Woman who withheld council tax in climate protest faces losing home
Jane McCarthy, 74, said she made the decision after becoming increasingly fearful about the impact of climate breakdown on future generations, particularly when she learned about climate tipping points at a local meeting.
'I think that was the point at which I realised, oh my goodness, this is really urgent, really serious.'
McCarthy, who has terminal cancer, said she did not take the decision to withhold the money from Buckinghamshire council lightly but said it was a matter of principle as the council continued to invest in fossil fuels through its pension fund and by using Barclays Bank.
'I really object having to hand money over knowing that it's going to be used in ways that are reckless, that are damaging my children's chances of a livable future, let alone my grandchildren,' she said
McCarthy appeared at Reading county court earlier this month, resulting in a final charge order on her home, leading to fears the council could force her to sell up to repay the debt.
'It has been very stressful but for me it was a matter of conscience and also as a matter of conscientious objection, because fossil fuels are the cause of so much war as well as driving the climate crisis.'
UK pensions invest about £88bn in fossil fuels, which campaigners warn is helping drive the climate breakdown. Experts also warn such investments put pension savings at risk because those investments will either become stranded if countries meet their emissions targets, or runaway climate breakdown will wreak havoc with the global economy and wipe out any potential returns.
Campaigners are hoping that the pension schemes bill currently going through parliament will change the way pension funds are managed, ensuring pension trustees take relevant system level risks, including climate change into account, when deciding where to invest.
Claire Brinn, senior UK policy manager at the ShareAction campaign, said there was a 'lack of clarity' over trustees' legal and moral obligations when investing funds at the moment.
'This creates uncertainty for trustees over the legal scope for taking into account systemic considerations, whether macroeconomic or environmental, or even their members' living standards and views.'
She said clarifying this 'fiduciary duty' would be a 'a simple legislative change that will empower pension funds to consider people and planet and secure our future prosperity and security.'
McCarthy says her debt to the council now stands at about £5,000 including costs. She said she would be more than happy to pay the withheld tax to local charities or good causes.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
'I do want to pay it … I would love to just talk to the council about what charities I could support in Buckinghamshire but I am sure that is very unlikely, a fantasy.'
She added: 'For them to apply for the sale when it's only a debt of about £5,000 feels so disproportionate but that is what could happen.'
Robert Carington, Buckinghamshire council's cabinet member for resources, said it was 'duty bound' to collect tax to pay for essential public services.
'While the council acknowledges the personal views held in this case, they do not constitute a valid reason for not paying council tax. Payment of council tax, like any other tax, is not a personal choice. People are legally bound to pay it and the council has a legal duty to recover council tax. We are therefore pleased that the court has found in the council's favour and that this matter has been brought to a conclusion.'
He added that the council was committed to a 'greener future' and its pension fund investments were only in projects or corporations that had set a target 'to be net zero by 2050 at the latest'.
