logo
Congress may have done something to KLIS to win elections: BRS leader KT Rama Rao

Congress may have done something to KLIS to win elections: BRS leader KT Rama Rao

BHUPALPALLY: BRS working president KT Rama Rao on Sunday expressed doubts that the 'luccha Congress vallu' (the wicked Congress leaders) might have done something to the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme, to tarnish the good name of the BRS and to win the Assembly elections.
Addressing party workers here, Rama Rao alleged that the Congress leaders, who thought that the people would not support them in the Assembly elections, might have started blaming the Kaleshwaram project.
Rama Rao recalled that Telangana earned a good reputation due to the construction of Kaleshwaram and became number one in paddy production in the country, surpassing Punjab. 'That's why the Congress leaders tried to win the elections by doing something or the other,' he alleged.
The BRS leader said that he had expressed these doubts earlier as well.
'Kaleshwaram is a gigantic project, which consists of three barrages, 15 reservoirs and 21 pump houses, hundreds of kilometres of tunnels and thousands of kilometres of gravity canals. All the canals, pump houses, reservoirs and two barrages are good and intact. But two piers of one barrage, having a total of 85 piers, sank,' he said.
'The two piers did not collapse but just sank,' the BRS leader added.
Rama Rao recalled that when the total cost of the Kaleshwaram project was Rs 80,000 crore, the Congress leaders alleged Rs 1 lakh crore corruption in the execution of the project. 'Even Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy's father-in-law found fault with this claim,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress, 'China guru' Rahul Gandhi hate Indian armed forces: BJP
Congress, 'China guru' Rahul Gandhi hate Indian armed forces: BJP

Business Standard

time7 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Congress, 'China guru' Rahul Gandhi hate Indian armed forces: BJP

After the Supreme Court rapped Rahul Gandhi over his alleged derogatory remarks about the Army, the BJP on Monday claimed that the "China guru" and his party hate Indian armed forces and that he is being remote controlled by foreign forces. The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the proceedings against Gandhi before a Lucknow court over his remarks about the Army during his December 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra. The court, however, censured the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha, saying if he is a true Indian, he would not say such a thing. Reacting to the development, BJP IT department head Amit Malviya said in a post on X, "The Supreme Court has once again reprimanded 'China Guru' Rahul Gandhi for making irresponsible statements concerning India's national security and territorial integrity." "Imagine, a leader of the opposition being repeatedly rebuked for speaking such recklessly," he said. Malviya also took on the Congress leader over his recent "dead" economy remark, calling it "a diplomatic disaster on multiple fronts". "His recent 'dead economy' jibe is just the latest in a long series. In doing so, he implicitly admitted that Russia, a long-standing ally, is struggling, while bizarrely endorsing a hostile state like Pakistan as having a robust economy," he said. Echoing US President Donald Trump's criticism of the Indian economy, Gandhi said on August 1 that everybody except Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman know that the country's economy is "dead". Referring to Gandhi's remarks on the surgical strike and Operation Sindoor, BJP national spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla alleged that the Congress leader and his party "hate" Indian armed forces. "Sena ka Apman Congress ki pehchan (Insulting the Congress is the hallmark of the Congress)," he said in a post on X. "Rahul and Congress hate Indian Armed Forces," he charged, adding, "Today SC has slammed him." Another BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari said on X that the Supreme Court's poser to Gandhi about his claim exposed him. He said, "Supreme Court asks Rahul Gandhi - 'How did you know that China had occupied land?'" This question by the Supreme Court has not only "exposed" Gandhi, but further got the attention back on the "secret MoU that Gandhi-Vadra family had with China", he said.

Rahul Gandhi's Bengaluru protest deferred to August 8 after Shibu Soren's demise
Rahul Gandhi's Bengaluru protest deferred to August 8 after Shibu Soren's demise

Hindustan Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Rahul Gandhi's Bengaluru protest deferred to August 8 after Shibu Soren's demise

