Ban on card payment surcharges: Cafe owner says they'll have to pass on cost
Photo:
123rf
Prices may need to rise at restaurants and cafes due to a ban on credit card surcharges, the sector is warning.
The government plans to
ban surcharges on card payments
for in-person payments.
Legislation is expected to be introduced to Parliament by the end of the year, with the ban to kick into effect no later than May 2026.
Richard Corney, founder of Flight Coffee and The Hangar cafe, said he would have to pass the cost on to consumers somehow.
"Our cafe, The Hangar, paid $17,000 in merchant fees in 2023 for the privilege of using PayWave and other associated services," Corney said.
"Yes, it speeds up service and there's value using it, but the solution isn't banning vendors from on charging this expense. What next? They ban cafes from charging a surcharge for opening on a public holiday? Better yet, and while they're putting restrictions on the banks, why not ban the banks from charging for this service outright and save small businesses real money by not having to fund this expense."
He said cafes would operate on profit to revenue ratios of less than five percent.
"Banks do not - and they're also institutionally paramount functions of our society," Corney said.
He said $17,000 was a significant portion of after-tax profit
"I absolutely have to on-charge any associated expense with regard to this."
The policy seemed out of touch, he said.
Restaurant Association chief executive Marisa Bidois agreed it would be tough on hospitality businesses operating on tight margins.
"These surcharges are genuine costs that businesses must pay. Without surcharges, businesses will need to absorb these fees, further impacting already small margins."
She said the announcement had come as a surprise.
"We've actively engaged with the Government to outline the financial pressures faced by hospitality businesses due to bank-imposed fees," Bidois said. "While we welcome consumer-focused changes, we are concerned about the lack of consultation on this particular announcement."
She said businesses would probably need to adjust their pries.
"Removing the ability to surcharge could mean businesses factoring these costs into their overall pricing, potentially leading to increased costs for diners."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
18 minutes ago
- RNZ News
'Very dangerous': Waipiro marina rubber-stamped for fast track
Local iwi and hapū Ngāti Kuta, Patukeha and Ngāti Hine are against a fast-tracked Waipiro Marina Project. Photo: supplied / Jay Howell The Bay of Islands community is shocked that a fast-tracked marina proposal will progress to the next stage. The approval on Monday by Minister of Infrastructure Chris Bishop comes with no support from local iwi and hapū Ngāti Kuta, Patukeha, and Ngāti Hine. "We are deeply concerned and do not understand how the minister could disregard the united oppositon to this proposal from across the district," Kohu Hakaraia of Patukeha hapū said. Bishop has been approached for comment, however, Hakaraia said they "refute" the minister's previous statements that the marina is regionally or nationally significant. The proposed build of a commercial marina will offer berthage for 200-250 recreational boating vessels with 14 spaces for 50-metre superyachts. The cost of each berth depends on the vessel size - a 10-20m slot would cost between $80,000 - $640,000 while a 20-30m berth could be priced up to $1.2 million. A public boat ramp, a parking lot, fuelling services, and hospitality and retail venues would also be constructed on reclaimed seabed with sand dredging used during construction and for maintanence. It is estimated to bring an economic impact of $177.9 to $218.8 million in value-added GDP and generate just under 150 full time jobs in construction, operations, and boat maintenance over a 30-year period. The proposed plan for up to 250 boating vessels Photo: supplied Those opposing the Waipiro Marina Project have called for transparency and accountability from the two companies - Hopper Developments and Azuma Property - and hoped the decision would go back to a Resource Management Act process. "As hapū and community, we feel that our voices have not been adequately heard," Hakaraia said. Both companies did not respond to requests for comment. An online petition has rallied 14,600 signatures disagreeing with the use of fast-track legislation for the site and Far North Mayor Moko Tepania had also pledged to write a personal letter . There has also been a stern no from boaties. Russell Boating Club members voted at their AGM in June to oppose use of the Fast Track Approvals Act 2024 with regards to the Bay of Islands project. Life member and former commodore of the club Jay Howell said the area was a quiet, treasured destination for locals to "anchor up and enjoy getting away from the hustle and bustle of Russell and the western flank of the Bay of Islands". The proposed marina and boat ramp would overwhelm the waterways with boat traffic, he said. Plus, the Ōpua-Okiato Vehicle Ferry crossing already brought long lines of cars that worsened in the summertime, Howell said. "That ferry is going to get overwhelmed by traffic. There aren't any alternatives really. They can't add more ferries and more ferry capacity, they're already at capacity. "There's infrastructure issues that Fast-Track just overlooks all of that and allows somebody [who isn't local] to make a decision that it has big ramifications locally." Boating and tourism businesses in Ōpua