Now US Switch 2 pre-orders are being cancelled, with just days to go
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Quick Summary
US customers are complaining that their Nintendo Switch 2 pre-orders are being cancelled.
Walmart, Target and others are allegedly cancelling orders due to payment issues. It's best to check your own ahead of Thursday's launch date.
There are just two days to go before you can get your hands on a Nintendo Switch 2 – although that's looking more unlikely for some.
As with some UK retailers, it's been revealed that several stores in the United States are also cancelling pre-orders of the highly anticipated new console.
Even at this late hour, posts from disgruntled US customers have started to appear on Reddit and X, claiming that their Nintendo Switch 2 orders have been cancelled by the likes of Walmart and Target.
For example, E1_guwop posted on Reddit (via Eurogamer) that their order was cancelled by Target – although they only found out after checking whether the payment had cleared.
It seems the issue this time was that pre-orders were initially taken with no payment needed – customers had to authorise payment afterwards to secure the console. It seems to have been a communication issue, with replies thanking the poster for the heads up.
It seems to be a similar story with other retailers. Walmart has reportedly cancelled some pre-orders citing payment issues.
These seem to be different types of cases to those emerging from the UK.
Game has reportedly cancelled several pre-orders without explanation – with some suggesting that it overestimated stock levels.
We've been lucky here at T3 – I have had an email from Argos in the UK over the last couple of days, confirming that the Nintendo Switch 2 I pre-ordered over a month ago is due to ship on launch day.
It's the same with a colleague.
I am also awaiting delivery of the Pro Controller and wireless GameCube Controller on the same day (both were pre-ordered from Nintendo directly).
If you've also had a similar confirmation email from your retailer of choice, you will likely also get the console this Thursday 5 June. If you haven't yet ordered the console or accessories, you'll likely have to wait however.
Accessories on Amazon, for example, are now listed as a 7 June delivery date (for Prime members).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 Monster High-Yield Stocks to Hold for the Next 10 Years
Realty Income is the largest net lease REIT and offers an attractive 5.6% yield. Brookfield Asset Management is planning to grow its dividend at 15% a year through the end of the decade. Target's retail business is struggling today, but the Dividend King has an attractive 4.6% yield and turnaround plans. 10 stocks we like better than Realty Income › The average time a Wall Street investor holds a stock has shortened dramatically over the decades. At this point, buying and holding a stock for 10 years is a virtual eternity. But there's a benefit to being a small investor because you can hold for that long and you don't have to worry about anyone breathing down your neck about the performance of the stocks you own. You can buy boring but reliable high-yield stocks like Realty Income (NYSE: O). Or dividend growth stocks with an income payoff that builds over time, such as Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM). Or even down-on-their-luck Dividend Kings like Target (NYSE: TGT) that are working on business turnarounds that will play out over years and not days. All three of these high yielders are worth close attention today. Realty Income is the largest net lease real estate investment trust (REIT). It owns single-tenant properties for which the tenants are responsible for most property-level operating costs. It owns over 15,600 properties, so it has an extremely large portfolio that spans across retail and industrial assets across North America and Europe. This is good and bad at the same time. To get the bad out of the way right up front, Realty Income is a tortoise of a business because it takes so much investment activity to move the needle on the top and bottom lines. On the good side, having such a large portfolio gives the REIT attractive access to capital markets, the size to take on deals that its smaller peers couldn't handle, and the ability to act as an industry consolidator. While slow and steady is the pace here, history suggests that slow and steady can be very rewarding for conservative income investors. That's particularly true when you consider the 5.6% dividend yield, which is backed by an investment-grade rated balance sheet and a dividend that has been increased annually for three decades. And the dividend is paid monthly, too, so Realty Income is kind of like a paycheck replacement. If you are a conservative dividend investor, this monster-sized net lease REIT should be on your short list today, with a plan to hold it for at least the next 10 years, if not longer. Brookfield Asset Management is one of the largest asset managers in