logo
"Stretched to the breaking point": SNAP cuts spook food banks

"Stretched to the breaking point": SNAP cuts spook food banks

Axios13 hours ago
Reductions to federal food assistance in President Trump's recently signed "big, beautiful bill" will further widen a gap that many in an overextended hunger relief network say will be impossible to fill.
The big picture: With millions of food-insecure people projected to be cut from benefits, food banks and pantries across the U.S. are bracing for the impact and already working to rally community support to continue serving those in need.
What they're saying: Vince Hall, Feeding America's chief government relations officer, told Axios that the nonprofit's food banking system generated nearly 6 billion meals last year.
Feeding America estimates that provisions affecting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) alone could eliminate the equivalent of some 6 to 9 billion meals annually.
Those program reductions, he said, would mean that Feeding America's network of more than 200 food banks and 60,000 faith-based and charitable partners would have to "essentially more than double" its amount of food distributed to fill the predicted hole.
"That's simply not possible," Hall said. Still, he added the network is "going to do everything within our power to ensure that every neighbor in need gets served" via reach-outs to donors, community leaders, farmers and lawmakers.
By the numbers: SNAP, which aids over 40 million Americans, provides roughly nine meals for every one supplied by Feeding America food banks.
The other side: White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told Axios in a statement that the legislation restores "commonsense work requirements to SNAP for able-bodied recipients to work, volunteer, or take classes for 20 hours per week."
Kelly pointed to tax breaks she said will "put more money in Americans' pockets."
Context: The benefit changes come as more Americans are going hungry.
In May, 15.6% of adults were food insecure, almost double the rate in 2021, according to recent Morning Consult data.
From April 2024 to April 2025, more than half of food banks surveyed by Feeding America reported seeing an increase in the number of people served.
"Food banks are stretched literally to the breaking point," Hall told Axios.
While some safety net cuts in the legislation don't take effect for years, others are more imminent, and Hall predicts food banks will see an "immediate increase" in demand as a result.
Other food bank leaders who spoke to Axios cited stress from the U.S. Agriculture Department's cuts as another challenge to meeting demand.
Zoom in: In 2019, the food pantries and soup kitchens that New York City's City Harvest serves saw some 25 million visits, CEO Jilly Stephens told Axios. Last year, they saw more than 46 million — a record high.
Long food bank lines were once symbolic of pandemic strain. But "they haven't gone away," Stephens said. In fact, "they've grown, but they're somehow less visible."
"We already exist to fill in the gap that's left after government programs," she said. "Now, we're looking at a yawning hole of need, and we have no hope of filling that in, but we will do everything we can."
Zoom out: Catherine D'Amato, the president and CEO of The Greater Boston Food Bank, said they'll have to turn to philanthropic partners amid spiking demand.
But she added that the impact of reduced support will be visible over time, and "the states can't make it up, and neither can philanthropy."
The bottom line: "What we do will never replace SNAP, and we know that," said Evan Ehlers, the founder and CEO of food rescue organization Sharing Excess.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Medinex Limited's (Catalist:OTX) Stock Is Rallying But Financials Look Ambiguous: Will The Momentum Continue?
Medinex Limited's (Catalist:OTX) Stock Is Rallying But Financials Look Ambiguous: Will The Momentum Continue?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Medinex Limited's (Catalist:OTX) Stock Is Rallying But Financials Look Ambiguous: Will The Momentum Continue?

Most readers would already be aware that Medinex's (Catalist:OTX) stock increased significantly by 12% over the past month. However, we wonder if the company's inconsistent financials would have any adverse impact on the current share price momentum. Particularly, we will be paying attention to Medinex's ROE today. Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. The formula for return on equity is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Medinex is: 17% = S$2.8m ÷ S$17m (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. One way to conceptualize this is that for each SGD1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made SGD0.17 in profit. See our latest analysis for Medinex We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features. To begin with, Medinex seems to have a respectable ROE. Especially when compared to the industry average of 11% the company's ROE looks pretty impressive. Needless to say, we are quite surprised to see that Medinex's net income shrunk at a rate of 16% over the past five years. We reckon that there could be some other factors at play here that are preventing the company's growth. For example, it could be that the company has a high payout ratio or the business has allocated capital poorly, for instance. So, as a next step, we compared Medinex's performance against the industry and were disappointed to discover that while the company has been shrinking its earnings, the industry has been growing its earnings at a rate of 5.7% over the last few years. Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. It's important for an investor to know whether the market has priced in the company's expected earnings growth (or decline). By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. Is Medinex fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide. Medinex's very high three-year median payout ratio of 131% over the last three years suggests that the company is paying its shareholders more than what it is earning and this explains the company's shrinking earnings. Paying a dividend beyond their means is usually not viable over the long term. To know the 4 risks we have identified for Medinex visit our risks dashboard for free. In addition, Medinex has been paying dividends over a period of six years suggesting that keeping up dividend payments is preferred by the management even though earnings have been in decline. Overall, we have mixed feelings about Medinex. While the company does have a high rate of return, its low earnings retention is probably what's hampering its earnings growth. Up till now, we've only made a short study of the company's growth data. So it may be worth checking this free detailed graph of Medinex's past earnings, as well as revenue and cash flows to get a deeper insight into the company's performance. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Patriot System Will Be Sent to Ukraine, Trump Says
Patriot System Will Be Sent to Ukraine, Trump Says

Wall Street Journal

time17 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Patriot System Will Be Sent to Ukraine, Trump Says

President Trump said Sunday the U.S. will send Patriot air-defense systems to Ukraine that will be paid for by the European Union, and he again criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'It'll be business for us, and we will send them Patriots, which they desperately need, because Putin really surprised a lot of people,' Trump said. 'He talks nice, and then he bombs everybody in the evening,' he added on his way back to the White House from New Jersey. 'There's a little bit of a problem there, and I don't like it.'

