Latest news with #Swedavia
Yahoo
05-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Sweden invented ‘flight shaming'. Now it is begging airlines to return
The country that invented 'flight shaming', a concept championed by climate activist Greta Thunberg, has scrapped its air tax in a bid to boost its ailing economy. As of July 1, Sweden has dropped the levy of 76–517 kroner (£5.50–£37.40) per passenger per flight, an eco measure introduced by the centre-left government in 2018. The U-turn will be seen as a disaster by environmentalists, and it exposes a tension at the core of the aviation versus climate debate. When jumbo jets disappear emissions drop, but other things begin to dwindle too: regional growth, connectivity and – it appears in Sweden – public support for eco concerns. Sweden introduced its air tax in the same year that a 15-year-old Greta Thunberg organised her first solo climate protest outside Swedish Parliament. In a short period of time the 'flight shaming' ('flygskam') movement took hold. A survey in 2019 showed that nearly a quarter of Swedes were abstaining from flying in a bid to reduce their climate footprint, up from 17 per cent the year before. The impact on Sweden's aviation industry was stark. Swedavia AB, which runs 10 Swedish airports, saw passenger numbers drop for seven consecutive months in 2019. The country witnessed its slowest growth in airline passenger numbers for a decade. Meanwhile, state train operator SJ saw passengers leap to 32 million citing 'big interest in climate-smart travel.' In the seven years that followed, international flights dropped by a third. Smaller airports, particularly in the wild and remote northern regions, saw fewer arrivals as airlines scaled back operations. Ryanair ceased all domestic flights in Sweden, while the domestic-focused Bromma Airport near Stockholm came to the brink of closure. Today, only one regional airline, Västfly, still uses the airport. The pandemic was the catalyst for change. The country suffered a recession in 2023 and the economy shrank by 0.3pc between April and July 2024. It was within this economic climate that the new right-wing government, elected in 2022, said that there were 'few reasons to feel flight shame' as they announced plans to invest £76m into the aviation sector and drop the air tax entirely. Airlines were quick to praise the decision. Ryanair promptly re-introduced two new aircraft to its Swedish fleet and added ten new routes. EasyJet said 'we strongly welcome the abolition of taxes on passengers to help keep flying affordable' and Norwegian announced it would add new routes from Norway to Sweden. 'We congratulate the Swedish government for abolishing the aviation tax. It is excellent news, which recognises that taxation of air passengers is counterproductive economically and ineffective environmentally,' was the international aviation body IATA's response to the news. The climate lobby, however, is disheartened by the news. Justin Francis, co-founder and executive chair of Responsible Travel, tells The Telegraph: 'Some governments' short-term attitudes to regulating aviation have shifted, but the science hasn't, and aviation will account for an ever-increasing percentage of total global carbon emissions and the massive costs of climate change to business and society.' No doubt politicians in neighbouring countries will be watching keenly from the sidelines to see how Sweden's U-turn plays out. That's because since Sweden introduced its eco-war against aviation, other countries have followed suit. In 2020, Germany increased its domestic and intra-European flight taxes by 75 per cent, while Belgium imposes a €10 'boarding tax' for flights of less than 500km (310 miles). In the Netherlands passengers must pay a departure tax of €29.40 per flight, regardless of the destination. Denmark is the latest to join the party. As of January 1 this year, passengers have had to pay 50DK (£5.73) for intra-European flights, 310DK (£35.83) for medium-haul and DK410 (£47.55) for long-haul flights. Ryanair was quick out of the blocks to criticise the tax. The Irish airline publicly described it as a 'discriminatory, fake eco-tax', criticising Denmark for penalising short-haul passengers while not taxing transfer passengers travelling far greater distances. The airline has scrapped its services from Billund and Aalborg, in response. Other countries are clamping down on short-haul aviation through other means. In 2023, France passed a law banning domestic flights on routes where the journey could be made by rail in less than 2hr 30m. While this was hailed as a 'domestic flight ban', effectively ruling out air travel between Paris Orly and Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux, some argued they could have been more ambitious by extending the train travel time to four hours, or to measure from city to city rather than airport to airport. In its current form, where you can still fly from Paris Charles de Gaulle to Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux. Because of this, the domestic flight ban has been criticised for being more gestural than anything else. Spain is considering mirroring the policy, banning flights where you can make the same journey in 2hr 30m. This would rule out 11 domestic air routes, reducing the country's domestic aviation emissions by an estimated 10 per cent. But, as in France, climate activists said it didn't go far enough. Ecologistas en Acción described the measures as 'purely symbolic'. The question is where these countries will go next. Clearly the Swedish U-turn highlights the complexities around marrying green policies with national interconnectivity and regional prosperity. 