Canada, but it is still much smaller than many of its U.S. peers. That's actually a monster of an opportunity when you look at the dividend. The yield today is around 3.1%, which isn't bad given the tiny 1.2% yield on offer from the S&P 500 index (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC). But the most recent dividend increase was a huge 15%, and management believes it can keep that rate of dividend growth going through at least the end of the decade. The yield and dividend growth combo here should interest dividend growth investors as well as growth and income investors. The big story with Brookfield Asset Management is going to be its ability to accumulate assets. As an asset manager, it gets paid fees for managing other peoples' money. Right now it has around $550 billion in fee-generating assets. The goal is to have $1.1 trillion by the end of the decade. It operates across the renewable power, infrastructure, real estate, private equity, and credit niches, so it has multiple levers for growth. The headliner here, however, is still that 15% dividend growth rate, which will double the current dividend in just five years. That's a huge increase in the income you can collect from Brookfield Asset Management in a very short period of time. Target is one of the largest retailers in the United States, competing against Walmart with a slightly more upscale look and feel. The big claim to fame here is the retailer's monster dividend record, which includes 58 consecutive annual dividend hikes. That makes Target a Dividend King, one of a highly elite group of companies that have proven that they have durable business models. For the record, Target's dividend streak is six years longer than Walmart's. Still, Target has a historically high yield of around 4.6% today. The truth is, Target's high yield is a result of the fact that its retail concept isn't resonating very well with consumers right now. Walmart's everyday low prices are bringing in customers more than Target's focus on fancier stores and products. It isn't unusual for retail trends to wax and wane over time, and history suggests that Target will find a way to turn its business around. In fact, it has recently overhauled its management team with the goal of more proactively effectuating a business upturn. Given Target's size, it could take a little while to get the ship moving in a new direction. Thus, you'll want to go in with a plan to hold it for the long term. But you'll get paid very well to wait for the turnaround to play out with that lofty yield and the regular annual dividend increases that back it. For more aggressive investors, that should sound like a pretty good deal. Realty Income is a monster-sized REIT with a reliable and large yield for income seekers. Brookfield Asset Management is targeting a monstrous dividend growth rate, for dividend growth and growth and income investors. And Target, as a Dividend King, has a monster of a dividend record and a historically high yield, for investors willing to dip into turnaround stocks. Take the time to get to know these high yielders and one, or more, could end up in your portfolio today. Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Realty Income. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Realty Income, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends Brookfield Asset Management. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Monster High-Yield Stocks to Hold for the Next 10 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Woman Kicks Out Mother-in-Law After She Picks New Name for Grandson That ‘Suits Him Better'
A woman says her mother-in-law has taken to calling her child a different name because she thinks it "suits him better" After repeatedly asking her not to, the woman finally told her mother-in-law to leave her home Now, she wants to know if she was overreacting — but Reddit users don't seem to think soA woman says she's kicked her mother-in-law out of her house after she insisted on using the wrong name for her newborn child. In a since-deleted post shared to Reddit, the 31-year-old woman writes that she and her husband recently had their first child — a boy they named Elijah. "We put a lot of thought into his name, we loved the meaning, and it just felt right," she writes. She notes that her mother-in-law "had no strong opinions about it at first. She didn't gush over it, but she also didn't object." Or so the couple thought. "The first time she met Elijah at the hospital, she looked at him and said, 'Oh little David you're so perfect,'" she recalls. "I thought I misheard her, so I ignored it. But then she said it again. I asked her, 'Who's David?' and she just smiled and said, 'Oh it just suits him better.' " The woman was "too exhausted from labor to argue," but over the next few weeks, her mother-in-law continued to call the boy David, even in text messages. "[She] kept calling him David, texting us things like 'How's my little David doing today?' or 'Give David a kiss for me!' I told