logo
Sweden invented ‘flight shaming'. Now it is begging airlines to return

Sweden invented ‘flight shaming'. Now it is begging airlines to return

Yahoo2 days ago
The country that invented 'flight shaming', a concept championed by climate activist Greta Thunberg, has scrapped its air tax in a bid to boost its ailing economy.
As of July 1, Sweden has dropped the levy of 76–517 kroner (£5.50–£37.40) per passenger per flight, an eco measure introduced by the centre-left government in 2018.
The U-turn will be seen as a disaster by environmentalists, and it exposes a tension at the core of the aviation versus climate debate. When jumbo jets disappear emissions drop, but other things begin to dwindle too: regional growth, connectivity and – it appears in Sweden – public support for eco concerns.
Sweden introduced its air tax in the same year that a 15-year-old Greta Thunberg organised her first solo climate protest outside Swedish Parliament.
In a short period of time the 'flight shaming' ('flygskam') movement took hold. A survey in 2019 showed that nearly a quarter of Swedes were abstaining from flying in a bid to reduce their climate footprint, up from 17 per cent the year before.
The impact on Sweden's aviation industry was stark. Swedavia AB, which runs 10 Swedish airports, saw passenger numbers drop for seven consecutive months in 2019. The country witnessed its slowest growth in airline passenger numbers for a decade. Meanwhile, state train operator SJ saw passengers leap to 32 million citing 'big interest in climate-smart travel.'
In the seven years that followed, international flights dropped by a third. Smaller airports, particularly in the wild and remote northern regions, saw fewer arrivals as airlines scaled back operations. Ryanair ceased all domestic flights in Sweden, while the domestic-focused Bromma Airport near Stockholm came to the brink of closure. Today, only one regional airline, Västfly, still uses the airport.
The pandemic was the catalyst for change. The country suffered a recession in 2023 and the economy shrank by 0.3pc between April and July 2024. It was within this economic climate that the new right-wing government, elected in 2022, said that there were 'few reasons to feel flight shame' as they announced plans to invest £76m into the aviation sector and drop the air tax entirely.
Airlines were quick to praise the decision. Ryanair promptly re-introduced two new aircraft to its Swedish fleet and added ten new routes. EasyJet said 'we strongly welcome the abolition of taxes on passengers to help keep flying affordable' and Norwegian announced it would add new routes from Norway to Sweden.
'We congratulate the Swedish government for abolishing the aviation tax. It is excellent news, which recognises that taxation of air passengers is counterproductive economically and ineffective environmentally,' was the international aviation body IATA's response to the news.
The climate lobby, however, is disheartened by the news. Justin Francis, co-founder and executive chair of Responsible Travel, tells The Telegraph: 'Some governments' short-term attitudes to regulating aviation have shifted, but the science hasn't, and aviation will account for an ever-increasing percentage of total global carbon emissions and the massive costs of climate change to business and society.'
No doubt politicians in neighbouring countries will be watching keenly from the sidelines to see how Sweden's U-turn plays out. That's because since Sweden introduced its eco-war against aviation, other countries have followed suit.
In 2020, Germany increased its domestic and intra-European flight taxes by 75 per cent, while Belgium imposes a €10 'boarding tax' for flights of less than 500km (310 miles). In the Netherlands passengers must pay a departure tax of €29.40 per flight, regardless of the destination.
Denmark is the latest to join the party. As of January 1 this year, passengers have had to pay 50DK (£5.73) for intra-European flights, 310DK (£35.83) for medium-haul and DK410 (£47.55) for long-haul flights. Ryanair was quick out of the blocks to criticise the tax. The Irish airline publicly described it as a 'discriminatory, fake eco-tax', criticising Denmark for penalising short-haul passengers while not taxing transfer passengers travelling far greater distances. The airline has scrapped its services from Billund and Aalborg, in response.
Other countries are clamping down on short-haul aviation through other means. In 2023, France passed a law banning domestic flights on routes where the journey could be made by rail in less than 2hr 30m. While this was hailed as a 'domestic flight ban', effectively ruling out air travel between Paris Orly and Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux, some argued they could have been more ambitious by extending the train travel time to four hours, or to measure from city to city rather than airport to airport.
In its current form, where you can still fly from Paris Charles de Gaulle to Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux. Because of this, the domestic flight ban has been criticised for being more gestural than anything else.
Spain is considering mirroring the policy, banning flights where you can make the same journey in 2hr 30m. This would rule out 11 domestic air routes, reducing the country's domestic aviation emissions by an estimated 10 per cent. But, as in France, climate activists said it didn't go far enough. Ecologistas en Acción described the measures as 'purely symbolic'.
The question is where these countries will go next. Clearly the Swedish U-turn highlights the complexities around marrying green policies with national interconnectivity and regional prosperity.
'Until electric planes and emissions-free aviation are viable options, we all need to fly less,' says Justin Francis. 'Aviation fuel needs to be taxed in line with other transport fuels. The industry has had a free pass here for too long, and the proceeds need to be ring fenced for investment in lower-carbon aviation and improving rail infrastructure.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Sells European ORLADEYO Business for Up to $264M
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Sells European ORLADEYO Business for Up to $264M

