
What is the Cold War-era ‘Nazi law' revived by Trump to strip citizenship?
A new Justice Department memo instructs attorneys to pursue denaturalisation more aggressively, targeting not only those who committed fraud in their immigration process but also individuals who may 'pose a potential danger to national security,' according to the directive, the CNN reported. The guidance, issued by the DOJ's Civil Division, aligns with Trump's broader effort to remake the federal immigration enforcement apparatus.
While the law behind denaturalisation has long existed, and was historically used to prosecute former Nazis and war criminals, legal experts as per CNN, warn that the administration's new posture could be weaponised to intimidate naturalised citizens, especially those viewed as critical of Trump.
'The politicisation of citizenship rights is something that really worries me,' Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, told CNN. Robertson added, 'I think it's just flatly inconsistent with our democratic system.'
The denaturalisation statute stems from a McCarthy-era law designed to root out Communists during the Red Scare. Since then, it's most famously been used to prosecute Nazi collaborators. Beginning in 1979, the DOJ created a special unit to target those who concealed their roles in World War II atrocities.
Eli Rosenbaum, the department's longtime Nazi hunter, stripped or revoked citizenship from over 100 individuals during his tenure. In 2022, he returned to lead US investigations into war crimes committed in Ukraine.
The Obama administration later expanded the practice under 'Operation Janus,' targeting individuals who used stolen identities to become US citizens.
In 2020, during Trump's first term, the DOJ even created a dedicated denaturalisation office, though it was quietly dismantled by the Biden administration a year later. One former DOJ official told CNN the initiative was more of a 'branding opportunity' than an effective enforcement mechanism.
But now, under Trump's renewed leadership, the strategy is being revived with more institutional heft. Instead of a single office, the entire Civil Division has been instructed to prioritise denaturalisation 'in all cases permitted by law,' while urging US attorneys' offices to flag potential targets nationwide.
Trump's DOJ filed 102 denaturalisation cases during his first administration, compared to 24 under President Biden, DOJ spokesperson Chad Gilmartin said on social media. Since Trump returned to office in January, five new cases have been filed in just five months.
The department maintains that all denaturalisation efforts will be legally grounded. 'Denaturalisation proceedings will only be pursued as permitted by law and supported by evidence against individuals who illegally procured or misrepresented facts in the naturalisation process,' the DOJ said in a statement to CNN.
But multiple current and former DOJ officials told CNN that the new memo is so broad that it risks giving the federal government leeway to file cases based on vague or politicised accusations — such as social media posts or political speech.
Robertson warned the administration could retroactively comb through applications for minor errors or inconsistencies, particularly among naturalised individuals critical of Trump.
Irina Manta, a law professor at Hofstra University, said the DOJ's move could cast a 'chilling effect' on speech. 'I regularly observe the fear firsthand,' she told CNN.
Trump has, at times, publicly mused about removing even native-born citizens from the country. He has claimed that 'many' of the 'bad people' he wants to deport were born in the US, and recently said his administration should 'take a look' at revoking Elon Musk's citizenship after the billionaire criticised his spending plan.
Now, one of Trump's allies has made that threat more formal. Republican Rep. Andy Ogles recently urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, who was naturalised in 2018 after immigrating from Uganda. Ogles claims Mamdani 'glorifies' people associated with Hamas in a rap song and should be considered for denaturalisation.
Bondi has not publicly responded to the request.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US' new tariff list: India at 25%, exports to get hit, competitors in lower band
Synopsis Effective August 7, 2025, the US has imposed a blanket 25% tariff on all Indian-origin goods, placing India among the most harshly treated nations in its new tariff regime. This measure, part of a new Executive Order, denies India product-level exemptions, even for critical sectors like pharmaceuticals and electronics. Agencies US' new tariff list New Delhi: In a move that could dent India's exports to US, Washington has imposed a blanket 25% tariff on all Indian-origin goods, effective August 7, measure, part of a new Executive Order issued by US President Donald Trump on July 31, places India among the most harshly treated countries in the new American tariff regime, offering no product-level exemptions even for sectors deemed critical like pharmaceuticals, energy, and Order mentions that tariffs may be reduced once countries do a deal with the per the order, countries have been subject to tariffs ranging from 10% to over 41% with differential rates based on geopolitical risk, economic alignment, and trade said the new order puts India at disadvantage to majority competitors including Pakistan, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Turkey where the tariffs are 15-20%. 'India's exports of petroleum products, smartphones, pharmaceuticals, engineering goods, electronics, and textiles will bear the brunt of the tariffs,' said a representative of an export promotion penalty threatened by Trump on India for doing business with Russia has not yet been US, Wednesday, announced 25% tariffs on India along with undisclosed penalty on trading with Russia.'The implications of the recent development are being examined by the government. The Ministry of Commerce and Industry is engaged with all stakeholders including exporters and industry for taking feedback of their assessment of the situation,' commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal said in his statement in Parliament US was India's largest export destination in FY25 with shipments valued at $86.51 billion. But it accounted for less than a fifth of its total goods exports of $437.42 per the Order, unlike many other trading partners, India has been denied all product-level exemptions—even for products and sectors, the US exempted Goods from other tariff exempted categories include finished pharmaceutical drugs, APIsand other key drug inputs; energy products, critical minerals and a wide range of electronics and EU has been granted a special concession in which if the existing US most favoured nation (MFN) tariff on an EU product is below 15%, the total tariff will be increased to 15%. However, if the MFN tariff is already 15% or higher, then no additional duty will be charged.A 10% tariff applies to a few countries—Brazil, the UK, and the Falkland 15% tariff, which is the most common, covers 38 countries. Countries facing higher tariffs (25-30%) include India, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Moldova, and and Serbia at 35%, Switzerland at 39% (unusually high for a developed nation), Laos and Myanmar at 40%, and Syria at 41%, the US Customs Border Protection authority will realise a guidance clarifying on how this measure will be applied.


NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
What Mahesh Jethmalani, Pragya Thakur's Ex Lawyer, Said On Malegaon Verdict
New Delhi: After all the seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case -- including BJP leader Pragya Thakur -- were acquitted by a special court on Thursday, senior lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani, who represented Ms Thakur during her early bail proceedings, criticised the foundations of the case. Speaking to NDTV, Mr Jethmalani said that the charges were politically driven, and because of this, a faulty investigation was inevitable. "If you're running a narrative as opposed to embarking upon an investigation for the truth of the matter, you are bound to be conducting a faulty investigation. And therefore, if your motive is political and not to search for the truth, that is what is going to happen, and you had a faulty investigation, and the judge said no evidence at all against these persons. I said that in 2009 itself, when I first took up Sadhvi Pragya's case for bail, I said it was a case completely based on oral evidence. There was nothing at all." Mr Jethmalani told NDTV. The court, presided by Special Judge AK Lahoti, held that the prosecution failed to establish any direct links between the accused and the 2008 Malegaon blast. It found that mere suspicion could not substitute for legal proof in a criminal trial. The court also ruled that the provisions of the stringent UAPA were not applicable in the case. On the question of whether officials responsible for prosecuting the case should now face consequences, Mr Jethmalani pointed the finger at the political establishment. The veteran lawyer laid the blame partly on the UPA-era leadership, accusing it of using investigating agencies to manufacture a narrative of 'Hindu terror'. "If you have a political motive as opposed to a search for truth, if you want to create this 'Hindu', 'saffron' terror theme in a dastardly attack where several innocent people were killed, then that's what's going to happen. You're going to have a false investigation, which a court won't accept," Mr Jethmalani said. "Who are the officials who pushed this case forward?" he asked. "The narrative was set politically, right? And unfortunately, if you're investigating officers in such heinous crimes, then you should really be going for the top people. You'll make a scapegoat out of a few officers who followed a faulty line of investigation. Maybe you should, maybe you will get the truth as to why they did it." Six people were killed in the blast that occurred on the night of September 29 2008, near Bhikku Chowk in the communally tense town, located about 200 km from Mumbai, during the holy month of Ramzan. The acquittals have left the victims' families without closure, and the lack of convictions raises difficult questions. "There is a travesty. It just shows that we have reached a new low in our country, where people are politicising terror. As a result of such politicisation, the real perpetrators behind these dastardly crimes are getting away. Maybe this matter needs to be reinvestigated, but don't forget that these cases were initially handled by the Anti-Terrorist Squad in Maharashtra and then by the NIA. You don't get more prestigious institutions than those. Those are the standards," Mr Jethmalani said. "I've been lamenting the standards in every institution. Did you think you'd see a judiciary where cash was found in such large amounts and in sacks? The whole thing is mind-boggling. Let's face it. People won't say this but our criminal justice system leaves much to be desired. It's in shambles at the moment," he added. In a 500-page judgment, Special Judge Lahoti held that the prosecution failed to prove key claims. While it was established that a bomb blast occurred, the court found no evidence conclusively tying the explosive to the motorbike allegedly owned by Ms Thakur. Nor did the prosecution sufficiently demonstrate the participation of the accused in any conspiracy. The court also awarded compensation to the victims with Rs 2 lakh for the families of those killed and Rs 50,000 for each of the 101 injured.


News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
Joe Biden Warns 'These Are Dark Days' In Address At National Bar Association Gala Trump
Former U.S. President Joe Biden delivered a forceful speech at the National Bar Association's 100th annual gala in Chicago on July 31, 2025, warning that civil rights, the judiciary, and marginalized communities now face existential threats under the Trump administration. Speaking to an audience of nearly 1,100 Black legal professionals, Biden decried rollbacks to immigration protections, erosion of legal precedents, and law firms capitulating to political pressure. He framed the moment as the most dire since the 1960s civil rights era and urged resilience in the defense of American values and institutions. Mobile App -