The council declined to say what it planned to do next in its efforts to recover the withheld tax.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Veterans minister may quit if Troubles-era troops lose immunity
The veterans minister is expected to resign over government plans to repeal the law that granted Troubles-era servicemen immunity from prosecution. Alistair Carns, a former Royal Marines commando, is said to have told ministers that he cannot support any proposal that would leave veterans vulnerable to criminal proceedings. Government sources said that Carns had made his position clear at a drop-in session for Labour MPs hosted by Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland secretary, on Monday last week. Benn had invited colleagues to be briefed on the Northern Ireland Office's plans to replace the Legacy and Reconciliation Act, the 2023 law that ended dozens of civil cases and inquests examining killings during the Troubles. At its heart is a conditional amnesty for all suspects in historic cases related to violence during the conflict. Conservative MPs had long pushed for the legislation to protect former soldiers from prosecution but the act's provisions also apply to republican and loyalist paramilitaries, provided they co-operate with a new information recovery body. Labour's election manifesto pledged to repeal the law and Benn said last year that it was 'completely wrong' that it had barred victims' families from pursuing new inquests or civil action in the courts. He has promised to abolish immunity for suspects, including veterans. Carns, who was appointed to the government within days of his election to the Commons last July, is understood to have told Benn that he could not endorse new legislation, due to be published within weeks, that reopened the possibility of veterans being prosecuted. 'There is a huge row brewing,' a government source said, adding: 'Everyone has been left with the impression that this is a resignation matter.' The minister was not present when MPs debated a petition signed by 176,485 people opposed to Benn's proposals in Westminster Hall on Monday evening. Suggestions that he is hostile to any change in policy on Troubles prosecutions risk embarrassing No 10, which made much of the fact that Carns, who won a Military Cross and is among the most decorated soldiers to have sat in the Commons, joined Labour last year. Senior figures in Downing Street are increasingly nervous of the backlash to the legislation. While Carns has yet to clarify his position publicly, the government's veterans commissioners for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales signalled their opposition to any legislative change in a joint statement on Monday night. 'We stand united in our firm support of the motion to be debated in Westminster today. We are deeply concerned by the prospect of retrospective legal action being taken against veterans who were carrying out their lawful duties, often under immense pressure and threat. 'We urge the government to resist any changes to legislation that would reopen legal uncertainty for veterans of Operation Banner,' David Johnstone, James Phillips and Susie Hamilton said. 'Any proposed changes must be measured, fair and informed by the voices of veterans themselves — many of whom have already endured decades of scrutiny and hardship. 'This is not a call for immunity from the law, but for fairness under it. Veterans deserve clarity, finality and respect for their service.' They added: 'There can be no moral equivalence between those who served in uniform to uphold peace and the rule of law, and those who sought to destroy it through acts of terrorism.' During the debate, hundreds of soldiers who served during the Troubles descended on Parliament Square to protest against the plans. They warned that modern soldiers would hesitate to pull the trigger in combat if the government were to remove legal protections for troops who served in Northern Ireland. • Trauma of veteran who faced jail over SAS shooting of IRA members The former servicemen massed on motorbikes and blasted their horns while circling Parliament Square during a 'rolling thunder' demonstration. The riders have been campaigning on the subject since 2019, but said that Labour's reignition of the debate made this their most important event to date. Veterans from all three services said that the move had 'reopened old wounds' and was fuelling a recruitment crisis. They said that the move could also be dangerous for serving soldiers whose fear of being dragged through the courts later in life may prevent them from fighting. 'No one will want to the pull the trigger,' said Geoff York, 71, a former lance corporal in The Blues and Royals cavalry regiment, who served for six years in Northern Ireland. 'If they're doing this to us, they'll be doing it to those who served in Afghanistan, Iraq … In 30 or 40 years' time, when these young soldiers are our age, they'll be getting the same thing. It is already reflecting on recruitment. Recruitment is on the floor across the three services.' York said that during the Troubles, British soldiers carried a 'yellow card' detailing the rules of engagement, which instructed troops to give a person three warnings before opening fire. Any soldier involved in a shooting would be investigated by the Royal Military Police and the Royal Ulster Constabulary. 'They would say 'you were in your rights to open fire' but many years later it's come to bite us on the rear,' he said. Special forces soldiers have also criticised Labour's pledge to reopen investigations. In a joint statement shared with The Times, seven commanders of The 22nd Special Air Service Regiment, who served in the elite unit during the Troubles, said: 'We have already processed our grief within our units and with the families of our fallen comrades. 'There's nothing healthy about perpetually reopening these wounds through endless legal proceedings. The harsh reality is that these new hearings are an exercise in futility. The terrorists responsible for killing our colleagues have already been granted 'letters of comfort' — effectively immunity from prosecution. 'So while these investigations might reopen painful chapters for veterans' families, they cannot deliver any meaningful justice. The terrorists walk free while we debate the merits of investigating decades-old cases. 'Our fallen comrades would not want their deaths to be used as political leverage to keep their families and the families of their comrades who are now being hounded, trapped in an endless cycle of hearings and investigations.' Carns and the Ministry of Defence were contacted for comment.
