Portsmouth-based Navy flagship HMS Prince of Wales leaves Australia
The fleet flagship has now set off for Japan in the next stop of its eight-month Indo-Pacific deployment.
The £3 billion warship sailed from Portsmouth in April for the mission which involves visits with 40 countries across the Mediterranean, Middle East, south-east Asia, Japan and Australia.
A Royal Navy spokesman said that the carrier had sailed from Darwin having taken part in the Talisman Sabre exercise as well as acting as a host for diplomatic visits, including from representatives of the indigenous Larrakia people.
He said: 'The flagship hosted a string of senior British and Australian politicians, including Defence Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary David Lammy, his Australian counterpart Penny Wong and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles.
'The aircraft carrier has also served as the impressive setting for a business and industry event, discussing the growing importance of defence links between London and Canberra.
'And the 2,500-plus personnel in the task group have enjoyed down time to explore the largest city in Australia's Northern Territory.'
Able Seaman Owen Altoft, an 18-year-old chef from Newcastle who is on his first deployment, said: 'It's an experience being out in Australia.
'This deployment has been great – seeing what the world's like, seeing different places, cultures and food. It's what I signed up for.
'I tried kangaroo at the local food market and would try it again in a restaurant.'
The Royal Navy spokesman said that the next stage of the deployment would involve combined air exercises with the carrier's F-35 jets and the Japanese navy.
He said: 'Both nations operate the same short take-off/vertical landing version of the stealth jet, the B variant, although Japan has not flown the fifth-generation strike fighter for quite as long as the UK.'
Earlier in the deployment one of the stealth fighter jets was stranded at an airport in Kerala, India, after suffering mechanical issues.
After the week-long exercise with Japan, the carrier will continue with its visit to the country while some vessels from the UK task group will head to South Korea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
an hour ago
- North Wales Live
DWP pension changes that could mean people retire later
Sweeping changes to both state and private pensions, overseen by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), have been announced. The modifications form part of extensive reforms to the pensions sector by the Labour government. Among the most significant alterations is the prospect of a substantial rise in the state pension age, which could force people to postpone their retirement. Last week, the government revealed a wide-ranging review of the UK pensions system. An independent commission has been formed to examine a series of controversial matters and put forward recommendations for reform. The Government plans to increase the State Pension age from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028, affecting those born on or after 6 April 1960. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here. There are proposals for a further rise, lifting the State Pension age from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046, though this timeline could be brought forward, reports Birmingham Live. "A faster increase is definitely on the cards," says Rachel Vahey, the head of public policy at investment platform AJ Bell. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank caused a stir when it suggested that the State Pension Age may need to climb to 69 by 2049 and 74 by 2069 if the triple lock safeguarding its value remains in place. Australian employers are presently obliged to pay 11.5% of workers' salaries into their pensions, with this figure set to rise to 12% in 2025. In comparison, whilst the overall minimum contribution in the UK sits at 8%, employers need only provide 3%. Pension firms and sector specialists have repeatedly lobbied for this amount to be raised to 12%. Nigel Peaple, director of policy and advocacy at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, has continually maintained the minimum pension contribution should rise from the current 8% of earnings to 12%. He said: "To minimise the impact on savers and employers, the increases should happen gradually, as they did in Australia, with employers paying more so that, by about 10 years from now, both employers and employees would pay the same. "This approach of a 50/50 split between employers and employees would strike a fair balance; it would involve higher contributions for employers compared to the current UK rules but much lower ones than traditional UK pensions in which the employer usually paid around two thirds of the cost." One concept attracting attention is the "sidecar savings" method. There are different ways to structure a "sidecar account". Two proposed models are the dual account and integrated plan frameworks. Within the dual account structure, the worker keeps a workplace pension whilst simultaneously joining a separate savings account via a savings provider. The saver sets a savings ceiling for the sidecar account, and the savings provider directs the employer to contribute to this sidecar until the limit is reached. Once the threshold is achieved, any extra funds are channelled into the pension alongside the standard pension contributions. Should funds be withdrawn from the sidecar, the individual recommences saving into it until the cap is attained once more. In the in-plan model, employees opt to save via their employer. Employers then remit the total sum contributed by an employee to both a workplace pension and an emergency savings account to a pension provider. The pension provider allocates the contribution between the pension pot and the emergency savings account. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the UK's Financial Conduct Authority, remarked: "Australia, New Zealand, the US, Singapore and South Africa all permit citizens to leverage their pension savings to buy a first home. "Some have suggested we consider, carefully, similar approaches in some circumstances here in the UK." This week, the government announced its dedication to "committed to both monitoring and narrowing" the gender pensions gap. Recent Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) figures have revealed that the gender pension gap has escalated to a "stark" 48%. The figures, unveiled as the government declared a 'revival' of the Pensions Commission amid concerns about undersaving, showed that in 2020 to 2022, women aged 55 to 59 had a median wealth of £81,000 compared to £156,000 for men. Approximately 20% of self-employed individuals are contributing to a private pension, with many pointing to the Lifetime ISA as a potential solution. There's talk that ministers may tweak the rules to let over-40s open a Lifetime ISA and boost its appeal by cutting the 25% withdrawal charge. Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, commented: "The 25% government bonus acts in the same way as basic-rate tax relief, and any income can be taken tax-free." She added, "There is also the ability to access money early if needed, subject to a 25% exit charge."
