logo
Rep. Andy Biggs would nix worker protection to appease billionaires

Rep. Andy Biggs would nix worker protection to appease billionaires

Yahoo05-02-2025
How does an Arizona politician tell you he sides with billionaires over working people without telling you?
In the case of U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs, it's easy.
He introduces H.R. 86, which reads in its entirety: 'The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is repealed. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is abolished.'
OSHA was created in 1970 and signed into law by Republican President Richard Nixon at a time when Congress finally decided there simply were too many workplace deaths, and that they needed enforced safety standards, training and protection for whistleblowers. Among other things.
In a press release accompanying the announcement of his bill, Rep. Biggs said, 'OSHA's existence is yet another example of the federal government creating agencies to address issues that are more appropriately handled by state governments and private employers.'
He added in par, 'It's time that we fight back against the bloated federal government and eliminate agencies that never should have been established in the first place.
'I will not let OSHA push Arizona around with their bureaucratic regulations and urge my colleagues to support my effort to eliminate this unconstitutional federal agency.'
Never should have been established in the first place?
I grew up in steel mill and coal mining country and spent years in a mill to earn money for college. I was among the first generation to receive some OSHA protections on the job, unlike the generations before mine, whose losses were well known in my neighborhood.
Biggs' bill does not require states to offer any protection for workers. It doesn't require protection for whistleblowers. It simply dissolves the system.
The folks at an important website for contractors, ForConstructionPros.com, also point out that 'in the asphalt and road building industries it's not uncommon for an employee to travel across state lines for a job on a given day, especially in rural or high-traffic interstate regions.
'When they go to the jobsite, should construction workers have to be concerned that the quality and standard for safety could dramatically change depending on their geographic location, or should the same standard of human safety be consistently applied for all those who put their lives on the line?'
Opinion: Arizona workers should never trust Trump's buyout
I believe — as did those who created OSHA — that the standard for human safety should be 'consistently applied for all those who put their lives on the line.'
Since the law creating OSHA was enacted, the agency reports that worker deaths in America are down from roughly 38 worker deaths a day in 1970 to 15 a day in 2023, and that worker injuries and illnesses have gone from 10.9 incidents per 100 workers in 1972 to 2.4 per 100 in 2023.
And even that is too many.
Rep. Biggs apparently does not care about those statistics, however, or the lives saved by OSHA.
He is a multi-millionaire who earned his riches the old-fashioned way … through blind luck. Back in 1993, Biggs was handed a $10 million check by Ed McMahon and Dick Clark as the winner of the American Family Sweepstakes.
The people who hate OSHA and want to abolish it are people like Donald Trump and Elon Musk, people who operate businesses where protecting workers cuts into profit margins.
It's some of those very workers, sadly and ironically, who keep Biggs in office.
But it's the billionaires he loves.
Reach Montini at ed.montini@arizonarepublic.com.
For more opinions content, please subscribe.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: OSHA keeps workers safe, but Biggs doesn't care for them | Opinion
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Andrew Cuomo set to run as an independent in NYC mayoral race — but there's a catch
Andrew Cuomo set to run as an independent in NYC mayoral race — but there's a catch

New York Post

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Andrew Cuomo set to run as an independent in NYC mayoral race — but there's a catch

Not Cuoing anywhere. Andrew Cuomo is expected to announce this week that he is staying in the New York mayoral race as an independent, despite the latest polls showing his odds of winning are slim. 3 Andrew Cuomo is reportedly set to announce his run as an independent in the NYC mayoral race. Getty Images Advertisement The former governor is going to unveil his independent candidate bid this week, sources told NewsNation — but there is a catch. After his announcement, Cuomo is going to ask all of the candidates — except for socialist Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani — to vow to drop out of the race come mid-September if they are not in the lead, himself included, a source close to the candidate told NewsNation. 3 Cuomo lost the Democratic primary to Zohran Mamdani by a significant margin. Advertisement The Post has reached out to Cuomo's campaign for comment. The decision comes despite polls showing the former governor trailing Mamdani. 3 Current Mayor Eric Adams is in fourth with a 11%, according to a recent survey. Paul Martinka The latest survey from from political consulting firm Slingshot Strategies has Mamdani comfotable leading with 35% of the vote, followed by Cuomo on 25%, Republican Curtis Sliwa in third with 14%, and Eric Adams in fourth with a paltry 11%.

Trump Gets 'Ratioed' on Truth Social for First Time Amid Epstein Backlash
Trump Gets 'Ratioed' on Truth Social for First Time Amid Epstein Backlash

Newsweek

time29 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Gets 'Ratioed' on Truth Social for First Time Amid Epstein Backlash

