logo
Trump's tariff threat shows US-India aren't really allies

Trump's tariff threat shows US-India aren't really allies

AllAfrica4 days ago
For years, India has proudly touted its 'comprehensive global strategic partnership' with the United States as a cornerstone of its foreign policy.
New Delhi's diplomats, defense chiefs, and prime ministers have invoked the US alliance as a sign of India's rise — a symbol that it has stepped out of the post-colonial shadow and into the ranks of major global powers. But if this week's events are any indication, those claims may be more illusion than reality.
On Tuesday (July 29), US President Donald Trump — the presumptive GOP nominee and still a loud voice in global politics — threatened to impose tariffs of up to 25% on Indian imports if a long-pending trade deal remains unresolved. 'They are going to pay 25%,' Trump said bluntly, adding with characteristic paradox, 'They're my friends.'
At the same time, Trump once again claimed that during the recent India-Pakistan military flare-up — Operation Sindoor and Operation Bunyan ul Marsoos — five aircraft were 'shot down.' Whether intentional or not, the comment lent weight to Pakistani assertions and left India scrambling to control the narrative of what was billed as a decisive show of strength.
India's foreign policy establishment has long pitched Washington as its most critical strategic partner. Defense pacts, intelligence cooperation, and joint military exercises — particularly naval drills in the Indo-Pacific — were presented as evidence of deepening ties.
But Trump's tariff threat now lays bare a fundamental truth: this relationship is still largely transactional, not transformational.
It was under Trump's first term that India lost preferential trade benefits under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). Tariff disputes escalated. US tech firms battled India's data localization laws. Now, the threat of 25% duties shows that the US remains willing to punish India economically, regardless of strategic rhetoric.
What kind of 'major defense partner,' as India is officially designated, faces the same hardball tactics reserved for adversaries?
And then came Trump's battlefield commentary. During a campaign stop, Trump repeated a now-familiar claim: that he helped broker peace between India and Pakistan during their May 2025 conflict, and that five fighter jets were downed during the standoff.
India has never publicly confirmed such losses. Pakistani officials, however, have claimed they downed multiple Indian Rafales. Trump's statement — true or not — undermines India's narrative of military supremacy.
When the world's most recognizable political figure asserts that India lost five jets, and India cannot decisively refute it, it casts doubt on New Delhi's transparency, competence, and strategic control.
This double blow — economic coercion and military humiliation — has serious consequences for India's legitimacy in the Indo-Pacific.
India wants to be seen as a credible counterweight to China, a regional anchor for democratic values and security cooperation. But if its most important Western ally is treating it as a disposable trading partner and publicly amplifying its military setbacks, that legitimacy suffers.
Smaller regional powers — from Vietnam to the Maldives — will begin to ask: Can India really lead? Or is it a middle power still vulnerable to both US pressure and Chinese encirclement?
The answer is clear: Pakistan and China. China benefits from the growing discord between Washington and New Delhi, while Pakistan — once sidelined in Indo-Pacific strategies — now finds itself vindicated.
Trump's 'five jets' statement lends legitimacy to Pakistan's military claims and reinforces the message that India is not the regional hegemon it claims to be.
India may continue to declare that it is a reliable, indispensable US partner. But when economic threats come faster than trade deals — and when public narratives on military engagements are shaped by Trump, not Delhi — the gap between rhetoric and reality is impossible to ignore.
Strategic partnerships are not built on joint statements and ceremonial summits. They are tested under pressure — in moments like this. And right now, the US-India partnership looks more fragile than firm.
Rashid Siddiqui is a student of MPhil Economics at the University of the Punjab. He may be reached at rashidsidiqui84@gmail.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India risks Trump's tariffs as oil refiners may still buy Russian
India risks Trump's tariffs as oil refiners may still buy Russian

South China Morning Post

time3 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

India risks Trump's tariffs as oil refiners may still buy Russian

India has not given the country's oil refiners instructions to stop buying Russian oil, according to people familiar with the matter, as officials grapple with meeting energy needs and maintaining ties with Moscow without further angering US President Donald Trump. Advertisement No decision has been taken as yet on stopping imports from Russia , the people said, asking not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. Both state-run and private refiners are allowed to buy from their preferred sources, and crude purchases remain a commercial decision made by them, several of the people said. Trump blasted India on Wednesday for continuing to purchase most of its military equipment and energy from Russia. The US leader imposed a surprise 25 per cent tariff on India and threatened an additional penalty for its close ties with Moscow. Two days later, Trump told reporters he 'heard' India would no longer be buying oil from Russia, calling it 'a good step.' India has maintained its energy purchases are driven by market forces and price. Last week, refiners were told to come up with plans for buying non-Russian crude, people familiar said to reporters. The government asked state-owned processors to prepare an outline of where alternate barrels can be sourced and at what volume if Russian flows get stopped, they said. One of the people said the instruction amounted to scenario planning in case Russian crude were to become unavailable. An Indian fisherman sails over the Ennore Creek covered with an oil spill after Cyclone Michaung, in Chennai, India, December 11, 2023. Photo: EPA-EFE US media reported on Saturday that India will keep buying Russian crude despite a threat of penalties from Trump, citing two senior Indian officials it did not identify.

India-Pakistan conflict: stuff that Bollywood dreams are made of?
India-Pakistan conflict: stuff that Bollywood dreams are made of?

South China Morning Post

time8 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

India-Pakistan conflict: stuff that Bollywood dreams are made of?

Indian filmmakers are locking up the rights to movie titles that can profit from the patriotism fanned by a four-day conflict with Pakistan , which killed more than 70 people. Advertisement The nuclear-armed rivals exchanged artillery, drone and air strikes in May, after India blamed Pakistan for an armed attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir The fighting came to an end when US President Donald Trump announced a surprise ceasefire. Now, some Bollywood filmmakers see an opportunity to cash in on the battle. India tagged its military action against Pakistan 'Operation Sindoor', the Hindi word for vermilion, which married Hindu women wear on their foreheads. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi (left) visits the Adampur Airforce Base in India's state of Punjab in a photograph released on May 13. Photo: Indian Press Information Bureau/AFP) The name was seen as a symbol of Delhi's determination to avenge those widowed in the April 22 attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam, which sparked the hostilities.

Former special counsel under investigation
Former special counsel under investigation

RTHK

time8 hours ago

  • RTHK

Former special counsel under investigation

Former special counsel under investigation Jack Smith resigned as special counsel in January, weeks before Donald Trump took office. File photo: AFP US officials have opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who led two federal criminal cases against President Donald Trump, US media reported on Saturday. The Office of Special Counsel told The New York Times it was investigating Smith for potentially violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal workers from engaging in political activity while on the job. Republican Senator Tom Cotton had reportedly asked the agency to investigate whether Smith's actions had been designed to influence the 2024 election. Smith was appointed special counsel in 2022, and charged Trump with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election and mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House. Trump denied both charges and sought to frame them as politically motivated, accusing the Justice Department of being weaponised against him. Neither case ever came to trial, and the special counsel – in line with a Justice Department policy of not prosecuting a sitting president – dropped them both after Trump won the November 2024 presidential election. Smith then resigned before Trump could fulfil his campaign pledge to fire him. The most severe penalty under the Hatch Act is termination of employment, which would not apply to Smith as he has already resigned. (AFP)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store