Canadians are boycotting the US. Are American travelers still welcome in Canada?
The region's tourist board released a promotional video on May 26 portraying an English-speaking tourist who bashfully admits to being American — then gets a big hug from a French-speaking hotel receptionist.
It's part of a CA$150,000 (US$109,000) ad campaign timed for the start of the summer travel season and aimed at US vacationers. Isabelle Charlebois, general director of Tourism Eastern Townships, said the video is meant to reassure American visitors that 'they are not only expected this summer, but truly welcome.'
If travelers need that encouragement, perhaps it's because amid a trade war and rising tensions some are wondering if it's the right time to visit Canada.
'When our administration starts talking about making Canada the 51st state, I could understand if Canadian border patrol might be giving extra scrutiny to Americans,' said Brian Kirchhoff of Middlebury, Vermont.
While he still plans to visit Montreal for next month's Canadian Grand Prix, Kirchhoff worries escalating rhetoric from the White House will have repercussions for Americans traveling abroad. 'I just don't know what attitudes are going to be as the situation continues to unfold,' he said.
Melissa Curtin McDavitt, a Fora Travel adviser in Los Angeles, California, was taken aback when clients cited concerns about politics and cancelled a planned girls getaway to Quebec City, a provincial capital that's among the safest cities in Canada.
'I was shocked,' she said. 'Like, 'are you sure?''
Other US travelers have been taking to social media forums to ask Canadians to weigh in directly. 'We don't want to stir up trouble,' wrote one American on Reddit. 'Is it appropriate for us to visit?'
Andrew Siegwart, president and CEO of the Tourism Industry Association of Ontario (TIAO), said Canadians working at hotels, resorts and other travel destinations are hearing similar concerns from Americans wondering if they should call off their plans.
'Our members and operators across the province are fielding these types of questions,' Siegwart said. 'Is it going to be seamless to cross the border? Are we really going to be welcome?'
Such hesitations could have a big economic impact in Canada, where Americans made up nearly 79% of international visits in the third quarter of last year. US travelers spent $6.6 billion in the same period, according to Canada's national statistics office.
'The US market is a really strong part of the economy,' Siegwart said, noting that as the peak travel season nears, he's concerned by slowing cross-border travel. US resident trips to Canada sagged in both February and March, the first year-over-year monthly decreases since 2021.
About a third of TIAO members have reported lower summer-season bookings from American travelers when compared with the same period in 2024, Siegwart said.
'We're concerned about the impacts of the trade dispute on travel plans by our US neighbors,' he said.
Like their counterparts in the Eastern Townships, members of the Ontario tourism industry are inviting Americans to visit — and telling them that they'll meet with a warm reception.
'We really are 'arms open' to the world and our US visitors,' Siegwart said, using a tagline that riffs on the 'elbows up' slogan that's a rallying cry for Canadian resistance to Trump's tariffs. 'I've heard of a number of destinations in Ontario planning to really roll out the welcome mat.'
In western Canada, a group of tour operators specializing in grizzly bear viewing is launching a 'Hey, Neighbor!' campaign this month, featuring small business owners speaking directly to Americans.
'We've been hearing your questions up here in British Columbia. You're wondering if you're still welcome,' the video begins. 'Come on up. You're always welcome.'
Other destinations in Canada are beckoning US travelers with reminders that their budgets go further north of the border. On April 28, Tourisme Montreal launched a 'stretch your dollar' campaign with a real-time ticker tracking the exchange rate between US and Canadian currencies, which is currently very favorable to Americans.
'In Montreal, we're privileged to have ties with the United States that are historical, cultural and geographical. This is just a way to encourage that to continue,' said Tourisme Montreal spokesperson Aurélie de Blois. 'Montrealers are known for being warm, welcoming and open-spirited, which is not going to change.'
A skeptic might point out that tourism representatives have a vested interest in convincing Americans that Canadians still want them around. Ad campaigns don't always mirror popular sentiment — and it's clear that events on the national level have sparked widespread anger in Canada.
Nearly two-thirds of Canadians now see the United States as an 'unfriendly' or 'enemy' country, according to a YouGov poll last month; the same poll found that 61% are boycotting American companies. This winter, Canadian fans at NHL and NBA games took to booing the US national anthem.
But surging Canadian pride really isn't hostile to Americans themselves, said Jessica Langer Kapalka, who co-owns Toronto's Canada-themed Grizzly Bar. (Tagline: Canada's most Canadian bar and grill.)
'We welcome Americans as long as they are respectful of our sovereignty and our culture. We aren't anti-American, we're pro-Canadian,' Kapalka said.
At Grizzly Bar, visitors of all nationalities can enjoy Molson lager and elk-topped poutine in a space decked with portraits of Canadian greats from Celine Dion to David Suzuki.