'Until electric planes and emissions-free aviation are viable options, we all need to fly less,' says Justin Francis. 'Aviation fuel needs to be taxed in line with other transport fuels. The industry has had a free pass here for too long, and the proceeds need to be ring fenced for investment in lower-carbon aviation and improving rail infrastructure.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Telegraph
05-07-2025
- Business
- Telegraph
Sweden invented ‘flight shaming'. Now it is begging airlines to return
The country that invented 'flight shaming', a concept championed by climate activist Greta Thunberg, has scrapped its air tax in a bid to boost its ailing economy. As of July 1, Sweden has dropped the levy of 76–517 krona (£5.50–£37.40) per passenger per flight, an eco measure introduced by the centre-left government in 2018. The U-turn will be seen as a disaster by environmentalists, and it exposes a tension at the core of the aviation versus climate debate. When jumbo jets disappear emissions drop, but other things begin to dwindle too: regional growth, connectivity and – it appears in Sweden – public support for eco concerns. The emptying of Swedish skies Sweden introduced its air tax in the same year that a 15-year-old Greta Thunberg organised her first solo climate protest outside Swedish Parliament. In a short period of time the 'flight shaming' ('flygskam') movement took hold. A survey in 2019 showed that nearly a quarter of Swedes were abstaining from flying in a bid to reduce their climate footprint, up from 17 per cent the year before. The impact on Sweden's aviation industry was stark. Swedavia AB, which runs 10 Swedish airports, saw passenger numbers drop for seven consecutive months in 2019. The country witnessed its slowest growth in airline passenger numbers for a decade. Meanwhile, state train operator SJ saw passengers leap to 32 million citing 'big interest in climate-smart travel.' In the seven years that followed, international flights dropped by a third. Smaller airports, particularly in the wild and remote northern regions, saw fewer arrivals as airlines scaled back operations. Ryanair ceased all domestic flights in Sweden, while the domestic-focused Bromma Airport near Stockholm came to the brink of closure. Today, only one regional airline, Västfly, still uses the airport. The pandemic was the catalyst for change. The country suffered a recession in 2023 and the economy shrank by 0.3 per cent between April and July 2024. It was within this economic climate that the new right-wing government, elected in 2022, said that there were 'few reasons to feel flight shame' as they announced plans to invest £76m into the aviation sector and drop the air tax entirely. Airlines were quick to praise the decision. Ryanair promptly re-introduced two new aircraft to its Swedish fleet and added ten new routes. EasyJet said 'we strongly welcome the abolition of taxes on passengers to help keep flying affordable' and Norwegian announced it would add new routes from Norway to Sweden. 'We congratulate the Swedish government for abolishing the aviation tax. It is excellent news, which recognises that taxation of air passengers is counterproductive economically and ineffective environmentally,' was the international aviation body IATA's response to the news. The climate lobby, however, is disheartened by the news. Justin Francis, co-founder and executive chair of Responsible Travel, tells The Telegraph: 'Some governments' short-term attitudes to regulating aviation have shifted, but the science hasn't, and aviation will account for an ever-increasing percentage of total global carbon emissions and the massive costs of climate change to business and society.' The European countries banning domestic flights No doubt politicians in neighbouring countries will be watching keenly from the sidelines to see how Sweden's U-turn plays out. That's because since Sweden introduced its eco-war against aviation, other countries have followed suit. In 2020, Germany increased its domestic and intra-European flight taxes by 75 per cent, while Belgium imposes a €10 'boarding tax' for flights of less than 500km (310 miles). In the Netherlands passengers must pay a departure tax of €29.40 per flight, regardless of the destination. Denmark is the latest to join the party. As of January 1 this year, passengers have had to pay 50DK (£5.73) for intra-European flights, 310DK (£35.83) for medium-haul and DK410 (£47.55) for long-haul flights. Ryanair was quick out of the blocks to criticise the tax. The Irish airline publicly described it as a 'discriminatory, fake eco-tax', criticising Denmark for penalising short-haul