
Rate cut not a fix for rising costs
Many say they will continue to practise caution and financial discipline.
For 32-year-old regional learning and development manager Heshwinder Oon Chee Eng, with the lower OPR, he will channel more disposable income into his savings.
'I will save the additional money. I divide my finances into savings, fixed and variable costs, and daily spending.
'These don't fluctuate much month to month, so it's nice to allocate a bit more to savings,' he said.
Despite the benefits, Oon remains cautious about future investments, particularly in property.
'With the uncertainty over the past five years, from Covid-19 to geopolitical tensions and market volatility, I'm not confident about taking on another large financial commitment like buying a new property,' he said.
Oon added that any financial gains from the OPR cut are effectively cancelled out by the recent expansion of the Sales and Service Tax (SST), which has made essential items more expensive.
'The expansion of the SST on everyday household items will increase costs and would probably reduce the benefit from the lower OPR, leaving little room for financial improvement,' he said.
On Wednesday, Bank Negara announced the reduction of the OPR by 25 basis points to 2.75% at its July Monetary Policy Committee meeting, marking its first adjustment rate since May 2023.
For Wan Muhammad Rifa'at Rosli, 33, the OPR rate cut is a welcome breather amid rising living expenses.
'It really helps as costs are climbing, especially groceries, school fees and electricity bills. A lower OPR makes my housing loan repayments a bit more manageable,' the credit consultant said.
Wan Muhammad said he plans to use the additional savings to ease other financial burdens.
'I'll be spending some of it and using the rest to settle other debts. It gives me a bit more breathing space,' he said.
Lee Xiao Jin, a key account manager in corporate sales, said while the lower OPR would reduce her monthly mortgage payments, it does not dramatically change her financial approach.
'Even saving RM100 a month, which adds up to RM1,200 a year, is not insignificant. It can enhance your lifestyle, but it's not life changing,' she said.
With her home loan being her only major financial commitment, Lee, 31, plans to invest the extra funds in shares or save them in a fixed deposit.
However, she is not planning any major financial moves just yet.
'I don't think the OPR drop is permanent; I'd rather avoid taking on new risks,' she said.
A 40-year-old engineer, who wants to be known as Rahman, said he values extra savings.
'I'll use whatever I save to pay off other debts or build up my savings. Money is tight these days; I can't afford to splurge,' he said.
Meanwhile, economics professor Dr Chung Tin Fah of HELP University noted that the OPR drop is good news for borrowers and will directly influence the Standardised Base Rate (SBR), which is the reference rate for most floating-rate loans.
'When the OPR is revised, banks must adjust the SBR by the same amount within seven working days.
'However, while the SBR is directly linked to the OPR, individual banks may reflect different effective rates due to varying business or funding costs,' he said.
Chung added that although borrowers can expect lower loan repayments, this does not necessarily translate into a significant reduction in the overall cost of living.
'Paying less on loans is helpful but the rising cost of living is driven by multiple factors, such as the reduction in subsidies and tax charges.
'Lower interest rates also tend to encourage borrowing, which can lead to higher household debt levels over time.
'The overall effectiveness of rate cuts in managing debt needs careful assessment,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Britain's manufacturing contraction eases in July but outlook remains weak
LONDON, Aug. 1 (Xinhua) -- Britain's manufacturing downturn showed signs of easing in July, with the seasonally adjusted Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) rising to a six-month high of 48, according to data released by S&P Global on Friday. The July PMI was slightly higher than 47.7 in June, but the index has now signalled contraction for ten consecutive months. S&P Global noted that risks persist, including fragile domestic and overseas market conditions, subdued consumer confidence, and manufacturers' ongoing concerns about costs. Market conditions remained subdued in July as British manufacturers reported weak spending willingness and low confidence at home and abroad. Rob Dobson, director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said although the UK manufacturing sector is starting to send some tentatively encouraging signals, there's no assured path back to strong growth. Domestic clients are unwilling to spend due to cost rises triggered by higher minimum wages and employer national insurance contributions, while export markets are being buffeted by geopolitical stresses as well as trade and tariff uncertainties. The data also showed that new export orders have decreased over the past three and a half years. Additionally, the sector faced a weak labor market in July. The company attributed this to a combination of weak demand, rising staff costs, and subdued market confidence. Job losses were recorded for the ninth month in a row, with the pace of reductions over the past six months ranking among the sharpest since 2020, when the country was hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.