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Foreign spies are targeting defence employees working on Aukus, Asio boss reveals
Foreign spies have an unhealthy interest in the Aukus submarine deal and are targeting defence employees working to develop nuclear capability in Australia, the head of the domestic intelligence agency says. The Asio director general, Mike Burgess, has revealed intelligence operatives have disrupted 24 major espionage and foreign interference operations in the past three years, uncovering spies stealing sensitive government data and a visiting academic who broke into a restricted technology laboratory to film. Placing the cost of espionage activities against Australia at $12.5bn each year, Burgess will use a major speech in Adelaide on Friday to warn foreign spies have a 'very unhealthy interest' in the sharing of nuclear technology with the US and UK. Burgess will warn public servants and private contractors with access to sensitive national security information are making it easy for spies to target their work, including by posting on professional networking sites such as LinkedIn. As many as 7,000 people have profiles referencing their work in the defence sector, with close to 400 explicitly revealing they are working on the Aukus rollout. Thousands more cite submarines and nuclear technology. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'I get that people need to market themselves, but telling social media you hold a security clearance or work on a highly classified project is more than naïve; it's recklessly inviting the attention of a foreign intelligence service,' Burgess will say. 'Surely these individuals, of all people, should understand the threat and recognise the risk?' Delivering the University of South Australia's Hawke lecture, Burgess will reveal foreign spies successfully recruited a security clearance holder who handed over official documents on free trade negotiations, and efforts by foreign companies connected to intelligence services to buy sensitive data or land near military sites. Other disrupted activities include the case of a visiting academic with links to a foreign government who broke into a restricted laboratory and filmed its contents, and operatives targeting law firms, media outlets and industry bodies to disrupt their work. An advanced copy of the speech revealed Burgess will namecheck China, Russia and Iran as countries targeting Australia through espionage, but warn many other nations are chasing individuals and entities here for classified or sensitive information and relationship building. Asio has tracked foreign agents trying to steal intellectual property or recruit elected officials, public servants, military members and community leaders, including to reveal secrets, silence criticism or undertake sabotage. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion One intelligence service has used employment sites to target individuals, offering cash for reports on international politics. In one case, an Australian provided their employment information before receiving an email requesting information on Aukus and the Indo-Pacific. 'The firm said it was particularly interested in 'exclusive information' and requested the applicant share the names of his Aukus-related professional contacts,' Burgess will say. 'Fortunately the applicant became suspicious and reported the engagement to Asio. Our investigation revealed the consultancy was a cover company for a foreign intelligence service.' The estimated cost of espionage includes known incidents, such as the state-sponsored theft of intellectual property, as well as the indirect costs of countering and responding. Calculated by the Australian Institute of Criminology for Asio, it includes the theft of nearly $2bn in trade secrets and intellectual property from Australian companies and businesses last financial year.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
New Zealand government votes to bring back fossil fuel exploration in major reversal
New Zealand's government has voted to resume oil and gas exploration despite an outcry from the opposition and environmental groups who argue the reversal will lay waste to the country's climate credentials. In 2018, the Jacinda Ardern-led Labour government banned the granting of new offshore oil and gas exploration permits as part of its plan to transition toward a carbon-neutral future. Environmental groups hailed the ban as a milestone in the fight against climate change, and commended New Zealand for standing up to 'one of the most powerful industries in the world'. But on Thursday afternoon, the ruling right-wing coalition voted to reverse the ban after the third and final reading of the crown minerals amendment bill – a move it believes will alleviate energy shortages and high energy prices. The bill passed by 68 votes to 54. 'The ban sent a chilling message to the investment community, halting the very exploration that underpins our energy security and leading directly to the supply constraints and price volatility that we see today,' climate and energy minister Simon Watts told parliament. 'In times where renewable production decreases, it is clear that we need contingency options to ensure that Kiwis are not left footing a bigger bill, and to ensure that we have sufficient supply.' The bill formed part of the minor populist New Zealand First's coalition agreement with the larger centre-right National Party and is the latest in a run of controversial government policies that environmental groups believe threaten New Zealand's unique biodiversity, natural resources and path toward a greener future. In 2024, the government passed a law that could see contentious mining and infrastructure projects fast-tracked for approval, while in May, the coalition set aside $200m of its budget to invest in gas exploration. In June, New Zealand pulled out of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, an international coalition for phasing out fossil fuels. The coalition government plans to boost mineral exports to $3bn by 2035, and at the same time has slashed funding to conservation and climate initiatives. The government has said these policies will enable economic growth. Opposition parties were united against the bill, with Labour's Megan Woods calling it 'an ideological desire to look to the past instead of investing in the future '. Steve Abel, from the Greens, said the decision to restart oil and gas was 'shamefully regressive' and efforts to bring back investors would be 'futile'. New Zealand's vote to restart fossil fuel exploration comes just one week after the world's top court ruled that states must tackle fossil fuels and failure to prevent harm to the climate could result in them being ordered to pay reparations. Dr Kayla Kingdon-Bebb, the chief executive of WWF New Zealand, called the legislation 'egregious' and 'deranged'. 'We are yet again dangerously off track and putting our international reputation in the shredder,' she said. Meanwhile, an 11th hour amendment to the bill would weaken the law that requires oil and gas permit holders to pay for the decommissioning and clean-up of wells, said Dr Jen Purdie, a senior research fellow at the University of Otago's centre for sustainability. Rules around the clean up of decommissioned wells were strengthened in 2021, after taxpayers had to pick up a NZ$400m bill for decommissioning the Tui oilfield after the oil company collapsed. 'Weakening these laws re-opens the prospect of taxpayers paying for clean-up,' Purdie said.