passengers while not taxing transfer passengers travelling far greater distances. The airline has scrapped its services from Billund and Aalborg, in response. Other countries are clamping down on short-haul aviation through other means. In 2023, France passed a law banning domestic flights on routes where the journey could be made by rail in less than 2hr 30m. While this was hailed as a 'domestic flight ban', effectively ruling out air travel between Paris Orly and Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux, some argued they could have been more ambitious by extending the train travel time to four hours, or to measure from city to city rather than airport to airport. In its current form, where you can still fly from Paris Charles de Gaulle to Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux. Because of this, the domestic flight ban has been criticised for being more gestural than anything else. Spain is considering mirroring the policy, banning flights where you can make the same journey in 2hr 30m. This would rule out 11 domestic air routes, reducing the country's domestic aviation emissions by an estimated 10 per cent. But, as in France, climate activists said it didn't go far enough, with the group Ecologistas en Acción describing the measures as 'purely symbolic'. The question is where these countries will go next. Clearly the Swedish U-turn highlights the complexities around marrying green policies with national interconnectivity and regional prosperity. 'Until electric planes and emissions-free aviation are viable options, we all need to fly less,' says Justin Francis. 'Aviation fuel needs to be taxed in line with other transport fuels. The industry has had a free pass here for too long, and the proceeds need to be ring fenced for investment in lower-carbon aviation and improving rail infrastructure.'
Local Norway
21-03-2025
- Local Norway
SAS cancels flights from Nordic countries to London after Heathrow fire
Flights from airports in Denmark, Norway and Sweden to London were cancelled on Friday after Heathrow Airport was closed due to a fire which broke out at a nearby power substation. The fire at the substation in Hayes caused a local power outage including at Heathrow. Over 1,300 flights in total are expected to be affected on Friday according to tracking site Flightradar24. Scandinavian airline SAS said all of its 14 flights from Heathrow to Nordic capitals Oslo, Stockholm and Copenhagen were cancelled on Friday. The earliest SAS departure was at 7.05am from Stockholm, while the latest was scheduled to depart from Copenhagen at 8.40pm. Conversely, there were 15 scheduled departures from Heathrow to the three Nordic capitals, all of which have also been cancelled. SAS or British Airways flights between Heathrow and other airports in the Scandinavian countries are also likely to be affected. Advertisement A BA flight from Heathrow to Denmark's second-largest airport Billund appears to have been cancelled. The flight, scheduled to arrive in Billund at 12.05pm and return to Heathrow departing at 1.05pm, is cancelled according to the Heathrow Airport website, although it has not been updated on Billund's website at the time of writing. Billund Airport has advised passengers to check for updates from both the airlines and the relevant airports. In Sweden, seven departures and arrivals are affected at Stockholm Arlanda, and three at Gothenburg Landvetter airports. Information on cancelled Swedish flights can be found on airport operator Swedavia's website as well as via the relevant airlines. Swedavia has advised passengers to contact their airline or travel provider if they have specific questions about their trip. SAS Norway said that 'all of SAS's twelve flights to London Heathrow today have been cancelled due to the incidents at the airport.' 'Affected passengers will receive information directly from us regarding their travel,' Øystein Schmidt of SAS Norway told Norwegian newswire NTB. British Airways has also cancelled all of its flights between Oslo and London Heathrow. Following the fire on Thursday night, Heathrow announced it would remain closed until midnight on Friday due passenger and staff safety precautions. Nearby Gatwick Airport said in a statement it was 'accepting redirected flights as needed' and is receiving diverted flights from cities including Singapore, Lagos, Cape Town, and Doha, according to the Guardian . Gatwick, and other London airports including Stansted to the north, do not have sufficient capacity to fully absorb all of Heathrow's flight traffic, however. It should be noted that not all flights to Heathrow have yet been confirmed as cancelled by the Copenhagen Airport website, but the Heathrow Airport website states all flights are cancelled and that the airport is closed until midnight on Friday. For example, British Airways flights from Copenhagen to Heathrow are not displaying as cancelled on the Copenhagen Airport website at the time of writing, but the Heathrow Airport website states they are cancelled. Flights from Norway, Sweden and Denmark to other London airports including Gatwick and Stansted are not affected by the Heathrow situation at the current time.