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Sells European ORLADEYO Business for Up to $264M

BioCryst Pharmaceutical Inc. (NASDAQ:BCRX) is one of the best high short interest stocks with huge upside potential. On June 27, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals announced a definitive agreement to sell its European ORLADEYO (berotralstat) business to Neopharmed Gentili for a total consideration of up to $264 million. The amount includes an upfront payment of $250 million for the European assets and rights related to ORLADEYO, along with up to an additional $14 million in future milestones contingent on sales in Central and Eastern Europe. The closing of this transaction is anticipated by early October this year. BioCryst plans to utilize the proceeds from this sale to retire all remaining term debt, amounting to $249 million from Pharmakon. A scientist in a lab coat observing a line of medicine pills in a container. This is expected to eliminate ~$70 million in future interest payments over the remaining life of the loan. Consequently, BioCryst projects to end 2027 with ~$700 million in cash and no term debt, representing an increase of $400 million compared to its previous net cash guidance for 2027. The acquisition by Neopharmed Gentili also involves taking over BioCryst's European organization, which is expected to result in at least $50 million in annual operating expense savings for BioCryst. BioCryst Pharmaceutical Inc. (NASDAQ:BCRX) is a biotechnology company that develops oral small-molecule and injectable protein therapeutics to treat rare diseases. Neopharmed Gentili is a pharmaceutical company founded in Italy. While we acknowledge the potential of BCRX as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

Italy's Bridge to Nowhere Shows Defense-Boom Risks
Italy's Bridge to Nowhere Shows Defense-Boom Risks

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Italy's Bridge to Nowhere Shows Defense-Boom Risks

The defense boom in Europe is as close to a tech-style gold rush as the Old Continent can offer. Armaments stocks are outperforming Nvidia Corp., and defense-themed funds are amassing billions in anticipation of rising military spending in a more dangerous world. NATO allies have agreed to more than double defense spending goals to 5% of gross domestic product in the coming years. But with so many countries already struggling to stump up the billions needed to keep up in artificial intelligence, reindustrialization and the energy transition, where's the cash going to come from? With the notable exception of Germany, many European countries are already near the limit of investor and voter patience with borrowing and taxation. And good luck shrinking the welfare state.

Cristiano Ronaldo's reason for not attending Diogo Jota's funeral revealed
Cristiano Ronaldo's reason for not attending Diogo Jota's funeral revealed

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Cristiano Ronaldo's reason for not attending Diogo Jota's funeral revealed

Former Manchester United star Cristiano Ronaldo opted to stay away from international teammate Diogo Jota's funeral yesterday. The footballing world was rocked earlier this week by the devastating news of Jota and his brother's death. Advertisement The two players were travelling back from holiday in Portugal in a car to catch a ferry in Northern Spain to take them to England. Reports suggest they suffered an accident whilst overtaking on the motorway. A funeral was held yesterday in the brothers' hometown of Gondomar, Portugal, that was well-attended by his club and international teammates, including United pair Bruno Fernandes and Diogo Dalot. One notable absentee was that of Cristiano Ronaldo who chose not to attend the ceremony. Portuguese paper A Bola reports that, 'Cristiano Ronaldo did not attend the funeral ceremonies of Diogo Jota and André Silva so as not to create a media circus that would only create even more trouble for the families of the late players.' Advertisement The Al Nassr forward has been in contact 'with the people closest to the former Liverpool striker and together they agreed that this would be the best option.' Ronaldo's absence has been a hot topic on social media where some people called him out for not attending and believed it was his role as the national team captain to be there. Nonetheless, his argument was 'his status as a global star would be more harmful than beneficial, drawing excessive attention at a time when the utmost modesty is required.' According to the newspaper, the former United forward has 'assured his family that he will always be present, having spoken to Diogo Jota's parents and wife, Rute.' Jota's international coaches Fernando Santos and Roberto Martínez were in attendance, however. Follow us on Bluesky: @

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store