&w=3840&q=100)
US-Indonesia trade deal shows risks of pressure, India must be wary: GTRI
Indonesia gave up far more than it gained, removing 99 per cent of its tariffs on US goods, agreeing to buy $22.7 billion in American products, and weakening important rules that protected its industries, food safety, and digital space, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said.
"India now faces similar US demands, including allowing remanufactured goods, opening up agriculture and dairy, accepting genetically modified (GM) feed, and adopting US rules on digital trade and product standards," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said.
He added that accepting American standards on cars, medical devices, or food, without any guarantee of reciprocity, would put India's consumers at risk.
"Handing over control of data under the name of digital trade would give foreign companies power over India's digital future. India must stay alert. Any trade agreement should be based on clear, public assessments of costs and benefits," Srivastava said.
Concessions especially on critical areas like food, health, digital, and IP (intellectual property) must be fair, reciprocal, and aligned with India's development needs, he added.
"Otherwise, India risks giving up long-term control for short-term gains, a decision it may regret later," he said.
India and the USA are negotiating a bilateral trade agreement. So far, five rounds of talks have been completed, and the sixth round will happen here next month.
Both sides are looking to finalise an interim deal before August 1, the deadline for suspended Trump tariffs.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Russiagate reignited: Tulsi Gabbard says Barack Obama engineered false intel, DOJ to review charges
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard ignited a political firestorm on Wednesday (July 23), alleging that former President Barack Obama and his national security team engineered a 'contrived narrative' that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to aid Donald Trump. 'There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false,' Gabbard said during a tense White House press briefing. 'They knew it would promote this contrived narrative… selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't.' Gabbard's claims follow the release of newly declassified intelligence documents that, according to her, expose efforts by the Obama administration to politicise intelligence findings. She said the materials show there was no direct information proving that Russian President Vladimir Putin actively supported Trump in 2016. 'All [the documents] come back to and confirm the same report: There was a gross politicization and manipulation of intelligence by the Obama administration intended to delegitimize President Trump even before he was inaugurated,' Gabbard stated. 'Ultimately, they sought to usurp the will of the American people.' Gabbard confirmed that the declassified material has been referred to federal law enforcement agencies for further investigation. 'We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI,' she said. 'The evidence that we have found, and that we have released, directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.' A day earlier, President Donald Trump directly accused Obama of being the 'ringleader' behind the 2016 Russia probe, escalating his long-standing claims that the investigation was politically motivated. Gabbard alleges 'treasonous conspiracy' by Obama-era officials to undermine Trump in 2016 Gabbard on Friday in her explosive claim said that former President Barack Obama and senior members of his administration orchestrated a 'treasonous conspiracy' to delegitimize Donald Trump ahead of the 2016 presidential election. 'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,' Gabbard said in a statement. 'We must ensure nothing like this ever happens again.' The released memo from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) identifies several high-profile intelligence figures allegedly involved in reviewing and crafting the intelligence community's assessment of Russian meddling in the election. The names include former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former FBI Director James Comey. Gabbard claims these officials collaborated to create a politically motivated assessment intended to delegitimise Trump's presidency even before he was sworn in. Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush dismissed the allegations as absurd. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' Rodenbush said in a statement. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.' He added, 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
H-1B wage levels: What will change in the new US immigration rules that will end visa lottery?
The proposed H-1B rule will be bad news for international graduates and senior American employees. The US administration is planning to bring in a new H-1B rule which will give weightage to wage level instead of the random lottery that takes place now when H-1B registration exceed the annual limit of 65,000 plus the additional 20,000 for individuals with an advanced degree from a US university. The new rule will not be applicable this year as 2026's registration quota has already been reached. US tech workers have welcomed the proposed changes as they think the changes will eliminate the possibility of U companies hiring foreign workers for posts that don't need high skills, as H-1B should be -- but they hire only to save money as they will have to pay less wage to a foreigner than a US citizen. Understanding weightage-based selection This is the same rule that the Trump administration wanted to bring in during the last term. 'USCIS will rank and select the petitions received on the basis of the highest Occupational Employment Statistics wage level that the proffered wage equals or exceeds for the relevant Standard Occupational Classification code in the area of intended employment, beginning with OES wage level IV and proceeding in descending order with OES wage levels III, II, and I. ' (The Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics program is within the Department of Labor.)" by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gentle Japanese hair growth method for men and women's scalp Hair's Rich Learn More Undo the 2021 DHS rule said. What does this mean? This means there will be no H-1B hiring at the entry level. Entry-level jobs will be protected for Americans. Based on the wages and expertise needed for a job, there are four levels: Entry, qualified, experienced and fully competent. The national average of entry-level salary is $83K, level 2 is $108K, level 3 is $127K and level 4 is $151K. International grads will suffer, senior American employees will face competition International graduates looking for entry-level jobs in America will suffer as they will not get a chance in the proposed system. While this is good news for American graduates, the new rule has bad news for senior American leadership as the new system will bring in more high-paid mid-level H-1Bs. Startups will also suffer as they won't be able to hire cheap labor from H-1Bs.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Who is Robin L Rosenberg? Florida judge denies DOJ's request to unseal Epstein's grand jury files
Robin L Rosenberg, federal judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, on Wednesday denied the Department of Justice's request to unseal the transcripts of the grand jury in the Jeffrey Epstein probe. Donald and Melania Trump with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.(X) An Obama appointee, Judge Rosenberg was giving her verdict on the DOJ's request last week that the transcripts of the grand jury be unsealed over the "extensive public interest" on the matter and for maintaining "transparency to the American public." However, Judge Rosenberg denied the request, saying that the judiciary's "hands are tied" and the DOJ has failed to furnish sufficient justification for the release of the grand jury files on the Jeffrey Epstein probe, as per a memo released on Wednesday. Who Is Judge Robin L Rosenberg? Judge Rosenberg, born in 1962 in West Palm Beach, Florida, currently serves as a federal judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. She was nominated by President Barack Obama on February 26, 2014, to fill the seat vacated by Adalberto Jose Jordan, as per the Federal Judiciary Center. Also read: US judge rejects request to unseal grand jury transcripts tied to Jeffery Epstein Her legal career began as a law clerk for Judge James C Paine in the same district she now serves. She worked as a trial attorney in the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, and later held various positions in both public and private sectors, including assistant city attorney for West Palm Beach, vice president and general counsel for Slim-Fast Foods, and principal at ARC Mediation. Before her federal appointment, she served as a circuit court judge in Florida's Fifteenth Judicial Circuit from 2007 to 2014. Rosenberg holds a B.A. from Princeton University (1983) and both a J.D. and M.A. from Duke University (1989).
