THUNDERBOLTS* Writer Talks Street-Level Hero Absences, Deleted Scenes, and a Very Hungover Teen — GeekTyrant
In a recent interview with Screen Rant, writer Eric Pearson shared some behind-the-scenes insights about the film's creative decisions, including those missing heroes, scrapped character arcs, and some quirky deleted scenes that didn't make the final cut.
Let's start with the big Void in the room… Why didn't we see a single street-level superhero during the chaos in New York? No Spidey swinging in. No Devil of Hell's Kitchen throwing punches. Pearson had a cautious response:
"I'm going to take the fifth on that one. I haven't looked at the map closely enough of where it went. I'm not sure if it went to Bleecker Street yet. But I also think that the time of it is happening so much faster than you expect."
That leads to Pearson's explanation of how time might work in The Void:
'That expansion and retraction of time is different. As we say in Thor: Ragnarok, 'Time works real different around here.' When you're in the Void Space, who knows how long it's been? Maybe it's been one second.'
So, The timeline's fuzzy, reality was bending, and Spidey might've been grabbing a slice of pizza one block away the entire time.
Pearson also shared some early plans for Bucky Barnes that didn't make it to the screen. Originally, Bucky was meant to show up as a "lobbyist," essentially used by politicians as a prop for Avenger-branded PR. 'Used by politicians to just stand there and propagandize Avenger stuff,' Pearson described.
Bucky was actually undercover, working with Senator Gary. Eventually, that arc was dropped, likely in favor of Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige's idea to make Bucky a Congressman.
One of the biggest shifts in the script involved Vault Level 5, the bleak government facility where things initially go sideways for the Thunderbolts. Pearson's original draft leaned more into a 'team-building retreat gone wrong' vibe.
"There were just a few more obstacles; it was set up a little bit more like a team building weekend, when corporations go and do trust falls and rope courses.
'It just took a little bit longer to get out there, and they didn't really fully get out until probably the end of Act 2.'
But the studio wanted the story to be tighter, more contained. He shared:
'I threw the Die Hard word out there, which is always a dangerous pitch to make. Let's keep it contained, and then our third act will be somewhere else.'
Eventually, the escape timeline shifted forward to the midpoint of the movie, to keep the pace snappy.
Director Jake Schreier also wanted to lean into some lighter, road-trip moments, one of which involved a totally random party casualty.
'There was one version where they drove to take cover at a house, and it was the morning after some high school kid had thrown a party.
'He was just there, very hungover, and was kind of their buddy for a second because he had trashed his house and was just waiting to get in trouble.'
That random kid almost became a temporary sidekick, but the scene dragged. Pearson said:
'At that point in the movie, you really want to gain momentum. And we were sitting and hanging out with this random kid for 5 pages.'
So, no hungover party bro, no rope-course bonding, no Bucky lobbying Congress on-screen, just the tight strong version of the story that made it to theaters.
And if you're wondering why Pearson isn't looped into all the final decisions? He's moved on to the Fantastic Four: First Steps project, with The Bear 's Joanna Calo polishing Thunderbolts ' final draft before shooting began.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Spartacus: House of Ashur' to premiere on Starz this winter
July 27 (UPI) -- Starz has narrowed the premiere window for Spartacus: House of Ashur to "this winter" and released a new teaser for the eagerly awaited period drama. Nick E. Tarabay will reprise his role of Ashur from 2010's Spartacus: Blood and Sand. Spartacus franchise creator Steven S. DeKnight is the showrunner for the latest chapter. "What if he lived, and the Romans rewarded his treachery with the gladiator school where he once bled? Welcome to the House of Ashur. No longer a slave, Ashur has clawed his way to power, owning the same ludus that once owned him," a synopsis for the show said. "But ruling a band of merciless gladiators is child's play compared to surviving the savage world of Roman politics -- a cutthroat game in which betrayal isn't a sin, it's currency." The cast will also include Tenika Davis, Graham McTavish, Jamaica Vaughan, Jordi Webber and Jaime Slater.