Plenty of everyday Canadians say they have no intention of taking out political frustrations on visitors — and some are going the extra mile to be neighborly.
In February, Canadian TikToker Tod Maffin posted an open invitation for Americans supportive of Canada to visit his Vancouver Island hometown of Nanaimo. On April 26, some 500 people took him up on it, gathering for group photos with the mayor in Maffeo Sutton Park and nibbling the town's namesake dessert: Nanaimo bars.
'It filled my heart,' Maffin said. 'When it comes to rank-and-file Americans, nothing has changed with the relationship and love and kinship that Canadians feel with the people across the border.'
Responses to Americans' anxious social media queries have been largely friendly, too. Echoing a recurrent theme, one poster suggested that Americans come, but be sensitive: 'Lay off the 51st state 'jokes' and you are welcome with open arms. Have fun, enjoy this beautiful country.'
In response to the American who asked, on Reddit, if it's 'appropriate' to visit, Blake Smith of Kitchener, Ontario, replied that even Canadians frustrated with US politics don't have a problem with Americans as people. On a recent phone call, he underscored that perspective.
'I think your average person in Canada likes to judge individuals by themselves, on their own merit … not as a deep red MAGA Republican or a blue Democrat,' he said, then weighed in with an invitation of his own.
He said he hopes Americans who do decide to vacation in Canada can treat it as a break from current events. In Canada, he noted, it's still considered a bit impolite to talk too much about politics.
'Leave your troubles at home. Turn off the part of your brain that's doom scrolling,' he said. 'Most people here just want to get along.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
"Stretched to the breaking point": SNAP cuts spook food banks
Reductions to federal food assistance in President Trump's recently signed "big, beautiful bill" will further widen a gap that many in an overextended hunger relief network say will be impossible to fill. The big picture: With millions of food-insecure people projected to be cut from benefits, food banks and pantries across the U.S. are bracing for the impact and already working to rally community support to continue serving those in need. What they're saying: Vince Hall, Feeding America's chief government relations officer, told Axios that the nonprofit's food banking system generated nearly 6 billion meals last year. Feeding America estimates that provisions affecting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) alone could eliminate the equivalent of some 6 to 9 billion meals annually. Those program reductions, he said, would mean that Feeding America's network of more than 200 food banks and 60,000 faith-based and charitable partners would have to "essentially more than double" its amount of food distributed to fill the predicted hole. "That's simply not possible," Hall said. Still, he added the network is "going to do everything within our power to ensure that every neighbor in need gets served" via reach-outs to donors, community leaders, farmers and lawmakers. By the numbers: SNAP, which aids over 40 million Americans, provides roughly nine meals for every one supplied by Feeding America food banks. The other side: White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told Axios in a statement that the legislation restores "commonsense work requirements to SNAP for able-bodied recipients to work, volunteer, or take classes for 20 hours per week." Kelly pointed to tax breaks she said will "put more money in Americans' pockets." Context: The benefit changes come as more Americans are going hungry. In May, 15.6% of adults were food insecure, almost double the rate in 2021, according to recent Morning Consult data. From April 2024 to April 2025, more than half of food banks surveyed by Feeding America reported seeing an increase in the number of people served. "Food banks are stretched literally to the breaking point," Hall told Axios. While some safety net cuts in the legislation don't take effect for years, others are more imminent, and Hall predicts food banks will see an "immediate increase" in demand as a result. Other food bank leaders who spoke to Axios cited stress from the U.S. Agriculture Department's cuts as another challenge to meeting demand. Zoom in: In 2019, the food pantries and soup kitchens that New York City's City Harvest serves saw some 25 million visits, CEO Jilly Stephens told Axios. Last year, they saw more than 46 million — a record high. Long food bank lines were once symbolic of pandemic strain. But "they haven't gone away," Stephens said. In fact, "they've grown, but they're somehow less visible." "We already exist to fill in the gap that's left after government programs," she said. "Now, we're looking at a yawning hole of need, and we have no hope of filling that in, but we will do everything we can." Zoom out: Catherine D'Amato, the president and CEO of The Greater Boston Food Bank, said they'll have to turn to philanthropic partners amid spiking demand. But she added that the impact of reduced support will be visible over time, and "the states can't make it up, and neither can philanthropy." The bottom line: "What we do will never replace SNAP, and we know that," said Evan Ehlers, the founder and CEO of food rescue organization Sharing Excess.
Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
House "crypto week" could change how Americans use, save money
A few years ago crypto was mostly a pariah in the financial services industry. Now, at the urging of the "first crypto president," Congress is on the verge of remaking American finance to embrace it. Why it matters: "Crypto week" could change everything from how Americans make payments to how they invest. It would also grant further legitimacy to an industry that has made the president and his family sudden billions of dollars. State of play: House Republicans declared the next five days Crypto Week, sending a clear message on legislative priorities after passing President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The agenda for next week consists of three bills. One is stablecoin legislation, and sources familiar with the plans tell Axios that the Senate-passed bill, known as the GENIUS Act, will get a straight-up vote next week. Stablecoins are how dollars go on blockchains, and they enable super-fast, super-cheap global payments. They started as liquidity for crypto traders, but now companies use them for global payroll. The bill would establish rules for who could issue stablecoins and how they manage them. It is expected to lead to a surge of new products and participation from traditional finance firms. How it works: The legislation would "spur more comfort among retailers and others to begin accepting stablecoins as payment," says Tony Tuths, tax principal in KPMG's alternative investment tax practice. Financial markets, meanwhile, could start to move funds in stablecoins — as opposed to cash — for faster settlements with less cost, he added. That could profoundly change how payments are made and processed in the U.S., putting pressure on traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. Market structure legislation is the other big one the table. It would create a framework for regulating broader crypto issuance and trading. If passed — the Senate is currently drafting its own version — it would establish a new category of registered digital assets, flashing a green light for traditional finance. More crypto related products would be expected to enter the mainstream market through retail brokerage accounts, Tuths says, "thereby opening a floodgate of retail capital into the crypto trading ecosystem." The third bill slated for this week is to prevent the Fed from ever creating a digital version of official U.S. currency, or a central bank digital currency (CBDC). Conservatives oppose the concept because they think it would mean more government intrusion into peoples' private lives. What they're saying: "It's one of these industries that, for a very, very, very long time has sought legitimization, either through getting these activities regulated at higher levels around the world, or through, of course, proving their real world use cases," Dante Disparte, head of global policy for stablecoin issuer Circle, tells Axios. Zoom out: So why now? For lawmakers, pressure to move is coming from a couple of different places — the president promising to deliver wins for the industry, plus a trio of linked PACs with more than $100 million on hand keeping tabs on how lawmakers vote. It's a whole different world from when the nation's leading crypto company, Coinbase, requested rule making and got sued by the Biden administration instead. Friction point: Several Democrats will be pushing back next week. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), the top Dem on the House Financial Services Committee, is calling next week"Anti-Crypto Corruption Week," calling all three bills "dangerous pieces of crypto legislation." At the center of many Democrats' resistance is President Trump himself, due to his family's considerable personal investments in cryptocurrency putting a the specter of corruption risks over the process. The bottom line: Republican leadership is likely to relish these votes, because they know 90% of their members will fall in line.
22 minutes ago
Humanitarian system struggles to fill US void in Sudan, where the world's most dire crisis rages
Humanitarians in Sudan, where a two-year civil war has given rise to the world's most acute needs and made assistance increasingly difficult, warn that a vacuum left by cuts to U.S. funding for aid programs cannot be filled. The civil war between the country's army and a paramilitary group has displaced 11 million people internally and 4 million more are refugees in other countries. It's the only place [country?] in the world where famine conditions have been confirmed in multiple locations, and the United Nations says 30 million Sudanese require assistance -- or 60% of the country's population. The U.S. last week shuttered its arm for foreign assistance, formerly the U.S. Agency for International Development, folding it under the State Department in a move Secretary of State Marco Rubio said marked the end of an 'era of government-sanctioned inefficiency.' 'Moving forward, our assistance will be targeted and time limited,' Rubio wrote on Substack, adding the U.S. 'will favor those nations that have demonstrated both the ability and willingness to help themselves and will target our resources to areas where they can have a multiplier effect.' The months-long drawdown of USAID reduced its staff by 83% -- down from 10,000 employees to a few hundred -- and resulted in stop-work orders for grantees of its funds, including in Sudan. The State Department says the life-saving work of the agency, which distributes grants to aid implementers, is continuing, and said its new 'America First' foreign assistance policy would be accountable to policymakers in Washington instead of global entities like the United Nations. A senior State Department official last week called the end of USAID and the institution of a new overarching office at State 'a milestone for American engagement in the world,' saying U.S. assistance abroad would be 'linked up diplomatically' with U.S. interests. The British medical journal Lancet found that in the absence of USAID's funds and works, 14 million more people would die in the next five years, a third of those children under senior State Department official downplayed the study. 'You can go back and relitigate all these little decisions. That's not our focus. That's not the secretary's focus,' the official said. 