Should You Buy Amazon Stock Before July 31?
Should You Buy Amazon Stock Before July 31?

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Buy Amazon Stock Before July 31?

Amazon is caught in a tug-of-war between the growing demand for AI and macro and geopolitical factors. The accelerating adoption of AI and growth from the company's cloud and advertising businesses may be enough to offset weakness resulting from higher tariffs. Despite these challenges, Amazon has a long track record of growth and is selling at a discount to its historic valuation. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Second-quarter earnings season is about to hit the ground running, and to say investors will be sitting on the edge of their seats may be an understatement. One company that's caught in the underlying economic tug-of-war is Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN). On the one hand, many of the products on the digital retailer's platform are sourced from around the world, so it's particularly vulnerable to the Trump administration's tariff agenda. On the other hand, the company's digital advertising business and its cloud segment -- Amazon Web Services (AWS) -- stand to gain from accelerating adoption of AI, which could be a significant catalyst for growth. The company faces a key hurdle when Amazon reports its second-quarter results, which are expected to be released on July 31. Given the competing economic forces at play, should investors buy Amazon stock ahead of this key financial report or wait until the results have been made public? Let's take a look to see what the evidence suggests. One of the biggest unknowns in the upcoming quarter is the impact of tariffs. Third-party merchants account for roughly 62% of unit sales, and many of those sellers source their goods from China. The U.S. announced a trade deal with China last month that set tariffs on Chinese goods at a minimum of 30%, though the levies on some products are higher. While this is down from the peak of 145%, the timing of the deal in early June suggests Amazon's second-quarter sales and profits will likely take a hit. However, the company expanded its Prime Day sale to four days, double the length of its member-only sale last year, which could boost sales. Unfortunately, the event began after the close of the second quarter, so the impact on any additional sales won't hit the financials until Q3. Results from the first quarter came in before the imposition of tariffs, and investors liked what they saw. Overall net sales increased 9% year over year to $155.7 billion, with 60% of its revenue coming from digital sales or third-party seller services. Investors will be watching closely to gauge the impact of tariffs on Amazon's biggest business. The news isn't all bad, as the breadth of Amazon's business will insulate the company somewhat from the trade war, starting with its cloud segment. AWS is the undisputed leader in cloud infrastructure services, controlling 32% of the market in the first quarter and growing 17% year over year, according to market analyst Canalys. It's also Amazon's biggest moneymaker, generating 19% of revenue and 63% of operating income. Growth has reignited over the past year or so, fueled by demand for AI. Last month, CEO Andy Jassy noted that Amazon had more than 1,000 generative AI services and applications in progress or built, with plans to develop many more, saying, "AI will be a substantial catalyst." This, in turn, could drive higher demand for AWS. Let's not forget Amazon's advertising, which has quickly become the company's fastest-growing business. Ad revenue grew 18% year over year in Q2, fueled by Amazon Prime and the company's live sports programming. Recent reports suggest marketers are moving millions in ad spending to Amazon's platform, according to advertising industry publication Adweek. Amazon's advertising business began as a way for the company to capitalize on the valuable digital real estate on its e-commerce platform, but has since expanded significantly. Earlier this year, advertising on Prime Video became standard, with users required to pay a $3 monthly fee to forego the ads. The company also gets ad revenue from Freevee, its other ad-supported streaming channel, and from Twitch, its live-streaming gaming platform. Amazon sought to expand its advantage, inking a groundbreaking deal with Roku to give advertisers "access to the largest authenticated CTV [connected TV] footprint in the U.S.," available exclusively through the Amazon Demand-Side Platform (DSP), which connects ad buyers with available advertising. Roku and Amazon reach combined reaches an estimated 80 million CTV households, which represents more than 80% of CTV households in the country, according to the press release. This could be a significant catalyst for ad growth going forward. I generally don't recommend making buying decisions based on arbitrary days on a calendar, but rather the totality of the circumstances and the opportunities that could fuel revenue and profit growth. Each of Amazon's major business segments is growing at a respectable clip, and the proliferation of AI could act as an ongoing catalyst. Wall Street is nearly unanimous in its bullish view of Amazon. Of the 70 analysts who have offered an opinion in July, 66 -- a whopping 94% -- rate the stock a buy or strong buy, and none recommend selling. Furthermore, the average price target of $242 suggests there's additional upside of 8% compared to Friday's closing price. However, just this week, analysts at Morgan Stanley lifted their price target on Amazon to $300, which represents 33% potential upside for investors. The analysts called Amazon a "top pick" and cited more manageable tariffs, cloud growth, and strength across its AI offerings as fueling the firm's bullish call. Amazon is the undisputed leader in e-commerce and cloud infrastructure services and a key player in digital advertising. Add to that the company's portfolio of AI offerings, and it's easy to see why Wall Street is so bullish on Amazon's future. On a final note, Amazon is currently selling for roughly 37 times trailing-12-month earnings. While that's a premium, it's well below the stock's three-year average multiple of 83, so from a historical standpoint, it's a bargain. I'd suggest that's a reasonable price to pay for a stock that gained 95% over the past three years, far exceeding the 61% gains of the S&P 500. For those reasons and more, Amazon stock is a buy. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,010,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Danny Vena has positions in Amazon and Roku. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Roku. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy Amazon Stock Before July 31? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store