
British cars are being stolen and shipped within a day, fueling a multi-billion-pound crime bill
Cars are being stolen and shipped from the U.K. within 24 hours, according to a new report which found thefts are costing British consumers and the economy billions of pounds.
Organized criminal gangs are driving the surge in car thefts in the country, the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) defense and security think tank said in a report published Thursday, with U.K. vehicle theft rising by 75% in the past decade to about 130,000 vehicles a year.
The cars that are being stolen are not just high-end vehicles like Range Rovers or Rolls-Royces, but everyday models like the Ford Fiesta or Focus and Volkswagen Golf, according to data on the most stolen makes and models.
They can be relatively easily snatched by organized crime gangs who use and adapt sophisticated vehicle theft technologies, which are quickly adapted when car manufacturers roll out anti-theft countermeasures, to steal cars.
Organized crime groups' techniques, networks and tried-and-tested smuggling routes mean that cars are "stolen, loaded and taken out of the U.K. within a day," RUSI said in its analysis, noting that vehicle theft is no longer a low-level, opportunistic crime, but rather a high-value, low-risk form of serious and organized crime with domestic and international dimensions.
"What we really stress in the findings is the fact that it's a certain make or model today, but if that gets engineered out [with technological advances to counter theft], or the demand shifts, it will be another tomorrow," Elijah Glantz, a research fellow for the Organised Crime and Policing Team at RUSI and one of the report's co-authors, told CNBC.
Criminals have become emboldened and better organized, able to relatively easily supply markets where vehicles are expensive or in short supply, and where demand is high for parts or entire vehicles.
Some key export markets for stolen high-value cars were said to include the United Arab Emirates, Georgia in the Caucasus, Cyprus (which, like the U.K., has left-hand drive) and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The overall increases in the cost of parts and vehicles and shortfall of supply in those markets "drive people to look for the cheapest alternative, which in many cases might be sourced from the illicit market and originally stolen off a drive," Glantz said.
CNBC has contacted the U.K.'s National Crime Agency, an agency that investigates serious and organized crime, about the findings of the report.
Aside from the personal costs of stolen cars for owners, vehicle thefts are having a significant impact on U.K. drivers and the wider economy.
"Vehicle theft now costs the U.K. economy about £1.77 billion [$2.43 billion] a year and has driven an 82% increase in car insurance premium quotes since 2021," with the costs compounded by increasing repair costs, vehicle prices and wider economic pressures, Glantz and RUSI co-authors Mark Williams and Alastair Greig found.
The estimated £1.77 billion refers to a social and economic "cost of crime" metric, based on data collected by the U.K. Home Office and refers to the money that goes into prevention of crime, the economic damage caused to the victim, whether it's a commercial business or individual, and the cost of remediating the theft.
"The cost of vehicles has gone up, the cost of insurance has gone up. Vehicle manufacturers have poured an enormous amount of money into safeguarding their vehicles, so the cost of the crime has gone up, and the overall volume of crime has also gone up. So that 1.77 billion really is a very lower bound figure," he said.
Of course, car theft and illegal exporting isn't confined to the U.K. — Canada, for example, has seen an increase in stolen cars being sent to Central and West Africa— but there are some specific problems that make the U.K. more vulnerable to such crime, such as its geographical location, the fact it's an island, and the prioritizing of violent crime by its budget-constrained police force.
"The U.K. is obviously a global trading partner that has many, many interactions and trade relationships with the UAE and Africa and elsewhere, and there's also a point of vulnerability in ports," Glantz said, with port officials spending a lot of time checking what's coming into the ports, but not a lot of time checking on what's going out.
"As a result, the systems are quite vulnerable," Glantz said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
UK terminates $34B subsea cable energy agreement in North Africa
The UK government has officially withdrawn its support for the £25 billion ($34.4 billion) Morocco-UK Power Project, a pioneering plan to harness solar and wind energy from the Sahara Desert and transmit it to Britain via the world's longest subsea power cable. The UK government has withdrawn support for the £25 billion Morocco-UK Power Project due to national interest concerns. This project aimed to transmit renewable energy from Morocco to the UK via a 3,800 km subsea power cable. The lack of government-backed contracts reduced investment attractiveness, leading to project termination. The ambitious project, led by British clean energy company, Xlinks, involved laying over 3,800 kilometers of high-voltage subsea cables from Morocco's Guelmim-Oued Noun region to Devon in southwest England, to generate enough electricity to power over 7 million UK homes, accounting for up to 8% of the country's energy needs. Prior to its termination, the inter-continental energy project, which would have harnessed over 10.5 gigawatts of solar and wind power to deliver a steady 3.6 gigawatts of baseload energy, had reportedly cleared environmental permits and was scheduled for construction as early as 2027. Reuters report that over £100 million ($137 million) has already been spent on development and feasibility studies, with significant interest from lenders to fund the construction phase. However, the lack of a government-backed contract for difference and a guaranteed minimum price for electricity made the project riskier and less attractive to investors. Michael Shanks, UK Energy Minister highlighted the reasons for the decision; he said the government had concluded that, 'it is not in the UK national interest at this time to continue further consideration of support for the Morocco-UK Power Project. ' He also cited concerns over economic alignment and a shift toward ' homegrown power ' as part of a broader energy security strategy, adding that the government had concluded that it preferred domestic renewable investments with greater economic and energy security benefits. Reacting to the news of cancellation, Xlinks, Chairman, Dave Lewis said, 'We are hugely surprised and bitterly disappointed that the UK government would choose to walk away from an opportunity to unlock the substantial value that a large-scale renewable energy project like this would bring,' 'We are now working to unlock the potential of the project and maximize its value for all parties in a different way.' He added. The Morocco-UK Power Project At its core, the Morocco-UK Power Project was envisioned as a transcontinental clean energy solution; designed to tap into North Africa 's abundant sunshine and wind to help the UK meet its 2030 net-zero grid ambitions while easing reliance on natural gas. It would have featured 11.5 gigawatts of solar and wind capacity with battery storage to deliver 3.6 gigawatts of steady baseload power. Despite backing from major investors like TAQA, TotalEnergies, Octopus Energy, and GE Vernova, concerns over the project's complexity, transmission length, geopolitical risks, and dependency on a non-European partner ultimately led to the UK's decision to pull back. As global clean energy investment is projected to reach $3.3 trillion in 2025, with two-thirds going towards renewables and storage, the UK's move signals a shift towards resilient, domestic systems over cross-border mega-deals.