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Business live: FTSE 100 to breach 9,000 for first time
London's leading share index is expected to rise above 9,000 this morning, with the FTSE 100 forecast to open 15 points higher and hit a new intraday high. The FTSE 100 closed at a new all-time high of 8,998.06 on Monday as the US-UK trade deal meant Britain avoided the trade turmoil affecting markets in the European Union, which faces possible US tariffs of 30 per cent. The intraday high was 8,999.22. Asian shares rose overnight as the focus turned from tariffs to US inflation data and quarterly results from America's biggest banks. Tokyo's Nikkei 255 was up 0.24 per cent, but China's SSE Composite fell 0.8 per cent as strong second-quarter GDP growth slowed. The dollar was flat against a basket of currencies and safe-haven buying buoyed the price of gold, up 0.6 per cent to $3,363.90 an ounce. The oil price dipped 0.3 per cent to $69 a barrel. China's economy slowed in the second quarter with gross domestic product (GDP) growing 5.2 per cent year on year. This is down from 5.4 per cent growth in the first quarter but ahead of analysts' expectations of growth of 5.1 per cent. The world's second-largest economy has so far avoided a sharp slowdown in part due to a fragile US-China trade truce and support from Beijing, but economists expect a weaker second half as exports lose momentum, prices continue to fall and consumer confidence remains low. 'China achieved growth above the official target of 5 per cent in the second quarter partly because of frontloading of exports,' said Zhiwei Zhang, chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management. 'The above target growth in Q1 and Q2 give the government room to tolerate some slowdown in the second half of the year.'
The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
George Russell buys luxury £2.2million Pershing 6X yacht as Mercedes star splashes cash after F1 success
GEORGE RUSSELL has splashed out on a £2.2MILLION luxury yacht following his success on the track. The Formula One superstar has traded the tarmac for the waves after recently purchasing a Pershing 6X yacht. 12 12 12 12 12 Russell, 27, is having one of his best campaigns behind the wheel for Mercedes and is currently fourth in the Driver's Standings. And the Brit is clearly earning himself a handsome pay packet, reportedly £11.2m-per-year, as he he started to treat himself to some of the finer things in life. The four-time F1 Grand Prix winner's new yacht is the definition of luxury, a cutting-edge boat with top speeds of 48 knots and enough space to carry 14 people. The 62ft vessel has four bedrooms, four bathrooms, a kitchen and a remarkable upper deck living area. Just like Russell's F1 car, the boat also packs a punch with twin MAN V12 1550mhp engines. Meanwhile the bow of the boat has a huge plush area for Russell and his pals to lounge in the sun when they're out on the water enjoying their time away from the track. And the rear is fit with a garage in case anyone was hoping to bring their jet ski along with them for a change of pace on the water. Pershing are clearly not a company who shy away from treating their customers either, as Russell recently attended the brand's 40th anniversary party in Capri - sipping on champagne and taking in the views of a private drone show. 12 12 12 12 12 Russell could be in good stead to grow his yacht collection in the future as he looks set to pen a new and improved contract with Mercedes. The 27-year old is out of contract next year and has expressed his hope to stay with the team in the future amid speculation of a potential move for Max Verstappen from Red Bull to Mercedes. Speaking ahead of the British Grand Prix earlier this month, he said: "I want to continue with Mercedes into the future. Toto [Wolff] has never let me down, has always given me his word. 'He's also got to do what's right for his team, which includes me and the thousands of people who work for Mercedes. 'For me it's nothing to worry about, as I don't think I'll be going anywhere, and whoever my team-mate is doesn't concern me either, so I'll just focus on the driving. 'It'll happen when the time is right. I expect in the next couple of weeks. But we'll need to wait and see. 'There hasn't been a lack of interest, let's say. But I've been focused on my side, I am loyal to Mercedes. 'The likelihood I'm not at Mercedes next year is exceptionally low.'