and Paihia were already struggling, he noted, and the marina could take business away from existing commercial centres making businesses less economically viable. A low tide aerial shot of Waipiro Bay. Photo: supplied Environmental benefits stated in the application included the creation of new marine environments, and improved ability to monitor and manage international and domestic boats that could be carrying foreign invasive species, like seaweed pest exotic caulerpa. Howell was also a member of the Eastern Bay of Islands Preservation Society. He was concerned that the influx of a couple of hundred extra boats would cause further decline of the whale and dolphin populations - something he had noticed in the last 15 years of living there. "Private boats just follow them around and don't leave them alone, and the marina will just exacerbate that situation out here." In addition, scallop beds and mussels in the area had already been decimated due to overharvesting. Te Rāwhiti residents would lose one of their main pipi beds. "There's all these impacts that the human activities are having on the marine environment in the area, and the marina will certainly put a lot more burden on all of that," Howell said. Another member of the Preservation Society, Sandra Scowen, said the area should be protected from large-scale commercial development and preserved for future generations. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
18 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Quarter of all tenant applications to Tenancy Tribunal relate to concerns about Healthy Homes
Tenants most often sought the recovery of a bond, damages due to landlords breaching obligations and compliance with Healthy Home standards. (File photo) Photo: 123RF About a quarter of all tenant applications to the Tenancy Tribunal relate to concerns about Healthy Homes standards, but industry commentators say most landlords are meeting obligations. In its latest annual report, the Tenancy Tribunal said there were 29,309 applications made to it in 2024, up 14 percent compared to 2023 and up 43 percent compared to 2022. About three-quarters came from landlords and 66 percent of all claims related to rent arrears. Tenants most often sought the recovery of a bond, damages due to landlords breaching their obligations, or compliance with Healthy Homes standards. From July 1 this year, all rental properties had to comply with Healthy Homes rules , which set minimum standards for heating, ventilation and insulation. Tenants living in a home that is not compliant could take their concerns to the Tenancy Tribunal. The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, said in 2024, 1412 applications to the tribunal related to a Healthy Homes concerns. In the 2025 financial year, it was 1394. Economist Ed McKnight, from property investment firm Opes Partners, said this was a factor in about 29 percent of tenants' complaints. "That sounds high. But there are approximately 600,000 rental properties in New Zealand. "So only 0.2 percent of rental properties had a tenancy complaint regarding the Healthy Homes Standards." He said the numbers indicated property investors had taken the rules seriously. Matt Ball, a spokesperson for the NZ Property Investors Federation, said the number of applications should start to drop now that all rental properties were required to be covered. But Sarina Gibbon, general manager of the Auckland Property Investors Association, said there could be "systemic illiteracy" about the standards, and tenants might not feel they could push back. Sarina Gibbon, general manager of the Auckland Property Investors Association said tenants may feel as though they cannot push back against landlords. (File photo) Photo: Supplied "The power imbalance inherent in tenancy relationships is not abstract. It's basically a butter knife we put in tenants' hands and say, 'There, go fight your battles.' "I can go on and on about the systemic illiteracy; it is pretty endemic - I see it everywhere, among landlords, tenants, property managers, vendors, assessors, and real estate agents. There's a lot of bad [Healthy Homes] information in the marketplace and it is concerning how many landlords are relying on them as professional advice." Ball said the big increase in applications overall was probably driven in part by an increase in the number of people renting. "Active bonds increased from 374,298 at the start of 2020 to 424,383 at the end of 2024, a 13 percent increase. Over the same period tribunal applications went up 31 percent, so this is close to half of the reason." He said the tribunal now offered a wider range of options to resolve disputes, which were faster and cheaper than a full hearing and could make it more likely that people would lodge an application. "For example, both fast-track resolution and mediation provide a faster way to resolve a dispute and are increasingly used by both parties. It's interesting to note that the percentage of applications which actually required a hearing fell from 50 percent in 2020 to 44 percent in 2024." Overall, in 2024, tribunal hearings for residential tenancy cases were conducted on average just under 10 weeks after filing. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
18 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Cabinet paper leak suggests Minister Nicole McKee's U-turn on alcohol sales reform