her, firmly, that his name is Elijah. She laughed and said, 'Oh, I know! But I think he just feels like a David.' " The woman writes that neither she nor her husband knows anyone named David. "It's not a family name. There's no sentimental reason behind it. It's just a completely random name she decided to call my child, despite us telling her not to." At first, the couple tried to let it go, "hoping she'd stop if we ignored it." "But it only got worse," she writes. "When we FaceTimed her, she'd coo at him saying 'Grandma loves you, David!' She even started knitting a baby blanket with the name David embroidered on it." The "final straw" came when her mother-in-law joined them for a family dinner and kept referring to him as David in front of everyone else. "My sister-in-law asked, 'Wait… why do you keep calling him David?' and MIL just laughed and said, 'Because that's his name to me.' " "That's when I lost it. I said, 'No, his name is Elijah, and if you can't respect that, you don't need to be here,'" the woman writes. "She rolled her eyes and tried to wave me off, but I wasn't having it. I told her to leave. She looked shocked, but she left without much of a fight." Now, the woman's husband is upset with her. "He agrees that his mom was being weird and disrespectful, but he thinks kicking her out was 'too extreme' and that I should've just let it go," she explains. "MIL is now playing the victim, telling everyone that I'm 'keeping her grandson from her over a harmless nickname.' " Some family members think the woman overreacted, while others agree that the mother-in-law's behavior "was bizarre." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Commenters are less split, with many arguing that the mother-in-law was in the wrong for knowingly using the wrong name. "Your feelings are valid. I also find it odd that your husband thinks you overreacted, but you literally just told her to use the correct name or to leave," one commenter wrote. "It sounds like she made her choice and now she's upset with you." Another said the husband was the one in the wrong, suggesting the poster should give him a taste of his own medicine. "I think you should start calling him by another name to see how he likes it," they wrote. Read the original article on People
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The AI Mental Health Market Is Booming — But Can The Next Wave Deliver Results?
AI tools promise scalable mental health support, but can they actually deliver real care, or just ... More simulate it? In April of 2025, Amanda Caswell found herself on the edge of a panic attack one midnight. With no one to call and the walls closing in, she opened ChatGPT. As she wrote in her piece for Tom's Guide, the AI chatbot calmly responded, guiding her through a series of breathing techniques and mental grounding exercises. It worked, at least in that moment. Caswell isn't alone. Business Insider reported earlier that an increasing number of Americans are turning to AI chatbots like ChatGPT for emotional support, not as a novelty, but as a lifeline. A recent survey of Reddit users found many people report using ChatGPT and similar tools to cope with emotional stress. These stats paint a hopeful picture: AI stepping in where traditional mental health care can't. But they also raise a deeper question about whether these tools are actually helping. A Billion-Dollar Bet On Mental Health AI AI-powered mental health tools are everywhere — some embedded in employee assistance programs, others packaged as standalone apps or productivity companions. In the first half of 2024 alone, investors poured nearly $700 million into AI mental health startups globally, the most for any digital healthcare segment, according to Rock Health. The demand is real. Mental health conditions like depression and anxiety cost the global economy more than $1 trillion each year in lost productivity, to the World Health Organization. And per data from the CDC, over one in five U.S. adults under 45 reported symptoms in 2022. Yet, many couldn't afford therapy or were stuck on waitlists for weeks — leaving a care gap that AI tools increasingly aim to fill. Companies like are trying to do just that. Founded by Sarah Wang — a former Meta and TikTok tech leader who built AI systems for core product and global mental health initiatives — BlissBot blends neuroscience, emotional resilience training and AI to deliver what she calls 'scalable healing systems.' 'Mental health is the greatest unmet need of our generation,' Wang explained. 'AI gives us the first real shot at making healing scalable, personalized and accessible to all.' She said Blissbot was designed from scratch as an AI-native platform, a contrast to existing tools that retrofit mental health models into general-purpose assistants. Internally, the company is exploring the use of quantum-inspired algorithms to optimize mental health diagnostics, though these early claims have not yet been peer-reviewed. It also employs privacy-by-design principles, giving users control over their sensitive data. Sarah Wang- Founder, Blissbot 'We've scaled commerce and content with AI,' Wang added. 