Columbia students' personal data stolen by politically motivated hacker, university says
The June 24 cyberattack prompted widespread network outages on campus, locking students and staff out of their e-mail accounts, coursework and video conference software for several hours. On the same day, images of President Donald Trump's smiling face appeared on several public monitors across the Manhattan campus.
A spokesperson for Columbia declined to elaborate on the political motivations behind the attack. But they described a highly sophisticated 'hacktivist' who had gained access to private student records in an attempt to further a political agenda.
The spokesperson said it was unclear if the Trump photo display was connected to the data breach.
'We are investigating the scope of the apparent theft and will share our findings with the University community as well as anyone whose personal information was compromised,' the school said.
The cyberattack comes as Columbia remains in the crosshairs of the Trump administration, which has threatened to pull $400 million in federal funds over what it claims is the school's failure to protect Jewish students.
Negotiations over a possible settlement are ongoing. The university has already agreed to a host of changes demanded by Trump, including placing its Middle East studies department under new supervision and overhauling its rules for protests and student discipline.
In March, a cyberattack against New York University resulted in student admission records briefly appearing on the school's website. An online hacker who took credit for that action on social media said the intent was to prove the university was not in compliance with the Supreme Court decision banning affirmative action in college admissions.
An NYU spokesperson said at the time that the data displayed on its webpage was 'inaccurate and misleading,' adding that the university 'scrupulously complies with the law.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
36 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Is Crypto Getting Too Political? 2 Indicators Investors Should Watch
Key Points Political lobbying is driving regulatory change in Washington. Clear rules could underpin long-term growth but only if they protect investors. Consider it a warning sign if politics, not policies, drive prices. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › One of the appeals of Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) at its inception was its decentralized nature. Early adopters proclaimed the birth of a digital currency that didn't need the backing of central banks or governments. A lot has changed since then. Blockchain may not need governments, but cryptocurrencies seem to need politicians. The industry spent more than $130 million on lobbying in 2024 per watchdog Follow the Crypto. Crypto leaders want regulations that will increase adoption and plug digital assets into traditional financial systems. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » It may not be in line with Bitcoin's original values, but many investors rightly welcome the prospect of clearer legislation as reflected in Bitcoin's recent rally. But has it all gotten to be too much? Are politics driving unsustainable highs? And are there long-term consequences? Let's dive into some key indicators to watch. How to know when crypto's become too political The current administration is shifting the U.S. approach to crypto. That includes the bills being debated in Washington, the appointment of pro-crypto figures in key positions, the creation of a strategic Bitcoin reserve, and more. Don't get me wrong. Freeing cryptocurrency from the regulatory quagmire of recent years is a good thing. So is creating rules for stablecoins and passing legislation that gives digital assets a clearer framework. These could all generate serious growth for long-term investors. However, the launch of the OFFICIAL TRUMP meme coin and the president's family business connections to crypto have fueled accusations of conflicts of interest. There is also concern that weak legislation could eventually trigger a financial meltdown, hurt retail investors, and enable criminals to use crypto for illicit activities. The risk of crypto getting too political is that the whole industry becomes one big pump-and-dump scheme. Rather than delivering decentralized finance to the masses and adding stability through careful legislation, it may instead fuel a crypto bubble and damage cryptocurrency's long-term prospects. If you're worried about how the shifting politics around cryptocurrency could affect your portfolio, pay attention to these important signs. 1. If politics drive unsustainable price increases The price of Bitcoin has already surged about 60% since November's election. Bitcoin is maturing, and regulatory changes mean it is entering a new phase. Increased institutional adoption and confidence could well reduce its volatility. While talk of a bubble is somewhat overstated, it is hard to know how sustainable the current rally is. Bitcoin's price history shows that new highs are often followed by dramatic crashes. For example, in December 2017, Bitcoin soared to almost $20,00 only to fall by about 60% in the following months. It almost topped $68,000 in November 2021, but a year later it had dropped to around $17,000. Bitcoin has always recovered after the plunges and gone on to set new highs. Even so, it is important to be prepared for another dip and pay attention to market sentiment, particularly if the crypto fear-and-greed index is flashing extreme greed, and investors are making emotional decisions. Another indicator is when crypto prices move on the back of the president's social media activity rather than concrete developments in Washington. It doesn't mean this is a bubble that will burst next week, but it is a signal that politics, not fundamentals, are driving price action. Also, watch for signs that political enthusiasm for crypto may be waning. A rally driven solely by politics may falter if a different party gains power or the current administration changes tack. For example, Bitcoin dipped twice in 2021 after crypto crackdowns in China. 