San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Max Verstappen off the pace with 'undriveable' car in qualifying for Red Bull home race
SPIELBERG, Austria (AP) — Max Verstappen felt his Red Bull car was 'undriveable' as he found himself off the pace at his Formula 1 team's home race. A lack of grip and an unfortunately timed yellow flag both played a role as Verstappen placed seventh in qualifying at the Red Bull Ring, where he's won five times, to further dent his hopes of defending the F1 title. A frustrating day for Verstappen and the wider Red Bull team came amid widespread speculation over his future after Mercedes driver George Russell indicated on Thursday he believed Verstappen was in talks about a move. 'The car is completely undriveable. I have no grip," Verstappen told the team over the radio part way through Saturday qualifying. Things got worse later on as he had to back off his final lap of the session because of a yellow flag. Speaking to British broadcaster Sky Sports after the session, Verstappen indicated he believed his car was 'miles off pole" set by McLaren's Lando Norris, even without the yellow flag. 'Hopefully tomorrow we can at least be competitive with Ferrari or Mercedes," Verstappen said. "I don't know even, because with the balance we had in quali that's for sure not going to look great for tomorrow, but we will analyze everything.' Verstappen's teammate Yuki Tsunoda was even less competitive as he qualified 18th and complained he, too, was lacking grip. Norris said he and McLaren expected Red Bull 'to be quicker here this weekend' after both teams brought upgraded parts to Austria, but said he wouldn't write off Verstappen. Piastri leads Norris by 22 points in the standings with Verstappen third, 21 points further back. 'Max has been our main contender for every race this season," Norris said. "Just because he's had a slightly worse qualifying today, definitely not going to count him out of of the race tomorrow and definitely not going to count him out for the rest of the season.' ___

Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Pro-Palestinian Irish rap group plays for big U.K. crowd despite criticism, terrorism charge
PILTON, England — Irish-language rap group Kneecap gave an impassioned performance for tens of thousands of fans on Saturday at the Glastonbury Festival despite criticism by British politicians and a terrorism charge against one of the trio. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, has been charged under the Terrorism Act with supporting a proscribed organization for allegedly waving a Hezbollah flag at a concert in London in November. The rapper, who was charged under the anglicized version of his name, Liam O'Hanna, is on unconditional bail before a further court hearing in August. 'Glastonbury, I'm a free man!' O hAnnaidh shouted as Kneecap took the stage at Glastonbury's West Holts field, which holds about 30,000 people. Dozens of Palestinian flags flew in the capacity crowd as the show opened with an audio montage of news clips referring to the band's critics and legal woes. Between high-energy numbers that had fans forming a large mosh pit, the band members led the audience in chants of 'Free Palestine' and 'Free Mo Chara.' They also aimed an expletive-laden chant at U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has said he didn't think it was 'appropriate' for Kneecap to play Glastonbury. The trio thanked festival organizers Michael and Emily Eavis for resisting pressure to cancel Kneecap's gig and gave a shout-out to Palestine Action, a protest group that the British government plans to ban under terrorism laws after its members vandalized planes on a Royal Air Force base. The Belfast trio is known for anarchic energy, satirical lyrics and use of symbolism associated with the Irish republican movement, which seeks to unite Northern Ireland, which is part of the U.K., with the Republic of Ireland. More than 3,600 people were killed during three decades of violence in Northern Ireland involving Irish republican militants, pro-British Loyalist militias and the U.K. security forces. Kneecap takes its name from a brutal punishment — shooting in the leg — that was dealt out by paramilitary groups to informers and drug dealers. The group has faced criticism for lyrics laden with expletives and drug references, and for political statements, especially since videos emerged allegedly showing the band shouting, 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah,' and calling on people to kill lawmakers. Members of the group say they don't support Hezbollah or Hamas, nor condone violence, and O hAnnaidh says he picked up a flag that was thrown onto the stage without knowing what it represented. Kneecap has accused critics of trying to silence the band because of its support for the Palestinian cause throughout the war in the Gaza Strip. A performance at the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival in April — where the band accused Israel, with U.S. support, of committing genocide against the Palestinians — sparked calls for the group members' U.S. visas to be revoked. Several Kneecap gigs have since been canceled as a result of the controversy. The BBC, which airs many hours of Glastonbury performances, didn't show Kneecap's set live, but said it would 'look to make an on-demand version of Kneecap's performance available on our digital platforms' afterward. About 200,000 ticket holders have gathered at Worthy Farm in southwest England for Britain's most prestigious summer music festival, which features almost 4,000 performers on 120 stages. Headline acts performing over three days ending Sunday include Neil Young, Charli XCX, Rod Stewart, Busta Rhymes, Olivia Rodrigo and Doechii. Glastonbury highlights Friday included a performance from U.K. rockers the 1975, an unannounced set by New Zealand singer Lorde, a raucous reception for Alanis Morissette and an emotional return for Scottish singer Lewis Capaldi, two years after he took a break from touring to adjust to the effect of the neurological condition Tourette syndrome. Dixon writes for the Associated Press.