New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Cross-border trade to thrive after high-level consultation
IT took bilateral summitry at the highest level to revive cross-border free-trade arrangement at the Tebedu-Entikong border crossing between Sarawak and West Kalimantan in Indonesia. This deal was one of the highlights of the 13th Malaysia-Indonesia Annual Consultation meeting between Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto in Jakarta this week. Also present were Sarawak Premier Tan Sri Abang Johari Openg and Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Mohd Noor. Sarawak had long sought to revive the free flow of goods since Indonesia unilaterally stopped it in 2016. Sarawak set up an inland port early in 2010 because it seemed to make good economic sense to transport goods from Kuching Port to West Kalimantan via the Tebedu inland port rather than all the way from Java. At its height in 2013, some RM700 million in goods were reported to be traded this way. Numerous Sarawak missions to Indonesia seeking to reinstate the free-trade arrangement since then had been fruitless. It, of course, hardly needs stressing that free trade benefits all who engage in it. It also makes geographic sense for transshipment of goods to and from West Kalimantan via Tebedu and Kuching. Naturally, it also needs to be acknowledged that West Kalimantan has similar aspirations to become a trade transshipment hub with the commissioning of a new deep sea port near Pontianak, the provincial capital. The new port will also be well-served by land adjoining it, which has been earmarked for the development of industries. It so happened that a trade delegation from Sarawak led by Deputy Premier Datuk Amar Awang Tengah Ali Hasan was in West Kalimantan and East Kalimantan, also this week. The main mission was, of course, to deepen the economic relationship not just with West Kalimantan bordering Sarawak but in East Kalimantan where the new Indonesian capital of Nusantara is being developed. Sarawak has already identified several joint-ventures in developing dams in Kalimantan and even major real estate developer Ibraco Bhd was scouting about for possible projects in Balikpapan, the major city adjoining Nusantara. Awang Tengah was reportedly also reviewing localities for setting up a Sarawak trade and tourism office in Pontianak. This comes on the heels of the revival of air connectivity between Kuching and Pontianak next month. There has been much clamour both in Sarawak and West Kalimantan for flights between the two cities to resume after they were stopped during the Covid-19 pandemic. People-to-people exchanges have come back strongly since as witnessed by the daily long queues at the Tebedu-Entikong main border crossing as well as other secondary border posts. All these positive developments must be sustained through regular high-level official exchanges, especially in showing to the Indonesian side that free trade and the free flow of people across our common border is not a zero-sum proposition benefiting only one side. What happened in Jakarta this week also shows that Sarawak and Sabah can and do benefit substantially from close state-federal ties and working in tandem to take the fullest advantage from similarly close Malaysia-Indonesia bilateral ties.


The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Pfizer, BioNTech lose UK appeal in Moderna patent case
LONDON: Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech on Friday lost their bid to overturn a ruling that their Covid-19 vaccine infringed one of Moderna's patents at London's Court of Appeal. Last year, the High Court ruled that one of Moderna's patents relating to the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology which underpinned its Covid-19 vaccine was valid and that Pfizer and BioNTech's Comirnaty vaccine had infringed it, meaning Moderna is entitled to damages in relation to sales after March 2022. The High Court also ruled that the other Moderna patent under challenge in the case was invalid. Moderna was refused permission to appeal against that decision. But Pfizer and BioNTech were granted permission to appeal in an attempt to try and invalidate Moderna's second patent and appealed earlier this month, arguing Moderna's developments of mRNA technology were obvious developments of previous work, rendering the patent invalid. Judge Richard Arnold, however, rejected Pfizer and BioNTech's appeal. Pfizer and BioNTech said in a joint statement that the decision 'does not change our unwavering stance that this patent is invalid' and the companies will seek to appeal. 'This decision has no immediate impact on Pfizer and BioNTech or Comirnaty,' the companies added. Moderna did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Friday's decision in the latest ruling in the legal dispute between the two sides over their competing vaccines, which helped save millions of lives during the pandemic. The companies have also been involved in proceedings in Germany – where a court ruled in Moderna's favour in March – the United States Patent Office, which held that two Moderna Covid-19 vaccine patents were invalid, and elsewhere. - Reuters