Los Angeles Times
11 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Marvel returns to form as ‘Fantastic Four' soars to $118 million at the box office
It was clobberin' time this weekend, as Marvel's 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' nabbed the top spot at the box office with a performance that returned the Walt Disney Co.-owned superhero franchise to form. The movie hauled in $118 million in the U.S. and Canada and grossed $218 globally in its opening weekend. The film, which stars Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph Quinn, is just the latest remake of the comic book property, though the first under Walt Disney Co.'s ownership. Formerly owned by 21st Century Fox, 'The Fantastic Four' is one of several key intellectual properties now under the umbrella of the House of Mouse after its $71.3 billion acquisition of that studio's entertainment assets in 2019. Disney has already capitalized on its ownership of the 'Deadpool' and 'X-Men' properties — its 2024 film, 'Deadpool & Wolverine,' garnered more than $1 billion in global box office revenue. Fox produced and released three 'Fantastic Four' movies, none of which were well-received by audiences or critics. A 2015 reboot was particularly reviled. Quality was not an issue this time. The movie notched a 88% approval rating on aggregator Rotten Tomatoes and an 'A-' grade from audience polling firm CinemaScore. The movie exceeded pre-release estimates. 'First Steps' was expected to gross $100 million to $110 million in its debut weekend, on a reported budget of about $200 million. The theatrical reception for 'The Fantastic Four' is a relief for Disney and Marvel, which has struggled in recent years to reap the box office earnings it once did with its superhero films. The Anthony Mackie-led 'Captain America: Brave New World' received middling reviews from critics and brought in about $415 million in global box office revenue. Ensemble movie 'Thunderbolts*' received strong reviews, but made only $382 million worldwide. Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger said earlier this year that the company 'lost a little focus' in its zeal to produce more shows and movies for the Disney+ streaming platform, acknowledging that 'quantity does not necessarily beget quality.' 'By consolidating a bit and having Marvel focus much more on their films, we believe it will result in better quality,' he said during an earnings call with analysts in May. Anticipation was high for 'The Fantastic Four,' and Disney went all out with the marketing. The company hired a skywriter to craft encircled 4's in the sky near downtown Los Angeles on the day of the premiere and featured a drone show outside the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion after the showing. 'While Marvel films have settled into a fairly predictable core audience after multiple under-cooked films and streaming series in the post-'Avengers: Endgame' era, the brand remains sturdy when the right film comes along,' Shawn Robbins, director of movie analytics at Fandango and founder of site Box Office Theory, wrote in a weekend theatrical forecast published Wednesday. Warner Bros.' DC Studios' 'Superman' came in second at the box office this weekend with a domestic total of $24.9 million for a worldwide gross so far of $503 million.
Geek Tyrant
11 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
How Dark Gritty Reboots Paved the Way for Today's Lighter Escapism in Cinema — GeekTyrant
For years, Hollywood loved its dark, grounded reboots. But times have changed, and so have audience tastes. A recent video essay by Pyramid Peak takes a deep dive into why the bleak tone of early 2000s blockbusters has shifted toward something lighter, more hopeful, and even escapist, like Superman . After September 11, 2001, American audiences gravitated toward stories that reflected their fears and uncertainties. Movies embraced gritty realism, and no franchise exemplified that better than Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy. 'You can imagine just how incredible it was to see this in 2005 for the first time audiences saw a Batman who looked like he belonged in our world and faced dangers that felt almost too real. 'Needless to say Batman Begins was a massive success to critics and general audiences the movie's dark and gritty tone felt like a breath of fresh air.' Following that, other franchises leaned hard into the 'realistic' approach, turning comic book worlds and action sagas into moody character studies. But that was 20 years ago, and as Pyramid Peak explains, that tone no longer resonates the same way: '20 years later the reboot doesn't pack the same punch. So what happened to the dark and gritty era? Right now we're living in a world of constant noise a million channels of conflicting information are all shouting at once. 'That overwhelm might inspire stories where the hero is someone who cuts through the chaos sees the bigger picture and finds a clean focused solution a narrative where all the threats are secretly connected and one brave person untangles them giving us the simple clarity we crave.' This shift is more than just stylistic. It's a reflection of our cultural mood. Back then, villains were symbolic. Today, the issues feel personal and systemic. As Peak notes, future stories might even tackle wealth inequality head-on. 'If another global recession makes wealth inequality the popular issue of the day, the real enemies might be the rich, the powerful the out of touch elite. We could see a resurgence of stories about the common person rising up against unchecked greed and corruption and a generation dealing with the housing crisis and endless inflation would connect with the hero who's dealt a crappy hand but make something of it.' The era of gritty antiheroes might be behind us, replaced by characters who bring clarity in chaos or challenge corruption head-on. In other words, escapism is evolving, and Hollywood will follow wherever our cultural compass points next.