'We are excited about what sort of the America First foreign assistance agenda is going to look like, and how much impact we can have moving forward.' Meanwhile, in the world's most dire humanitarian crisis, where access for emergency food and medical workers has been made increasingly difficult by warring parties, people are fleeing violence on foot, children are malnourished, and Sudanese are dying from treatable conditions. Pietro Curtaz, an emergency logistics coordinator for Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders, or MSF) said children he sees crossing Sudan's border are malnourished at a rate of 29%. The cuts to USAID -- and the chaos that followed -- have 'come with a body count' in Sudan said Tom Perriello, the U.S. special envoy to Sudan in the last year of the Biden administration from 2024 to 2025. There were 29 USAID employees in Sudan in 2023, at the outset of the war, according to then-administrator Samantha Powers. The July 1 reprogramming of USAID into the State Department cut two additional U.S. staffers dedicated to Sudan, leaving just nine remaining in the region, said Andrea Tracy, a former USAID Sudan official who now runs her own humanitarian funding mechanism for the country. Tracy saw colleagues lose their jobs on a daily basis as USAID wound down the programs it funded in the country, she told ABC News in a June phone call. 'I was talking to one of the regional directors the other day, and just that morning, she got an email saying another 40 programs are going to be cut,' she said. 'So we haven't found the floor yet.' The dramatic reorientation of U.S. aid abroad comes as the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and Germany have announced a scaling down of their own foreign assistance budgets and as humanitarian crises in places like Sudan -- where the civil war has stretched into a third year -- deepen. According to data from the U.N., USAID provided 44% of the world's humanitarian funding in 2024 for Sudan. A U.N. spokesman told ABC News that 'food aid, nutrition support and essential health services' have been cut back as the U.N.'s annual fund for Sudan is funded at only 14%. 'Without urgent additional support, the risk of famine and further deterioration remains high,' said Dan Teng'o, a spokesperson for the U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The State Department did not respond to requests by ABC News for the current data on its assistance commitments to Sudan after foreign aid freezes and layoffs. But it said in a statement that 'foreign assistance continues to arrive in Sudan,' citing a $56 million donation to the World Food Programme and a wheat grain delivery under USAID that would feed 'as many as 3.2 million people for an entire month.' It also said emergency assistance continues for refugees of Sudan who have been displaced to 'seven neighboring countries due to the conflict.' Important dollars for refugee assistance are in jeopardy, too, as humanitarians brace for the impacts of a proposed $1.7 billion cut to U.S. refugee assistance. As a part of Rubio's reorganization, the State Department proposed a 50% reduction for aid to the world's refugees in its 2026 budget request to Congress. Chain reactions and health care at the brink Humanitarians, who are legally protected under international law, have not been spared from the violence of the civil war, which has deprived people of the chance to stave off starvation and made access increasingly difficult. Five humanitarians in June died when a U.N. convoy came under attack, the U.N. said. In the void, small, grassroots organizations began to sprout when war broke out two years ago. A coalition known as Mutual Aid stood up emergency clinics and soup kitchens that became 'a lifeline' for Sudanese, Tracy said. The coalition was backed by nearly 80% funding from USAID, organizers have the White House on President Donald Trump's first day in office froze all U.S. assistance abroad, Tracy said, some 1,500 of the kitchens in Sudan closed almost immediately. Perriello, whose role as the special envoy in Sudan has been left vacant by the Trump administration, said the Mutual Aid coalition was among a group of 'edgy efforts … redefining approaches to aid.' These programs suffered the first and 'deepest' cuts, he said. Tracy said the pain from the cuts has been felt most acutely in the health sector, where medicine is not moving the way it used to and a 'chain' of 'different components that rely on each other' are not in place. 'Once you break one of those components, it all breaks,' she said. MSF, which provides emergency medical care in Sudan, is operating in a country where the World Health Organization estimates only 20 to 30% of health facilities are operational. 'Wherever we look in Sudan, you will find humanitarian and medical needs. All those needs are overwhelming, urgent, and unfortunately, unmet,' Claire San Filippo, MSF's emergency coordinator for Sudan, said. A 'case study' for impact of cuts At the Tine border point in Chad, east of the violence-plunged Darfur region of Sudan, Curtaz, the emergency coordinator for MSF, told ABC News the cuts are impossible to miss. 'Clinically … we tend to see people that are in much worse condition than before because of all of that,' he said. MSF is independent and donor-funded, taking no dollars from the U.S. government and therefore not directly affected by the cuts and shutdown of USAID. Sudan has become a 'case study' for the 'impact of those cuts,' Curtaz said. 'One of the examples you can touch first,' he said, is the lack of shelter for refugees under a 110-degree sun. People arrive by foot in Chad having spent the day with no form of shelter, he said. The 18,000 people hosted in Tine should have had at least 350 toilets, meeting a standard in acute situations of one toilet for every 50 people, Curtaz said. But for a group surging toward 20,000 people, it had only nine toilets. Asked whether the large, interconnected humanitarian system is neglecting Sudan, Curtaz agreed. 'A majority of the weight is lying on us, on the host community and on grassroots organizations that are doing their best to support the population,' he said. 'So, yes.' 'For the first time in my life,' Tracy said, MSF doctors and administrators told her, ''We really need the USAID money…to come back online, because we're carrying way more of a load than we can handle. We're falling apart here.''
