and should have been obvious, to Alexandra House from the school care plan and risk assessment, the numerous meetings before Jason's placement began, the Grant report, the concerns raised by staff and the concerns raised by Melissa herself, who was frightened of him. 'Based on the evidence, it was the gross breach of Alexandra House's duty of care to Melissa that caused her death, as it allowed a known dangerous young man who was under no supervision at the time the opportunity to murder her.' In a narrative conclusion, the coroner said Miss Mathieson 'died as a result of unlawful killing caused by both the act of strangulation and also due to the acts and omissions by the home entrusted with her care'. 'The home failed Melissa in numerous ways,' she said. 'The resident who went on to strangle her, should not have been placed in the same facility as Melissa at all based on his known risks. 'The decision was wrongly made to place him in the same facility with an ineffective care plan and risk assessment, with staff that were not trained on his level of risk, and managers who failed to act when concerns were highlighted by staff and Melissa.' Support workers at the home told the inquest they did not know about his history of predatory sexual behaviour. Several staff told the hearing they would never have been alone with Conroy if they knew of the risk he posed to others, and described reporting their concerns to supervisors. Miss Mathieson, who was from Windsor, Berkshire, had been sent to Alexandra House by social services when she turned 18, having spent the previous two years in a series of different placements. In a letter written before her death, Miss Mathieson blamed social services for 'destroying' her life. Titled Social Services Have Destroyed My Life, she wrote: 'This was a terrible time for me, and I felt like I was dragged away from my home and everything I knew and being completely disrupted. 'They never took into consideration my age or the distance from my family. I was still a child, just very confused.' The letter was read to the court as part of the written evidence of Miss Mathieson's mother, Karen, who died from cancer a year after her daughter's death. Mrs Mathieson said 'the system' had failed her daughter and had also failed Conroy. 'Not only has Jason Conroy ended Melissa's life, but he has also ended his own. He should have had his problems addressed a long time ago,' she said. 'The system has failed him, and it has failed Melissa. 'We question the professionals who have had the responsibility for his care, as much as we do of those who had a responsibility for Melissa's care.' Miss Mathieson's father, James, said he felt 'helpless' because he and his wife had not been listened to by social services. 'Karen and I blame Jason Conroy for our daughter's death,' he said. 'But at the same time, how can we blame him when he had said what he was going to do to professionals and was allowed to carry it out. 'We blame the people who put him there with Melissa.' Speaking after the inquest, Mr Mathieson said: 'My daughter should still be here today and I miss her terribly. 'She was a wonderful, warm person with an infectious personality that lightened any room she entered. 'Alexandra Homes let down both Melissa, and Jason Conroy. He should never have been given the opportunity to murder Melissa. 'It was well known that he was at extremely high risk of murdering someone, particularly petite females, and he should never have been allowed to wander a care home, unsupervised. 'Care home providers, social services and governing bodies have a duty of care to every one of their residents.' Family solicitor Joseph Morgan, from law firm Bindmans, added: 'The coroner's findings are utterly damning. 'They reflect the gravity of the failures of the management of Alexandra Homes, who were ultimately responsible for the welfare of their residents. 'In essence, they welcomed a known sexual predator into their care home with no risk management plan, at the same time as admitting a young woman who matched his known victim profile. 'Even with these failures, the coroner's conclusion rightfully acknowledges the role Guernsey played in Melissa's death through their woeful handling of Jason Conroy's transition to Alexandra Homes. 'It is desperately tragic that a young woman was deprived of her life as a result of these catastrophic, multi-agency failures.'
