A Central Scheme Changes. Experience With Jagan Reddy's Government Cited
Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan has announced crucial modifications to the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY), citing an experience of the Centre with the previous Jagan Reddy government in Andhra Pradesh. The changes aim to ensure that farmers are not denied crop insurance benefits due to the default of state governments.
Responding to a question from Rajasthan MP Hanuman Beniwal, Minister Chouhan detailed how the Modi government had transformed the earlier National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS) into the PMFBY, with a mandate to settle farmer claims within 21 days. He then highlighted a critical issue that emerged in Andhra Pradesh.
"Some states had announced that they would bear the farmer insurance premium themselves. However, in Andhra Pradesh, the then Jagan government failed to contribute its state share towards the premium for three consecutive years," Chouhan revealed. "Due to this, farmers in Andhra Pradesh suffered immensely as they were denied their rightful crop insurance."
Emphasizing the Centre's commitment to farmers, Shivraj Singh stated that this "bad experience" had led to a fundamental policy modification.
Under the revised PMFBY, the Union Government will now pay its share for crop insurance irrespective of whether the state government fulfils its premium contribution.
To ensure accountability and prevent future lapses, the Union Minister announced a stringent penalty mechanism. "If a state government does not pay its share, it will be charged at 12% interest, and that amount will be directly credited to the farmers' accounts," Chouhan affirmed. "The insurance would not be denied to farmers, and the state would be penalized."
This significant policy shift aims to safeguard farmers from bureaucratic delays and political inaction at the state level, ensuring timely and uninterrupted access to crucial crop insurance benefits.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Raichur MP alleges stagnation in Institutions of Eminence scheme
Raichur Lok Sabha member G. Kumar Naik has criticised the Union Government's handling of the Institutions of Eminence (IoE) scheme, saying the Centre has failed to deliver on its core promise of building globally competitive universities even eight years after its launch. On July 28, the MP had raised the issue in the Lok Sabha. Following up, on July 31, Mr. Naik released a statement in which the MP stated: 'Bureaucratic inertia, underfunding, and lack of institutional autonomy' have derailed the Central Government's flagship programme for higher education excellence. 'The state of higher education in India speaks volumes in the silence that has followed. The ambition was to put Indian universities on the global map. But as the numbers show, the reality is far from this goal,' he said. According to the reply by the Union Ministry of Education to his query, only 114 institutions have applied under the IoE scheme since its launch in 2017. Of these, just 11 are greenfield institutions that are yet to commence operations. The MP termed the figures 'abysmally low', noting with concern that prominent institutions such as Jawaharlal Nehru University, known for its work in the social sciences and development studies, are excluded from public funding under the scheme. Mr. Naik pointed out that while 12 universities have been granted the 'eminence' tag, no new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) has been signed since 2022. 'This is because the Empowered Expert Committee, which was supposed to process new applications, has not been reconstituted after its term expired in 2021,' he said. Highlighting the 2026 QS World University Rankings, Mr. Naik said only six Indian institutions have made it to the top 500 list – five of which have consistently figured in the rankings since 2012. 'The scheme aimed to elevate Indian institutions into the top 500 globally. However, according to the 2026 QS World University Rankings, only six Indian universities have made it to that list so far. Five of these had already entered the top 500 by 2012, during the tenure of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. Since then, only one additional institution, the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, has made it to the list under the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. Even that has seen a steep fall in its global standing, slipping from 147 in 2016 to 219 in 2026,' he said. Pointing to ₹10,000 crore earmarked for 10 public institutions under this scheme, Mr. Naik claimed that almost 40% of the amount remains unallocated, and even Delhi University had received only ₹481 crore. 'Worse, this year's budget estimates have been slashed by nearly 68% compared to 2023-24, to just ₹475.12 crore,' Mr. Naik said. Mr. Naik flagged a broader decline in public investment in education, pointing out that the share of education in the Union Budget has fallen from over 4% in 2013-14 to 2.5% in 2025-26 whereas the number of students in higher education has grown from 3.2 crore (32 million) in 2013-14 to 4.3 crore (43 million) in 2021-22. He added that one-third of faculty posts in Central universities remain vacant as of March 2023. 'The 2017 policy shift from grants to loans has only added pressure on our universities. It is making higher education more expensive for students, and financially unsustainable for institutions.' he claimed. Quoting a 2023 report by the Ministry of Science & Technology, Mr. Naik noted that India's expenditure on research and development (R&D) had declined to just 0.64% of GDP as of 2020-21, continuing a downward trend since 2009-10. 'Our researcher base is also shrinking, with the number of researchers per capita five times lower than the global average. While China is producing frontier AI models like DeepSeek, we are struggling to fill teaching vacancies,' he said. 'The quest for 'eminence' will no doubt continue, but whether it is driven by meaningful action, or left to wither in quiet neglect is for the Indian political class to decide,' he stated.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Med Device makers decry US Tariffs as Troubling, Shortsighted
New Delhi: Raising strong concerns over the recent announcement of 25 per cent trade tariffs and additional penalties by the US President, medical device makers in India have called the move troubling and shortsighted. In a post on Truth Social, Donald Trump said, India will be paying a tariff of '25 per cent' plus an additional 'penalty' for expanding 'arms and energy' trade with Russia, starting August 1. 'Tariffs in India are among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country,' Trump alleged in his post. Criticizing the move, Pavan Choudary, Chairman of an MNC representative body MTaI, said, 'Trump's announcement today on Truth Social declaring steep tariffs on India from August 1 is troubling and seems economically shortsighted and strategically misguided.' 'This move is aimed at partners, not a rival and such missteps could shift Indo-US ties from cooperation to caution,' he added. Over the additional unspecified penalties announced by Trump, Choudary said, 'As a sovereign nation, India makes independent choices and attempting to punish these decisions through coercive trade measures is not only inappropriate but also counterproductive. Meanwhile, the Union Commerce Ministry in a statement noted, 'the government is studying the implications of the US President statement on bilateral trade and will take all steps necessary to secure national interest.' The announcement has been made ahead of the August 1 deadline for the pause on reciprocal tariffs, which the country administration had introduced to give countries time to negotiate trade agreements. So far, the two countries have engaged in five rounds of talks discussing various sectoral trade terms and a delegation from the US is set to arrive in India for the sixth round slated for August 25. The new measures would push import duties on the industry to as high as 35 percent, including the 10 per cent base duty introduced on April 2 and the recently announced additional 25 per cent tariff. Until now, medical devices from India were not subject to any tariffs in the US while imports to India attract a basic customs duty (tariffs) of 0-7.5 per cent. Notably, India has a high-import dependency in the medical devices sector and around 80-85 per cent of total device requirement is met through Imports where US-based companies have a sizeable share. According to the Exports Promotion Council of Medical Devices, in FY 2023-24, India's exported $714.38 million (around ₹6000 crore) worth of medical devices to the US, while imports from the US to India were more than double at $1,519 million (around ₹12,900 crore). Earlier this year, the US Trade Representative (USTR) in a report outlined that certain compliance requirements in India are burdensome and a fact sheet issued by the White House noted, 'If these barriers were removed, US exports could rise by at least $5.3 billion annually.' Another industry voice Rajiv Nath Forum Coordinator of an domestic device makers body AiMeD suggest, such steep tariffs will definitely provide protection to US based manufacturers and for products in low risk, high volume category where manufacturing had been moved from US and Indian players have a natural competitive advantage may see reverse investments into US.