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's weekend post defending Attorney General Pam Bondi's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files has triggered an unprecedented backlash, marking the first time the Republican has been "ratioed" on his own social media platform, Truth Social. The term "ratioed" refers to when a social media post receives more replies than likes or shares, often signaling more disagreement or criticism than support. In his Saturday evening post, Trump lashed out at those criticizing Bondi, calling her performance "FANTASTIC" and dismissing the ongoing interest in Epstein as a waste of time. "We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening," the president wrote. "Let's not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about." President Donald Trump stands while greeting first responders as he observes flood damage in Kerrville, Texas, Friday, July 11, 2025 President Donald Trump stands while greeting first responders as he observes flood damage in Kerrville, Texas, Friday, July 11, 2025 AP The post—lengthy, defensive, and directed at his own base—appears to have backfired. According to public engagement data archived from Truth Social, the post has garnered more than 36,000 replies, compared with nearly 11,000 re-truths (the platform's term for shares) and 32,000 likes as of 10:45 a.m. ET Sunday. Why It Matters The backlash on Truth Social reflects growing internal division among MAGA supporters, many of whom have spent months anticipating revelations from the so-called "Epstein Files." Unlike mainstream social media platforms, Truth Social was designed as a haven for Trump and his supporters, where engagement overwhelmingly leans positive. What To Know The internal rift appears to stem from growing frustration over unfulfilled promises related to the Epstein case. Trump and several of his allies had long suggested that secret documents, including a so-called "client list," would be released under his administration. Bondi had previously claimed to possess such a list. But last week, the Justice Department announced that no list exists and reaffirmed that Epstein acted alone, dying by suicide in jail in 2019. The anticlimactic conclusion and the administration's refusal to release further files sparked fury from parts of Trump's base, especially activists and influencers who had built expectations around broader revelations. At the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit in Tampa this weekend, chants calling for Bondi's resignation could be heard. Trump's post defending her appeared to be a direct response to that dissent, but it only fueled it further. A user called Mother Rosie wrote: "This statement breaks my heart, Mr. President. I have four daughters, and live in Texas, where families lost little children. I can't even begin to comprehend the flipped narrative that 'it was so long ago' 'why are we still talking about this' and 'nobody should care.' These victims were some ones daughters, sisters, nieces, granddaughter. Someone's child. Please reconsider, sir. I voted for everything you are doing! Accountability was not something negotiable." Another woman, Crissy, who can be seen wearing a Trump-supporting beanie in her profile picture, said: "We want the ELITE PEDOS exposed! You promised us that. Pam promised us that. Kash promised us that. Now it's OUR fault bc we want that promise fulfilled and call Pam out every time she lies? What else has she lied to us about?" A third user, Dewayne Sykes, said: "This is going to cost you so many supporters. I being one of them." There will still some people speaking out in support of Trump in the comments, including from Navy veteran known as Robby F, who said: "We all want to know. But President Trump only has the evidence that these criminals left for him to find. If he gets his hands on anything that's useful, we will know." How the Analysis Was Done The data comes from an open-source GitHub repository which scrapes and stores all of Trump's Truth Social posts along with public metrics including reply count, like count, and re-truths. Using this dataset—which includes over 1,000 posts since 2022—Newsweek applied a filter to identify any posts where the number of replies exceeded both likes and shares. Only one post met that condition: the July 12, 2025 post defending Pam Bondi. Other posts in the archive occasionally drew large reply volumes, but in every case until now, likes or re-truths outnumbered them. This post represents the first—and so far only—time Trump was publicly rebuked by more of his own followers than supported him. Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks during a press conference in the James S. Brady Briefing Room at the White House, on June 27, 2025, in Washington D.C. Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks during a press conference in the James S. Brady Briefing Room at the White House, on June 27, 2025, in Washington D.C. Mehmet Eser/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying FBI Director Kash Patel wrote on X on Saturday afternoon: "The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been. It's an honor to serve the President of the United States @realDonaldTrump—and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me." Far-right political activist Laura Loomer on Saturday wrote on X: "President Trump says he thinks Blondi [sic] is 'doing a Fantastic job' as AG in a post he posted on Truth Social today...." Charlie Kirk, conservative founder and president of Turning Point USA, wrote on X: "President Trump on the Epstein Files, says he supports Pam Bondi at AG, the files are untrustworthy and created by Comey and Brennan. He wants his Justice Department focused on the voter fraud, the rigged election, ActBlue, and arresting thugs and criminals." What Happens Next While Trump used his Truth Social post to try shift focus away from the Epstein controversy, his followers seem unconvinced. The administration now faces the challenge of reuniting a fractured base ahead of the 2026 midterms elections.

College coaches seem to be realizing that a union will cure the chaos
College coaches seem to be realizing that a union will cure the chaos

NBC Sports

time40 minutes ago

  • NBC Sports

College coaches seem to be realizing that a union will cure the chaos

Colorado coach Deion Sanders recently argued for a salary cap in college football. That's half the story. The other half is this — there can't be a salary cap without an antitrust exemption. And there's two ways to get one. First, beg Congress for it. Two, have a nationwide union of college football players. We've been arguing for months that college football should embrace a union. By creating a multi-employer bargaining unit, the schools would acquire the ability to impose rules that would apply among various distinct and independent businesses. Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy recently went there, acknowledging that the players should be dubbed 'employees' (because they are), with collective bargaining aimed at removing the chaos becoming the next step. It's smart, because it's the right solution. The NCAA and its members don't need the federal government to clean up a mess that resulted from decades of corruption that denied players the ability to make money. The universities should be responsible for finding the solution, and the best solution is a nationwide union and Collective Bargaining Agreement. Salary cap? Check. Transfer rules? Check. Real, enforceable players contracts? Check. Chaos largely resolved — but for the practical inability to police or limit true NIL payments. So why aren't more coaches clamoring for this? They don't want what will go along with getting the things they want. First and foremost, a union will take a close look at practice rules, limiting the ability of college coaches to basically beat the shit out of their players without oversight or consequence. Padded practices, all the time. Double sessions in high heat and humidity. Former players, deep into their 20s, coming back and suiting up against teenagers. Currently, there are few if any limitations on the mandatory work. Then there's the voluntary stuff, which seemingly keeps the players running and lifting and borderline puking throughout the offseason, with few breaks. With a union, those things will change. Players will have rights. They'll have power. And the Nicktators of the college football world do not want the players to have the ability to push back against the men who have basically become kings and emperors of the colleges that employ them. Basically, the college coaches want it both ways. Rules to apply to the players. No rules to apply to the coaches. The coaches may need to sacrifice their unlimited power over their teams, in order to bring some balance to the post-corruption chaos of college football.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store