The Congress party has postponed its planned protest in Bengaluru, originally scheduled for August 5, to August 8, following the demise of former Jharkhand Chief Minister and JMM founder Shibu Soren. Party leader Rahul Gandhi, who was slated to lead the agitation on Tuesday, will instead attend Soren's last rites, along with Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge. Rahul Gandhi's Bengaluru protest pushed to August 8,(PTI) Addressing a press conference on Monday, Congress general secretary and Karnataka in-charge Randeep Singh Surjewala announced the deferral. 'The protest programme will remain unchanged in content but will now be held on August 8,' Surjewala said, flanked by Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister and KPCC president D K Shivakumar. Also Read - After tigress and cubs, now 20 peacocks found dead in Karnataka village, foul play suspected: Report The protest was to focus on the Congress party's allegations of large-scale electoral fraud in Bengaluru's Mahadevapura constituency during the 2023 Assembly elections. Rahul Gandhi had earlier claimed that a detailed examination of electoral rolls, digitised by the party, revealed a 'bhayankar chori' (massive theft) of votes. He accused the BJP of manipulating voter lists and 'stealing elections' across the country. The Congress had planned to hold a massive gathering at Freedom Park, where Gandhi was expected to address party workers and supporters. However, as per the High Court's directives, no processions or rallies will be held on city roads. The protest will be conducted strictly within legal limits, state Home Minister G Parameshwara confirmed. Also Read - BJP was never silent on Prajwal Revanna, law must take its course: Union Minister Pralhad Joshi With the protest now rescheduled to August 8, the Congress intends to continue raising its concerns over alleged electoral malpractice while pausing its political activity briefly to pay respects to a veteran political figure. Meanwhile, CM Siddaramaiah paid condolences to the family of former Jharkhand Chief Minister and JMM founder Shibu Soren. In an X post, he wrote, 'Deeply saddened by the passing of Shri Shibu Soren — former Chief Minister of Jharkhand, former Union Minister, and a towering figure in India's tribal rights movement. As the founding leader of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, he dedicated his life to the creation of a separate Jharkhand and the upliftment of Adivasi communities. My heartfelt condolences to Jharkhand CM Shri @HemantSorenJMM, his family, and the people of Jharkhand in this moment of grief.' (With PTI inputs)

SC questions Uttar Pradesh's ‘tearing hurry' in promulgating Banke Bihari temple ordinance
SC questions Uttar Pradesh's ‘tearing hurry' in promulgating Banke Bihari temple ordinance

Scroll.in

time7 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

SC questions Uttar Pradesh's ‘tearing hurry' in promulgating Banke Bihari temple ordinance

The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the 'tearing hurry' with which the Uttar Pradesh government promulgated the 2025 Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, which permitted it to take over the management of the shrine in Mathura district's Vrindavan, Live Law reported. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi was hearing petitions against the ordinance. It also expressed disapproval of the 'clandestine manner' in which the state government, by filing an application in a civil dispute, secured permission through a May 15 judgement to use temple funds for the development of a corridor. The May 15 verdict permitted the state government to use temple funds to acquire five acres of land to develop a corridor that is estimated to cost Rs 500 crore, India Today reported. However, this was allowed on the condition that the land should be registered in the name of the deity. On Monday, the bench verbally proposed to recall the directions in the May 15 verdict, Live Law reported. It also proposed the formation of a committee headed by a retired judge to oversee the management of the temple while the validity of the ordinance was being decided by the High Court. The bench then adjourned the hearing of the petitions against the ordinance till Tuesday. During the proceedings, advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for the former management of the temple, told the court that the ordinance ejected the Goswamis, who were earlier managing the temple, and vested the state government with the management, Live Law reported. He added that the directions in the May 15 judgement were passed 'behind the back of the management' as they were not heard. The verdict came in a case that dealt with a private dispute between two sects, the advocate added. The state government intervened in the private dispute and secured the orders for the utilisation of the temple funds, he added. The lawyer for the former management of the temple urged the court to issue a status quo order and further questioned the need for the state government to urgently promulgate an ordinance. 'Ordinance is for emergency measures,' Live Law quoted Divan as having said. The bench then asked Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, representing the state government, how the May 15 judgment could be justified when the affected parties were not heard. Kant criticised the manner in which the directions were passed without notice to the affected parties. 'A public notice could have been issued,' Live Law quoted Kant as having said. 'It was not a case of No Man's Land. Someone had to be heard on the behalf of the temple… Temple funds will have to be utilised for pilgrims, can't be pocketed by private persons.' He also added that the state government had filed an application in the dispute in a 'clandestine manner', adding that this was unacceptable. The judge asked why the state government did not acquire the land as per the law after paying compensation. 'What was the tearing hurry for the ordinance?' Live Law quoted Kant as having asked. The case The Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan has historically been managed privately. In 2023, the Allahabad High Court permitted the development of a corridor that was proposed by the Uttar Pradesh government, Live Law reported. However, it restrained the state government from using Rs 262.5 crore from the temple fund for its construction. In March, the High Court appointed advocate Sanjay Goswami as an amicus curiae to assist in resolving management-related issues. Subsequently, the state government promulgated the 2025 Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance. It proposed the creation of a statutory trust with several state government officials as ex-officio trustees. On May 15, the Supreme Court modified the 2023 order issued by the High Court. The bench allowed the state government to use temple funds to acquire five acres of land around the temple for the development of the corridor. The verdict came in a private dispute between two sects

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store