Associate Justice Minister, ACT's Nicole McKee, is reforming the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A leaked Cabinet paper shows the government was planning to restrict the hours bottle stores and supermarkets could sell alcohol but then backed away to focus on reforms more friendly to the alcohol industry. The Associate Justice Minister - ACT's Nicole McKee - is reforming the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act and had said that part of her focus would be reducing alcohol harm, which currently costs the country $9.1 billion a year. But documents leaked to RNZ, including a draft Cabinet paper, suggest the minister is now switching the focus of her reforms to making business easier for the alcohol industry. The documents show McKee initially proposed to change off-licence sale hours, from the current 7am to 11pm, to only allow alcohol sales between 9am and 9pm. The draft Cabinet paper says restricting opening hours could have had a major impact on violent crime - preventing 2400 "violent victimisations" each year. But that move has now been axed. A Ministry of Justice email, also leaked to RNZ, shows justice officials "were directed by Minister McKee to proceed with speed to lodge a revised Cabinet paper" to go before a Cabinet committee on 13 August. "The focus of the paper had changed during negotiations - it is now on reducing regulatory burden with some of the harm reduction measures no longer included - e.g. reducing maximum default trading hours." McKee told RNZ it was regrettable her draft Cabinet paper was leaked. "I won't be discussing a few cherry-picked parts of a draft paper through the media before I've even had an opportunity to discuss the issue with my Cabinet colleagues," she said in a statement to RNZ. "I am extremely disappointed that a draft Cabinet paper has been shared with media. This undermines the integrity of the public service and erodes New Zealanders' trust in public servants." The draft Cabinet paper says restricting opening hours could have had a major impact on violent crime. Photo: RNZ The leaks show that in an early version of her Cabinet paper, McKee proposed to restrict bottle store opening hours to between 9am and 9pm in a bid to reduce violent crime. "I am focused on hazardous drinking which can lead to violent crime. Evidence shows a strong correlation between later opening hours for off-licenses and violent crime," the Cabinet paper originally said. "Ministry of Justice analysis indicates that bringing forward the closing hour to 9pm could see up to 2400 fewer violent victimisations annually." The paper said restricting opening hours would reduce sales revenue for off-licences, as about 20 percent of sales were made between 8pm and 11pm and about 2 percent before 9am. The paper originally said the impacts on business had been "weighed carefully" against the benefits of reducing violent crime. But the leaks show this was changed in a later version. "I am not proposing any changes to the maximum trading hours for license holders," McKee wrote in the updated paper, noting Auckland and Christchurch had already set a 9pm closing time under their Local Alcohol Policies. "I consider that this is sufficient to manage concerns around license hours." McKee would not be interviewed by RNZ, but confirmed her reforms would now focus on making it easier for businesses in the alcohol industry. "My focus is on reducing red tape restricting businesses and New Zealanders who play by the rules. The law Labour left us with is a mess," she said. The draft Cabinet paper obtained by RNZ shows McKee is now proposing to make it easier for clubs and bars to serve alcohol outside normal trading hours when screening major sport or cultural events. McKee's Cabinet paper also proposes giving the alcohol industry more power when faced with objections to liquor licenses. The paper says changes in 2023 allowed any person or group to oppose a liquor license but that McKee wants to overturn this so objections only come from the community impacted. "To better balance community voice and impacts on business I seek agreement to only allow objections to licensing applications by people or groups and organisations in the same territorial authority as the premises." There are also moves to protect businesses impacted by changes to a council's Local Alcohol Policy (LAP) - where communities determine when and how alcohol is sold. "To protect existing businesses if a LAP is adopted or amended I also seek agreement to prevent a DLC (District Licensing Committee) from declining a renewal application if the license would be inconsistent with the relevant LAP." The changes would also give applicants for a liquor license a right of reply to objections received in DLC hearings. Andrew Galloway. Photo: supplied Andrew Galloway, executive director of Alcohol Healthwatch, funded by the Ministry of Health, said reducing trading hours for bottlestores and supermarkets would have had a major impact on reducing alcohol harm. "Off-licences sell over 80 percent of alcohol in Aotearoa and these off-licenses are over-concentrated in the most deprived areas. Restricting off-license supply of alcohol would be especially important in reducing alcohol-related harm." Galloway said that when he became aware the government was looking at restricting off-license trading hours he said to his team "we should prepare for a U-turn" once industry lobbying swung into action. "We will continue to miss every meaningful opportunity to reduce or prevent alcohol harm in New Zealand if we continue to allow unbridled access to power for harmful commodity industries." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
