How will Trump's E.U. tariffs affect drug prices?
The trade deal, announced Sunday, places a 15% tariff on most imported goods from the E.U., including pharmaceuticals. While that comes in well below the 200% tariffs Trump had threatened on pharmaceutical imports earlier this month, it'll still have an impact.
Pharmaceuticals are the United States' fifth largest import, said Dr. Aaron Kesselheim, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School.
Europe is a major manufacturing hub for brand-name drugs in particular. Nearly half of the active ingredients for brand-name drugs taken in the United States are produced in European countries such as Ireland, Germany, Italy and Belgium, Kesselheim said. Europe is also where many drugmakers do final steps, such as filling and packaging.
Novo Nordisk's diabetes and obesity drugs Ozempic and Wegovy are both produced in Denmark. Botox, made by Allergen, and the cancer drug Keytruda from drugmaker Merck are made in Ireland. (In recent years, however, more of Keytruda's manufacturing has shifted to the United States.)
While brand-name drugs only account for about 10% of prescriptions filled in the United States, they make up about 80% of all drug spending, Kesselheim said.
'That's because they're priced so high,' he said. 'Each individual [generic] statin is pennies, whereas Botox is thousands to tens of thousands of dollars.'
In the short term, drug companies might increase the list prices of these products to account for the higher cost, said Rena Conti, an associate professor at Boston University's Questrom School of Business.
'U.S. consumers will pay more at the pharmacy counter for these drugs,' Conti said. 'What patients pay at the pharmacy counter reflects drug companies' set price list.'
Kesselheim said it's an open question whether patients would even notice the higher prices, given that brand-name drugs are already so expensive.
'The drug prices are already two to three times higher in the United States than they are in other countries,' he said. 'There is a lot more room for drug companies [to charge more.]'
Generic drugs, on the other hand, are often sold at close to the cost that they're made. About 9 out of 10 prescription drugs taken in the United States are generics, Kesselheim added.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a drug industry trade group, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The E.U. tariffs aren't expected to affect the prices of many generic drugs.
Some generic drugs are made in Europe, but the majority are manufactured in countries like China and India, said Arthur Caplan, the head of the division of medical ethics at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City.
There have been concerns that tariffs on these countries could drive up the cost of generic drugs and exacerbate drug shortages. Generic drugs aren't a lucrative enough business for companies to invest in new manufacturing facilities in the United States, Caplan said.
A spokesperson for the Association for Accessible Medicines, a trade group that represents generic drugmakers, said the group is still assessing the potential impact of the tariffs as well as the specifics of the trade deal.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump orders firing of US official as cracks emerge in jobs market
President Donald Trump said Friday he has ordered the firing of a key economic official, accusing her of manipulating employment data for political reasons after a new report showed cracks in the US jobs market. US job growth missed expectations in July, Labor Department data showed, and revisions to hiring figures in recent months brought them to the weakest levels since the Covid-19 pandemic. Without providing evidence, Trump lashed out at the department's commissioner of labor statistics, writing on social media that the jobs numbers "were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad." In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, he charged that Commissioner Erika McEntarfer had "faked" jobs data to boost Democrats' chances of victory in the recent presidential election. "McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months," Trump said, referring to latest data for July. "Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative," Trump said, insisting that the world's biggest economy was "booming" under his leadership. He later told reporters "we need people that we can trust," accusing the economic official of inflating hiring figures under former president Joe Biden's administration. - 'Dangerous precedent' - The United States added 73,000 jobs last month, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.2 percent from 4.1 percent, said the Department of Labor earlier Friday. Hiring numbers for May were revised down from 144,000 to 19,000. The figure for June was shifted from 147,000 to 14,000. This was notably lower than job creation levels in recent years. During the pandemic, the economy lost jobs. The employment data points to challenges in the key labor market as companies took a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Trump's sweeping -- and rapidly changing -- tariffs this year. The numbers also pile pressure on the central bank as it mulls the best time to cut interest rates. With tariff levels climbing since the start of the year, both on imports from various countries and on sector-specific products such as steel, aluminum and autos, many firms have faced higher business costs. Some are now passing them along to consumers. William Beach, who previously held McEntarfer post at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, warned that her firing "sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau." The National Association for Business Economics (NABE) condemned her dismissal, saying large revisions in jobs numbers "reflect not manipulation, but rather the dwindling resources afforded to statistical agencies." "Firing the head of a key government agency because you don't like the numbers they report, which come from surveys using long established procedures, is what happens in authoritarian countries, not democratic ones," slammed Larry Summers, former US Treasury secretary under Democratic president Bill Clinton. - 'Gamechanger' - Heather Long, chief economist at the Navy Federal Credit Union, said Friday's jobs report was a "gamechanger." "The labor market is deteriorating quickly," said Long, noting that of the growth in July, "75 percent of those jobs were in one sector: health care." "The economy needs certainty soon on tariffs," Long said. "The longer this tariff whiplash lasts, the more likely this weak hiring environment turns into layoffs." It remains unclear when the dust will settle, with Trump ordering the reimposition of steeper tariffs on scores of economies late Thursday, which are set to take effect in a week. A sharp weakening in the labor market could push the Federal Reserve toward slashing interest rates sooner to shore up the economy. On Friday, the two Fed officials who voted this week against the central bank's decision to keep rates unchanged warned that standing pat risks further damaging the economy. Both Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller argued that the inflationary effects of tariffs were temporary. They added in separate statements that the bank should focus on fortifying the economy to avert further weakening in the labor market. Putting off an interest rate cut "could result in a deterioration in the labor market and a further slowing in economic growth," Bowman said. bys/sla/aks/acb Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's long history of bashing jobs report numbers dates back to 2016: ANALYSIS