News18
32 minutes ago
- News18
India Can Beat Trump Tantrums With Atal Doctrine: Stay Calm, Build Own Capability
In spite of being in a coalition government, Vajpayee went ahead with the nuclear tests in May 1998, knowing fully what was to come. In an inverted and unintended way, US President Donald Trump may prove to be India's best friend. Even if he follows up his public bullying and childish tantrums with actual sanctions. Trump has been particularly prickly over India's refusal to bend its knee to the US trade hegemony and to forsake its time-tested friendship with Russia. He wants India to stop buying oil and arms from Russia and China, while Europe continues to do so. He himself is keen to make up with Xi Jinping after sensing a Chinese backlash to his tariff war that the US may find difficult to handle. Trump is still hoping that India will cave. New Delhi's first response has been a matured and measured statement from the Union ministry of commerce and industry. 'The Government has taken note of a statement by the US President on bilateral trade. The Government is studying its implications. India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective," it reads. If only Trump looked back 27 years over his shoulders, he would know that India keeps calm and emerges stronger from such threats and hostility. India has a very potent response template ready from former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee's playbook: do what you have to, stay calm even if allies abandon you, build capacity at home, and go about your business. They come back. In spite of being in a coalition government, Vajpayee went ahead with the nuclear tests in May 1998, knowing fully what was to come. Immediate sanctions across continents followed, including the United States, Europe, Japan, Australia, and Canada. Interestingly, Russia condemned India's nuclear tests, but just as the Soviet Union did in 1974, did not impose sanctions. But most powers wanted to stop India from nuclear proliferation by restricting aid, loans, and technology transfers. They wanted to crush India's ambitions and right to protect itself. But as ideologue S Gurumurthy says on X: 'What happened was the opposite. India, which had a forex reserve of just $5 billion, floated the India Development Bonds for $5 billion which was oversubscribed by $1 billion. The economy did receive jerk for one year but from 2001 onwards it zoomed." In 1999-2004, India's GDP grew robustly and by an average 6 per cent, inflation came down to under 5 per cent, and jobs grew by 60 million, he recalls. 'Most important we posted current account surplus of $25 billion for 3 years from 2002 to 2004. Never from 1950 to till now we ever posted current account surplus except those 2 years and for one year in 1976-77 — that is during the Emergency," says Gurumurthy. 'At that time I was associated with the govt responses to the sanctions. Dr Abdul Kalam, who was the scientific adviser, told me to tell PM Vajpayee to continue the sanctions for 5-6 years as that would only promote domestic R&D and scientific advancement." Trump knows not India fought not just US EU Japan Canada Australia imposed tech and financial sanctions on India for 3 years. They thought they could crush India. What happened was the opposite. Here is the story (I was partly associated with) — S Gurumurthy (@sgurumurthy) July 30, 2025 What Vajpayee also did then, apparently on the advice of bureaucrat-politician NK Singh, was to unlock the power of India's diaspora. India Development Bonds were floated for NRIs and it soaked in the nationalist upsurge that followed the Pokhran blast. On the diaspora front, PM Narendra Modi has taken Vajpayee's vision much further, and this could be a bulwark against western sanctions today. While India found opportunity in the adversity of sanctions, the US, ironically, suffered because of the Glenn Amendment. It restricted foreign aid to US social outfits working in the Indian subcontinent, limited defence sales and licences, curbed commercial exports, hindered trade and investments, and hit American financial institutions. Export opportunities were lost. One surprise victim of the sanctions was the US agricultural sector. On March 19, 1999, the Committee on Ways and Means requested that the US International Trade Commission (USITC) examine the economic sanctions imposed on India and Pakistan under Section 102 of the Arms Export Control Act (or the Glenn Amendment). This is what the ITC report, submitted in September 1999, found: 'The US economic sanctions imposed on India and Pakistan after they detonated nuclear explosive devices appear to have had a relatively minimal overall impact on India and a minimal but somewhat more pronounced adverse impact on Pakistan. Based on a telephone survey of over 200 U.S. companies and associations, the ITC found that the U.S. companies most affected by the Glenn Amendment sanctions were those involved in the sale of wheat and certain other agricultural products; industrial machinery; transportation, construction, and mining equipment; electronics products; and infrastructure development services. The ITC further found that the loss of trade and project finance support from the U.S. Export-Import Bank and the Overseas Private Insurance Corporation, as required by the Glenn Amendment sanctions, particularly hindered the ability of some U.S. companies to operate in India; that a prohibition of export credits and export guarantees by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, required under the Glenn Amendment but waived through September 30, 1999, most likely would adversely affect U.S. wheat exports to Pakistan; that the economic effects of the Glenn Amendment sanctions on the United States, India, and Pakistan are likely to be small; and that the major alternative suppliers benefitting from reduced U.S. exports to India and Pakistan under these sanctions are Japan; Europe; the rest of Asia; and Australia, New Zealand, and other South Pacific trading partners." — United States International Trade Commission Annual Report, 1999 India did not flinch when the US sent its 7th Fleet siding with Pakistan in the 1971 war. India came out stronger from the Pokhran sanctions. And India will certainly up its game a few notches faced with Trump's tantrums. Only the US stands to lose in the long game. Abhijit Majumder is a senior journalist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : Atal Bihari Vajpaee donald trump pm narendra modi tariff view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 31, 2025, 12:35 IST News opinion Opinion | India Can Beat Trump Tantrums With Atal Doctrine: Stay Calm, Build Own Capability Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
