‘Don't confront, consult with state governments'
Excerpts:
The Supreme Court has recently outlined the powers and timeline for governors to decide on bills passed by state legislatures. Your take on this?
The Constitution clearly states that if the governor finds a bill passed by the legislature inappropriate, they may return it for reconsideration. However, if the legislature passes the bill again, the governor is constitutionally bound to give assent, unless there is a clear legal issue. In such cases, the governor can refer the matter to higher authorities.
Sometimes, when there is a conflict between the interests of the State and the Centre, it may take time to seek legal opinion. In such situations, consultations with state-level legal experts and discussions with the Union government may be necessary, which can cause delays.
Such confrontational scenarios are rare and do not arise ideally. Everyone, including the governor, must act by the Constitution. Also, legal provisions allow for the bill to be referred to the President if necessary.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Haryana human rights panel seeks report on rejection of claim under Dayalu scheme
Chandigarh, The Haryana Human Rights Commission has taken cognisance of the "arbitrary rejection" of a claim regarding a clerical error in a death certificate filed under the state's Dayalu scheme, and has sought detailed reports from the concerned authorities. Haryana human rights panel seeks report on rejection of claim under Dayalu scheme The complainant was attempting to claim financial assistance under the Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojana scheme after the death of his father. He informed the commission that his claim was rejected due to a mismatch in his father's age as recorded in the death certificate and the family ID. He submitted that the discrepancy was a clerical error, which has since been rectified. However, despite presenting the corrected death certificate, the authorities failed to reopen or reconsider the claim. The Haryana government had notified the Dayalu scheme over two years ago to provide financial assistance to families with an annual income of less than ₹1.80 lakh in case of death or permanent disability of a family member. Justice Lalit Batra, Chairperson of the Commission, observed that such welfare schemes are aimed at providing social protection to economically weaker sections. In his order dated July 8, Justice Batra said the rejection of the complainant's claim "defeats the very purpose of the scheme." "The denial of financial assistance under the welfare scheme, despite the complainant's compliance and correction of official records, amounts to a violation of his right to life with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution," the order stated. "As state instrumentalities, the respondent authorities are duty-bound to ensure the timely delivery of welfare benefits, especially to economically weaker sections. The instant case reflects procedural unfairness and administrative apathy, resulting in a breach of basic human rights," it added. The commission found prima facie merit in the complainant's grievance, indicating an unjustified rejection and potential denial of welfare entitlements in violation of basic human rights. Meanwhile, Dr Puneet Arora, Protocol, Information and Public Relations Officer of the Commission, said that reports have been called from the Chief Executive Officer, Haryana Parivar Suraksha Nyas , the Deputy Commissioner, Jind, and the Administrative Officer, Haryana Parivar Suraksha Nyas . The authorities have been directed to explain why the claim was not reconsidered despite the correction of records, clarify provisions for review under the scheme, and outline steps to avoid such lapses in the future. The commission has further directed that the case be reviewed promptly, ensuring the complainant's participation in the process and the timely facilitation of necessary formalities. The next date of hearing has been fixed for August 21, 2025. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab minister: BJP patronising gangster Lawrence Bishnoi
Punjab finance minister Harpal Singh Cheema on Thursday blamed the BJP for patronising gangster Lawrence Bishnoi, who is lodged in Sabarmati Jail of Ahmedabad since 2014. Punjab finance minister interacting with the media after the adjournment of the first sitting of the two-day special session of the Punjab assembly in Chandigarh on Thursday. (Ravi Kumar/HT) 'The recent murder of a businessman in Abohar was carried out by Bishnoi, who is in Gujarat jail. It is sad that he is targeting Punjab sitting in Gujarat,' Cheema told mediapersons after the adjournment of the first sitting of the two-day special session of the Punjab assembly. 'The BJP is protecting gangsters, and he (Bishnoi) is lodged in a jail in Gujarat, the state from which Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Union home Amit Shah come. Why does the BJP protect him? The gangster is executing targeted killings in non-BJP ruled states. Why is he not sent to other states, where he has murdered people? We will now try to bring him to Punjab on a production warrant,' the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader said. Bishnoi is the mastermind behind the killing of popular Punjabi singer Sidhu Moosewala three years ago and he has been issuing threats to actor Salman Khan. He is also allegedly behind last year's killing of NCP leader Baba Siddique in Mumbai. Commenting on the murder of businessman Sanjay Verma in Abohar on July 7 and the delay in arresting the three assailants, Cheema said: 'We will not allow anyone to vitiate the law and order situation. We will deal with anti-social elements with an iron fist.' 'Bishnoi takes responsibility for every murder sitting inside jail. What does this mean and why is he kept in Gujarat jail?' he said, demanding a reply from the Centre. He blamed the Congress for sheltering gangsters like Mukhtar Ansari while it was in power. The notorious gangster from Uttar Pradesh was brought to a jail in Punjab and given VIP facilities, Cheema said. Police records show the support of Shiromani Akali Dal leaders to anti-social elements, Cheema claimed, describing the opposition party as 'the root cause of the drug mafia in Punjab'. 'The opposition parties have patronised gangsters and the AAP government is cleaning the rot,' he added.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Former Minister Kimmane Ratnakar questions BJP leaders' allegiance to Indian Constitution
Former Minister and Congress leader Kimmane Ratnakar has questioned the BJP leaders' allegiance to the Indian Constitution, citing their devotion to M.S. Golwalkar's 'Bunch of Thoughts'. 'If BJP leaders accept the Constitution they have to reject the 'Bunch of Thoughts' written by Golwalkar of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. A person cannot accept both,' said Mr. Rathnakar in a press conference in Shivamogga on Thursday. 'The RSS is celebrating its 100th year. The BJP leaders, influenced by Golwalkar's ideas, have been trying to implement what the organisation stands for. However, the thoughts propagated by the leader are against the basic principles of the Indian Constitution,' he said. Holding a copy of Golwalkar's book, Mr. Ratnakar went through the excerpts from the book and questioned if the BJP leaders did support those ideas. Making a reference to the mention of Purusha Sukta in the book, he wanted to know if the BJP leaders would accept the depiction of the origin of four varnas – Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shudra. Referring to Golwalkar's thoughts favouring a unitary State and opposing the federal system, the former Minister stated that the views expressed in the book were completely opposite to the principles of the Constitution. 'Leaders of the BJP should clarify where they stand on these issues,' he wanted to know. Referring to Home Minister Amit Shah's recent comment that those who speak English in India would soon feel ashamed, Mr. Rathnakar stated that Shah's speech had its roots in Golwalkar's ideas. 'Shah did not make that statement all of a sudden. Golwalkar himself has advocated priority to Hindi over other languages,' he said. Further, he demanded BJP's response to RSS leader Dattatreya Hosabale's call to omit 'socialist' and 'secular' from the Preamble of the Constitution. Displaying a copy of the BJP's constitution, the Congress leader stated that the party (BJP) announced to have faith and allegiance to principles of socialism and secularism. 'The words – 'socialism' and 'secularism' – were present in the party's constitution. They may have amended it now,' he commented. District Congress Committee president R. Prasanna Kumar, party spokesperson Ramesh Hegde and others were present at the press conference.