Local Sweden
21-03-2025
- Local Sweden
SAS cancels flights from Nordic countries to London after Heathrow fire
Flights from airports in Denmark, Norway and Sweden to London were cancelled on Friday after Heathrow Airport was closed due to a fire which broke out at a nearby power substation. The fire at the substation in Hayes caused a local power outage including at Heathrow. Over 1,300 flights in total are expected to be affected on Friday according to tracking site Flightradar24. Scandinavian airline SAS said all of its 14 flights from Heathrow to Nordic capitals Oslo, Stockholm and Copenhagen were cancelled on Friday. The earliest SAS departure was at 7.05am from Stockholm, while the latest was scheduled to depart from Copenhagen at 8.40pm. Conversely, there were 15 scheduled departures from Heathrow to the three Nordic capitals, all of which have also been cancelled. SAS or British Airways flights between Heathrow and other airports in the Scandinavian countries are also likely to be affected. Advertisement A BA flight from Heathrow to Denmark's second-largest airport Billund appears to have been cancelled. The flight, scheduled to arrive in Billund at 12.05pm and return to Heathrow departing at 1.05pm, is cancelled according to the Heathrow Airport website, although it has not been updated on Billund's website at the time of writing. Billund Airport has advised passengers to check for updates from both the airlines and the relevant airports. In Sweden, seven departures and arrivals are affected at Stockholm Arlanda, and three at Gothenburg Landvetter airports. Information on cancelled Swedish flights can be found on airport operator Swedavia's website as well as via the relevant airlines. Swedavia has advised passengers to contact their airline or travel provider if they have specific questions about their trip. SAS Norway said that 'all of SAS's twelve flights to London Heathrow today have been cancelled due to the incidents at the airport.' 'Affected passengers will receive information directly from us regarding their travel,' Øystein Schmidt of SAS Norway told Norwegian newswire NTB. British Airways has also cancelled all of its flights between Oslo and London Heathrow. Following the fire on Thursday night, Heathrow announced it would remain closed until midnight on Friday due passenger and staff safety precautions. Nearby Gatwick Airport said in a statement it was 'accepting redirected flights as needed' and is receiving diverted flights from cities including Singapore, Lagos, Cape Town, and Doha, according to the Guardian . Gatwick, and other London airports including Stansted to the north, do not have sufficient capacity to fully absorb all of Heathrow's flight traffic, however. It should be noted that not all flights to Heathrow have yet been confirmed as cancelled by the Copenhagen Airport website, but the Heathrow Airport website states all flights are cancelled and that the airport is closed until midnight on Friday. For example, British Airways flights from Copenhagen to Heathrow are not displaying as cancelled on the Copenhagen Airport website at the time of writing, but the Heathrow Airport website states they are cancelled. Flights from Norway, Sweden and Denmark to other London airports including Gatwick and Stansted are not affected by the Heathrow situation at the current time.
Local Sweden
28-01-2025
- Business
- Local Sweden
Stockholm's Arlanda tops list of most punctual airports in Europe
In 2024, Arlanda had an 80 percent punctuality rate for departures, four percent better than in 2023, and well above the average of 66 percent across all airports included in the report by industry organisation Eurocontrol. Oslo, which improved 1 percent on 2023, came second place for punctuality, while Copenhagen, which saw an 8 percent improvement, came in third. Arlanda, as well as nine other Swedish airports, is owned and run by Swedavia. "We're happy to hear that Arlanda was able to deliver the best punctuality for departures in Europe in 2024," Swedavia's CEO Jonas Abrahamson said in a statement. "We always place a high priority on being punctual and we plan to continue our work to further strengthen this alongside our employees and collaborators who all contribute to Arlanda's efficiency." The number of flights passing through Arlanda also increased by four percent in 2024 compared to the previous year. International flights increased by seven percent, while domestic flights decreased by ten percent.