President Donald Trump's history of criticizing the Bureau of Labor Statistics' jobs report has surfaced in the wake of his decision to fire commissioner Erika McEntarfer on Friday. Trump's public frustrations with the economics and statistics agency appear to date back to his 2016 presidential campaign. "Don't believe those phony numbers," then-candidate Trump said in his New Hampshire victory speech during his first campaign for the White House. Last August, Trump claimed without evidence that former President Joe Biden's administration was "caught fraudulently manipulating" job statistics, when the agency publicly disclosed that the economy created fewer than 818,000 jobs between April of 2023 and March of 2024 than initial estimates suggested. "There's never been any revision like this," Trump said at a campaign rally in North Carolina on Aug. 21, 2024. "They wanted it to come out after the election, but somehow it got leaked," he claimed at the time. MORE: Trump fires BLS commissioner after weak jobs report and baseless claim of 'faked' stats Trump did not provide evidence that the information publicly disclosed by the agency was leaked. Then-Labor Secretary Julie Su in November 2024 defended the figures, and also suggested the numbers were impacted by Hurricane Helene's impact on the southeastern United States, and labor strikes. "The labor market remains very strong, and this shows what happens when you have a president and a vice president who are fighting for workers every single day," Su said at the time. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) uses several surveys for estimating employment levels in the U.S. and revisions are common. Every monthly Jobs Report has a blurb at the end that updates the figures from the previous two months based on new data. The revision that Trump was referencing was made public on Aug. 21, and updated with final figures in February 2025, according to the BLS website. The same downward revisions also took place during Trump's first term, under then-BLS commissioner William W. Beach. The agency determined 518,000 fewer jobs were created in March 2019 than it had initially reported. Alternatively, Trump had no complaints about the jobs report produced under McEntarfer -- a Biden appointee -- right before the 2024 election, which showed the U.S. gained 12,000 jobs in October. The then-candidate referenced the low numbers while criticizing the Biden-Harris administration at a rally in Milwaukee. "They did 12,000 jobs," Trump said to boos at the rally on Nov. 1. "It's hundreds of thousands of jobs less than it should be," he added. Trump was also quick to embrace the jobs reports as president -- when they were favorable. In March 2017 -- when the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that the economy added 235,000 jobs the prior month -- then-Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Trump had full faith in the positive report, despite calling it "phony" in the past. "I talked to the president prior to this and he said to quote him very clearly: 'They may have been phony in the past, but it's very real now,'" Spicer said to reporters at the time. Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer on Friday came after the report found the U.S. had added 73,000 jobs in July, according to data from the BLS. The figure marked a slowdown from 147,000 jobs added in the previous month. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2%, keeping it at near-historic lows, according to the report. The report provided new estimates for two previous months, significantly dropping the government's estimate of jobs added in May and June. The fresh data indicated a notable slowdown in hiring as Trump's tariffs took hold over recent months. Trump criticized McEntarfer over the revisions, saying without evidence that the revisions suggested jobs statistics had been "manipulated." ABC News has reached out to McEntarfer for a comment. MORE: Fed holds interest rates steady, defying Trump's pressure The Trump administration described the downward revisions as an unwelcome sign for the U.S. economy but did not dispute the data. "Obviously, they're not what we want to see," Stephen Miran, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said on Friday morning. Asked by reporters as he departed the White House on Friday about the reason for McEntarfer's firing, Trump said he believes the economy is doing well and claimed the latest jobs numbers were "phony." "I believe the numbers were phony just like they were before the election, and there were other times," Trump said, pointing to a previous revision in the jobs numbers last year that he claimed, without evidence, was an attempt to benefit Democrats heading into the election. He said this despite using the numbers as a talking point in his campaign. "So you know what I did? I fired her. And you know what? I did the right thing," Trump said.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google (GOOGL) Pledges Support for EU AI Rules While Warning Against Overregulation
Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:) is one of the . On July 30, Alphabet Google's global affairs president said in a blog post that it will sign the European Union's code of practice to help companies comply with the bloc's landmark artificial intelligence rules. The voluntary code of practice strives to offer legal certainty to signatories on how to meet requirements under the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act). 'We do so with the hope that this code, as applied, will promote European citizens' and businesses' access to secure, first-rate AI tools as they become available.' -Kent Walker, who is also Alphabet's chief legal officer. In other news, CNBC reported how Google executives are pushing their employees to be innovative with their use of artificial intelligence as the tech giant looks for ways to cut down costs. CEO Sundar Pichai and executive Brian Saluzzo conveyed the message at a meeting last week. 'Anytime you go through a period of extraordinary investment, you respond by adding a lot of headcount, right? But in this AI moment, I think we have to accomplish more by taking advantage of this transition to drive higher productivity.' Alphabet announced in its earnings report last week that it plans on spending spend $85 billion on capital expenditures in 2025, up from the previous $75 billion. 'We are competing with other companies in the world. There will be companies which will become more efficient through this moment in terms of employee productivity, which is why I think it's important to focus on that.' Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is an American multinational technology conglomerate holding company wholly owning the internet giant Google, amongst other businesses. While we acknowledge the potential of GOOGL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Must-Watch AI Stocks on Wall Street and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio