What would the fallout be if Donald Trump tries to fire the Federal Reserve chief?
Trump also told reporters that he had floated the idea of getting rid of Powell with Republican lawmakers in a meeting on Tuesday.
No president in recent US history has gone after the head of the Federal Reserve, which is supposed to operate independently from the government.
So, does Trump have the power to fire Powell, and what would the economic fallout be of any attempt to do so?
Can the president fire the Federal Reserve chief? According to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the chair of the bank can only be dismissed "for cause", which is broadly interpreted as relating to extraordinary cases of gross misconduct. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Trump appeared to double down on the Fed's renovation as a new line of attack, stating that it was "possible there's fraud involved" while complaining about the cost of the project. "There could be something to that, but I think he's not doing a good job. He's got a very easy job to do. You know what he has to do? Lower interest rates," he added.
The comments prompted concerns from Democrats that Trump is manufacturing outrage over the building works to use them as grounds for Powell's dismissal.
If Trump were to fire Powell, over what many view as a policy dispute, it would be unprecedented and could end up in court.
But whether or not the Supreme Court — which has consistently ruled in Trump's favour throughout his second term — would seek to protect the impartiality of the central bank is currently being hotly debated by US economists, scholars, and analysts.
A 'dreadful idea' and 'very significant' market reaction Former Fed officials and financial experts have consistently warned that the economic fallout from any attempt to fire Powell would be swift and far-reaching. "If there were an effort by the president to remove the chair, the market reaction would be very significant — well before any court had an opportunity to pass on the issue," former Fed board member Daniel Tarullo told the Harvard Gazette in late April.
In an interview with CNBC on Wednesday, Roger Altman, who was deputy Treasury secretary under former President Bill Clinton, described Trump's impulse to interfere with the Fed as "a dreadful idea," pointing to the economic downturn other countries that have meddled with their central banks have faced.
Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina delivered a spirited defence of an independent Fed on Wednesday. "There's been some talk about potentially firing the Fed chair," said Tillis, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees the Fed and confirms presidential nominations to its Board. Subjecting the Fed to direct presidential control would be a "huge mistake," he said. Meanwhile, a research paper by Wolfe Research, which gamed out possible market scenarios if Trump decides to go after Powell, stated that regardless of whether it was deemed legal or not, the result would be an extreme "mess". "We expect, as does everyone else, that it would be significantly negative for markets, likely driving both an equity selloff and a counterproductive spike in long-term yields," the firm wrote in a briefing. — Additional reporting by Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Revealed: Rapid rate of Sydney's most in-demand suburbs
Homes have begun to sell at an extraordinary pace across parts of Sydney as buyers gear up for further interest rate cuts. PropTrack data revealed multiple areas where homes are being purchased at a rate of more than one home every single day, with more than 365 sales over the past year. These suburbs accounted for a large share of the total properties being transacted annually, with the top 40 most popular suburbs alone driving 22 per cent of all home sales across Greater Sydney. The data revealed suburbs houses have sold over 365 listings in the past 12 months were Blacktown, Marsden Park and Castle Hill. While top performing suburbs for unit sales over the past year included Parramatta, Liverpool, Dee Why, Epping and Ryde. PropTrack Senior Economist Anne Flaherty said these suburbs equally indicate where people are most frequently buying – due to a combination of accessibility and lifestyle appeal. 'First and foremost is the actual size of the suburb, an area like Blacktown for example is a relatively big suburb,' she said. 'Then also homes that may meet someone's expectations for a period of time but not necessarily for the whole of their lifetime. 'There are a few there which are relatively more affordable areas and so they might be properties that people upgrade from.' According to Ms Flaherty, this frequency may also alleviate rapid rising prices in these suburbs in contrast to tighter-held locations. 'When we do see a lot of homes coming up for sale, it means that there is more choice for buyers in those areas and can help to prevent prices growing as rapidly as they would if fewer homes were coming up for sale,' she said. 'Looking at Blacktown for example, the median house price is well below the greater Sydney house price, so it is what you would consider by Sydney standards, relatively affordable. 'I think for people looking to buy houses at a more affordable entry point, it's a great place to go, we know after a while those areas do see a good capital growth and for a lot of people it's their first step into the property ladder and then they upsize, perhaps needing a larger dwelling or perhaps want to live closer into Sydney for example.' Ms Flaherty said unit development over the last decade in these suburbs was another factor. 'Liverpool and Blacktown, they are areas where there is a lot of development happening so that's another factor,' she said. William Halteh and his wife Nicole, who are expecting their first baby in October, are selling their home in Marsden Park, one of the most popular areas, and shared why they think the suburb has been so appealing. 'It was fairly new to the market and it was going to be an exciting area to live in, a lot of land available and a whole new community,' Mr Halteh said. 'We built our home and we've been living here for about four years now.' Ms Haltech said it was an attractive area with everything close by. 'It's family orientated, there's schools nearby, the shops are down the road, we have a lot of friends around as well,' Ms Halteh said. 'There are nice walking tracks and multiple parks around the area so you can go on a nice stroll – the scenery is beautiful.' Ms Haltech added the area is also rapidly progressing. 'They keep expanding it,' she said. 'They are adding more shopping centres, there's a new high school that has just opened and there's a metro apparently that will be built and coming along here for the Western Sydney airport,' Mr Halteh added. The Halteh's selling agent Kavishay Prasad of LJ Hooker Schofields said the high amount of properties transacting in suburbs such as Marsden Park was likely due to its fairly new offering. 'There's a lot of greenery, a lot of parks and still very much a developing community,' he said. 'The family-friendly component of Marsden Park, which is why there are so many young families entering the market, particularly with mention of the property at 89 McAlister Parade. 'A lot of buyers have been first homebuyers, young families, people that are looking to solidify their living in the suburb for the next five to ten years.' PropTrack data confirmed combined averages for house and unit sales over the past year soared in suburbs such as Blacktown, Ryde, Liverpool, Parramatta and Epping. Four years later, the Haltech's are now making a move closer to family for their next chapter. 'Because we are expanding our family it will be nice to be closer where I'll be able to have that support,' Ms Haltech said. 'It is a bit crowded at the moment – because it's such a popular area,' Mr Haltech said. 'At the moment, we're currently looking in the Narellan, Mount Annan areas, Camden also because of the scenery as well.'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The US economy keeps chugging along. Does everyone owe Trump an apology?
It is true that recession fears have subsided, though not entirely. In April, JPMorgan gave the United States a 60 per cent chance of falling into recession this year. By May, after Trump paused most tariffs, the bank had revised that to 40 per cent, where it stands today. But the headline GDP figures are not the full story. And Trump's tariffs – and threats of tariffs – have a lot to do with it. In the first few months of the year, as Trump began announcing border duties and the world awaited his so-called 'Liberation Day' on April 2, America's imports surged, with businesses and consumers rushing to beat the tariffs. Imports negatively affect GDP calculations. As such, GDP contracted by 0.5 per cent. In the most recent quarter, imports fell, and GDP returned to 3 per cent – the same strong growth figures the US posted in the middle of last year, under former president Joe Biden. Contrary to Trump's claims, he did not inherit an economic mess from his predecessor, but one of the fastest-growing developed economies in the world post-COVID-19 pandemic. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell said it was better to focus on the combined growth figures for the first half of the year, to smooth out the volatility, which showed GDP rose at 1.2 per cent – down from an average 2.5 per cent last year. 'The moderation in growth largely reflects a slowdown in consumer spending,' he said on Wednesday. Business investment in equipment and intangibles was broadly up, he said, while activity in the housing sector remained weak. But generally speaking, the economy was solid, though inflation was still 'somewhat elevated'. 'It seems to me, and to almost the whole committee, that the economy is not performing as though restrictive policy is holding it back inappropriately,' Powell said, explaining the bank's decision to leave interest rates on hold at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent – despite Trump's intense pressure to cut. Consumer spending rose 1.4 per cent for the quarter, up from 0.5 per cent, even as Trump's new tariffs are raking in tens of billions of dollars in new tax revenue, and amid significant uncertainty about who is footing the bill and how much more there is to come. 'We're going to look back and either say, 'Wow, the economy was super resilient' … or we're going to say, 'Yeah, you could kind of feel it was weakening'.' Louise Sheiner, Brookings Institution And consumer sentiment, measured by the long-running University of Michigan survey, has bounced back into the 60s from just above 50 points. An update is due this Friday, US time. While tariffs have been in place for months and raised tens of billions of additional dollars for US government coffers, the new tariffs, which go into effect in a week, represent the first time since Trump came to power that there has been the semblance of certainty over what the rates will be – at least for now. Still, the US economy seems to be more robust than the doomsday predictions considered. So, do the world's economists owe Trump an apology? Maurice Obstfeld, of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, says it is too soon to decide. 'These behavioural shifts have made GDP data more volatile than usual,' he says. 'Let's wait for the tariffs to settle down at new, predictable levels and see what happens before we shoot the economists.' Louise Sheiner, an economist at the Brookings Institution, espoused a similar view to The New York Times: 'We're going to look back and either say, 'Wow, the economy was super resilient and these things didn't matter as much as we thought they would', or we're going to say, 'Yeah, you could kind of feel it was weakening'.' Justin Wolfers, an Australian economics professor at the University of Michigan, and a regular critic of Trump's economic agenda, says there is still a decent chance of the US economy heading south later this year. 'When I was asked in the first half of the year for a forecast of the chances of a recession, I was careful to give a conditional forecast: if they go for the 'Full Trump', then 75 per cent, and if they drop their nonsense, then 25 per cent,' he says. Loading 'As it happened, he started with the Full Trump, then TACO'd. So perhaps the correct probability is somewhere between 25 and 75 per cent, and probably something like 40 per cent. That still seems right to me.' The term TACO stands for Trump Always Chickens Out – a popular critique of the president's tendency to make scary announcements, before backtracking or reverting to the norm. 'The idea that a single quarterly reading on a single measure says anything about [the economy being a] miracle or mirage is silly on its face,' Wolfers says. 'The economy isn't as bad as folks forecast, but neither was the actual policy that the White House was telling us we should expect.' In moments of candour, the Trump administration acknowledges American consumers might pay higher prices for some goods, but it is convinced economic growth will compensate. Hassett said as much this week, noting real wages had grown, which 'means people have more money in their pockets than the price increases that they've seen'. Board appointees break ranks Trump is also desperate to stimulate economic growth with lower interest rates, hence his constant badgering of Jerome 'Too Late' Powell to cut the rate. Despite Trump insisting 'there is no inflation' (it is 2.7 per cent), the majority of the bank's board wants to see more data before it makes a move – although the market expects cuts later this year. Loading But for the first time in three decades, two governors dissented from Wednesday's decision. Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman – both Trump appointees to the board from his first term – voted to cut rates by 0.25 points. Both are considered candidates to replace Powell when his term expires next year. [In his dissenting reasons, published Friday in the US, Waller said tariffs only caused a one-off increase in prices, which the bank should 'look through', while soft growth meant monetary policy should be 'close to neutral'. The 'wait and see' approach was overly cautious, he said. Bowman said inflation had fallen - excluding tariff-related increases - and noted the slower growth in private domestic final purchases, a leading indicator of consumer spending.] Arthur Sinodinos, a former Australian ambassador to the US who now works at the Asia Group, says now that Australia's tariff rate has been confirmed at 10 per cent, its main worries will be what impact the tariff regime has on global economic conditions, as well as the US economy.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
The US economy keeps chugging along. Does everyone owe Trump an apology?
It is true that recession fears have subsided, though not entirely. In April, JPMorgan gave the United States a 60 per cent chance of falling into recession this year. By May, after Trump paused most tariffs, the bank had revised that to 40 per cent, where it stands today. But the headline GDP figures are not the full story. And Trump's tariffs – and threats of tariffs – have a lot to do with it. In the first few months of the year, as Trump began announcing border duties and the world awaited his so-called 'Liberation Day' on April 2, America's imports surged, with businesses and consumers rushing to beat the tariffs. Imports negatively affect GDP calculations. As such, GDP contracted by 0.5 per cent. In the most recent quarter, imports fell, and GDP returned to 3 per cent – the same strong growth figures the US posted in the middle of last year, under former president Joe Biden. Contrary to Trump's claims, he did not inherit an economic mess from his predecessor, but one of the fastest-growing developed economies in the world post-COVID-19 pandemic. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell said it was better to focus on the combined growth figures for the first half of the year, to smooth out the volatility, which showed GDP rose at 1.2 per cent – down from an average 2.5 per cent last year. 'The moderation in growth largely reflects a slowdown in consumer spending,' he said on Wednesday. Business investment in equipment and intangibles was broadly up, he said, while activity in the housing sector remained weak. But generally speaking, the economy was solid, though inflation was still 'somewhat elevated'. 'It seems to me, and to almost the whole committee, that the economy is not performing as though restrictive policy is holding it back inappropriately,' Powell said, explaining the bank's decision to leave interest rates on hold at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent – despite Trump's intense pressure to cut. Consumer spending rose 1.4 per cent for the quarter, up from 0.5 per cent, even as Trump's new tariffs are raking in tens of billions of dollars in new tax revenue, and amid significant uncertainty about who is footing the bill and how much more there is to come. 'We're going to look back and either say, 'Wow, the economy was super resilient' … or we're going to say, 'Yeah, you could kind of feel it was weakening'.' Louise Sheiner, Brookings Institution And consumer sentiment, measured by the long-running University of Michigan survey, has bounced back into the 60s from just above 50 points. An update is due this Friday, US time. While tariffs have been in place for months and raised tens of billions of additional dollars for US government coffers, the new tariffs, which go into effect in a week, represent the first time since Trump came to power that there has been the semblance of certainty over what the rates will be – at least for now. Still, the US economy seems to be more robust than the doomsday predictions considered. So, do the world's economists owe Trump an apology? Maurice Obstfeld, of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, says it is too soon to decide. 'These behavioural shifts have made GDP data more volatile than usual,' he says. 'Let's wait for the tariffs to settle down at new, predictable levels and see what happens before we shoot the economists.' Louise Sheiner, an economist at the Brookings Institution, espoused a similar view to The New York Times: 'We're going to look back and either say, 'Wow, the economy was super resilient and these things didn't matter as much as we thought they would', or we're going to say, 'Yeah, you could kind of feel it was weakening'.' Justin Wolfers, an Australian economics professor at the University of Michigan, and a regular critic of Trump's economic agenda, says there is still a decent chance of the US economy heading south later this year. 'When I was asked in the first half of the year for a forecast of the chances of a recession, I was careful to give a conditional forecast: if they go for the 'Full Trump', then 75 per cent, and if they drop their nonsense, then 25 per cent,' he says. Loading 'As it happened, he started with the Full Trump, then TACO'd. So perhaps the correct probability is somewhere between 25 and 75 per cent, and probably something like 40 per cent. That still seems right to me.' The term TACO stands for Trump Always Chickens Out – a popular critique of the president's tendency to make scary announcements, before backtracking or reverting to the norm. 'The idea that a single quarterly reading on a single measure says anything about [the economy being a] miracle or mirage is silly on its face,' Wolfers says. 'The economy isn't as bad as folks forecast, but neither was the actual policy that the White House was telling us we should expect.' In moments of candour, the Trump administration acknowledges American consumers might pay higher prices for some goods, but it is convinced economic growth will compensate. Hassett said as much this week, noting real wages had grown, which 'means people have more money in their pockets than the price increases that they've seen'. Board appointees break ranks Trump is also desperate to stimulate economic growth with lower interest rates, hence his constant badgering of Jerome 'Too Late' Powell to cut the rate. Despite Trump insisting 'there is no inflation' (it is 2.7 per cent), the majority of the bank's board wants to see more data before it makes a move – although the market expects cuts later this year. Loading But for the first time in three decades, two governors dissented from Wednesday's decision. Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman – both Trump appointees to the board from his first term – voted to cut rates by 0.25 points. Both are considered candidates to replace Powell when his term expires next year. [In his dissenting reasons, published Friday in the US, Waller said tariffs only caused a one-off increase in prices, which the bank should 'look through', while soft growth meant monetary policy should be 'close to neutral'. The 'wait and see' approach was overly cautious, he said. Bowman said inflation had fallen - excluding tariff-related increases - and noted the slower growth in private domestic final purchases, a leading indicator of consumer spending.] Arthur Sinodinos, a former Australian ambassador to the US who now works at the Asia Group, says now that Australia's tariff rate has been confirmed at 10 per cent, its main worries will be what impact the tariff regime has on global economic conditions, as well as the US economy.