'It's time we scale healing.' Blissbot isn't alone in this shift. Other companies, like Wysa, Woebot Health and Innerworld, are also integrating evidence-based psychological frameworks into their platforms. While each takes a different approach, they share the common goal of delivering meaningful mental health outcomes. Why Outcomes Still Lag Behind Despite the flurry of innovation, mental health experts caution that much of the AI being deployed today still isn't as effective as claimed. 'Many AI mental health tools create the illusion of support,' said Funso Richard, an information security expert with a background in psychology. 'But if they aren't adaptive, clinically grounded and offer context-aware support, they risk leaving users worse off — especially in moments of real vulnerability.' Even when AI platforms show promise, Richard cautioned that outcomes remain elusive, noting that AI's perceived authority could mislead vulnerable users into trusting flawed advice, especially when platforms aren't transparent about their limitations or aren't overseen by licensed professionals. Wang echoed these concerns, citing a recent Journal of Medical Internet Research study that pointed out limitations in the scope and safety features of AI-powered mental health tools. The regulatory landscape is also catching up. In early 2025, the European Union's AI Act classified mental health-related AI as 'high risk,' requiring stringent transparency and safety measures. While the U.S. has yet to implement equivalent guardrails, legal experts warn that liability questions are inevitable if systems offer therapeutic guidance without clinical validation. For companies rolling out AI mental health benefits as part of diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) and retention strategies, the stakes are high. No If tools don't drive outcomes, they risk becoming optics-driven solutions that fail to support real well-being. However, it's not all gloom and doom. Used thoughtfully, AI tools can help free up clinicians to focus on deeper, more complex care by handling structured, day-to-day support — a hybrid model that many in the field see as both scalable and safe. What To Ask Before Buying Into The Hype For business leaders, the allure of AI-powered mental health tools is clear: lower costs, instant availability and a sleek, data-friendly interface. But adopting these tools without a clear framework for evaluating their impact can backfire. So what should companies be asking? Before deploying these tools, Wang explained, companies should interrogate the evidence behind them. 'Are they built on validated frameworks like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), or are they simply rebranding wellness trends with an AI veneer?,' she questioned. 'Do the platforms measure success based on actual outcomes — like symptom reduction or long-term behavior change — or just logins? And perhaps most critically, how do these systems protect privacy, escalate crisis scenarios and adapt across different cultures, languages, and neurodiverse communities?' Richard agreed, adding that 'there's a fine line between offering supportive tools and creating false assurances. If the system doesn't know when to escalate — or assumes cultural universality — it's not just ineffective. It's dangerous.' Wang also emphasized that engagement shouldn't be the metric of success. 'The goal isn't constant use,' she said. 'It's building resilience strong enough that people can eventually stand on their own.' She added that the true economics of AI in mental health don't come from engagement stats. Rather, she said, the show up later — in the price we pay for shallow interactions, missed signals and tools that mimic care without ever delivering it. The Bottom Line Back in that quiet moment when Caswell consulted ChatGPT during a panic attack, the AI didn't falter. It guided her through that moment like a human therapist would. However, it also didn't diagnose, treat, or follow up. It helped someone get through the night — and that matters. But as these tools become part of the infrastructure of care, the bar has to be higher. As Caswell noted, 'although AI can be used by therapists to seek out diagnostic or therapeutic suggestions for their patients, providers must be mindful of not revealing protected health information due to HIPAA requirements.' That's especially because scaling empathy isn't just a UX challenge. It's a test of whether AI can truly understand — not just mimic — the emotional complexity of being human. For companies investing in the future of well-being, the question isn't just whether AI can soothe a moment of crisis, but whether it can do so responsibly, repeatedly and at scale. 'That's where the next wave of mental health innovation will be judged,' Wang said. 'Not on simulations of empathy, but on real and measurable human outcomes.'