2. If crypto crime goes unpunished In recent years, the old Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursued several enforcement actions against major crypto players that centered on the question of whether some cryptos are actually unregistered securities. Many insiders viewed the cases as a consequence of a lack of clear regulation rather than actual crimes. That view seems to be supported by the new SEC regime, which has dropped cases against crypto exchanges. What's worrying is that it may drop other cases too. For example, it paused its case against Justin Sun -- the crypto entrepreneur behind BitTorrent and Tron (CRYPTO: TRX). The accusation went beyond a technicality about trading unregistered securities; it accused Sun of fraud and wash trading. There's a difference between having regulatory clarity and allowing crypto platforms to do whatever they want. A swing to an anything-goes environment could expose investors to unfair practices and ultimately cost them money. Rather than preventing another FTX failure amid fraud by its founder, it could open the door to an even bigger collapse. Pay attention to what checks and balances exchanges need to follow and how authorities oversee and enforce the rules. Handling today's crypto environment Politics are a part of life, and savvy investors will look for ways to benefit from changing tides. That might mean jumping on the crypto train because you think the current administration's policies will create fertile ground for long-term growth. Ot it may mean putting the brakes on your crypto plans because you think it's creating an unsustainable environment. If you don't like the political environment concerning crypto, here are some steps to take: Consider your risk tolerance: If you think politics has made crypto a riskier proposition, you may want to reassess your exposure. Ensure that risky assets make up only a small percentage of your portfolio. How much depends on your age, financial situation, and goals. Balance your crypto investments with less-risky assets such as equity ETFs, bonds, or even gold. Remember why you bought crypto: If your underlying investment thesis has changed, it may be time to consider other assets. If you're still willing to take risks, that might mean looking for opportunities in artificial intelligence (AI) stocks. If you think blockchain technology still has a way to run, consider companies like IBM (NYSE: IBM) that have integrated the tech into their businesses. Diversification is key There's a lot of uncertainty right now across many asset classes, including crypto. If you're a buy-and-hold investor, what matters is how the shifts in regulation could affect your investments over time. Ultimately, a diversified portfolio and long-term perspective are two of the best protections any investor can have. Should you invest $1,000 in Bitcoin right now? Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,010,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to180%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025
Globe and Mail
36 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats and Republicans don't agree on much, but they share a conviction that the government should help American manufacturers, one way or another. Democratic President Joe Biden handed out subsidies to chipmakers and electric vehicle manufacturers. Republican President Donald Trump is building a wall of import taxes — tariffs — around the U.S. economy to protect domestic industry from foreign competition. Yet American manufacturing has been stuck in a rut for nearly three years. And it remains to be seen whether the trend will reverse itself. The U.S. Labor Department reports that American factories shed 7,000 jobs in June for the second month in a row. Manufacturing employment is on track to drop for the third straight year. The Institute for Supply Management, an association of purchasing managers, reported that manufacturing activity in the United States shrank in June for the fourth straight month. In fact, U.S. factories have been in decline for 30 of the 32 months since October 2022, according to ISM. 'The past three years have been a real slog for manufacturing,'' said Eric Hagopian, CEO of Pilot Precision Products, a maker of industrial cutting tools in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. 'We didn't get destroyed like we did in the recession of 2008. But we've been in this stagnant, sort of stationary environment.'' Big economic factors contributed to the slowdown: A surge in inflation, arising from the unexpectedly strong economic recovery from COVID-19, raised factory expenses and prompted the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates 11 times in 2022 and 2023. The higher borrowing costs added to the strain. Government policy was meant to help. Biden's tax incentives for semiconductor and clean energy production triggered a factory-building boom – investment in manufacturing facilities more than tripled from April 2021 through October 2024 – that seemed to herald a coming surge in factory production and hiring. Eventually anyway. But the factory investment spree has faded as the incoming Trump administration launched trade wars and, working with Congress, ended Biden's subsidies for green energy. Now, predicts Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, 'manufacturing production will continue to flatline.' 'If production is flat, that suggests manufacturing employment will continue to slide,' Zandi said. 'Manufacturing is likely to suffer a recession in the coming year.'' Meanwhile, Trump is attempting to protect U.S. manufacturers — and to coax factories to relocate and produce in America — by imposing tariffs on goods made overseas. He slapped 50% taxes on steel and aluminum, 25% on autos and auto parts, 10% on many other imports. In some ways, Trump's tariffs can give U.S. factories an edge. Chris Zuzick, vice president at Waukesha Metal Products, said the Sussex, Wisconsin-based manufacturer is facing stiff competition for a big contract in Texas. A foreign company offers much lower prices. But 'when you throw the tariff on, it gets us closer,'' Zuzick said. 'So that's definitely a situation where it's beneficial.'' But American factories import and use foreign products, too – machinery, chemicals, raw materials like steel and aluminum. Taxing those inputs can drive up costs and make U.S producers less competitive in world markets. Consider steel. Trump's tariffs don't just make imported steel more expensive. By putting the foreign competition at a disadvantage, the tariffs allow U.S. steelmakers to raise prices – and they have. U.S.-made steel was priced at $960 per metric ton as of June 23, more than double the world export price of $440 per ton, according to industry monitor SteelBenchmarker. In fact, U.S. steel prices are so high that Pilot Precision Products has continued to buy the steel it needs from suppliers in Austria and France — and pay Trump's tariff. Trump has also created considerable uncertainty by repeatedly tweaking and rescheduling his tariffs. Just before new import taxes were set to take effect on dozens of countries on July 9, for example, the president pushed the deadline back to Aug. 1 to allow more time for negotiation with U.S. trading partners. The flipflops have left factories, suppliers and customers bewildered about where things stand. Manufacturers voiced their complaints in the ISM survey: 'Customers do not want to make commitments in the wake of massive tariff uncertainty,'' a fabricated metal products company said. 'Tariffs continue to cause confusion and uncertainty for long-term procurement decisions,'' added a computer and electronics firm. 'The situation remains too volatile to firmly put such plans into place.'' Some may argue that things aren't necessarily bad for U.S. manufacturing; they've just returned to normal after a pandemic-related bust and boom. Factories slashed nearly 1.4 million jobs in March and April 2020 when COVID-19 forced many businesses to shut down and Americans to stay home. Then a funny thing happened: American consumers, cooped up and flush with COVID relief checks from the government, went on a spending spree, snapping up manufactured goods like air fryers, patio furniture and exercise machines. Suddenly, factories were scrambling to keep up. They brought back the workers they laid off – and then some. Factories added 379,000 jobs in 2021 — the most since 1994 — and then tacked on another 357,000 in 2022. But in 2023, factory hiring stopped growing and began backtracking as the economy returned to something closer to the pre-pandemic normal. In the end, it was a wash. Factory payrolls last month came to 12.75 million, almost exactly where they stood in February 2020 (12.74 million) just before COVID slammed the economy. 'It's a long, strange trip to get back to where we started,'' said Jared Bernstein, chair of Biden's White House Council of Economic Advisers. Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products said that it will take time to see if Trump's tariffs succeed in bringing factories back to America. 'The fact is that manufacturing doesn't turn on a dime,'' he said. 'It takes time to switch gears.'' Hagopian at Pilot Precision is hopeful that tax breaks in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill will help American manufacturing regain momentum. 'There may be light at the end of the tunnel that may not be a locomotive bearing down,'' he said. For now, manufacturers are likely to delay big decisions on investing or bringing on new workers until they see where Trump's tariffs settle and what impact they have on the economy, said Ned Hill, professor emeritus in economic development at Ohio State University. 'With all this uncertainty about what the rest of the year is going to look like,'' he said, 'there's a hesitancy to hire people just to lay them off in the near future.'' 'Everyone,'' said Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products, 'is kind of just waiting for the new normal.''
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Trump envoy arrives in Kyiv as US pledges more Patriot missiles to Ukraine
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, was in Kyiv on Monday, a senior Ukrainian official said, as anticipation grew over a possible shift in the Trump administration's policy on the three-year war. Trump last week said he would make a 'major statement' on Russia on Monday. Trump made quickly stopping the war one of his diplomatic priorities, and he has increasingly expressed frustration about Russian President Vladimir Putin's unbudging stance on U.S-led peace efforts.
